Jump to content

Line code

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Encoding scheme)
An example of coding a binary signal using rectangular pulse-amplitude modulation with polar non-return-to-zero code
An example of bipolar encoding, or AMI.
Encoding of 11011000100 in Manchester encoding
An example of differential Manchester encoding
An example of biphase mark code
An example of MLT-3 encoding

In telecommunications, a line code is a pattern of voltage, current, or photons used to represent digital data transmitted down a communication channel or written to a storage medium. This repertoire of signals is usually called a constrained code in data storage systems.[1] Some signals are more prone to error than others as the physics of the communication channel or storage medium constrains the repertoire of signals that can be used reliably.[2]

Common line encodings are unipolar, polar, bipolar, and Manchester code.

Transmission and storage

[edit]

After line coding, the signal is put through a physical communication channel, either a transmission medium or data storage medium.[3][4] The most common physical channels are:

Some of the more common binary line codes include:

Signal Comments 1 state 0 state
NRZ–L Non-return-to-zero level. This is the standard positive logic signal format used in digital circuits. forces a high level forces a low level
NRZ–M Non-return-to-zero mark forces a transition does nothing (keeps sending the previous level)
NRZ–S Non-return-to-zero space does nothing (keeps sending the previous level) forces a transition
RZ Return to zero goes high for half the bit period and returns to low stays low for the entire period
Biphase–L Manchester. Two consecutive bits of the same type force a transition at the beginning of a bit period. forces a negative transition in the middle of the bit forces a positive transition in the middle of the bit
Biphase–M Variant of Differential Manchester. There is always a transition halfway between the conditioned transitions. forces a transition keeps level constant
Biphase–S Differential Manchester used in Token Ring. There is always a transition halfway between the conditioned transitions. keeps level constant forces a transition
Differential Manchester (Alternative) Need a Clock, always a transition in the middle of the clock period is represented by no transition. is represented by a transition at the beginning of the clock period.
Bipolar The positive and negative pulses alternate. forces a positive or negative pulse for half the bit period keeps a zero level during bit period
An arbitrary bit pattern in various binary line code formats

Each line code has advantages and disadvantages. Line codes are chosen to meet one or more of the following criteria:

  • Minimize transmission hardware
  • Facilitate synchronization
  • Ease error detection and correction
  • Achieve a target spectral density
  • Eliminate a DC component

Disparity

[edit]

Most long-distance communication channels cannot reliably transport a DC component. The DC component is also called the disparity, the bias, or the DC coefficient. The disparity of a bit pattern is the difference in the number of one bits vs the number of zero bits. The running disparity is the running total of the disparity of all previously transmitted bits.[5] The simplest possible line code, unipolar, gives too many errors on such systems, because it has an unbounded DC component.

Most line codes eliminate the DC component – such codes are called DC-balanced, zero-DC, or DC-free. There are three ways of eliminating the DC component:

  • Use a constant-weight code. Each transmitted code word in a constant-weight code is designed such that every code word that contains some positive or negative levels also contains enough of the opposite levels, such that the average level over each code word is zero. Examples of constant-weight codes include Manchester code and Interleaved 2 of 5.
  • Use a paired disparity code. Each code word in a paired disparity code that averages to a negative level is paired with another code word that averages to a positive level. The transmitter keeps track of the running DC buildup, and picks the code word that pushes the DC level back towards zero. The receiver is designed so that either code word of the pair decodes to the same data bits. Examples of paired disparity codes include alternate mark inversion, 8b/10b and 4B3T.
  • Use a scrambler. For example, the scrambler specified in RFC 2615 for 64b/66b encoding.

Polarity

[edit]

Bipolar line codes have two polarities, are generally implemented as RZ, and have a radix of three since there are three distinct output levels (negative, positive and zero). One of the principle advantages of this type of code is that it can eliminate any DC component. This is important if the signal must pass through a transformer or a long transmission line.

Unfortunately, several long-distance communication channels have polarity ambiguity. Polarity-insensitive line codes compensate in these channels.[6][7][8][9] There are three ways of providing unambiguous reception of 0 and 1 bits over such channels:

Run-length limited codes

[edit]

For reliable clock recovery at the receiver, a run-length limitation may be imposed on the generated channel sequence, i.e., the maximum number of consecutive ones or zeros is bounded to a reasonable number. A clock period is recovered by observing transitions in the received sequence, so that a maximum run length guarantees sufficient transitions to assure clock recovery quality.

RLL codes are defined by four main parameters: m, n, d, k. The first two, m/n, refer to the rate of the code, while the remaining two specify the minimal d and maximal k number of zeroes between consecutive ones. This is used in both telecommunications and storage systems that move a medium past a fixed recording head.[10]

Specifically, RLL bounds the length of stretches (runs) of repeated bits during which the signal does not change. If the runs are too long, clock recovery is difficult; if they are too short, the high frequencies might be attenuated by the communications channel. By modulating the data, RLL reduces the timing uncertainty in decoding the stored data, which would lead to the possible erroneous insertion or removal of bits when reading the data back. This mechanism ensures that the boundaries between bits can always be accurately found (preventing bit slip), while efficiently using the media to reliably store the maximal amount of data in a given space.

Early disk drives used very simple encoding schemes, such as RLL (0,1) FM code, followed by RLL (1,3) MFM code which were widely used in hard disk drives until the mid-1980s and are still used in digital optical discs such as CD, DVD, MD, Hi-MD and Blu-ray using EFM and EFMPLus codes.[11] Higher density RLL (2,7) and RLL (1,7) codes became the de facto standards for hard disks by the early 1990s.[citation needed]

Synchronization

[edit]

Line coding should make it possible for the receiver to synchronize itself to the phase of the received signal. If the clock recovery is not ideal, then the signal to be decoded will not be sampled at the optimal times. This will increase the probability of error in the received data.

Biphase line codes require at least one transition per bit time. This makes it easier to synchronize the transceivers and detect errors, however, the baud rate is greater than that of NRZ codes.

Other considerations

[edit]

A line code will typically reflect technical requirements of the transmission medium, such as optical fiber or shielded twisted pair. These requirements are unique for each medium, because each one has different behavior related to interference, distortion, capacitance and attenuation.[12]

Common line codes

[edit]

Optical line codes

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ K. Schouhamer Immink (2022). "Innovation in Constrained Codes". IEEE Communications Magazine. Retrieved 2022-10-05.
  2. ^ K. Schouhamer Immink (2001). "A Survey of Codes for Optical Disk Recording". IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 19: 751–764. Retrieved 2018-02-05.
  3. ^ Karl Paulsen. "Coding for Magnetic Storage Mediums" Archived 2014-05-21 at the Wayback Machine.2007.
  4. ^ Abdullatif Glass; Nidhal Abdulaziz; and Eesa Bastaki (2007), "Slope line coding for telecommunication networks", IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication, Dubai: IEEE: 1537, Line codes ... facilitates the transmission of data over telecommunication and computer networks and its storage in multimedia systems.
  5. ^ Jens Kröger (2014). "Data Transmission at High Rates via Kapton Flexprints for the Mu3e Experiment" (PDF). p. 16. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  6. ^ US 4387366, Peter E. K. Chow., "Code converter for polarity-insensitive transmission systems", published 1983 
  7. ^ David A. Glanzer, "4.7 Polarity", Fieldbus Application Guide ... Wiring and Installation (PDF), Fieldbus Foundation, p. 10, archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09
  8. ^ George C. Clark Jr.; J. Bibb Cain (2013). Error-Correction Coding for Digital Communications. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 255. ISBN 9781489921741. When PSK data modulation is used, the potential exists for an ambiguity in the polarity of the received channel symbols. This problem can be solved in one of two ways. First ... a so-called transparent code. ...
  9. ^ Prakash C. Gupta (2013). Data Communications and Computer Networks. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 13. ISBN 9788120348646. Another benefit of differential encoding is its insensitivity to polarity of the signal. ... If the leads of a twisted pair are accidentally reversed...
  10. ^ Kees Schouhamer Immink (December 1990). "Runlength-Limited Sequences". Proceedings of the IEEE. 78 (11): 1745–1759. doi:10.1109/5.63306. A detailed description is furnished of the limiting properties of runlength limited sequences.
  11. ^ Kees Schouhamer Immink (1995). "EFMPlus: The Coding Format of the MultiMedia Compact Disc". IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. CE-41: 491–497. A high-density alternative to EFM is described.
  12. ^ Dong, Jielin (2007). Network Dictionary. Javvin Technologies Inc. p. 284. ISBN 9781602670006.
[edit]