Talk:Syrian civil war
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Syrian civil war article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Syrian civil war. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Syrian civil war at the Reference desk. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting. |
Frequently asked questions
To view an answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question. To view references used by an answer, you must also click the [show] for references at the bottom of the FAQ. Q1: Why is this article titled in lowercase, as opposed to Syrian Civil War (which redirects to this article)?
A1: Wikipedia policy on article titles is to use sentence case unless a preponderance of reliable sources treats the subject as a proper name. While this policy can lead to inconsistent titles (e.g. compare this article's title with Russian Civil War), community consensus (confirmed most recently here for this article) is that following the treatment by reliable sources takes precedence over in-Wikipedia title consistency. |
|
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Syrian civil war, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
Consensus required: All editors must obtain consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion). If in doubt, don't make the edit. |
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
FAQ: infobox
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Question
Why is the infobox short? Where is the information about belligerents and other information commonly seen in an infobox?
Answer
The Syrian civil war is an ongoing multi-sided conflict in Syria involving various state-sponsored and non-state actors.
[From the opening sentence of the lead]
Previously, this article had a very long infobox, which attempted to capture the complex relationships between the many belligerent parties in this civil war and present other information such as strengths and casualties.
An RfC was held proposing a substantially shorter version as we now see (Talk:Syrian civil war/Archive 51#RfC on infobox).
To summarise some key points, an infobox is a simple, at-a-glance summary of key points from the article. It is unsuited to capturing nuance and complex information. Quoting from MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE:
The less information that an infobox contains, the more effectively it serves its purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance.
The consensus of the RfC was for the substantially shorter version of the infobox.
Issues
[edit]The whole article needs a rewrite, it for example lists allied forces as bellingerents. And it's locked so that nobody can actually do anything to deal with its problems.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.78.207.102 (talk) 07:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- I suppose that just as consensus can change, so can allies change. Feel free to use {{Edit semi-protected}} here to suggest specific edits. – wbm1058 (talk) 01:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, needs to be re-written. Starting with the title that reads "CIVIL" war. When foreign forces unlawfully invade and annihilate your country, it is not a civil war. It is a hostile and aggressive attack we call today terror. Calling it a "civil" war is a misleading political statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.29.185 (talk) 09:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- It's quite common for foreign forces to intervene in a civil war. That doesn't (necessarily) change the internal aspect of the war. — kwami (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- I would support the notion that this was not a civil war but a proxy war. Mercenaries, foreign or national, fighting a proxy war for foreign powers, paid, armed and guided by those foreign powers, among which the CIA, do not qualify as a local uprising and part of a civil war. Mregelsberger (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- For the people who are defending USA and NATO, USA with the help of turkey, they posioned syrian civillians by dropping posion gas from airplanes. If that is not a war crime then I do not know what is. 155.4.141.62 (talk) 21:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I would support the notion that this was not a civil war but a proxy war. Mercenaries, foreign or national, fighting a proxy war for foreign powers, paid, armed and guided by those foreign powers, among which the CIA, do not qualify as a local uprising and part of a civil war. Mregelsberger (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think that even the title - Syrian Civil War - is misleading and should be changed. This is corroborated by people here and by information, that is increasingly available, not least the continuation of the proxy war between the USA and Russia in Ukraine. A proxy war opposing armed gangs managed by foreign powers and a national army is not a civil war, even though it apparently is among national parties. The "conflict in Ukraine" as it is called by the OHCHR[1] is quite similar and is named on Wikipedia as "War in Donbas" described, without further proof as follows: "The war in Donbas, or Donbas war was a phase of the Russo-Ukrainian War in the Donbas region of Ukraine." This could also be said of the war in Syria, which could be named the "War in Syria", a "phase of the proxy war of the USA and Russia, opposing US mercenary groups assisted by US and US ally troupes and the Syrian army with Syrian allies (Russia, Iran, Hezbollah)". The war in Syria actually is not over, with the USA illegally occupying the north-eastern part of the country, i.e. the oil fields of Syria, producing oil on its own account without permission from the national government. Nothing is "civil" there. Wikipedia shouldn't get involved in politics and have only one standard, in this case applied to all conflicts alike, without distinction of who is waging them. Mregelsberger (talk) 10:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. There is a sentence in there saying that the Syrian Civil War "...started nine years ago..." This page needs work. Livepsycle (talk) 04:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Well said. Spiralwhats in your boxCox (talk) 11:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Conflict-related civilian casualties in Ukraine" (PDF). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 27 January 2022. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Requesting changing the colours of the free army and/or the interim goverment on the map table
[edit]The two groups colours on the map given by the table are both mildly different shades of green and they are genuinely hard for me to tell the difference. I am having issues seeing the difference then i believe others are too, espically those who may be colour blind. i don't know how to change it, i would if i could so instead i am asking that one or both be changed. I propose changing the Syrian Interim Government's (SNA) colours to blue as it would would contrast nicely against the yellow of the AANES and SAAF yellow and red respectively 92.236.211.53 (talk) 22:35, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I recognise your issue which may affect many people. My issue with the article is the complete lack of information regarding the involvement of the American " intelligence" community in fomenting trouble in Syria in 2011 and the years preceding this. Spiralwhats in your boxCox (talk) 11:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
New fights around Aleppo
[edit]https://levant24.com/news/2024/11/cmos-repelling-the-aggression-operation-gains-ground-against-assad-regime-forces/ 2A02:3032:14:3509:C85A:47D1:3E37:124F (talk) 14:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Map needs to be updated
[edit]https://syria.liveuamap.com/ Arye Bernshtein (talk) 23:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Aleppo
[edit]The battles in Aleppo should be added 88.236.189.163 (talk) 10:50, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Hama
[edit]Hama has been retaken by SAA map should be changed Mayukh Mitra 123 (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Are there multiple WP:RS for intra-Syrian-govt fighting/attempted coup d'etat in Damascus?
[edit]Question started at: Talk:Northwestern Syria offensive (2024)#Any sources for intra-Syrian-govt fighting in Damascus? Boud (talk) 00:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Map Accuracy and Projection
[edit]We need to way out the current map and wait for things to settle, as it seems that the Syrian Interim Government under the Free Syrian Army occupies many areas around the Lake strategic eastern of Aleppo, as they also carried out the operations to occupy it. It is in no way deemable to assume this is part of the HTS (in white). The sources must be syria.liveuamap.com, but they are coloring all the new occupied Territories the same color, so we do not know the exact borders of which group owns what. DerEchteJoan (talk) 22:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- I want to add to that, that the Syrian Free Army controls areas west of the lake aswell, which the HTS did not take. 79.247.24.147 (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Currently they control the whole lake Sabkhat al-Jabbul, and areas surrounding it. In the current version of the map, HTS and the Syrian Army still control it 79.247.24.147 (talk) 09:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Still is severely outdated; as uncertain as things are right now, we need to change the detailed map to reflect what we do know is happening. LordOfWalruses (talk) 03:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. This is one of the most complicated armed conflicts, not much is known. Things need to settle out. DerEchteJoan (talk) 05:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- So, currently syria.livuamap.com is reporting, that the HTS and the NLF (part of the SNA) are currently both attacking Assad Forces in the same places, which must implicate joint control. We need to find a solution to this problem, as it is impossible under the current circumstances to show accurate projections of HTS and SNA control. One solution may be, that we group the Rebel Forces together. 89.244.83.56 (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- We could do that, or we could have a separate coloration for “HTS-SNA joint control.” LordOfWalruses (talk) 20:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Black shading over zoomed in map.
[edit]When you click on the map in the infobox showing the War Map, some black lines appear over parts of the map that aren't there before. This could be because it's an SVG and chooses not to show those lines until you zoom in, I don't know.
But it's still very strange and I'm not sure what it's supposed to be or if it's even intentional, especially since these black lines even go over Raqqa, which is firmly under SDF control.
My best guess is that it represents renewed ISIS activity, but if so, this hasn't been mentioned anywhere else I can find on any Wikipedia article, so for that to only appear on the map is strange.
And either way, the fact that they onlt appear when the image is clicked on is very strange and I think that should be fixed. Taiyaki Schizo (talk) 10:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- There is also a gray circle to the west of the upper corner of the "D" in Deir ez-Zor. What is that? 104.171.53.110 (talk) 00:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- It’s ISIS activity. Ambushes, raids, etc. It’s not really mentioned anywhere except for the SDF advances in “Deir ez-Zoir. ISIS there is a third side of the belligerents. 71.236.127.123 (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
“Territorial changes” section outdated
[edit]The source is from the beginning of 2023 and major changes have been made since the rebel offensive of 2024: an updated source should be found for this section (if possible). LordOfWalruses (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Viceskeeni2 (talk) 05:50, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Just wanted to express support for this change. I was going to raise this issue myself until I saw it had already been raised. Editors please update this ASAP in light of recent events. 2A00:23C8:90A:1601:C55F:48DA:5A82:8E4E (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Update the map!!!!!
[edit]There is a need to include hama 109.53.212.182 (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Color changes for southern Syria rebels
[edit]The magenta colors don’t match the other colors in the key (not even the purple one, which is for reconciled rebels and not ones that are still fighting the government), and green for the southern rebels may not be accurate since the SNA is currently in the north only. (I may be totally wrong on that though.) As such, new colors should be added into the legend and/or the southern rebels (that are currently in green) should be changed to a new color on the map.LordOfWalruses (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The percentages of control need to be updated.
[edit]Possibly, after we know what happens in Damascus. NesserWiki (talk) 17:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly, I just raised that in a newer section, and we likely have to also change the outcome too should Assad's regime finally collapse---rumors and news report that some high-ranking Syrian officials may want to defect to the rebels now. Bf0325 (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Wikibox Map
[edit]Someone has replaced the normal high quality wikibox map with the LiveUA one, which in addition to having unconfirmed and incorrect information, is also generally low quality. People should wait for the real map to update. Reverting edits doesn't seem to be able to change this back to the normal map though. MegaZeroX7 (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Not sure why they thought that'd be a good idea Colin dm (talk) 19:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I just reverted the edit. haha169 (talk) 19:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- can somebody make the grey lands back to red again Sanad real (talk) 22:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- the map is more difficult to read and understand like this especially since the cities are colored red Sanad real (talk) 22:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I’m not sure that’s really a good idea: I may be totally wrong on this, but I believe the grey parts of the map are where Assad is technically in control but has no real ability to exert power. Given how much this indicates the severity of Assad’s downfall, I think including this in the map is not a bad idea. LordOfWalruses (talk) 22:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- i know but it's simpler for readers to see one color for assad's forces instead of being confused on what the gray is Sanad real (talk) 22:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I get what you’re saying. Maybe we could add a separate color for “loose SAA control” or “uncontrolled.” Perhaps even some sheet over the red (similar to the gray stripe sheet used to show ISIS operations). LordOfWalruses (talk) 23:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- yeah maybe a lighter shade of red for loose control and a darker one for strong control Sanad real (talk) 23:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I get what you’re saying. Maybe we could add a separate color for “loose SAA control” or “uncontrolled.” Perhaps even some sheet over the red (similar to the gray stripe sheet used to show ISIS operations). LordOfWalruses (talk) 23:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- i know but it's simpler for readers to see one color for assad's forces instead of being confused on what the gray is Sanad real (talk) 22:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- can somebody make the grey lands back to red again Sanad real (talk) 22:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Map needs update
[edit]There have been many new rebel advancements that haven’t been included in the map (especially advanced by the Southern Front and the Syrian Free Army). This should be changed as soon as possible. LordOfWalruses (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not just that, the whole outcome and territorial changes need amendments too...the developments right now have to be measured in hours and minutes instead of days and weeks due to Assad's regime collapse, and this time it won't be as lucky as 2012 when it was able to battle and launch multiple offensives and counteroffensives against the rebels. Bf0325 (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Wrong color for Southern Operations Room?
[edit]Is it just me or is the color listed for the southern operations room on the color code different than the one used on the map? Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Territorial Changes etc needs update
[edit]The current description of the titled stopped "as of Jan 1, 2023" whereas the ongoing Syrian rebels offensives simply drastically change the whole outcome, and Assad's regime may be numbered in days or hours as we speak.
Should Assad's regime finally collapse, not only we've to change the whole percentages of territorial changes attributed to HTS-led coalition, southern groups, and Kurdish's Rojava, but also the final outcome itself. Bf0325 (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I think the "Territorial Changes" section of the infobox should be removed altogether, as rapid changes have been made. As to the case of hypothetical Syrian Opposition/Rojava victory, we'll have to wait until the outcome to decide that. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 02:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. Now there're reports that Assad already fled. Bf0325 (talk) 03:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Should we make an article on the remnants of the Ba'ath Syria, and the remaining army in Latakia? PopularGames (talk) 04:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Those are Russian military bases Waleed (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Status and date
[edit]If Assad has confirmed to have fled, is the status now a Rebel victory? Does this mean the civil war is over or should we keep the status and date as is? 2001:56A:7956:9000:7080:2590:97EC:DE15 (talk) 04:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
second cold war in infobox
[edit]the conflict isn’t even well defined Bte3000 (talk) 04:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Fix the date, 8/12/2024 the end of the war
[edit]Fix the date, 8/12/2024 the end of the war 2001:8F8:1B2F:478C:A5CE:60AF:67E6:5DEA (talk) 04:40, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think we should wait and see if everyone accepts HTS or there are groups who would fight HTS. All of this ought to be cleared in few days. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 04:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- if there is no agreement between HTS and others, I think it would be wise to declare a "split" between the civil war before the fall of Assad and the time after. AsyarSaronen (talk) 04:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's not clear that the coast will be taken over by HTS (or another rebel group) peacefully.--Brian Dell (talk) 08:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Date Phase
[edit]Syria civil war has or rather had(?) gone through very long time - 14 yrs and recent offense done by rebels ascend the fall of Assad dynasty after few years of stalemate from 2020 to 2024. i would propose the adding of Two Phases: first one from 2011 to 2020 and second is from 2024 to present day as there was no significant fighting from 2020 to 2024 Foxy Husky (talk) 06:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's too early to tell. We don't know it this is really the end. I sure hope so, but, it's too early. Gue101 (talk) 08:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Gue101 true.... but we recently caught attention from syria when the rebels AKA democrat Syrians renew the civil war and took Aleppo and since then overthrew the government. so maybe can consider this as 2nd Phase of the date(3rd or 4th? whatever the phase yall think is)? Foxy Husky (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- We'd have to follow the sources, but, two (or three, or four) phases sounds reasonable.
- Still, I'd wait a few days. Gue101 (talk) 15:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- just think of Chinese Civil War.... the 22-year-log-war is splited into two phases: one for pre-invasion by Japan and one for post-invasion and the one in-between is either stalemate or temporary end. so Syria civil war last(ed) for 14 years which indeed very long, and the statemate lasted from 2020 to 2024 so... we can probably split overall date into 2 phase (or 3 if ISIS-uprising is considered): pre-stalemate and post-stalemate Foxy Husky (talk) 13:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Gue101 true.... but we recently caught attention from syria when the rebels AKA democrat Syrians renew the civil war and took Aleppo and since then overthrew the government. so maybe can consider this as 2nd Phase of the date(3rd or 4th? whatever the phase yall think is)? Foxy Husky (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The syrian civil war has ended 8 Dec 24 Asssad regime has collapsed Syrianheart45 (talk) 07:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done - Assad's regime falling from power does not mean that the civil war has ended. There is not yet evidence that everyone left in Syria is going to get along. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 08:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- The Turkish-backed Syrian National Army is literally attacking Manbij as I write this.[1] It's unfortunate to say so, but the war is not over yet. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:18, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- If there is a continuation it will be an insurgency and maybe a new war, but this war has ended with the fall of the capital just like in Vietnam and Afghanistan. If there is an announcement that the war has ended then definitely it must be added to the article, we just need an official announcement, if they cite December 8 as the day then so it would be. Just need an official announcement. Dilbaggg (talk) 14:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Which source says the Civil war is over? This war has many belligerents. Fighting has not ended. 207.96.32.81 (talk) 00:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If there is a continuation it will be an insurgency and maybe a new war, but this war has ended with the fall of the capital just like in Vietnam and Afghanistan. If there is an announcement that the war has ended then definitely it must be added to the article, we just need an official announcement, if they cite December 8 as the day then so it would be. Just need an official announcement. Dilbaggg (talk) 14:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Map Needs Updated
[edit]The map needs updated severely because of recent battle changes. Also, can the gray areas be colored. There is no reason to have unclaimed land since all of it is either controlled by the rebels or the Kurds. 206.21.104.67 (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
“Ongoing”
[edit]what will have to happen for it be appropriate to say the war is over. is their precedent for this? Cannolorosa (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps wait until a stable government is formed. Syrian PM has expressed willingness to cooperate, so I'd expect this to happen relatively soon. WP:RS will likely follow suit and call it the end of war, then we can add that. Brandmeistertalk 16:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
@Zabezt you can talk here to reach a consensus. currently it's to early no tell what is going to happen so the heading should not be changed.
Damascus Map
[edit]Jolani (or Al Shari' as he's known now) is currently in Damascus and his troops (slowly filtering through into the city, including special forces) are unquestionably the ones charged with security in the city. I don't think the Syrian Free Army are the ones that are in command (if they even have the troop count to actually control all the areas that the map gives). Although, I am all for evidences proving me wrong. Ilovedajjal (talk) 16:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Damascus came into the partial control of FSA after the Palmyra offensive (2024) as well as southern operations room following the Southern Syria offensive (2024), the map shows a joint tripartite control between the three factions Waleed (talk) 00:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2024 (2)
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2001:5A8:457D:B00:0:0:0:1003 (talk) 17:14, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Delete a space before (Islamic State)as of currently, the word is in two lines
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. cyberdog958Talk 02:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Agreement between Trump and Putin
[edit]Please add to the article Trump's agreement with Putin on the division of spheres of influence, in particular, Ukraine - for Russia, and the Middle East - for the United States. Also, add that many American companies are involved in the extraction of minerals in the Middle East, including oil and gas, the transportation of which to the EU has become possible through Syria thanks to the agreement. 91.210.251.13 (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Should we add Israel’s invasion of Syria?
[edit]I've heard that Israel is invading the southern parts of Syria, since it's related to the war, should we add it? Superyassi362 (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, and now that Assad is overthrown the belligerents and their leaders should be summarized in the infobox, including Israel. --Plumber (talk) 20:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are there sources to say the civil war is definitely over? 207.96.32.81 (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Currently no. There is still fighting in the north between Turkish backed forces and the SDF while the other now former rebel groups (as definitionally speaking they aren't rebels anymore) are now trying to consolidate power. It is possible they will fight each other over the future of Syria or spill over into Lebanon to fight Hezbollah. Hinga toka (talk) 04:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are there sources to say the civil war is definitely over? 207.96.32.81 (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Can someone update the map?
[edit]The last Assad Loyalist pocket in Jableh on the coast is currently being captured and the remaining diehards wiped out as of about 45 minutes ago.
The remaining grey zone has been captured mostly by the HTS, with some proclamations by the USA for them not to cross the river or attack Kurdish positions. (So there's clearly a distinction being made between the more directly American backed forces out of Al-Tanf and the South, and the Turkish backed SNA and semi-Turkish backed SSG).
Also the Syrian National Army finally began their full scale assault yesterday on the Manbij Pocket and have captured about half of it from the Kurds. 2604:3D09:1F7F:8B00:5582:C3B0:BBD3:AB82 (talk) 20:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
How to edit infobox
[edit]i don't know how to do it for this article since it does not function as normal can somebody please tell me Sanad real (talk) 22:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- This Template:Syrian civil war infobox, click on the wikilink and you'll go to the infobox page there you can edit it normally Waleed (talk) 00:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- thanks Sanad real (talk) 01:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Syrian civil war is over 64.43.50.15 (talk) 00:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{Edit semi-protected}}
template. cyberdog958Talk 02:59, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Status of War RFC
[edit]
|
Is the Syrian civil war over? 207.96.32.81 (talk) 00:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. I'm pretty sure what's happening right now is still civil war material, mostly due to ISIS and the Kurds. Although, my question is, is this the end of this FIRST Syrian civil war, and a new one began? Or is it just a new phase? Zabezt (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would say no. There is no end in sight for violence in Syria, especially with the ongoing fight for Manbij, and it remains to be seen if the new government will actually be stable enough not to immediately descend into civil war once again. I’m not sure who edited the article to say it ended today, but I’d wait until a stable government has been established before any drastic changes are made. DarthTFalls12 (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. And I reverted the inaccuracy on the infobox, it's way too early to tell. Zabezt (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- As of this comment, the result parameter is used not status parameter for template:Infobox_military_conflict See this edit - [2]207.96.32.81 (talk) 03:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would disagree theres no end in sight, given Assad has fallen there is very much an end in sight if the rebel groups can come to agreement. But I do think its too early to say its over now GothicGolem29 (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. And I reverted the inaccuracy on the infobox, it's way too early to tell. Zabezt (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- No. The rebels might start fighting each other so for now its still going GothicGolem29 (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment (not a vote): I don't know a whole lot about the war myself, but if it now only involves people from other/outside countries, then wouldn't this technically be no longer a civil war (i.e. "just a war")? — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is not over YET. Hinga toka (talk) 03:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- an important competitor in the Syrian civil war which is rojava does still exist and still fighting in manbaj so it should be ongoing but with adding the information that says Assad regime has fallen or maybe as long nothing is clear for the aftermath of this offensive let's just leave it empty untill something happens 81.215.194.128 (talk) 06:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Basically Not Yet - We rushed to announce the war in Afghanistan as being over and that was a mistake (albeit one that ultimately didn't make too much difference). I'm of the same opinion here: let's have some reliable sources saying it's over before we declare it over based on our own assessments. FOARP (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not over. I agree it is not over. if the various opposition groups, factions, and militias do not have any conflicts at all after today, it will be a miracle. i think we need to keep covering this for a while.*:Sm8900 (talk) 14:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Russian military bases
[edit]The term "Russian military bases" will suffice, It's not an occupation at the moment. Zyxrq (talk) 08:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Actually because the other countries use “occupation” I do think it’s appropriate. Zyxrq (talk) 09:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Can someone give me the source of the "No man's land territitory"?
[edit]I am just going to try dive in further to see if it is 100% accurate as we already took away a bug chunk of what used to be called "unclaimed land". That Inverclyde Guy (talk) 08:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- You’re not the only who has questioned this decision to leave unclaimed land. There is no reason to have unclaimed land listed because it has been held by the opposition since yesterday. 2620:6D:C000:1001:117E:80D4:BB60:2991 (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- That is exactly what I think. It just feels as if we're just putting unclaimed land for the sake of it in a way. That Inverclyde Guy (talk) 09:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- TBH, the sourcing of the map has always been problematic. It seems to be based in large part on Twitter updates from sources that are usually reliable but many of which wouldn't meet WP:RS. The same goes for other conflict-maps (e.g., the old Afghanistan one). FOARP (talk) 13:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Being overly reliant on a news source to mention everything in a conflict like this is how you end up with stuff like Al Queda holding a huge blob of desert in Yemen for years after they lost it in maps 2604:3D09:1F7F:8B00:22:76C3:528F:EBCF (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Map
[edit]I believe this map should be removed from the article entirely because it is misinforming. Not only does it not cite any sources, but it also asserts that the Syrian rebel group, RCA, controls 1/3rd of the country, even the capital Damascus. Despite the fact that this group has just 500 fighters.
I have tried overwriting the file but this has failed due to the constant edit warring going on in it with different users. So I suggest removing it from its article. Ecrusized (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Map shouldn't removed but fixed. The source for the map was always the template. Also you're right of US backed FSA controlling such region is impossible. HTS steamrolled Assadist forcest. Beshogur (talk) 11:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I personally disagree: yes, it doesn’t cite sources itself, but each of the claims of certain cities controlled by various groups in the map is supported by sources: you can go to the “detailed map” section and check yourself just in case. I wouldn’t be opposed to adding citations (in fact, it would be a great idea), but I don’t think their lack gives this map a need for deletion. Besides, I do think it’s possible for the RCA to control so much territory given the collapse of Assad’s forces and the fact that much of the territory it advanced into is barren desert with no geographical defenses. LordOfWalruses (talk) 14:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- The RCA encircled the north of Damascus so it's more than likely they controlled the land. RowanJ LP (talk) 14:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support removing the map - These maps are almost always sourced largely to Twitter accounts of dubious reliability - that is when there's any source given at all: no source has been given for the last 27 updates to the map, and the most recently-given source was This link to a tweet. It's basically just one big mess of original research collected by enthusiasts. FOARP (talk) 14:30, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Everything is done through the sources of syria.liveuamap.com RowanJ LP (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If this is the case then why isn’t the map being updated anymore in the infobox? 206.21.104.107 (talk) 14:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Map was updated yesterday. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Everything is done through the sources of syria.liveuamap.com" That's absolutely false, a quick glance at that website shows a massively different revision than what you are pushing, and reverting back to. Ecrusized (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- The website merged all the groups together as I believe the people running it weren't bothered to take care of who owns what, In reality when reporting on news of cities being captured they mentioned specifically which group captured them and I believe that's what the wiki map used to be based on. Smol2204 (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would also like to add that the old wiki ISIL presence and the current Liveuamap ISIL presence is inaccurate due to the fact ISIL/DAESH don't actually control any territory and didn't even perform an attack in recent times to my knowledge. They just have vague presence over some regions Smol2204 (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- The website merged all the groups together as I believe the people running it weren't bothered to take care of who owns what, In reality when reporting on news of cities being captured they mentioned specifically which group captured them and I believe that's what the wiki map used to be based on. Smol2204 (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If this is the case then why isn’t the map being updated anymore in the infobox? 206.21.104.107 (talk) 14:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Everything is done through the sources of syria.liveuamap.com RowanJ LP (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @RowanJ LP is correct. Each of the rebels are separate and Southern Operations Room and RCA took Damascus. However They have all just joined the Transitional Govt so they can be bunched up up but occupation zones canbe shown separate. HTS has not taken Damascus Mayukh Mitra 123 (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Mayukh Mitra 123 I am not questioning you, I am more curious could you give some sources for the transition government? Smol2204 (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Transitional Govt has a Wikipage. Its in the Wikibox map too. Mayukh Mitra 123 (talk) 16:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Mayukh Mitra 123 I am not questioning you, I am more curious could you give some sources for the transition government? Smol2204 (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Updated based on liveuamap
[edit]I have updated this file based on https://syria.liveuamap.com/ Let's hope @RowanJ LP: does not disrupt this change as well by reverting back to an unsourced revision based off on their own imagination about how the map is supposed to look. Ecrusized (talk) 15:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Firstly, you're just being disrespectful, secondly, the factions aren't united under one umbrella but are separate factions of the Syrian opposition, but I won't change this because you can't understand that anyway. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have spent the past 12 hours trying to explain how references work to you. To put it simply, you need to cite a source. Ecrusized (talk) 15:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- According to your generalized source, syria.liveuamap.com, which has its own citations that state which group controls what. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Unless I'm losing my mind, this is what liveuamap currently looks like. There is no distinction on what rebel group controls what. File:Liveuamap 12 9 2024.png Ecrusized (talk) 15:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's what liveuamap looks like because it generalizes the Syrian opposition. According to the sources that liveuamap uses there's different groups who control whatever. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @RowanJ LP would like to second this, while the war was ongoing and the city control was updated there were announcements that if you checked 99% of the time gave you which group actually controlled the region. Smol2204 (talk) 16:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's what liveuamap looks like because it generalizes the Syrian opposition. According to the sources that liveuamap uses there's different groups who control whatever. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Unless I'm losing my mind, this is what liveuamap currently looks like. There is no distinction on what rebel group controls what. File:Liveuamap 12 9 2024.png Ecrusized (talk) 15:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Would like to add while I agree the map should get a proper source this current version pushes the idea that all the rebels are currently united which they are not. What the other person means by liveuamap is the live updates that included which group took which city. As such, the old version of the map would've been more accurate. It could also be sourced by listing a large amount of separate twitter/telegram posts. Smol2204 (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- "rebels are currently united which they are not." According to whom? Any reference for that statement? Ecrusized (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Ecrusized I don't think this requires a statement as this was the status quo, there was no statement released saying that the rebels united.
- The status quo was that the rebels were separate, yet allied. When liveuamap updated to show them as one there was no announcement stating that the rebel groups had formed some sort of unitary government or central command, which leads me to believe that they had not unified and the people running liveuamap simplified it for server space or some other reason i am not aware of. Smol2204 (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- As far as map goes, the rebels are unified, per the only source cited.
- Original research is never allowed. Ecrusized (talk) 16:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- As stated before a person could go back and cite all the twitter/x and telegram announcements declaring every city/region as under the control of a group. Most of these sources are also in Arabic.
- This is not original research. These are based on announcements by news resources or otherwise the rebels themselves Smol2204 (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If something cannot be shown accurate, it should not be shown at all. You cannot paint the map in 3 separate random rebel zones based on preference, and assert the readers that that is exactly what is controlled. Unless a reliable source separates were each of these rebel groups operate, they have to be shown in unification. Wikipedia is not a forum where users decide what is written. This is an encylopedia about facts. Ecrusized (talk) 17:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- "rebels are currently united which they are not." According to whom? Any reference for that statement? Ecrusized (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- According to your generalized source, syria.liveuamap.com, which has its own citations that state which group controls what. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have spent the past 12 hours trying to explain how references work to you. To put it simply, you need to cite a source. Ecrusized (talk) 15:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have two slight problems with your version, the RCA on the UA map is mixed with most of the other rebels, while yours still has them separated. And the ISIS blobs on your map look different too. Zabezt (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I will adjust those momentarily. Ecrusized (talk) 15:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Glad we agreed on something. Zabezt (talk) 15:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Ecrusized would like to mention that the ISIL blobs in liveuamap are also inaccurate as ISIL doesn't control any territory, they commit acts of terrorism.
- If you check the areas highlighted in liveuamap and the old Wikipedia map as ISIL you will find that there are no farms, no military bases, settlements, roads or anything else a group could base itself on. Smol2204 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- And would like to ask as to why you haven't included the Manbij update? Smol2204 (talk) 16:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- As I've said above, this is not for Wikipedians to decide. We only copy what references say. Ecrusized (talk) 16:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- So you would rather believe and push forward the idea that ISIL has stayed alive in random portions of the desert (these are mostly random as to my knowledge, the original wikipedia map did not cite sources for the ISIL control and neither did liveuamap, except for the short period of time when a rumour that ISIL was moving in on Palmyra started and their short capture of 2 settlements on the Euphrates). Smol2204 (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- May I also ask again why the Manbij update shown on liveuamap isn't shown on the current version of the map
- The Manbij advancement is also an example of what has been stated that smaller sources make posts that announce territorial control under certain groups which the map no longer updates to include on liveuamap. If you check the "notification" bubbles on liveuamap you will notice that it specifically mentions the SNA captured the region. Smol2204 (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- With all due respect, what you're saying is meaningless, if there isn't a source, not a single change can be made. Ecrusized (talk) 17:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- The Manbij update is shown, you may need to refresh your browser data if it isn't showing up. Ecrusized (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- You have it marked with the wrong people, SNA is the one doing it. Livemap marks all gains post-November 26 under the same green opposition color other then the SDF since they used to be a Kurdish group. They aren’t a perfect source and it’s better to use the sources in their side bar 2604:3D09:1F7F:8B00:22:76C3:528F:EBCF (talk) 17:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I will adjust those momentarily. Ecrusized (talk) 15:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would probably support a change to the unified map. Even if the separated map is more informative, updating it with a source is no longer possible, so the map will likely become out-of-date very soon. –Gluonz talk contribs 20:49, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Why are the other rebel groups shown as controlling Manbij?
[edit]It’s the SNA doing it who you have colored differently.
Livemap colors all rebels gains the same so I know it looks that way, but the sidebar info clearly states it’s the SNA doing it.
(the current map is dumb btw, just because Livemap took the lazy route and lumped everything on their map doesn’t mean we should. Just use the sources in the side info bar, the prior version from yesterday was fine) 68.144.93.30 (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- (the current map is dumb btw, just because Livemap took the lazy route and lumped everything on their map doesn’t mean we should. Just use the sources in the side info bar, the prior version from yesterday was fine)
- Seconded. We should revert to Yesterday's map
- Also Manbij should be coloured SNA Mayukh Mitra 123 (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Like I’m not against lumping them together in a couple months when they actually finalize agreements, but at the moment it’s paper thin and we saw how that went in Libya.(the 2020 agreements still never really fully happened even if no war broke out).
- Especially since the Southern Front and Revolution Commando Army are pretty closely linked, but the Salvation Government less so and they still use a different flag. Hold off on that.
- But regardless the map as it stands is factually wrong due to Manbij. Livemap considers SNA part of the opposition and marks all their gains beyond November 26 lines part of the vague green ‘opposition blob’. The SNA are the ones fighting the SDF there and I think that screw up is proof we can’t just copy Livemap 1-1, use the sources in the sidebar as we did prior.
- I also really want an actual look into the ISIS situation. This is starting to remind me of the infamous Yemen Al Queda blob that stayed on maps because of circular sourcing and it having been captured years prior slipping through. Some of these maps have been mostly unchanged since the conventional defeat of Isis in 2018 and some might have not actually meant those specific spots and just been shorthanding and simplifying “ISIS Remnants in this general area” 2604:3D09:1F7F:8B00:22:76C3:528F:EBCF (talk) 17:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. People jumping the gun hard trying to portray every rebel faction sans the sna and rojava as some unified government. PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
The area North of Aleppo is SNA, not anyone else
[edit]Same issue as in Manbij except worse as they’ve held that for nearly two weeks now.
Did someone just take one look at Livemaps color scheme and not check the sidebar? They kind of blanket draw the opposition in one color and mark everything post November 26 that isn’t SDF Kurd Yellow in the same green. Probably due to being caught off guard their Syria templates are old.
We don’t do this for Ukraine, this is sloppy. 2604:3D09:1F7F:8B00:22:76C3:528F:EBCF (talk) 17:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. We shouldnt lump all apposition into one colour Mayukh Mitra 123 (talk) 18:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Actually I agree, it’s confusing and it makes terrorists look like the good guys. Zyxrq (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Even with the transitional govt (like 24 hours old btw), it is way more informative to show which rebel factions control what territory. PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Stop editing the Map every 2 minutes. Also make the "Syrian Opposition Map" linked to the map on this article
[edit]It should not be happening, there are so many reverts that HTS controls all of Syria while they don't. They only govern a small fraction. It needs to be waited on how the territories will be deald after a stable government comes around, but for now LEAVE IT AS IT IS DerEchteJoan (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- There may be flaws with how the map is edited, but we can fix that and improve our methods as we go along. It’s still good to keep the map consistently updated to keep it up to date with the rapidly evolving information of the situation. LordOfWalruses (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree. We can keep the map updated without merging all the different rebel factions together. Easily the most glaring issue with that is the green blob seemed to show the tranistional govt attacking manbij when it was actually the sna. PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 19:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
We should go back to the transitional government map
[edit]Not only is it much more accurate given how the Syrian rebels have created a temporary provisional government that has assumed control over the country, but it also makes no sense to have the old map with the new legend. LordOfWalruses (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Luckily someone has reverted the legend to match. Considering this transitional government was established within the last day or two, the situation is still fluid enough that it is more informative to present which factions control what territory. PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's an agreement that's on paper only at the moment and the HTS is notably far less involved(they still have a different flag).
- Also it was only because one guy wanted to just copy Livemap verbatim which is dumb as they don't distinguish anything and lumped all the rebel gains together including SNA attacking Majib which made it look like we were saying everyone was.
- Current map is fine template was. It needs the grey zone removed, the Manbij offensive by SNA included, and I think we should re-check some of the ISIS stuff to avoid circular sourcing and another Yemeni Al Qaeda situation. Do they actually hold those specific spots or was that one sites shorthand to represent 'ISIS Remnants in Rural Areas' back in 2019 that nobody is checking or verifying anymore. Given even in all this chaos they didn't do anything I have my doubts they have much left 2604:3D09:1F7F:8B00:B54A:FB85:2DF1:9AF9 (talk) 19:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Just following the sourcing trail, looks like the grey zone was mostly split between HTS and SDF, SDF might have pulled back from a few spots too or maybe that was misreported. Nothing from the Commando Army, if anything we might be overselling them in that direction.
- The SNA has taken most of the Manbij pocket including the city itself. Main supply road was also just captured so I don't expect the SDF to hold in the pocket for long. They've been dealing with issues controlling some new territory elsewhere and especially in Maskanah so keep an eye on that too.
- And I couldn't find good sourcing for specific ISIS control anywhere 2604:3D09:1F7F:8B00:B54A:FB85:2DF1:9AF9 (talk) 20:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Would you like some more useful sources?
[edit]Hello! Unfortunately, I'll have no time at all to help you update this and other pages with more information on the offensive and the fall of the regime; however, I just wanted to leave you some useful sources you can use to add more details and links yourself.
Obviously, we've already got plenty of good live timelines to choose from, including The Guardian, The New York Times, the BBC, El País and Le Monde.
However, I think you should check out the material from Il Post and Al Jazeera, too: the former outlet has put together a very on-point timeline, with lots of references to other newspaper and social media content, as well several in-depth articles like this one, while the latter has created a bunch of maps and graphics that could be quite useful as Creative Commons content that could be uploaded on Wikimedia portals.
Let me know if this helps! Oltrepier (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Syrian civil war
[edit]Did the Syrian civil war end with the fall of Assad? Can we consider the conflict against the Kurds as the second Syrian civil war? 89.155.47.76 (talk) 21:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class Arab world articles
- High-importance Arab world articles
- WikiProject Arab world articles
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- High-importance Crime-related articles
- B-Class Terrorism articles
- High-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class history articles
- High-importance history articles
- High-importance contemporary history articles
- Contemporary history task force articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class International relations articles
- High-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- B-Class Iran articles
- High-importance Iran articles
- WikiProject Iran articles
- B-Class Iraq articles
- High-importance Iraq articles
- WikiProject Iraq articles
- B-Class Islam-related articles
- High-importance Islam-related articles
- B-Class Salaf articles
- Mid-importance Salaf articles
- Salaf task force articles
- B-Class Shi'a Islam articles
- Mid-importance Shi'a Islam articles
- Shi'a Islam task force articles
- B-Class Sunni Islam articles
- Mid-importance Sunni Islam articles
- Sunni Islam task force articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- B-Class Kurdistan articles
- High-importance Kurdistan articles
- WikiProject Kurdistan articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- C-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Russia articles
- High-importance Russia articles
- High-importance B-Class Russia articles
- B-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- B-Class Syria articles
- Top-importance Syria articles
- WikiProject Syria articles
- B-Class Turkey articles
- High-importance Turkey articles
- All WikiProject Turkey pages
- B-Class 2010s articles
- High-importance 2010s articles
- WikiProject 2010s articles
- B-Class Human rights articles
- Top-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- Wikipedia articles under general sanctions
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Wikipedia requests for comment