Jump to content

User talk:Aarem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Click here for posting a message
Click here to email me.





Did this museum earlier belonged to Nair Brigade ?

[edit]

Please let me know if this museum belonged to the Nair Brigade before it was made the Legislative Museum.

As you might be aware of, this image was also been used to term it as Nair Brigade HQ. But since there was no refence to it, the image has been removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.122.120 (talk) 05:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was. The legislative museum was set up recently (end 1990s / early 200s). -- Aarem (Talk) 03:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Orissa symbols has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 07:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken the somewhat unusual step of reopening this TfD and co-nomination {{Kerala symbols}}. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed; using common template, instead. -- Aarem (Talk) 12:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited List of software companies in India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages HCL and Technopark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why all those edits in kochi page was reverted?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metroman87 (talkcontribs) 13:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss here : Talk:Kochi -- Aarem (Talk) 02:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Quack quack?  Abhishek  Talk 06:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems so :-)
More are there. See : Rash9745 (talk · contribs) and User_talk:Samaleks#Message. Cheers, -- Aarem (Talk) 12:58, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please provide an input at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DileepKS69?  Abhishek  Talk 13:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion seems to be closed now. Cheers, -- Aarem (Talk) 04:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well it was closed as no input was given. You can re-open it and provide an input. Cheers!  Abhishek  Talk 19:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Abhishek for inviting me to this discussion. I think we should wait till those sock accounts re-opens again to edit wiki. I will track them, and will report if needed. --Samaleks (talk) 08:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Singapore meetup invitation

[edit]


Singapore Meetup

Meetup 6

Please indicate your interest on the meetup page.

v  d   e

G'day! You are cordially invited to a meetup Tuesday evening (tomorrow; 4 September). Sorry about the short notice. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 6. I hope to see you there! John Vandenberg (chat) 04:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aarem, there is another Singapore meetup 31 October (Wednesday). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 7. Cheers, John Vandenberg (chat) 13:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Trivandrum International

[edit]

As a person familiar with trivandrum, international school, I must inform you that there was nothing inaccurate about the edit made: Trins indeed has a bad reputation for student abuse of marijuana. moreover, the president of the school is indeed the uncle of a student. Before making such unnecessary changes, kindly verify your own facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.88.237.79 (talk) 09:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

[edit]

Hi. I'm wondering a bit about this image. Could you help clarify who the author is? I asume there was some renaming of usernames involved but is it the right user who is attributed now? --MGA73 (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

[edit]

Vandalism in the Kochi article

[edit]

I had made cleanups and removed some irrelevant information from Kochi page. My posts were removed and I was warned of vandalism. That guy doesn't know what vandalism means. That guy User:Prathambhu doesn't know GCDA means what the UA means. I noticed that you had made some interventions in the Kochi article yourself.

To quote the first paragraph :

"The city of Kochi (pop. 601,574) is the most densely populated city in the state and is part of an extended metropolitan region (pop. 2.1 million), which is the largest urban agglomeration in Kerala. Kochi city is also a part of Greater Cochin region[6][7] and is classified as a B-1 grade city[8] by the Government of India, making it the highest graded city in the state".

I had also checked the discussions Talk:Kochi, India and found that the consensus was that the article is about the city not the UA. From this it is pretty clear that the article is about the Kochi and not about the Kochi UA or the metropolitan area. Some of the information added in the page are for the UA of Kochi, and should be entered in the Kochi metropolitan area. Quoting from the page Kochi metropolitan area,

"This article is about the urban agglomeration of Kochi. For the city of Kochi, see Kochi ". And again,

"The Urban Agglomeration (UA) of Kochi (Malayalam: കൊച്ചി [Kocci]; formerly known as Cochin) is a part of the Greater Cochin region and the largest urban agglomeration in the Indian state of Kerala."

So I hope it might be clear to you by now, which is the page on the Urban Agglomeration and which is the page on the city. I merely removed these irrelevant information's from the page. Aluva is a separate municipality from Kochi and a part of the metropolitan area but it is not part of the Kochi city which has a population of 601,574. Kolenchery is a small town within a Panchayat which is outside the purview of both GCDA and Kochi metropolitan area. So please allow me to remove these irrelevant information from the page.

There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents on the issue.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.44.110 (talk) 03:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply] 

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

[edit]

Malayalam Cinema location

[edit]

An edit by 69.47.228.36 removing well cited authentic information and adding arbitrary information was reverted by me. If you have reverted this by accident please take care to restore it. Prathambhu (talk) 06:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

[edit]

Personal info removed on your demand

[edit]

Possible personal information edited out from Malayalam cinema talk page on your demand. Let me know if any more still remains anywhere inadvertently. Prathambhu (talk) 07:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not about personal information, but about the attempt to reveal the personal information. I would have asked to remove any names other than my username. Thanks for the positive response :-) Cheers, -- Aarem (Talk) 06:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution in Malayalam cinema page

[edit]

Inviting you to Page protected. JK (talk) 13:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

[edit]

Arbitration notice

[edit]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Malayalam cinema industry hub and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Prathambhu (talk) 21:14, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

[edit]

Request for Arbitration case declined

[edit]

This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a request for arbitration, which named you as a party, has been declined. Please see the Arbitrators' opinions for potential suggestions on moving forward.

For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ21 04:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kamal Haasan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ponni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

[edit]

Hello

[edit]

Hello sir, Can I ask you for your email address? I want some problems with Oracle Forms 10g. my email is [email protected]. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.172.43.186 (talk) 15:19, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

[edit]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:Aruvikkara tvpm.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



The Signpost: 08 January 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

[edit]

File:Bhavani6.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

[edit]

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

[edit]

File source problem with File:Panga.gif

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Panga.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Iflex52.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iflex52.JPG, which you've attributed to iflex solutions. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 01:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wizardbig.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wizardbig.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 01:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Pressmachine.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Pressmachine.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 01:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:UA kochi pop.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:UA kochi pop.JPG, which you've attributed to World Gazetteer. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gvprs2 tvm.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Gvprs2 tvm.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aarem,

Looks like Malayalam Cinema wiki page is going to a dispute again on the base of malayalam film industry :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.59.154 (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the photogrpaher? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

find family member

[edit]

hey sir could you help me to find my family member .i have some letter that related some village at kerala are our inheritance could help me sir any else hope u call me at 0163407916 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.164.214.243 (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bharatheeya Vichara Kendram

[edit]

The article Bharatheeya Vichara Kendram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After going over this article in some detail, I cannot see any inherent claim to notability, nor can I find sufficient coverage in sources to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde (talk) 08:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cinema halls in Thiruvananthapuram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cinema halls in Thiruvananthapuram until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of M. S. Kumar for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. S. Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. S. Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Aruvikkara tvpm.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Ponmudi tvpm.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Kerala

[edit]


Namaskaram, Aarem. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, Wikiproject Kerala hasn't a newsletter yet. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!





Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Kerala. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kinfra Apparel Park for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kinfra Apparel Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinfra Apparel Park (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam Black GB (talk) 06:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iffk logo.JPG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iffk logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Kerala Newsletter: July 2024

[edit]


Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Kerala. © Copyleft 2024.
Go here to unsubscribe if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]