User talk:Ballastpointed

Hello, Ballastpointed. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Kevin Deutsch, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

I have no relationship to article subject nor do I have any COI. I am contributing factual and objective language in accordance with all of Wikipedia rules and policies.

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. SnowFire (talk) 02:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kevin Deutsch. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 03:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I considered disruptive ? It was the other user who was deleting my edits. I don’t understand.

I don't understand why I was blocked. These were valid edits.

Blocked

I have blocked this account for one week because you continued the same edit war you were warned about above, and which you were also made aware of in the discussion at WP:ANI that you participated in. If you wish to be unblocked before the week expires, you will need to make clear to any admin who responds to your request that you intend to disengage from editing the page directly which is the source of the conflict, and instead use the article talk page to discuss and hammer out differences so a consensus can be reached. If you just let the block expire and return to the same behavior, you will likely be blocked again. Repeatedly hammering through your intended changes against multilateral opposition to them is not useful. If you wish to be unblocked, reply using the following template: {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}} and leave a clear explanation that will assuage any concerns about you continuing to behave in a disruptive manner. You may want to read Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more information. --Jayron 32 03:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice 2

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 00:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Long term edit warring.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. If you don't intend to follow Wikipedia policy, there is not much point in your continuing to participate here. EdJohnston (talk) 05:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 01:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]