Talk:Mega Bucks/GA1

GA Review

Expand the "WWF" acronym at the first mention.
Only publications as publishers for references need to be italicized; otherwise, they don't.

Gary King (talk) 01:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the first two sentences to explain the acronym. Thanks for catching that.

Having read Template:Cite web, it is my belief that something like "SLAM! Wrestling" is a "work" rather than a "publisher":

"Work: If this item is part of a larger "work", such as a book, periodical or website, write the name of that work."
"Publisher: Publisher, if any—for example if the website is hosted by a government service, educational institution, or company."

I find that "SLAM! Wrestling" is closer to being a website than a company, so it seems appropriate to classify it as a "work" in the citation template. Because of the autoformatting, "works" are italicized, whereas "publishers" are not. This is the format I have followed in every other Good Article that I have written (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9).

Please let me know if you have further concerns about these matters. Thanks for the review, GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Passing Gary King (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]