User talk:MIR17

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! 129.49.72.78 (talk) 16:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LCFC seasons

Why don't you like my new format?Mr Hall of England (talk) 11:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC) It is an improvement on it though.[reply]

- Tell you what User talk:Mr Hall of England/Archive 12 look at this and see if you can spot an error.Mr Hall of England (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When you get time tell me if the list I have made is correct. if not write the league data, cup data and top goalscorer data in the corresponding season and I will get it right. Mr Hall of England (talk) 11:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I spilt the article in 3 so it helps me then if if is OK the whole lot will be together. Mr Hall of England (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey how are you? My page for LCFC is in a final draft but before I put this 3 parts together tell me which is right and which is wrong please?Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of Leicester City F.C. players

Hi, I re-added the split of league/total apps, and have provided an explanation of my reasoning at the above location. If you have any comments post there, or you can reply direct to me. I have now added some explanatory text to the list indicating what competitions should be included in the totals. Regards. Eldumpo (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We shouldn't be using that website as a reference if it is incomplete. The best place for complete player stats for Leicester players is the reference book (and club bible) Of Fossils and Foxes which has the complete playing history of every single player ever to play for the club and the line-up, substitutes and scorers for every single competitive game the club has ever played (this is where I also got all of the player stats from the players I added to the table, sorry I should have sourced it). Reference books such as OFAF are generally considered a much better source than websites for wikipedia, because reference books are always properly researched and double and triple checked by editors and publishers and have their own reference sections (OFAF has also been sold in the club shop also as it is sanctioned by the club and has gone through the club's official records for history etc), whereas websites can be published by anyone without any proof reading or research and generally don't reference their own research sources.

Generally, in club history pages, complete competitive playing records are used, because Leicester have not just playing in the league throughout their history as it implies that league matches are all that is important, whereas other competitive competitions are important as well. Players such as Steve Claridge or Ken Leek for example are notable and important players in the club's history for their performances in competitive matches which weren't in the league.

Also, the "Explanation" section you have done at the top of the page I think are just table footnotes which belong more in a "Notes" section at the bottom of the page, not an "Explanation" section at the top of the page, see: Template:Note label for more details.

I can also add every player who has played over 100 times for the club using OFAF, but I really think we should just have a column for all competition apps and goals and not one for league apps and goals. --MIR17 (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. You can see I have copied your reply here so we can follow the thread. I will watch this talk page, and once we've finished any discussion it may be appropriate to move some of it to the article's talk page.

There's nothing wrong with listing the filbert street website just because it's incomplete (as long as what is there is generally accurate, which I believe it is), but the fact that you have the OFAF book is good and I see it is now sourced in the article. Whilst having book sources is fine, the advantage of web sources is that people can check data directly, but it would seem that the OFAF book is the best overall source for club stats, though the Neil Brown website and the Michael Joyce pre-WW2 book are, as far as I'm aware, accurate sources for League stats only. However, care needs to be taken in not using a single source just because it is convenient and to hand.

However, I still don't understand why you don't want league stats to ALSO be included as well as total apps - surely it can only be a benefit to have both. I outlined the reason as to why League apps are meaningful on the talk page, but essentially they are often quoted by various sources (including the League stats references mentioned above), and League stats only form the basis of player infoboxes in Wikipedia, so the list we are building can be used as a quick check against infoboxes if needed. Is it simply the case that League stats are not sub-divided in the OFAF book - they must be though surely?

I have no problem if you feel that my competition notes should be moved around, although I see you have already reverted my changes relating to the league/total split. I believe it would have been best to leave that aspect of the article whilst we were having a discussion on it. Does the OFAF book include the same competitions as I included in my note? Eldumpo (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that League stats are different to other competitions in that they are the only fixed appearances at the start of the season and are very much the "bread and butter" fixtures. However I am happy with your compromise of listing Lge, FAC, LC and Other and then Total (as per the link you show), but the only problem would be a space one if you tried to do apps and goals for each competition, or would you propose to do apps-only for the competitions and then just show goals for the Total column? Eldumpo (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that works pretty well space-wise. I assume you will look to fill in most of the stats as they are in the book. If there are any discrepancies with other sources we can always consider on a case by case basis. One suggestion though to make the list a bit more readable is to try and make entries in the Notes column a bit shorter if possible, in order to reduce space taken up. Regards. Eldumpo (talk) 15:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another suggestion is that the 'Nationality' column be changed to say 'Leicester International' (or a shortened version), in order to record those players who gained full international caps whilst on Leicester's books. The column would be blank for those players not capped, and in any case, it is often not clear what 'nationality' a player is unless they have played international football. Eldumpo (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notable competitions

Hi, I was wondering why you have changed the note on the list to exclude 4 competitions. Is it because those competitions are not included in your book? To me all of those comps are notable, and the AIC in particular is the successor to the FMC, whilst the Texaco/ASC are to an extent its predecessor. I also moved some of our previous discs to the article talk page. Regards. Eldumpo (talk) 16:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have you any comment on the above post re notability of competitions. Eldumpo (talk) 04:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming back on this. My first point is that given we had agreed some wording on competition notabilify previously it would've been better to discuss before making changes, but anyway. I do think your arguments have some merit but wanted to put forward some counter-points.

Rothmans manuals do list player apps for these competitions. Yes, they don't incude them in the player directory section, but nor do they for FAC/League Cup/Europe. Soccerbase incudes Football League Trophy apps and it would therefore seem reasonable to incude the other comps as they are all effectively a step up from FLT; the only reason they're not on there to my knowledge is that Soccerbase does not go that far back. We need to be careful about solely relying on an official club book and saying that is the only basis for compiling a list. Whilst official club sources should ahave some weight it is not just down to Leicester to determine what counts as meaningful, and certainly I think the 'first class' wording should be removed. I would point you to a number of the List of player articles whereby these competitions are generally included.

Hopefully you can see the arguments I am making and perhaps there is some consensus wording/approach we can adopt, as we did successfully with the stats breakdown by competition. Regards. Eldumpo (talk) 20:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what sources were you referring to when you said that Graham Cross 599 is referenced elsewhere? I had a look at filbertstreet.net for Cross, Whitworth and Weller and unfortunately their league stats at fs were less than both our list (which primarily came from OFAF I assume) and the Neil Brown stats site, which I have now added as a ref. I chose the above 3 players as they were at the club at the time of the 'disputed status' competitions. What does OFAF do for these players. Does it show them as playing in these other competitions but then not include those apps in the overall 'top apps' list, or are those comps not listed at all? Any idea why fs is lower for some league stats - is it maybe that sub apps are not included? Is there a couple more players you could check against OFAF? The difficulty with leaving out AIC is that in its later format it was a direct successor to FMC but in its earlier format it was maybe closer in spirit to the Texaco etc, but it would not seem sensible to only include AIC in part. Eldumpo (talk) 08:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming filbertstreet does not include sub apps. I have added a suitable note to the List. See what your further checking later throws up so we can come to a conclusion about notable comps. Eldumpo (talk) 15:50, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Footballbox collapsible

Hello, I strongly recommended restoring my edit to the Leicester City season page, as you are mistaken by saying goal order was correct as of the general doing of these things. Those general doings are dictated by the documentation of the template, which in this case is template:footballbox collapsible/doc, and you can see under the usage example that the goal/card icon always follows the player name except during penalty shootouts. Check out 2010 FIFA World Cup, 2010–11 UEFA Champions League knockout phase for further examples. Thanks! Vanadus (talk) 01:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you are quite mistaken. Look at Aston Villa, Blackburn, Bolton, Chelsea, Everton, Fulham, Liverpool, among others. The documentation for the template is there for a reason and I strongly suggest not to deviate from it. Vanadus (talk) 15:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, we all make mistakes sometimes ;-). Keep up the good work on that page! Vanadus (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ally/Ali Mauchlen

Just letting you know that I moved this article back to Ally Mauchlen. I fully appreciate why you made the move as he has been known as Ali, particularly at Leicester. However Google searches for Ally Mauchlen outnumber Ali Mauchlen by about ten to one and he is Ally in the standard reference works such as the annual editions of the Rothman's/Sky Sports Yearbook and Football Who's Who (sadly defunct). Obviously Ali Mauchlen will continue as a redirect so any Foxes fan searching by this name will still find it (as I'm sure you know anyway). Keresaspa (talk) 15:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leciester players list

Hi, thanks for the note. As you indicate, we've had discussions on this before, and the multiple competitions were adopted as a compromise (on your suggestion), rather than just having Lge/Total. My reasoning against having only a 'Total' column have been made on talk here and at the article, but just to summarise:

Makes it easier to check figures, say if someone only had a Lge apps-only source. League apps only are available at a couple of established sources (Neil Brown, Joyce), and our infoboxes track lge games only
There is a split between club lists that use Total only and those which show the split e.g. Birmingham, Wolves, Portsmouth, WBA all do the latter. Also, the 4 you list are different to Leicester in that I believe they all have an online player resource site which lists 'total apps', not the case for Leicester
Does it take that much time to add 6 or 8 figures at a time (especially if you have the source to hand), although with Lge/Total only there would be just 4 entries to make.

Regards. Eldumpo (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no worries if you want to change it to just Lge/Total, as you input the extra data. Quite a bit of the (complete) info is already there though, so I'm not sure how much more there would be to input? Eldumpo (talk) 23:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Leicester City F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Chandler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrick Lane (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Lane (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lane (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jared Preston (talk) 20:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dean Marney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LCFChistory.jpg

Hi! If you don't mind me asking, I was just wondering what you used to create the league rankings graph for Leicester City F.C.? I'm thinking of doing something similar for the Sheffield United article.

Cheers --SUFC Boy 19:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiago Gomes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dean Marney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Hurst (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Turner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Ice Kings (football)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ice Kings (football) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jameboy (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying user about missing file description(s) (bot - disable)

File:Silenceoftherams.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Silenceoftherams.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Silenceoftherams.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Silenceoftherams.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.bentleysroof.co.uk/five-goals-against-derby-county/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 Leicester City F.C. season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|report = [http://www.lcfc.com/fixtures-results/match-report/index.aspx?matchid=3631336 Report
|}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 Leicester City F.C. season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}
vs. [[Watford F.C.|Watford]], [[Football League Championship|Championship]], 2.11.2013) & 3-0 (vs. [[Millwall F.C.|Millwall], [[Football League Championship|Championship]], 30.11.2013)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hillsborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Foy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, MIR17. You have new messages at JMHamo's talk page.
Message added 13:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JMHamo (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Leicester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reading (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leicester City season 2014-15

When players signed for a new club they are always added to the transfers section and you've removed Danns entirely from the article Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 20:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ulloa fee

If you have seen the article on the club website it says its an undisclosed fee. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 11:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating club stats in the infobox you should update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please update the dates that accompany career stats tables? Mattythewhite (talk) 21:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Liam Moore, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 20:20, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MIR17. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MIR17. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Vardy

Hi, just to let you know you omitted Vardy's EFL Cup appearance on 25 September when updating the stats after today's match. I've now included this appearance. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MIR17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Special:Diff/926450202 - just like to let you know that you were one short of typing the following character, ~ when updating the player's stats. Iggy (Swan) (What I've been doing to maintain Wikipedia) 11:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Hobbs (footballer) GA Reassessment

Jack Hobbs (footballer), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]