Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 May 21: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bookofjude (talk | contribs)
Bookofjude (talk | contribs)
Line 29: Line 29:
:*Why not just bung it to {{tl|cite web}} for the very few times when it is needed? <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 01:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
:*Why not just bung it to {{tl|cite web}} for the very few times when it is needed? <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 01:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' When we do cite it we should do it properly. It will additionally help to keep track of those articles where the groups are cited. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 01:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' When we do cite it we should do it properly. It will additionally help to keep track of those articles where the groups are cited. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 01:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. [[Template_talk:Cite_newsgroup#Citation_warning_incorrect]] pretty much sums up the reasons why this template exists, and I believe that [[WP:ELNO]] applies to ''external links'', not citations. I can think of, off the top of my head, several instances where this template could correctly be used (though not necessarily current usage): [[Terry Pratchett]] posted regularly on newsgroups in the late 90s (might still do, I don't recall), and using {{tl|cite newsgroup}} to provide a citation when quoting such a post would be useful. The [[Inform]] group of programming languages, as well as other related topics ([[Interactive Fiction]], [[TADS]]) is primarily developed via the newsgroup rec.arts.int-fiction, and announcements about its development are made there. Certainly, I agree, there will be some incorrect uses of it, but to delete it purely on that basis just doesn't make any sense. Likewise, I think that replacing it with {{tl|cite web}} would degrade the quality of the reference as (at least as far as I'm aware) {{tl|cite web}} doesn't have any provision for newsgroup-linking. [[User:bookofjude|Jude]] <small>([[User_talk:Bookofjude|talk]])</small> 05:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. [[Template_talk:Cite_newsgroup#Citation_warning_incorrect]] pretty much sums up the reasons why this template exists, and I believe that [[WP:ELNO]] applies to ''external links'', not citations. I can think of, off the top of my head, several instances where this template could correctly be used (though not necessarily current usage): [[Terry Pratchett]] posted regularly on newsgroups in the late 90s (might still do, I don't recall), and using {{tl|cite newsgroup}} to provide a citation when quoting such a post would be useful ('''Edit''': It appears that [[Discworld]] uses this template at least three times to directly reference a quote from Terry Pratchett). The [[Inform]] group of programming languages, as well as other related topics ([[Interactive Fiction]], [[TADS]]) is primarily developed via the newsgroup rec.arts.int-fiction, and announcements about its development are made there. Certainly, I agree, there will be some incorrect uses of it, but to delete it purely on that basis just doesn't make any sense. Likewise, I think that replacing it with {{tl|cite web}} would degrade the quality of the reference as (at least as far as I'm aware) {{tl|cite web}} doesn't have any provision for newsgroup-linking. [[User:bookofjude|Jude]] <small>([[User_talk:Bookofjude|talk]])</small> 05:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:50, 21 May 2009

May 21


Template:19 TV Productions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This would be better handled by a list. This is just a mess. No criteria for inclusion for one thing. And unwieldly. User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 04:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Costa Rica Squad 2005 UNCAF Nations Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is a navbox for national football team squad at a competition which is not a FIFA or Confederation championship. WP:FOOTY consensus is that navboxes are only needed for those championships. Jogurney (talk) 01:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite newsgroup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

According to WP:ELNO, we should almost never cite to a newsgroup except in very, very rare circumstances. Looking at the number of pages using this template, it is clearly being misused for cases where a better reference is needed. I've been trying to remove the most blatant instances, while others seem like they could simply be replaced with a {{Cite web}}. If we're not supposed to cite newsgroups, then why do we have a citation template for them anyway? (I can't tag the template proper as it's locked.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 00:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep When we do cite it we should do it properly. It will additionally help to keep track of those articles where the groups are cited. DGG (talk) 01:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Template_talk:Cite_newsgroup#Citation_warning_incorrect pretty much sums up the reasons why this template exists, and I believe that WP:ELNO applies to external links, not citations. I can think of, off the top of my head, several instances where this template could correctly be used (though not necessarily current usage): Terry Pratchett posted regularly on newsgroups in the late 90s (might still do, I don't recall), and using {{cite newsgroup}} to provide a citation when quoting such a post would be useful (Edit: It appears that Discworld uses this template at least three times to directly reference a quote from Terry Pratchett). The Inform group of programming languages, as well as other related topics (Interactive Fiction, TADS) is primarily developed via the newsgroup rec.arts.int-fiction, and announcements about its development are made there. Certainly, I agree, there will be some incorrect uses of it, but to delete it purely on that basis just doesn't make any sense. Likewise, I think that replacing it with {{cite web}} would degrade the quality of the reference as (at least as far as I'm aware) {{cite web}} doesn't have any provision for newsgroup-linking. Jude (talk) 05:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]