User talk:Mr.User200
Gallery of Sockpuppets
[edit]Likely Sock puppet account
[edit]Anti Turkish Sock puppet account. He keeps adding misinformation. Likely Russian troll. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neosinan (talk • contribs) 18:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Agree, also keeps reverting edits and vandalizing pages about the Russian invasion of Ukraine PilotSheng (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment
[edit]How do this works?User200.48.214.19 (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "User200.48.214.19", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it resembles an IP address. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 13:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks never knew it was not apropiate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple
User200.48.214.19 (talk) 13:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks never knew it was not apropiate.
New sock?
[edit][[1]] Gala19000? Shadow4dark (talk) 19:55, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Most possibly. Should keep an eye on the pages those SP vandalized.Mr.User200 (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Mr.User200, may I report the sockpuppet investigation? {{31}}{{25A (talk)}} 15:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Go ahead.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Mr.User200, thx but give me some diffs; the ANI report isn't enough. {{31}}{{25A (talk)}} 15:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hope format help to understand: A) Previous Socks, B) This user.
- Most possibly. Should keep an eye on the pages those SP vandalized.Mr.User200 (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
1) 2019–20 Western Libya campaign
A) SockPuppet User:Gal17928 a secundary SP of User:Gala19000. Edited and commented that Turkish Drones used in Lybia were GNA operated despite some sources they were Turkish operated. First , Second, Thrid
B) Same behaviour. Here on Turkish drones.
2) Turkish drones: Bayraktar Tactical UAS & A) Use of Claim in edit Summaries by User:Gal17928 a secundary SP of User:Gala19000.Claims, Errasing Info.
A cookie for you
[edit]
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for cleaning up my edit to Raptor-class patrol boat. Jjmclellan82 (talk) 07:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC) |
List of Americans killed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine
[edit]You might be interested to chip in here [2], I was notified that someone has nominated the List of Americans article for deletion. EkoGraf (talk) 12:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Same with the Poles now [3]. EkoGraf (talk) 16:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
US volunteers killed in Ukraine
[edit]Hey there, regarding your edit here [4]. The Atlas report's figure includes the deaths of American civilians non-combatants. It states "Hamm joins the 47 other confirmed U.S. military veterans that have been killed in Ukraine as well as the five confirmed civilian U.S. volunteers that have been killed." Also, at the time of its publication, when I saw the Atlas report, I immediately recognised they were using the same figures that were on our (now-deleted) Wikipedia page of the list of Americans killed in Ukraine. At the time of Atlas' publication, there were 48 Americans listed in our Wikipedia article as killed soldiers, while 5 were listed as killed civilians (aid workers etc). Same figures Atlas reported. Also, I left the latest report you added regarding the missing guy who's body was now returned, but I am not entirely sure if it should be included. I saw the report myself earlier and didn't add it. Because of the possibility the unnamed soldier might be one of those we already counted as killed (named earlier). Up to you if you want to remove it now after my message. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Here, tried to clarify as one reference [5][6], although still not sure we should included that missing-body-returned since I still think he may be one of the eaerlier reported dead/named. EkoGraf (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Seems I was right, the US Army veteran whos body was retrieved was said to have died in a drone strike near Bakhmut last year and that a number of Ukrainian soldiers were killed trying to retrieve his body. We have Army vet Jericho Skye Magallon [7] who was said to have died in a drone strike near Bakhmut last year and that a number of Ukrainian soldiers were killed trying to retrieve his body. And then there is this from several days ago [8]. EkoGraf (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
New pro-Ukrainian foreigners killed
[edit]Two new pro-Ukrainian foreign fighters killed confirmed only by non-RS at the moment - American[9] and Sri Lankan[10]. EkoGraf (talk) 15:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- .Sri Lankan - Done.
Curently US national (Michael Paul Maldonado) and Brazilian (Murilo Santos Lopez) without proper source.Mr.User200 (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Added source for Maldonado, the pro-Ukraine FB memorial (replaced a Russian news site from earlier), so it should be ok. Non-RS for Lopez [11] and we got a new one - Australian Brock Greenwood [12]. EkoGraf (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- All done, found another RS for a Colombian too.Mr.User200 (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Saw, great! :) I also found an older source for Brazilians (4 at the time) which mentioned one we didn't know about before. EkoGraf (talk) 13:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- All done, found another RS for a Colombian too.Mr.User200 (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]I did provide a reliable source. The Times of Israel reported on the IDF statement confirming Fuad Shukr's death. If the IDF wasn't sure Shukr was killed, they would have stayed quiet like they did with Mohammed Deif. Believe what you want and please stay out of my talk page. --Foxhound45 (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please be Civil, before starting to edit in English Wikipedia. The IDF and Saudi outlets are not Reliable enough to consider that living person deceased, you should wait for more Sources, reliabe btw, for a confirmation.Mr.User200 (talk) 22:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of List of French people killed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of French people killed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.D.S. Lioness (talk) 03:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Colombians killed - unconfirmed (saved)
[edit]Just in case they delete that article list as well, saving what we have left to yet confirm via RS (confirmed only via Telegram). We can continue updating at the main casualties article after if the list article gets deleted. Saving at your talk page, because you are much better than me at finding sources for the Latinos killed. :)
Andrés Silva Sánchez[13]
Fernedis Leider Lopez Gomez[14]
Carlos Andres Morales Olaya[15]
Julio Oviedo Gonzalez[16]
Hernando Navarro Nieto[17]
Juan David Blanco Morelo[18]
Jhon Ery Villareal Cacua[19]
Wilson Tarache Ojeda[20]
- US (Carlos Antonio Covington)[21] Mr.User200 (talk) 01:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Georgian (Alazani)[22] EkoGraf (talk) 11:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nice source and hobby you got there. TylerBurden (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oroitz Caballero Villasante (Spain)[23], Carlos Henrique Morais (Brazil)[24]. EkoGraf (talk) 15:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Missing Colombians
[edit]Regarding this edit [25], the post [26] lists only three Colombians, not five? EkoGraf (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- If its ok with you, I will reduce it in the article to three and remove the mention of the other two. Although I think I remember there being at least four listed in the post. Maybe they edited it or something? EkoGraf (talk) 20:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 53rd Mechanized Brigade (Ukraine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Avdiivka.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
I view this edit at the TP to be WP:BATTLEGROUNDy and WP:UNCIVIL. Your edit to the article was reverted here. Your edit was challenged. Per WP:ONUS, reinstating the same material (here) without gaining consensus for the addition is edit warring. I note that you have been made C-TOP aware for Eastern Europe which covers this article and thereby are reasonably aware that a higher standard of conduct is expected. I suggest that you self-revert the subject edit to the article until and if a consensus is gained for its inclusion. I would also suggest that you strike your post to the TP and restart the discussion civilly. If you read my edit summaries, you will see that I have given reasons for my edits that are based on relevant guidance. Cinderella157 (talk) 09:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Never meant to be incivil to you Cindirella157. What called strongly my attention was the revert of both mine edits, by you on that article. Calling different justification or guidelines for each time. At first you said that since the body of the article didnt mention the Ukrainian unit (123rd) or its commander. My aditions should have been reverted. I added context on the article and expanded the role of that Ukrainoan unit, for you to revert me once again.Mr.User200 (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- You appear to not be hearing what has been said here. Per WP:ONUS, you have edit warred. Your TP edit is seen as uncivil and battlegroundy whether you meant that or not because of the pejorative language used. It is not the way to start a collegiate discussion to determine consensus. You appear to be unwilling to remedy either of these two issues. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I never meant to hurt your feelings of cause you to suffer a bad time for my comment at the Talk Page of the aticle. I apologice for it, if that can help you feel better. However I still think you should elaborate better your edit summary in each one of your reverts. Because at the first glance both were different excuses to deliberately errase the content I added.Mr.User200 (talk) 22:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- There you go again using the term excuses which is pejorative. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Ukrainian flag officers losses during the Russo-Ukrainian War for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ukrainian flag officers losses during the Russo-Ukrainian War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.