User talk:Oxmn9

Oxmn9
Toronto Argonauts
Career information
Position(s)	RB
Career highlights and awards
	1991, 1996, 1997 Grey Cup winner; CFLAllStar: 1990, 1997; 1990 Jeff Russel Trophy; 1990 CFL MOP; 1993 Tom Pate Award; 1996 Tom Pate Award; #31 Retired; Records: CFL Most Combined Yards, All-Time Regular Season: 25,438; CFL Most Combined Yards, Regular Season: 3,840 (1997); ;
Career stats
	Canadian Football Hall of Fame;

Oxmn9
Toronto Argonauts
Career information
Position(s)	RB
Career highlights and awards
	1991, 1996, 1997 Grey Cup winner;
CFL All-Star	1990, 1997
Awards	1990 Jeff Russel Trophy; 1990 CFL MOP; 1993 Tom Pate Award; 1996 Tom Pate Award
Retired #s	31
Records	CFL Most Combined Yards, All-Time Regular Season: 25,438; CFL Most Combined Yards, Regular Season: 3,840 (1997)
Career stats
	Canadian Football Hall of Fame;

Archives

Infobox Gridiron football person header

Good day! I am opposed to the idea of putting the jersey number and position in the header of the infobox. I believe it should be reserved for the name of the person only. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes) also hints at this in the "Design and usage" section. Do you object strongly to me moving those parameters back to within the box itself? DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

height and weight

I moved height and weight to career info since it is only of interest in the playing career of the individual. In this template, which is used for players, coaches, and admins, as well as former players, it is best, I think, that the height and weight be mentioned only with the career parameters; any other reference may be a WP:BLP contravention. In fact, I considered a more drastic make-over to put it within the Years as a player section but discarded that idea as a too major change requiring a more complete over-haul. DoubleBlue (Talk) 00:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and why remove the records, awards and whatnot from copy-paste documentation? DoubleBlue (Talk) 00:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the {{career_highlights}} parameter is replacing the other highlights parameters. Although it's still being used, but it shouldn't be. So it many articles that uses that should be removed. --Louis Alberto Guel 00:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Why? Those parameters do fall under the Career highlight and awards heading already and seem to be a handy way to organise them. What's wrong with the way it's done at Pinball Clemons? I've used career_highlights in the past to include other highlights that don't fit into those parameters. DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See these examples. You prefer the second one over the first? DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Oakland Raiders seasons

I have nominated Oakland Raiders seasons, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakland Raiders seasons. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Buc (talk) 20:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Player dab moves

Hi. Could you please explain why you moved George White (football player) to George White (Canadian football) and Doug Brown (football player) to Doug Brown (gridiron football). According to WP:D, the disambiguator should be as simple as possible and need not be specific unless there is need for further disambiguation. In these cases, I don't see any other football player to require further disambiguation and (football player) would be best. DoubleBlue (Talk) 16:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To other wikipedians "football" to them means "soccer". --Louis Alberto Guel 17:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, so what? It's not necessary to be more specific about what code of football unless there are more than one football player with same name. Secondly, the standard dab for soccer players is (footballer). DoubleBlue (Talk) 00:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well "player" shouldn't be included in the dab either unless another figure like coach is there, which that just leaves (football), and I'm pretty sure that incorrect for dab. Because of that, I have to move those pages. --Louis Alberto Guel 11:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explain please. You say (football) is insufficient so you have to add something. Why not "player"? DoubleBlue (Talk) 17:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You don't add "player" unless another football figure like coach or owner exist. I'm pretty sure you're not just to put simply (football) anyways. American, Canadian, Arena, or gridiron will work though. louis 21:26, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

You're not making a lot of sense. You say don't add player unless you need to differentiate from a coach or the like but you maintain that you do need to differentiate from different codes of football. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All I can say is make a discussion about this in football related projects. louis 12:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

You are the one who is making changes from the status quo. DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what status quo? louis 14:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

The way they were. DoubleBlue (Talk) 04:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please stop moving articles to change perfectly good dabs. (football player) is perfectly correct and accurate. DoubleBlue (Talk) 04:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject - thanks

		El Sombrero Barnstar Award
		Thank you for helping out with the Latinos WikiProject. LatinoMuslim 01:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Stevenson (American football)

I think that the "American football" qualifier is technically correct but misleading - this is a Canadian born and raised, career CFL player, and in Canada we never call it 'American football'. Typically, when people see that, they will assume it is a US player of NFL football. Could it be changed to Bill Stevenson (CFL) or Bill Stevenson (Canadian football) or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.59.222 (talk) 01:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Oakland Raiders 1960-1962.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oakland Raiders 1960-1962.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Oakland Raiders 1963.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oakland Raiders 1963.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 02:44, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Louis Alberto Guel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Curt Mohl - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Curt Mohl

The article Curt Mohl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP for over a year. Subject never played a match in the NFL and so fails the American football player requirements of WP:NSPORTS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 20:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Dickerson

The article Ricardo Dickerson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails general notability guidelines, notability for athletes.. gnews archive brings back trivia coverage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CutOffTies (talk) 03:31, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buddy Tate (American football)

The article Buddy Tate (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never played a game in the NFL according to this, I couldn't find anything that indicates he meets WP:GNG or WP:ATHLETE, 17th round draft pick...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 00:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elizabeth M. Cashwell Elementary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth M. Cashwell Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth M. Cashwell Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phil Nelson

The article Phil Nelson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGRIDIRON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 16:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raider (piracy) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raider (piracy) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raider (piracy) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of South View High School

The article South View High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N. No citations to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

South American fish listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South American fish. Since you had some involvement with the South American fish redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archieve listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Archieve. Since you had some involvement with the Archieve redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Oakland Corsairs helmet rightface.png

The file File:Oakland Corsairs helmet rightface.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional football team, so no need to have this file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:OaklandCorsairs 1000.png

The file File:OaklandCorsairs 1000.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional football team, so no need to have this file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris Johnson (safety, born 1960)

The article Chris Johnson (safety, born 1960) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources that I can find

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. William Avery (talk) 14:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jesse Boone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesse Boone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Boone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cbl62 (talk) 09:34, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gridiron football roster

Template:Gridiron football roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d "Individual Records - Combined Yards". Regular Season All-Time Records. cfl.ca. Retrieved 2007-12-10.

[cfl_mcy-1] "Individual Records - Combined Yards". Regular Season All-Time Records. cfl.ca. Retrieved 2007-12-10.

[1]