User talk:Howard Alexander
[Foregoing archived to the bin.]
Howard Alexander (talk) 13:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Yogh
[edit]I endeavoured to intervene. The person in question is not listening and does not care about data integrity. Neither is anyone else joining in on the discussion. -- Evertype·✆ 16:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't detect any evidence that I have made any difference. And I don't see anyone else joining in on the discussion. -- Evertype·✆ 00:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Royal Standard of Scotland
[edit]Hi. At Talk:List_of_English_flags you stated that:
- "In Scotland a servant may bear his lord's arms, which would seem shocking to an English herald. Thus in Scotland certain high officials may bear a royal banner (the Lion in that case, preserved for that purpose only)".
I'd like to refer to this aspect of heraldry in Scotland, whereby "a servant may bear his lord's arms", in the Royal Standard of Scotland article but can't find a source. Do you know of one? Regards. Endrick Shellycoat 07:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the refs, much appreciated. Regards Endrick Shellycoat 08:15, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Bishops sending stuff to India, 883
[edit]The guy sending the stuff should have been Wulfsige of Sherborne in 883. I don't suppose we understand why the names are considerably different. While we are at it, why the appellation "of Sherborne"? No last names just towns they were from, I suppose? Thanks. Student7 (talk) 22:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I did not understand your latest edit/editsummary here [1]. Not actually Norse, though Dublin was. as summary while changing Norse-Gael to Norse doesn't really make sense to me. (I did understand the part about Mercia though :) Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 20:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. The use of Gaelic names I guess is based on that this is how they're given in most of the sources (the Irish chronicles), as far as I know there are no sources in Norse regarding these persons who were active in Britain and Ireland 9th 10th Century - meaning that "Sigtrygg" is a deduction from Sithric etc, same with Amlaib -> Olaf, Aralt ->Harald and so on. It get's trickier with names like Ragnall which could be either Ragnar or Ragnvald (Røgnvald). I notice people seem to have different opinions regarding the use of nominativ r for these names, personally I prefer Sigtrygg and use that form when I write at Wikipedia in Norwegian. In Norwegian it also comes natural to use Norse forms (deducted or not) so that I don't have to chose between English/Saxon/Gaelic forms.
- That Sigtrygg should have been married to the daughter of a high king was interesting news to me, would that be Muirgel daughter of Flann Sinna? The article already mentions his marriage to Ætherstans sister Orgiue/Eadgifu - possibly mother of Olaf Sigtryggson.
- As for Norse-/Gaelicness that's a bit hard to tell. Sigtrygg was a third generation "immigrant" (although a not very peaceful one), and his family had surely been influenced by the poeple they'd been living amidst those 50 years. When it is correct to say that they were no longer "pure" Norse I don't know (nor is it terribly important what we label them in my opinion). Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 21:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- I found a reference regarding Sigtrygg as Nialls brother if your interrested: Byrne writes in his article "Ireland before the battle of Clontarf" (A New History of Ireland: I - PreHistoric and Early Ireland, ed. Daibhi O Croinin. 2005, ISBN 0-19821-737-4 , p. 857): "Níall Glúndub's mother was Máel Muíre, daughter of Cínaed mac Ailpín... ...It is not impossible that the Anglo-Saxon annalist of York was correct when he asserted that Níall was brother to the Sitric who slew him in 919, for Máel Muire may have been married also to a son of Ivar." Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 09:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Those amazing maps
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thorn and Eth
[edit]Regarding your question about Thorn (þ) and Eth (ð) See my talk page. Herbolzheim (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Odd edits
[edit]I see we both got involved here and similar. I absolutely do not get what the user was trying to do. I'm afraid that the baby could perhaps have gone out with the bathwater, as in some cases I couldn't even determine whether an edit was serious in intent or not. But given the context and the number of edits that were clearly dubious, if not outright vandalism, I think that reverting everything was probably the cautious and sensible thing to do. Cheers DBaK (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suffrage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galwegian Gaelic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Howard Alexander. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Howard Alexander. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Howard Alexander. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Marxist cultural analysis
[edit]You created the page Marxist cultural analysis in September 2020. I have some concern this was an unintentional content fork of Western Marxism, Cultural Studies or a related page, as most of what appears on Marxist cultural analysis would be suitable additions to those. Were you aware of those pages at the time? In either case, what do you see as the proper boundaries between those topics? I also started a discussion about this at [2] This is not to the point of a formal merge proposal or anything, just getting some perspectives. Thanks! Sennalen (talk) 01:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Placename argument
[edit]
Template:Placename argument has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Cultural Marxism (disambiguation) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Marxism (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.TarnishedPathtalk 14:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.