User talk:Alphachimp
Maccast Deletion Review[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of The_Maccast. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Edits at Uncle Ben's[edit]Dear Alphachimp: I have noticed you have expereince in editing / updating http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Ben's Would you consider assisting in making corrections to the content so that it is accurate. Here is the history and evidence to support the history: www.huzenlaub.com and http://huzenlaubunclebens.blogspot.com/ and http://huzenlaubinthenews.blogspot.com/ JIm Shapiro[edit]Hi: I am new to Wikipedia. My username is ArieltheUnicorn. I was utterly'dismayed'''''''at reading the messages about the article on Jim Shapiro. In fact, I used the link and read the article for myself to seee what all the fuss was about. My Dad always taught me to make up my own mind on things like this!! ;0) I AGREE COMPLETELY with the Administrators that the article should have been deleted IMMEDIATLEY!!!!! There was NOTHING positive in the article AT ALL!!! :( :( :( JIm Shapiro is apparently a complete SNAKE he is the type of attorney that all the jokes were made up about! You know, the ones that give the rest the bad reputation! Deletion of The Maccast entry[edit]Hi, On August 26th, 2007 I posted the following in your talkback and I have not received a response yet. Can you please upate me on this request? Thank you.
Sorry for the (apparently) invalid WP:AIV report. At the time, from what I understood, personal attacks in all forms are unacceptable. I was patrolling the sandbox, and found this, that looked like an attack. I warned, then he/she added this. I gave a final warning, and then the user added [1]. I thought that it was unacceptable for anyone to add something like " ALL OF THE WIKIPEDIA MODERATORS AND ADMINISTRATERS LOVE SUCKING COCK", "Wikipedier is a pussy", etc. I guess those kind of attacks don't warrent a block for WP:NPA, and I'll ignore such things in the future. Again, sorry for the invalid report.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 21:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Staten Island Railway stations[edit]Hey Alphachimp, haven't seen you in a long time. Listen, I need to ask you a favor. Me and the other participants at WT:NYCPT have worked on creating articles for Staten Island Railway stations and have also modified {{Infobox NYCS}} for SIR article use. But we need to find the opening dates for the SIR articles. But we need to find the opening dates for the stations, and surprisingly; nycsubway.org and stationreporter.net have them. So let me know if you come across any sources that can provide this. I'll continue adding the infoboxes to the stations. Thanks. Other than that, what's going on? I haven't seen you around the project for a long time. Knowing you're an admin an all, I really do hope you still do participate at the project. Marc Shepherd has also returned and we've also been getting a substantial amount of help from Larry V and NE2. So things at the project are okay, and I hope you're good too. So get back to me when you can, and enjoy your wikibreak. —Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs • email) 20:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC) Barnstar of Diligence[edit]
Just to let you know[edit]You didn't add a block notice to the the talk page. Was that intentional? Thanks for blocking the disruptive user, Enigma msg! 17:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Castratingkittens[edit]He's requesting unblock. While I would like to see him change the username, do four vanity edits really warrant an indefinite block? I'm inclined to unblock and offer another chance, unless there's more to the story. Daniel Case (talk) 08:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Tagging of WikiProject Companies articles using Alphachimpbot[edit]Hi. As per the discussion over at Bot Requests, are you still willing/able to help out with my request? If so, here is what I would like Alphachimpbot to do: Main Task
Additional Tasks, not required but would be nice if they are easy to accomplish
Let me know your thoughts. Thanks! Richc80 (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
71.193.17.159[edit]Thank you for responding to my request to block this IP. --InvisibleDiplomat666 17:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
:) AGK § 18:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Long time[edit]
Your name popped up while browsing which surprised me as I thought you had vanished sometime last year, nice to see you. As it turns out it takes fourteen months from that comment for me to become one and due to you helping me out a fair bit way back when this means you are indirectly responsible for the hundreds of complaints on my talk page from creators of articles I have deleted. Now how do you feel? –– Lid(Talk) 11:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Why was my page deleted?[edit]Hello. I posted an article about the North American Nunchaku Association and you removed it. Please let me know why. There should be no reason it was removed. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hikeba (talk • contribs) 02:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Weird HelperBot behavior[edit]I dunno how often you monitor the AIV Helperbot talk pages, but there have been a couple of weird report deletions by Helperbot2 recently (User talk:HBC AIV helperbot2#Odd report removal). I am guessing there is a race condition where helperbot reads the page, as user submits a report, then helperbot writes the page back? If so, you probably already thought of this, but I suppose the bot (or, sigh, another bot) could detect this kind of condition by looking at the helperbot edit summary and if there were modifications that did not match the edit summary, restoring those? I dunno, just thinking out loud. Or maybe this race condition happens so rarely that it doesn't matter :) --Jaysweet (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC) hi! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.255.15.72 (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Hello. I've noticed that you have registered as a member of WP:NYCPT. Please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation/Participants and add or correct you status as an active or semi-active member, as well as if you are an admin, whay projects you work on, and a sample of the work you do in the NYCPT scope. Thank you. —Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs • email) 15:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 15:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Not vandalism[edit]Alpha, I have checked the edit you mention: ( diff) (hist) . . m Pimenta; 20:53 . . (+393) . . IceCreamAntisocial (Talk | contribs) (link spp) ...and (to the best of my knowledge, have found him clean. Not guilty. All he wrote seems totally true to me. Regards, --AVM (talk) 01:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC) HBC AIV helperbot2[edit]Hello, just letting you know that your bot (as well as all the rest in the series) appear to have died. I assume this is a toolserver issue, since they all died at once, but the IP addresses aren't blocked, so I was checking to see if there was something you could look into. None of the bots have made any edits in the last 50 minutes. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Return of Mykungfu Sockpuppet[edit]Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mykungfu (6th) Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Greetings...[edit]Hello, Alphachimp, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC) Deleted GraalOnline article maliciously recreated secretly in german...[edit]The GraalOnline article that was deleted due to WP:WEB, NPOV, and other issues noted in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GraalOnline has been secretly reposted at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graal_Online , with little to no changes except for the language translation... The English page was nearly unanimously voted for removal and barring any significant changes should not be allowed back in any language... Vipercat (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Removed from Signpost spamlist[edit]Hi! I'm Ral315, editor-in-chief of the Wikipedia Signpost. It appears that you have not edited in at least a few months. To avoid spamming your talk page any further, should you be on leave, your name has been removed from the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to continue receiving the Signpost on your talk page, please leave a note on my talk page to that effect, and I will restore your name, and keep you on the list indefinitely. Ral315 (talk) 06:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC) delete my account[edit]I wasn't sure who to ask or where to ask so here goes. I was simply wondering if you could please permanently delete my account on wikipedia. Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanmelnik (talk • contribs) 07:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Megladon[edit]Why did you delete megladon article????!!!! I needed it for a school report! David Soyer[edit]David played in the Navy Band, not the Army Band. He tells me he started as a Musician First Class, and left as Second Class. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.49 (talk) 23:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC) Is Alpachimp Kidding or is He an Asshole?[edit]"Imagine a room with 1000 tiny monkeys with 1000 huge typewriters. Now imagine hundreds upon thousands of those rooms, pushed together more tightly than any architect could possibly conceive. Now imagine a single head monkey to lead them all - sorting, filing, and publishing the work of the many monkeys and many typewriters. That monkey is the Alphachimp, and he welcomes you to Wikipedia." Are you this narcissistic in real life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.104.81 (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC) block this IP 70.158.32.194 again?[edit]User talk:70.158.32.194 gets warned for vandalism multiple times every month. You temporarily blocked this IP once before. Please take a look. Thanks. 158.228.211.10 (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Nanos Valaoritis[edit]The article on Nanos Valaoritis was first written by me. I now notice at the bottom of the article under References that a claim is made for the article having originally appeared in the Greek version of Wikipedia and translated from that source. This is not true. If it appears in the Greek version, then that version was translated from my initial English version. -- Michael Haag —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelhaag (talk • contribs) 14:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Nanos Valaoritis[edit]Further to my remark about the erroneous Reference, I have now deleted the false statement that the Valaorites article was translated from the Greek. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelhaag (talk • contribs) 14:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC) AIV helperbot[edit]Hi Alphachimp! Could you take a look at a suggestion for the AIV helperbot? Thanks - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Ultralingua[edit]You deleted an article about Ultralingua some time ago. I was not the author and never saw the article in question. I have prepared a new article about Ultralingua, based on similar articles about proprietary software, that have not been deleted. Please review this article before I post it, and leave a message on Kudpung (talk) 09:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)my talk page. It's in my sandbox at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kudpung/Sandbox Many thanks.Kudpung (talk) 09:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC) hi, if you are who asked about penultimate as opposed to final, yes, they were all on the NEXT to last shows, all of them had special shows put aside for their lasts, and the penultimate ones were the ones that (I guess cause it went down that way with Carson) they have chosen to book people to "serenade" -Marc Mshaiman (talk) 21:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC) RFC: socionics[edit]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Socionics Tcaudilllg (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Happy birthday![edit]Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Account request[edit]Template:Account request has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. GrooveDog (talk) 01:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Deletions[edit]This delete (which you beat me to by just a couple seconds) probably should have been as "attack page" or some such, rather than "patent nonsense" (which it wasn't). It's not a huge deal, especially with such obvious vandalism as this, but it does help to keep the deletion logs organized in case something ever comes up. Thanks, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 04:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Request for Reconsideration of Deletion / Canasta[edit]I would like to suggest that the deletion of the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canasta_(band) be reconsidered. Below is information supporting the criteria for notability (music) as well as additional supporting documentation. 1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries... http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kcfwxz95ldse 7. Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. From the above Sun-Times article, by Jim Derogatis... "Though its popularity can be traced to the indie duo Cardinal in the early ’90s, the ork- (short for “orchestral-”) pop genre has produced some of the best bands in the Chicago underground in the last decade, starting with Yum-Yum and continuing with the Scotland Yard Gospel Choir, the 1900’s and Head of Femur. Canasta certainly deserves a place on this list..." 10. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article.) A link to the trailer for Diminished Capacity (IFC Films), starring Matthew Broderick and Alan Alda, which features Canasta's "Slow Down Chicago" (it comes in about halfway through)... http://ifcfilms.com/viewFilm.htm?filmId=776
Other information of note... Canasta was involved in Barack Obama's online campaign: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=E6CD48AEE4C3053E And was invited to join Barack Obama at Chicago’s gorgeous Riviera Theatre (capacity: 2500), as part of a fundraiser for his Democratic Primary bid: http://www.canastamusic.com/images/photoalbum/ChangeRocksDecember7,2007/photo/0 http://www.canastamusic.com//shows/flyers/2007-12-07-ObamaPoster2.jpg Several television commercials that made use of our music, including Mission Federal Credit Unions and Oklahoma City Community College, all viewable here... http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=8532266C07419B76
--Gouache23 (talk) 16:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Waiting your orders sir....[edit]My name is Arun.....I have applied for auto wiki browser.....Pls verify....Last time u disapproved.....So pls evaluate and reply...Any answers welcome.... tc.... ARUNKUMAR P.R (talk · contribs) 09:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Alphachimpbot[edit]Hey there Alphachimp, i noticed that your bot isnt running. I was hoping you could start 'er up agian. There appears to be quite a bit of work to be done. Thanks, Tim1357 (talk) 02:28, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
FYI[edit]Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Review of indefinite rangeblocks. –xenotalk 17:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Happy Birthday![edit]Hope you love it and sign my Guestbook! --Sainsf<^> (talk) 16:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Man-Faye[edit]Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination)[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination). --Gwern (contribs) 11:13 4 August 2010 (GMT) 11:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}}) Public domain and Wikipedia.[edit]Wikipedia and public domain for upcoming edits.[edit]Please discuss seriously about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Wikipedia_and_public_domain_for_upcoming_edits.
Rishikeshan (talk)ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators[edit]Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- DQ (t) (e) 00:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Translating a page[edit]Thanks for the welcome Alphachimp. Can you look at the new page I created and let me know if I did it right? It's a translation of an existing page in the Catalan Wikipedia (Viquipedia), plus I added a few references. Here's my page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lizcastro/Toni_Strubell_i_Trueta And here's the original: http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toni_Strubell_i_Trueta What do you think? Lizcastro (talk) 11:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC) Liz Removing Betty Martini's info--Mission Possible...your own agenda?[edit]Why would you possibly choose to remove all of Betty's info she's compiled to inform the public of the dangers of excitotoxins? Plus so much more of her hard work to serve to keep the public awake in order to guard their own health? Could it be that you have fallen in line with the agendas of Big Pharma and the Global Elite for population control? If her name is mentioned anywhere, so should her mission be. The fact that you've deleted her page on this is suspect. Please consider a re-post, and thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.12.16.4 (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC) thank you[edit]thank you :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.254.33.148 (talk) 02:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Happy Birthday![edit]Hello, Alphachimp. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— at any time by removing the Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 15:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC) File:81st St. IND.jpg listed for deletion[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:81st St. IND.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC) File:GrandStIND6thAveLine.JPG listed for deletion[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GrandStIND6thAveLine.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Payzone[edit]I notice Payzone article was previously deleted by yourself, am I okay to re-add it if the text is compliant? RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 10:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC) Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
legend you are — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trotter23 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Article in need of improvement[edit]A substantial part of the article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_impetus concerns a "tunnel experiment," as proposed by Galileo in his Dialogo. The article would clearly benefit by having it pointed out that, although it could be, the experiment has as yet not been performed. In its original form the idea is to have a tunnel dug through the Earth so that a test object ("cannonball") can be dropped into it. This is, of course, impossible. But the same physical principles would be revealed by using laboratory-sized massive bodies instead. The experiment could be performed in an Earth-based laboratory or in an orbiting satellite. Articles that discuss these possibilities and present further reasons for doing the experiment can be found at: http://astroreview.com/issue/2012/article/interior-solution-gravity-experiment and http://astroreview.com/issue/2012/article/the-direction-of-gravity I have no experience contributing to Wiki, but feel this issue is important enough to learn how to do so, if this message is not sufficient to make it happen. Please advise. Thank you. Richard Benish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.63.30 (talk) 22:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC) Happy Birthday![edit]
Unprotect[edit]Hi there, can you please unprotect my user page now: User:Christiaan. Thanks.
Travel Channel Producer Seeking info on the Source of the photo of Austen Leslie[edit]Hi Jason! My name is Suzy Beck, I'm a producer for a show called Food Paradise that airs on the Travel Channel. I'm currently working on an episode all about Fried Chicken and we featured Jacques-Imo's as one of our "Fried Chicken Paradises." Obviously we can't talk bout Jacques-Imo's fried chicken without mentioning Austin Leslie! I'm looking for a photo of Austin Leslie to use in the piece and I found the photo that you posted on Wikipedia. Travel Channel is really strict with permissions to use photos, and I noticed that Jason Perlow is credited as the source - is he the photographer? If he is the photographer, do you have a way that I can get in contact with him to see if he will sign a material agreement allowing us to use his photo? Please feel free to email me at [email protected] and please also feel free to pass my email address align to Jason Perlow. I hope to hear back from you soon! Kindest regards, ~Suzy~ Suzy Beck Producer Food Paradise for the Travel Channel Prometheus Entertainment [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.39.129.210 (talk) 19:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC) A warning? Not sure why?[edit]I came on Wikipedia and got this message: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to "Cascade Festival of African Films", you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 02:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC) I'm not sure what this is about, as I have no idea what that topic is or why I've been accused of messing with it. I think you've made a mistake. I VERY RARELY edit ANYTHING on this site, and even then it's only been articles about heavy metal music. This has me baffled. Please let me know what's going on. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.117.76 (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC) I'm not sure what this is about, as I have no idea what that topic is or why I've been accused of messing with it. I think you've made a mistake. I VERY RARELY edit ANYTHING on this site, and even then it's only been articles about heavy metal music. This has me baffled. Please let me know what's going on. Thanks.
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 04:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Indefinitely protected user subpages[edit]Hi. The following pages are currently indefinitely protected:
These protections are five or six years old now. Could you please unprotect these pages? --MZMcBride (talk) 20:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You deleted PASTE; this is a polite notification to say that PASTE has been recreated by me as a redirect to Paste (magazine).--Launchballer 17:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC) Hi, i need some help with Vandalism on WBIR and WTNZ's articles an IP user keeps removing people from the news team on both articles i have contacted WBIR and the people they still work for the stations. ACase0000 (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC) Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians[edit]You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC) Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment[edit]Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Hi, after long years since making it (I think it was me, maybe it was already there), I was going to start a community page and a corresponding dab per [wiki-search below the available redlink]
Many BC local and community articles were just stubs at the time; did it not have a stub tag? I still find the occasional one that doesn't. It might not have had one maybe? And a simple google search would have come up with the major community and area of the Fraser Valley that this is, with a high school, a native archaeo site and museum, lake and adjoining prairie and mountain all taking their name from "Hatzic", which was the name used for the people of the locality; given it's an obscenity for the male member, referring to a root gathered in the area, what their actual name in Halkomelem was I don't know; unless in the days it wasn't an obscenity per cultural changes in times past and was in fact the name of the group. They are linked west to the Kwantlens, as I was recently told by another user who's steeped in local lore (he's 84) The primary topic of that title is a major topic, i.e. the community, and has numerous related dabs; rather than deleted it you should have tagged it for expansion and improvement. Or perhaps contacted the author; if it was me I was around Wikipedia for a while already and had made many community/locality titles for BC, this may have been one of them. I'll be recreating it later on today or tomorrow; a bit stunned it's not there, it's a major neighbourhood of Mission, British Columbia, an OMI mission school located there is the town's namesake, and one of the most historica locations in British Columbia for a number of reasons.Skookum1 (talk) 08:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC) What was the reason for you to delete the above non profit charitable society page , can you kindly restore it please.(Raafat (talk) 01:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)) FYI - since you've previously edited the article. Bazj (talk) 11:50, 6 June 2015 (UTC) Hi, Hi, Requested edit[edit]
My name is Master Phillip Redmond. I'm one of the senior students under Grandmaster William Cheung. When I did a wiki search I found that there was information missing. First of all. My name and the other senior Master, Keith Mazza in the U.S. weren't mentioned. Also, William Cheung has changed the name of his Traditional Wing Chun Kung Fu Association to the Global Traditional Wing Chun Kung Fu Association (GTWCKFA). I made the corrections and someone named Chrisw80 deleted them. I made the corrections again and he deleted them again saying that I needed a secondary source. I understand that part so I sent him a message showing a video of the ceremony I performed with William Cheung to become the second of only two people in the U.S. to have had the honor. My updates were still deleted. What can I do to fix this? Sifupr (talk) 15:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
William Cheung[edit]You know what, I guess there's nothing I can do. When people who know the facts about William Cheung read his wikipedia page they'll just have to rub their heads. Have a great day. Phillip Redmond — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sifupr (talk • contribs) 16:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC) Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Kenny Vaughan[edit]Hey, I was wondering why you deleted a page on producer/songwriter/guitarist Kenny Vaughan? He's done a substantial amount of work in music, TV and film and was just curious. [1] [2] Thanks! Md massimino (talk) 20:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC) References Extended confirmed protection[edit]Hello, Alphachimp. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins[edit]Hello, Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC) A new user right for New Page Patrollers[edit]Hi Alphachimp. A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best. If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]Hello, Alphachimp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Your inactive bot(s)[edit]Hello Alphachimp. We currently show that you are the operator on file for at least one Administrators' newsletter - February 2017[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC) Happy Birthday[edit] Wishing Alphachimp a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 08:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Unban proposal for 'CarryMinati' from blacklist[edit]CarryMinati has been identified by YouTube as the 2nd top independent Indian creator in 2016. (http://gadgets.ndtv.com/internet/news/youtube-rewind-2016-google-lists-top-india-and-global-trending-videos-1635664) He has 1.5 million subscribers which is a notable amount. X4rid (talk) 17:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]Hello, Alphachimp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]Hello, Alphachimp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]Hello, Alphachimp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Mike McDonnell[edit]Hello, I'm creating an article on politicans and I want to make this article on a Nebraskian politican that has the same name. Did you delete an article about a politican with that name 12-13 years ago or was that a different Mike McDonnell or is that a different Mike McDonnell? I don't know if you remember that far or not but I just wanted to check before I went to create the article. Dillon251992 (talk) 20:43, 5 April 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 special circular[edit]
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)[edit]ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community. Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Response[edit]Thanks for the info! alphachimp 10:48, 12 May 2019 (UTC) WP:NYCPT misses you!!![edit]Hey there! Hope all is well with you A-chimp! (I used to go by Imdanumber1, but have dropped the name to go with something less arrogant). I know it's been a while since you've been on Wikipedia and even longer since you've been on the NYCPT WikiProject, but you're always welcome to come back and help out. Have a nice day! —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 12:55, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Woohooo[edit]
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Happy Birthday![edit]Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC) Still here[edit]I'm still alive, thanks! alphachimp 18:41, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Happy Birthday![edit]Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled[edit]A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC) How we will see unregistered users[edit]Hi! You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki. When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed. Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help. If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter. We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January. Thank you. /Johan (WMF) 18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Badcleanup[edit]Template:Badcleanup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC) New administrator activity requirement[edit]The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment. Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work. 22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC) Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:11, 1 May 2022 (UTC) Still here, thanks[edit]Still here alphachimp 00:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC) Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:59, 1 December 2022 (UTC) Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed. Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN. Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 03:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Happy Birthday![edit]
|