Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Current requests for protection: add The Rain Tapes, repeated, unexplained deletion of material against consensus by a changing IP anon. Might need long term.
Caulde (talk | contribs)
21,354 edits
Line 10: Line 10:
===={{la|The Rain Tapes}}====
===={{la|The Rain Tapes}}====
'''Semi-protect''' Repeated, unexplained deletion of material against consensus by a changing IP anon. Might need long term. / [[User:Edgarde|edg]]<small> [[User_talk:Edgarde|☺]] [[Special:Contributions/Edgarde|☭]]</small> 11:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
'''Semi-protect''' Repeated, unexplained deletion of material against consensus by a changing IP anon. Might need long term. / [[User:Edgarde|edg]]<small> [[User_talk:Edgarde|☺]] [[Special:Contributions/Edgarde|☭]]</small> 11:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
*{{RFPP|s|for a period of 1 month}} [[User:Rudget|<span style="color:#171788;font-weight:bold">Rudget</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Rudget|.]] 11:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

===={{la|Makati City}}====
===={{la|Makati City}}====
'''semi-protect until the end of the month'''. The vandalism in that page is crazy (calling Mayour Jejomar Binay "feces" in Tagalog, [[Uncyclopedia]]-like stupidity written in the page, etcetera). I may have opposing viewpoints with the mayor and have a level of distaste against that city BUT I HAVE TO KEEP WIKIPEDIA SANE. I will thank you later. [[User:Ianlopez1115|iaNLOPEZ1115]] [[Image:Flag of the Philippines.svg|30 px]] [[User_talk:Ianlopez1115|TaLKBaCK]] [[User:Ianlopez1115/Sandbox|Vandalize it]] [[User:Ianlopez1115/Userboxes|UBX]] 09:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
'''semi-protect until the end of the month'''. The vandalism in that page is crazy (calling Mayour Jejomar Binay "feces" in Tagalog, [[Uncyclopedia]]-like stupidity written in the page, etcetera). I may have opposing viewpoints with the mayor and have a level of distaste against that city BUT I HAVE TO KEEP WIKIPEDIA SANE. I will thank you later. [[User:Ianlopez1115|iaNLOPEZ1115]] [[Image:Flag of the Philippines.svg|30 px]] [[User_talk:Ianlopez1115|TaLKBaCK]] [[User:Ianlopez1115/Sandbox|Vandalize it]] [[User:Ianlopez1115/Userboxes|UBX]] 09:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:22, 12 January 2008


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit


    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Semi-protect Repeated, unexplained deletion of material against consensus by a changing IP anon. Might need long term. / edg ☺ ☭ 11:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protect until the end of the month. The vandalism in that page is crazy (calling Mayour Jejomar Binay "feces" in Tagalog, Uncyclopedia-like stupidity written in the page, etcetera). I may have opposing viewpoints with the mayor and have a level of distaste against that city BUT I HAVE TO KEEP WIKIPEDIA SANE. I will thank you later. iaNLOPEZ1115 TaLKBaCK Vandalize it UBX 09:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:65.87.185.73 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Semi-protect IP blanking content and causing disruption after multi-month block. — Save_Us † 09:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alison ❤ 09:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi Protect The same nonsense paragraph being added by the same editor using an IP range. Old Moonraker (talk) 08:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rudget. 08:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi Protect Constant IP vandalism.--The Dominator (talk) 06:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - see how that goes. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protect A lot of people keep adding the recent news of Nicole Richie's child, dispite the content already existing elsewhere within the article. -AbJ32 (talk) 06:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protect Under fairly heavy attack by both named accounts and random IPs HalfShadow (talk) 04:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Mr.Z-man 08:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protect. A magnet for continuous IP vandalism. JNW (talk) 04:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected. Mr.Z-man 08:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi protect a target for commercial companies in "bug sweeping" adding their corporate web links in the External links section. I keep removing them, they keep adding them back. Edit history shows the clear pattern. Thanks for your consideration to assist. Mikebar (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mr.Z-man 08:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection - Apparently one anonymous user repeatedly adds his own points of view as well as unsourced information to the article. Registered authors have asked him to provide proof for his claims but to no avail. He refuses to discuss the issue on the article's Talk page. The article has been semi-protected twice for two weeks each time and it apparently hasn't motivated this author to register an account and participate in the discussion. Maybe an IP address ban is an option in this situation. I have reason to believe that he regularly uses the internet connection of the Central Sydney Health Care Services in Sydney, News South Wales, Australia. A frequent IP address of his is 152.76.0.130 - which permanently resolves to the subdomain *.cs.nsw.gov.au. According to a DNS lookup at domaintools.com the server with this IP addresses hosts various sites of the Central Sydney Health Care Services. Besides this IP address he apparently uses Australian Internet service provider Telstra BigPond during his edits. But while addresses such as 121.218.212.194 and 58.168.87.30 resolve to the News South Wales area this part of his anonymous edits is probably unstoppable. It's too general since it'd affect millions of users. Is semi-protection and a ban of the Health Care Services IP address appropritate? -- Aexus (talk) 13:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected. Mr.Z-man 08:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protection heavy IP vandalism. It is not ready for unprotection. Footballfan190 (talk) 08:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected - let's see how that goes, no set expiry. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Note that I am an admin myself, but have history with one of the involved edit warriors (DreamGuy) that prevents me from taking admin actions myself on the article.

    The Ripper article has been fully protected since late October because several editors were blanket-reverting each other. (I filed the RFPP request to get it originally protected.) Since the protection, progress has been made at User:Jaysweet/Jack the Ripper, and compromizes have been made on a number of the key issues. Not all issues have been worked out, though. But one of the key people in the discussion has not posted to the JTR talk page in almost a month, and absolutely no edits have been made to the user space version in a similar time frame. So the article has been fully protected for over two months, and any sort of progress is stalled by the absence of the one editor (DreamGuy).

    Given the progress that *has* been made, and the lack of any discussion for several weeks, I'm not sure that the page protection is still necessary. But I cannot act myself given my history with DreamGuy.

    Do note that, if the page is unprotected, a history merge from User:Jaysweet/Jack the Ripper back to Jack the Ripper should also be performed, so that the progress made at that version can be worked back into the main article. - TexasAndroid (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected for now. J-ſtanContribsUser page 01:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Semi-Protection - IP vandilism~ IP's frequently are adding speculation that he will be returning to WWE. They are posting "dirtsheet" websites as their sources, this has been occuring for the past 24 hours. Semi-Protect until end of month if possible. Thanks.--TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 03:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected until the end of the month.   jj137 ♠ 03:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank You--TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 03:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    Temporary semi-protect. Users from the website GameFAQs are vandalizing this page by posting fake death information and other nonsense. KJS77 02:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protect. Lots of IP vandalism lately, the bots do a good job reverting but they don't catch everything, users have been policing the article but the frequency of these attacks remain. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.   jj137 ♠ 03:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    temporary semi-protection , The article seems to have become an unreferenced/false rumour target for anon IPs recently. Requesting protection (instead of protecting it myself) for the sake of transparency..Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 01:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks muchly. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 01:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, This article is vandalised daily with childish comments by anon editors. One guesses that it is linked on some school curriculum. .Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - we'll just see. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:08, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    Temporary Semi-Protect - Page has been vandalized multiple times over the past several days by unregistered users. Increased vandalism to this page is due to increased media attention on the subject matter. Requesting a temporary block on unregistered users from editing the page. Ihateaubergine (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-Protect - it apparently has semi protection status but IP's have been editing, apparently the semi-protection status has expired. With this, IP's have been disrupting this page heavily in the past week.--TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 21:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. J-ſtanContribsUser page 01:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect IP user on the 86.x.x.x range keeps repeatedly adding unsourced information to the article, despite warnings to the various IPs they have used. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 08:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    Protected for too long, protection no longer necessary. Solumeiras talk 11:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Not unprotected — heavy vandalism every time the page is unprotected, has been protected recently before. --Oxymoron83 11:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Protected for too long, protection no longer necessary. Solumeiras talk 11:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Not unprotected — high level of vandalism although semiprotected. --Oxymoron83 11:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Protected for too long, protection no longer necessary. Solumeiras talk 11:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Not unprotected This isn't the place to make requests about that article. It really needs to be taken to arbcom - see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Reposting with correct tag as per below. Ameriquedialectics 20:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection (maybe full protection??) Spate of IP vandals, now supplemented by usernames with less-than-helpful edits. Gladys J Cortez 23:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was just turned off, and the drive-bys started up again almost immediately. "I love you, you love me" is just too tempting... :-o) SkierRMH (talk) 23:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Hehehe...yeah, if I was vandaciously-inclined, I'd hafta say Barney'd be one of the first places I'd go for. :) Thanks! Gladys J Cortez 00:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection Spamming has been present on this article for a while now by many IP addresses. Intent of continued disruption by spamming is stated on the talk page. — Save_Us_229 22:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Spebi 22:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, Incessant vandalism, multiple times daily.Mlouns (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Acalamari 21:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:Pope Sheila Morse (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Full Protection -Indef blocked user is vandalizing their talk page. Icestorm815 (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=183820483"