User talk:Anjana Malhotra

Hello, Anjana Malhotra, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Gold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Star Vijay Music

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Star Vijay Music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dtt1^Talk 13:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Star Vijay Music for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Vijay Music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Vijay Music until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 1292simon (talk) 09:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed COI

Hello, Anjana Malhotra. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Star India, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 1292simon (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And again

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anjana Malhotra. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anjana Malhotra|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Regarding the various Star India articles. 1292simon (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm sorry Anjana Malhotra (talk) 12:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akbar Ka Bal Birbal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Akbar Ka Bal Birbal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 1292simon (talk) 08:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Regarding the redirects on two articles related to the Star India subscriber TV company. 1292simon (talk) 08:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Anjana Malhotra. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Star India, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. This request has been previously made, but you have not responded to it. // Timothy :: talk 09:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UTV HD India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UTV HD India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UTV HD India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 14:36, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It must be deleted Anjana Malhotra (talk) 12:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I already I'm earlier unfamiliar with rules but now I'm familiar. Please unblock me.I will not post/edit anything Anjana Malhotra (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What? I'm paid for nothing.I don't even know what does that mean, I'm...what can I say? I know no one will listen,just delete my account Anjana Malhotra (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 43777

UTRS appeal #43777 has been declined

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have said already that earlier I'm unfamiliar with Wikipedia rules.Now I'm know the rules somehow.But I will not post anything. Please unblock me because I'm stupid. Anjana Malhotra (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me Anjana Malhotra (talk) 11:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is a Anjana Malhotra (talk) 12:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

anyone getting my msg? or I've been blocked Anjana Malhotra (talk) 12:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me, right now I know all rules . Please unblock me Anjana Malhotra (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be unblocked, please follow the instructions given to you. 331dot (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What instructions,now one given me instructions. Anjana Malhotra (talk) 10:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get any instructions Anjana Malhotra (talk) 10:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell, what instructions I have to follow Anjana Malhotra (talk) 11:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be unblock Anjana Malhotra (talk) 10:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me I will not do anything without noticing the rules Anjana Malhotra (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me, I want to edit minor things Anjana Malhotra (talk) 04:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked I'm just a person who edited Wikipedia for first time,I will never edit Wikipedia but please unblock me or give expiration date Anjana Malhotra (talk) 14:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK ME

Please someone unblock me I've got appeal key I will never edit Wikipedia but please unblock me Anjana Malhotra (talk) 14:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]