Jump to content

Talk:Chevrolet Lumina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notes

[edit]

HAs there been any official comment on the wheel cover problem? It's rare to see a Lumina with all four wheel covers. Even replacements tend to fall off after a while. PrometheusX303 13:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've always assumed that there was a problem with the base "lace" wheel covers on the 1990-1994. Those base Luminas are the ones that suffered the problem. the 1995+ don't suffer from this, and I don't think that the optional "sport" hubcaps on the 1990-1994 had this problem either. 93euro 16:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what year model, but they are always the first generation. There are quite a few around town. Most of them are missing at least one wheel cover. Those that aren't have replacement sets. PrometheusX303 00:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see very many beater cars of any make with all their original hubcaps. mine has all of its originals, and it's a 91. one is missing some nuts though.

--- Neither of my first generation Luminas have had any problem retaining their hubcaps. And I've hitten some pretty big potholes and such on poorly maintained dirt roads. LuminaRS

Lumina LTZ?

[edit]

LTZ is a luxury trim for most Chevrolets today. The LTZ was the high-end Lumina introduced in 1997, but did it replace the Caprice? -- Bull-Doser 01:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um... the 1990-94 section is talking about the Ford Escort for some reason. Looks like vandalism?

Need To ad UTE

[edit]

How many names one car have? It's hard to understand since I'm in China, quite far away to USA. http://www.chevrolet.co.za/content_data/LAAM/ZA/en/GBPZA/001/models/1F/gallery.html

Full-size car?

[edit]

The 2nd generation Lumina is over 200 inches long, so I think it should be classified as a full-size car. The 1st generation Lumina is close to 200 inches too, but I'm okay with it being classified as mid-size or full-size. I just want to make sure that other people agree that the 95-01 Lumina is full-size before I make any changes. —Reelcheeper (talk) 19:19, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. The car was never designed or marketed as a full-size and there is no way it could be construed as such with its size and market position. --Sable232 (talk) 16:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. Even though I still consider Luminas to be full-size, I will not make any changes since they technically are mid-size. —Reelcheeper (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merged Z34 article back into this article

[edit]

VX1NG (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chevrolet Lumina → Chevrolet Lumina (W-body) – Better differentiation between US-market versions, Lumina APV minivan, and global versions Relisted. BDD (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2013 (UTC) SteveCof00 07:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:

The disambiguation page is most likely a mess, but this should help things a bit.--SteveCof00 07:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

So you'd move the disambiguation page to this location as well? -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 08:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chevrolet Lumina (disambiguation) does need a little work, but it's hardly a mess. Andrewa (talk) 22:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Accidental Move

[edit]

I just wanted to apologize for moving the article; I should have checked the talk page to see the discussion first. I posted the request to Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests#Technical_requests so hopefully, my move will be reverted soon. Sorry for inconvenience.VX1NG (talk) 12:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chevrolet Lumina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chevrolet_Lumina&oldid=1231845535"