User talk:Nobeljeff

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rescission, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rescission was changed by Nobeljeff (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892312 on 2010-12-18T04:50:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Lynch

Hi. Thanks for editing the Aaron Lynch page. Do you have a source for that information? —Wknight94 (talk) 18:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James Chadwick

Thanks for your contributions to this article. When citing a book or journal article, I need to know the page number in the reference. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean Arnold article, it's p. 422.

Thanks! How about this one: His research into such matters were complicated by all-but incessant Luftwaffe bombings of the environs of his Liverpool lab, such that the windows were blown out so often that they would have to just be replaced by cardboard. I'm sure they were but we need a source? Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have nominated the article for an A-Class review. Would you like to be a co-nominator? Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is your interest in Chadwick? Would you be interested in collaborating on articles on other British physicists? Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I may be up for being a co-nominator/ collaborator for an A-Class review etc. of the Chadwick entry. I don't know as much about other Brits. I have a financial interest in some of Chadwick's artifacts.

Precious

James Chadwick
Thank you for your contributions to quality article James Chadwick and Timeline of the Manhattan Project, with excellent edit summaries. such as quoting "a physicist, a scientist-diplomat, and a good, wise, and humane man", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 1008th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Six years ago, you were recipient no. 1008 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:34, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]