User talk:Kingpomba

Welcome!

Hello, Kingpomba, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! karmafist 07:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am most grateful for all the information and thank you for the welcome Kingpomba 08:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

David Cohen

Just dropping by to say that his article needed expanding and you did a cool job of it. Keep it up! - iGod 08:31, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AID

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Contact lens was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

cmh

Well, I just finished adding comments to both your pages and another user has deleted them. I happen to have the edit pages in my cache, so I'm reproducing the comments here in the hopes they will help you. I'm bringing across your comments too for context. Feel free to delete all this crap from here later if you like. Of course, I just realized that I misspell Abel throughout... oh well you get the point.

brutus

i fail to see how this is not neutral , i will not remove the tag but the floor is open to discussion also this is a small article and my time is limited so i try to add to it each day at a small trickle rate... i would of appreciated if you contacted me first Kingpomba 07:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Sorry, I should have contacted you first. I was going through newbie pages with no accounts and didn't check thoroughly. cmh 14:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the article, when I first approached it I suspected it was written by the author of Brutus due to the emphasis on popularity and download counts. I removed the download counts, but the reference to popularity remains. I put the POV tag on it because I was hoping someone would come along with a second opinion about the article as a whole. Thing is, the article does read like an ad to me. It's exuberant about what Brutus can do, but not so hot on the side of why we should care. In retrospect a tag for context might have been a bit more appropriate than the NPOV one. I think in order to escape from POV, the article needs to establish why it is a notable system in terms of what it has been useful for, its history, etc. More than just a list of great (or not so great) features. cmh 14:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cain

i just created the page , i hope it grows in size and in information , cheers, Kingpomba 11:37, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope the same. Thanks for asking for my review. My comments are similar to the Brutus (software) page in that I think the article lacks context. In other words, why should we care. Wikipedia is not a collection of internet directory pages, so this tool's simple existence, IMHO, is not enough to justify the article. cmh 14:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding style in this article, I'd put commas right after the term with a single space after. (So foo, bar, baz. Not foo , bar ,baz.) The first sentence is much too long and has several main ideas... consider breaking it up so there is one main idea per sentence. (I recommend reading the article aloud when there is no one around, you'll immediately spot problems like that.) Able is not capitalized at the end of the first sentence. I wonder whether there is a need to identify every kind of hash in the world that it supports. This is an encyclopedia which means that we should be complete, but it also means, IMO, that we should present the important facts, not just all facts which are true. Lastly, this article should be linked to appropriate categories. Good luck in improving the article! cmh 14:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Saw you deleted the brutus page. May be for the best, but hope you keep contributing elsewhere! cmh 05:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CSIRO is ACOTF

Hi. You voted for Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation as Australian Collaboration. It has been selected, so please help to improve this article in any way you can. Thanks. Scott Davis ^Talk 15:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David X Cohen

You added "David Cohen has also supposedly been exchanging e-mails with key members of the futurama staff about it's possible revival." to the David X. Cohen article. Just wondering where you heard this. I'm patiently waiting for some sort of official word that Futurama is coming back. Qutezuce 04:29, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

You voted for Storm, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. PDXblazers 23:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism reversion

Although test templates do not have to be used in order, giving an anon user an "only warning" template is often over the top unless it's something like deeply racist vandalism on high-view talk pages. Try {{test-n|Article Name}}, or {{test2-n|Article Name}}. There are an amazing amount of templates suitable for lots of different situations at Template:TestTemplates if you'd care to take a look. Thanks for fighting vandalism, I hope you can find the time to carry on! --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 10:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you i am most honored to even have you come to my talk page and though i am only a few hours new to the vandal busting game, i will continue to fight the good fight. Kingpomba 10:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing special about me, I just try and help where I can. Hope you like it here! --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 17:54, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Kingpomba,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.1 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that not enough mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Computerjoe 's talk 09:58, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Australian Collaboration is Census in Australia

Hi. You voted for Census in Australia as Australian Collaboration of the fortnight. It has been selected, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Thankyou. Scott Davis ^Talk 14:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

You voted for Time bomb, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Davodd 06:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Futurama was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Cain (software)

It has been proposed that Cain (Software) be deleted. I thought this may be of interest to you seeing as you were the one who started it. See you around. MichaelBillington 11:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Alison Sutcliffe (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 11 Dec 2024 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF) as this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Alison Sutcliffe (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 11 Dec 2024 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF) was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Errabee 11:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Futurama: Bender's Big Score

Hello. Regarding the Wikipedia page "Futurama: Bender's Big Score", you wrote on my talk page: "You removed the proposed deletion and gave no reason, therefore i am placing it on this article again" I did not perform that particular edit; you're looking for Wikipedia user Luna Santin. --Shawn81 19:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: David Letterman Article

Yeah shame is has been shafted around by Nine. - Mike Beckham 08:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was this you?

Was this you? User talk:143.238.44.134 --Deskana (For Great Justice!) 16:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes is was me , why do you ask? (won't be for much longer afaik my ISP's dynamic ip's last for 6ish hours. Kingpomba 16:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Omicron Persei VIII

Hey, I brought up your concerns about the location of the Omicron Persei VIII page over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama. I thought you would be interested in participating in the discussion so please do stop by and make your case! Stardust8212 19:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama Roll Call

Hello, you are currently listed as a member of Wikiproject Futurama though you may be inactive. This seems to be the case for many members so I am sending this message to help renew interest in working on these articles. If you are still interested in working on Futurama related tasks please visit the wikiproject page to see how you can help. If you have time please also join in the recent discussions on the talk page, in particular I would personally appreciate comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama#A new proposal for episode articles. Thank you for your time, hopefully I didn't annoy you too much. If you would not like to receive messages such as this in the future then consider removing yourself from Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama/List of participants. Happy editing. Star dust 8212 01:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Civil War

Hi. You've left a note on the talk page for my IP (I've now created an account) a note on my "censorship" of the Finnish Civil War Article. I did not censor anything. I removed a mention of the German Reich financing the Bolsheviks because this is far from being established. The article on the Russian Revolution states correctly :

Critics on the Right have long argued that the financial and logistical assistance of German intelligence via their key agent, Alexander Parvus was a key component as well, though historians are divided, for the evidence is sparse.

As, in addition, the question is peripheral to the Finnish Civil War, I think it would be best to simply remove the sentence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilestre (talk • contribs) 13:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

The first edit I made to Stip was changing the format to dot-points so it could be read better. I then removed the section after I saw a "notable people" section further down the page. You'll see I added the names I deleted to that section. And this is a static IP. Alex 202.10.89.28 (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Decadence Title (Screenshot).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Decadence Title (Screenshot).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Dwarf planet as this week's WP:ACID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Dwarf planet was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Zginder^{(talk) (Contrib)} 02:23, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that my edit to an article regarding a television program hosted by Penn and Teller was reverted and marked vandalism. Appologies for the trouble, was not sure of wikipedia's policy - simply saw this and figured it could offend some and would be a quick fix. Where should i go to confirm my edits are good in the future before posting them? Is there a listing of policy somewhere? Sorry for the trouble, and thanks in advance for the info ^_^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.3.231 (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kingpomba. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. β^_command 17:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CainAndAble.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CainAndAble.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine Project

The project itself is biased... Palestine is NOT a country. Please read Big Lies, which demolishes the myths of the propaganda war against Israel.

69.181.81.6 (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Palestine Project

However, you must know that Palestine is not a country and never has been.

69.181.81.6 (talk) 19:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

No worries! SGGH ^speak! 11:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logocain.png

Thank you for uploading Image:Logocain.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

What was that for!? Why did you remove my questions when adding your own?!?! Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 10:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Futurama revival

Hello. WikiProject Futurama is being revived. Since you are listed as a participant here, you have received this message to make sure you still are. If you like to help update the WikiProject, please discuss here. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Futurama-related articles. GamerPro64 (talk) delivered by MuZebot 06:46, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:CainSoftwareLogo.png)

You've uploaded File:CainSoftwareLogo.png, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Justin Pitt.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Justin Pitt.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]