User talk:37Celcius

Welcome!

Hello, 37Celcius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! delldot talk 03:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Grand L. Bush

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 37Celcius! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 15:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bush

Hi Sharon, I think Shadowbot removed the links as spam, since it says something about that in the above post. Certain addresses are on spam blacklists and get automatically removed. Maybe you can find similar material from a different site. Also, it could be this edit, the edit summary mentions removing some external links. You can click on "history" at the top of the page and use the "cur" and "last" buttons to see every change that has been made to the page, maybe by doing that you can see where the specific links were removed. Though it looks like you're the main one to have edited the page.

Did you read the conflict of interest guideline I showed you before? It also mentions close relationships, which I think marriage would count as. I had a brief look at the article and didn't see any glaring POV problems, and I can look more closely at it later. I'll also bring it up with other editors to see what they think and whether the relationship is a problem. Sorry I couldn't be more help with the link question, it's a little confusing to me, too. Peace, delldot talk 01:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cats

No problem. When you want to add something to a category, all you do is write [[Categoy:the category you want to add it to]] to the bottom of the page, and the software includes it in the category. What category do you think we should include it in, Category:American television news anchors? I'll add that, if you think of another cat we can add it too. Peace, delldot talk 13:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Hi Sharon, if someone other than you owns the copyrights, you need to get permission from them to release the pictures under the GFDL. You would follow the steps listed at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission to request it. They will have to email Wikipedia saying they grant permission. If they do not grant permission, you'll need to supply other photos that you own the copyright to, i.e. photos that you took yourself. delldot talk 17:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Grandasbalrog.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandasbalrog.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 03:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Grand.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Grand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 03:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Grandredcarpet2006.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Grandredcarpet2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 03:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Grandpremiere1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandpremiere1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 03:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Grandpremiere1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandpremiere1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 03:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Grandlicencetokill_(2).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandlicencetokill_(2).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 03:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Grandtrinidadcolors.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandtrinidadcolors.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 03:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sharonantonio.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sharonantonio.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 03:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey again, thanks for the nice note! Good job on the pictures permissions! Peace, delldot talk 16:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Grandlicencetokill.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grandlicencetokill.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Image

Hey, I'm not actually sure what's going on, I think you should talk to the deleting admin, Angr. It looks like you may have tagged it with a license tag that only the creator of the image can use, so someone else replaced it with a fair use tag, and the deleting admin deleted it because it's not a valid fair use claim. But if you have permission this shouldn't be a problem. I'd talk to the deleting admin to figure out what kind of tag you should use for the image with the type of permission you got (i.e. did the copyright owner agree to release it into the public domain or under the GFDL?). I wish I could be more help but I'm not that good with images and copyrights. Peace, delldot talk 21:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Shapeshifter

Subject is not about a band, but an artform called turntablism (currently a Wikipedia article). The person featured is keeping the art of turntablism alive not only in the U.S., but throughout the world. He has received encore invitations to perform throughout the France, Spain, Mexico and Hawaii. He's even performed his artform at the House of Blues in Las Vegas. He's keeping alive an original artform that's approaching 30 years. The simple fact that said subject is world-renown makes him notable. 37Celcius 02:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shaw

Hey, sounds great! Can't wait to see the article. Peace, delldot talk 19:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Janice Raiford Shaw (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC) If you are really connected with this person and she has a problem with the article, please contact the Wikimedia Foundation to prove your identity. Academic Challenger 00:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you created the article and were the only substantial editor, it seems that your request can be granted without any involvement from the foundation. However, I have deleted the article entirely instead of letting it stay in the history under a nonsense title. Academic Challenger 04:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark E. Kalmansohn

I am currently penning an article about Mark E. Kalmansohn, the federal prosecutor who hunted down and brought to trial Lucian Kozminski, the man convicted in 1982 of swindling more than 3,000 of his fellow Holocaust survivors.

37Celcius 20:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry for the delayed response. I've been studying a lot lately and not around much. Glad you got the problem fixed! Peace, delldot talk 01:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's possible that someone will come across it and decide to add some, but the effort is not coordinated enough that you can be sure of it. If you want them, I'd suggest adding them yourself. With categories, you can figure out what categories the subject belongs in by going to a broad category they belong in and browsing the subcategories, and the subcategories of those categories. E.g., for a marine biologist, go to Category:Scientists and try to narrow it down from there. People also are frequently cateogrized by the year of their birth, e.g. Category:1957 births. You can look at WP:CAT for more info. I wouldn't add an external links section unless you know of some specific links that would add something that the article itself can't provide (e.g. a much more detailed treatment of the topic). Peace, delldot talk 16:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BALROG.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BALROG.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of D.E.L.T.A. Rescue

A tag has been placed on D.E.L.T.A. Rescue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of D.E.L.T.A. Rescue

I have nominated D.E.L.T.A. Rescue, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D.E.L.T.A. Rescue. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DELTA Rescue clarification

I think you mean that expenses related to service animals can be deducted, not the animals themselves. :) --Mr. Vernon (talk) 23:46, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are correct. I am an owner of a registered service animal and my CPA deducts any and all expenses approved by the IRS. Thank you for the clarification. 37Celcius (talk) 00:42, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grillo

thanks, I only have a passing interest in the DELTA article, so I will pass on adding references to the founder. Ikip (talk) 21:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:LEO GRILLO WITH WILLY.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:LEO GRILLO WITH WILLY.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 06:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Clear Morning Skies on Aug 30 2009.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Clear Morning Skies on Aug 30 2009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Grandpremiere1 (3).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Grandpremiere1 (3).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3 files

File:Grandpremiere1 (3).jpg is sourced to www.wireimage.com (which I believe is a Getty image repository), so even if you are the (c) holder, you'll need to prove it through WP:OTRS as they have a 'competing' (c) claim on the image.
File:Clear Morning Skies on Aug 30 2009.jpg simply has no templated copyright tag - the 'where to start' page is found at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
File:LEO GRILLO WITH WILLY.jpg was moved to "commons" - there's a duplicate File:HORSE RESCUE OF AMERICA.jpg which will probably be deleted sooner or later (probably later) by someone who monitors the commons/non-commons duplicates. Nothing you need to do there. Skier Dude (talk) 18:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pic kalmansohn (2).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pic kalmansohn (2).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Grandpremiere1 (3).jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grandpremiere1 (3).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Peripitus (Talk) 21:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Hey, good to hear from you again. I replied to your question on my talk page. Peace, delldot ∇. 19:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overwriting file File:Raul julia-levy in 2006.jpg again

Hi 37Celcius, please don't. I've again reverted your upload and deleted it as having no source. We have a free image and you can't just replace it with an image taken from the internet. If you want to upload another image please do so, but under a different name - Peripitus (Talk) 23:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Raifordredcross.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raifordredcross.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secret ^account 05:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notice of an RfC

A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:List of African-American firsts# Request for Comment: Pro wrestling. --Tenebrae (talk) 12:02, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Janice, 1975.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Janice, 1975.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:RAIFORDAMERICANREDCROSS.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RAIFORDAMERICANREDCROSS.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rudolph douglas raiford, 1943 (2).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rudolph douglas raiford, 1943 (2).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GRAND LEE BUSH 2007 PARAMOUNT.jpg

The file File:GRAND LEE BUSH 2007 PARAMOUNT.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GRAND L BUSH 2007.jpg

The file File:GRAND L BUSH 2007.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Favorite Son (film)

The article Favorite Son (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NF, specifically WP:NFSOURCES since none can be found online or offline. No critical reviews to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mike Allen 01:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]