User talk:AmiDaniel

; Archives
	27 Feb 06 – 31 Mar 06; 01 Apr 06 – 13 Apr 06; 14 Apr 06 – 25 Apr 06; 26 Apr 06 – 12 May 06; 13 May 06 – 24 May 06; 25 May 06 – 28 May 06; 29 May 06 – 1 June 06; 1 June 06 – 4 June 06; 5 June 06 – 8 June 06; 9 June 06 – 17 June 06; 18 June 06 – 22 June 06; 23 June 06 – 3 July 06; 4 July 06 – 24 Aug 06; 25 Aug 06 – 6 Oct 06; 6 Oct 06 – 25 Nov 06; 26 Nov 06 – 02 Mar 07; 03 Mar 07 – 09 May 07; 09 May 07 – 21 Sep 07; 21 Sep 07 – 19 Nov 07; 20 Nov 07 – 1 June 09; 15 June 09 – 19 April 11;

Welcome to the talk page for Wikipedia user and administrator Daniel Cannon, who uses the alias AmiDaniel.

You may contact me on this page by following this link. If you post to my talk page, please observe the following guidelines:

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A descriptive header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.
Be polite. Messages that are rude, offensive, or disruptive may well be ignored, refactored, or archived at my discretion.
Assume good faith. I truly don't go out of my way to make life difficult for you; however, I am human and thus fallible. If I have done something with which you disagree, please do not immediately jump to conclusions about my intentions, as it may have simply been a misunderstanding or a mistake.
No personal attacks will be tolerated. If you make personal attacks against me or any other contributor, expect that you will be blocked.
Do not provide private information on this page. Comments made here are public to everyone, so if you need to convey private or personal information to me, do so by e-mail. I have a responsibility to protect the confidential information of individuals, and as such, I will not republish any e-mail I receive, in part or in whole, without your explicit consent.

If you have come to this page because you believe you have been unfairly or incorrectly blocked by me, please send me an e-mail. If you are unable to use this link to e-mail me because you do not have a user account or because you have not set and confirmed your e-mail, then please send an email to [email protected] where I or another administrator will review your block. In either case, include in the e-mail your username (if you have one), your IP address, the reason specified for your blocking, the username of the blocking administrator, and your reason for why the block should be reversed. If you do not provide all of this information, your block cannot be reviewed. In e-mails sent either to the mailing list or to me directly, please observe proper etiquette, try to keep a cool head, refrain from harsh language, and avoid making presumptions about my intentions.

My PGP public key ID is 0xEFE649A3, expand for key:

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
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=kjOk
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Please don't take this as a threat :3 I only pick guys that I trout.
I love open source. so should you. 09:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Penguin330

Hi!

--Avillia ^{(Avillia me!)} 13:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hullo. How goes it? AmiDaniel (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Itsupforgrabsnow

Hello there. You recently blocked User:Itsupforgrabsnow for a short period after that user made a series of unconstructive edits. Well, it seems that they have continued to do so after their block. They do make the odd constructive edit, but these are far outnumbered by the edits they make that are to the detriment of the encyclopaedia. I would appreciate it if you could introduce further disciplinary action against this user. – Pee Jay 12:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting article

Hello, will you or another administrator delete the rticle, "John Anderson Highway".

Eric567 (talk) 21:06, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked user

Hello, you've blocked 67.152.0.0 about a month and two weeks ago. Why did you block that IP user? The reason you gave is not a good reason. I think you should unblock that IP user.

Eric567 (talk) 21:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Greeting from the past. Just passing by. --mboverload @ 01:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

mboverload @ 05:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappensinzig.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wappensinzig.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 08:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would You like to Help?

Hi, I am starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the [[1]]. McKinseies (talk) 14:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to events in June and July: bot, script, template, and Gadget makers wanted

I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 01:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Kuliglig

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kuliglig , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Image2012 (talk) 13:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better to do so. Image2012 (talk) 13:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can i contact you personally?

How can i contact you personally? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.91.64.83 (talk) 13:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About Swami YugPurush

I will add references. I amnnot done completing the write up yet. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diviwadhwa (talk • contribs) 18:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Account creation error Cannot create account: The requested username is already taken by a user on another wiki. names beekeepers plz help o respond to my email plz at [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.220.169.213 (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alzarqawi3.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alzarqawi3.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, AmiDaniel. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi AmiDaniel.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AmiDaniel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Just wanted to be here! Steeltree1 (talk) 10:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Whodunit SS.JPG

You uploaded or restored , File:Whodunit SS.JPG, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]