This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Assuming the article is correct the 2nd baron was created first earl (in 1351) so that's why the loop. Of course if there are multiple unconnected earldoms - then we will need to cover this.Alci1223:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is a problem with the potted history on the article page. When an attainder is reversed, it does not rehabilitate all those before the reversal who might have been barons. It passes over them as though they don't exist. The person who has been successful in overturning the attainder becomes the next numbered baron. No time to change today. David Lauder14:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have noticed that Humphrey, later 1st Duke of Buckingham, is described as Baron and Earl Stafford from 1402, yet his father was only killed at Shrewsbury in 1403.17:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)17:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)17:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smlark (talk • contribs)
