User talk:Pigandraccoon

Welcome!

Hello, Pigandraccoon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anoir SS19.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anoir SS19.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello Pigandraccoon. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pigandraccoon. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pigandraccoon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 18:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Hello User:Praxidicae I am sorry for inconvenience.I affirmly not trying to promote.First I tried to put references as I could.When issues were told,then I tried to rectify.Please consider this article and try to help me over here as I am not that experienced.I declare I am not being paid for this.It will be very kind of you to help me out.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Pigandraccoon (talk) 21:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pigandraccoon, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for clarifying that you are not being paid to edit Wikipedia. I've taken a look at Draft:Amal Kiran Jana and I can see a few issues with it. The most important thing to remember when writing Wikipedia articles is that everything should be supported with a citation to a reliable source. These citations allow others to verify what you have written and are especially important when writing about living people. This requirement, called verifiability, is one of the core policies of Wikipedia. Many of the statements in your draft article are not supported with a footnote, including some sections that appear to be quotations. Direct quotes must always be supported with a citiaton.

The verifiability policy gave rise to a guideline called notability that describes what subjects should be written about on Wikipedia. In general, subjects should have recieved significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources before articles are created. The guideline for biographies contains further guidance for articles about people, including in this section about creative professionals (which covers Amal Kiran Jana). I went through the sources you've cited in the article and determined that no sources that meet the criteria have been cited. If no such sources exist, Amal Kiran Jana just isn't a good topic for an article yet. In that case, you should wait for them to be covered in-depth by reliable sources. If they do exist, please add them to the article.

I do still see some issues with a promotional tone in the article. When writing an article, you should try to stay as neutral as possible. Avoid words like "very" and other potentially problematic phrases. You should also summarize what reliable sources have said about Amal Kiran Jana and not what he has said about himself or your opinion. Everything should be written in your own words. The "Brand" section and the end of the "Achivements" section are problematic in this regard and should be reworded. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Anoir SS-19.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Anoir SS-19.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. creffett (talk) 18:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding article Talk:Amal Kiran Jana

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello I have improved the promotional tone of the article.May i know if it still creates a problem or not? Also regarding the Citation issues,I have already used authentic citation.May i get a guidance how i can use only these to create a successful article? I have been trying hard to get it improved. Kindly Help. Thankyou Pigandraccoon (talk) 19:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're essentially asking for a review; the way to do that is to submit the article for review.

I see that you've used new references not listed on the talk page source assessment. A new assessment may be needed on that basis.

But you still have multiple statements in your draft that a) are not referenced and b) use language that we may consider promotional. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Amal Kiran Jana.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Amal Kiran Jana.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amal Kiran Jana (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amal Kiran Jana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amal Kiran Jana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pigandraccoon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KartikeyaS (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amal Kiran Jana

Hello, Pigandraccoon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amal Kiran Jana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]