Talk:Lucid Dreams (Juice Wrld song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lucid Dreams (Juice Wrld song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Lucid Dreams (Juice Wrld song). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Lucid Dreams (Juice Wrld song) at the Reference desk.

United States: Music Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Low-importance).

Hip-hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Lucid Dreams

I feel like it was more accurate after me changing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.44.168.119 (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How was my genre addition a misrepresentation of the source? The article literally described the song EveryonesFAVORITE*toy (talk) 22:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

— “Lucid Dreams” is lush loner music, an inheritor of the emotional hip-hop of the last decade, delivered with the raw texture of the SoundCloud rap generation and a deeply keen sense of pop efficiency." -New York Times EveryonesFAVORITE*toy (talk) 22:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Calling it "an inheritor of the emotional hip-hop of the last decade" isn't directly attributing the song to emo hip-hop. See WP:EXPLICITGENRES. Hayman30 (talk) 00:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emo=emotional?? But ok EveryonesFAVORITE*toy (talk) 02:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Altercation heard at the beginning of Lucid Dreams

I don't think this is notable enough to include in the main article (if anything, it's just needless trivia which a significant number of people MAY be curious about), but a video of the actual fight heard at the beginning of the song can be found on YouTube. [1] Anakin-Marc "DJ AniZ" Zaeger (talk) 01:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Juice world's great songs

I wan t to know — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.213.133.216 (talk) 10:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Juice world's great songs

I n my power — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.213.133.216 (talk) 10:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure). Jenks24 (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lucid Dreams (Juice Wrld song) → Lucid Dreams – The 11x platinum record with 30x more pageviews is likely the primary topic here. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. An overwhelming primary topic. Station1 (talk) 19:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The plural of Lucid dream is more notable, capitalised or not. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Lucid dream, singular or plural, is primary, secondary, and so on. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DAB § Different spelling variants says capitalization is an OK disambiguator. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. While the Juice song is incredibly notable, this feels like an Apple / Apple Inc. situation. The capitalized form can still sometimes refer to the dream-related concept, and thus it makes sense that the capitalized version redirects to the disambiguation page. Paintspot Infez (talk) 16:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Paintspot: Not sure I'm following ... "Apple" as the company would be the same page title as the fruit; here capitalization in the middle of the title disambiguates, which is OK per above. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:DIFFCAPS, the concept is primary here. Polyamorph (talk) 08:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. In as much as the pageviews is a factor, Lucid Dreams (Franz Ferdinand song), pageviews or not, makes an argument. Intrisit (talk) 08:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.