Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/March 2019: Difference between revisions
Archiving March 3. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/ITNCArchiver |
Archiving March 4. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/ITNCArchiver |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<!-- ADD NEW ARCHIVE HERE --> |
<!-- ADD NEW ARCHIVE HERE --> |
||
== March 4 == |
|||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2019 March 4]]}} |
|||
{{Portal:Current events/2019 March 4}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
|||
---- |
|||
==== (Closed) RD: Juan Corona ==== |
|||
{{atop|Stale, unimproved. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 01:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Juan Corona |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/obituaries/juan-corona-dead.html The New York Times]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = no<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = SirEdimon <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updater = <!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
| nom cmt = One of the most notorious and "prolifics" serial killers in US history. |
|||
| sign = [[User:SirEdimon|SirEdimon]] ([[User talk:SirEdimon|talk]]) 06:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Some unreferenced parts of the article, such as [[Juan_Corona#Evidence]] as well as a quote. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 15:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' multiple [citation needed] tags on this BLP. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 18:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
==== (Closed) RD: Art Hughes (Canadian soccer player) ==== |
|||
{{atop|Stale. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 01:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Art Hughes (Canadian soccer player) |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.canadasoccer.com/art-hughes-hall-of-fame-honoured-member-dies-at-88-p162081-preview-1 CSA], [https://www.prpeak.com/canada-soccer-hall-of-famer-art-hughes-a-west-coast-scoring-legend-dies-at-88-1.23653964 PR Peak]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = yes<!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = SirEdimon <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updater = SirEdimon<!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Canadian soccer legend. Article is small, but I updated it fixing all ref issues. |
|||
| sign = --[[User:SirEdimon|SirEdimon]] ([[User talk:SirEdimon|talk]]) 06:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
* '''Support''' Everything looks good. --- [[User talk:Coffeeandcrumbs|<span style="color:#CC2200">Coffee</span>]]<nowiki/>and[[Special:Contributions/Coffeeandcrumbs|<span style="color:#663366">crumbs</span>]] 15:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*<s>'''Weak oppose'''</s> Incomplete coverage of the subject's life, particularly in [[Art_Hughes_(Canadian_soccer_player)#Life_and_career]]. Only 1 single sentence about his life after 1960 up until his death in 2019. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 15:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::{{Re|Spencer}} Please take a second look. I think the notable period spanning 17 years of his soccer career are sufficiently mentioned. I have also add a couple of sentences about this personal life and reorganized the page a bit. --- [[User talk:Coffeeandcrumbs|<span style="color:#CC2200">Coffee</span>]]<nowiki/>and[[Special:Contributions/Coffeeandcrumbs|<span style="color:#663366">crumbs</span>]] 18:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::::Weak oppose stricken; thanks for your work in improving the article. I guess my concern is that if he was known for goalscoring, the article would talk about games in which he had a decisive goal (or goals for the national team). Some of the information in the intro could definitely be moved to the "Career" section as well. At the same time, it seems like the information for that may be a lot harder to come by or not exist. For some it may meet minimum standards, but I think our RD articles should have more meat to them: to me, much of the article seems like the [[Art_Hughes_(Canadian_soccer_player)#Honours|Honours]] section written out in prose. I think that's a good starting point, but to me what makes an RD article of minimum standards worthy of posting is having a little bit more than that. Best, '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 03:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:::::For an example of what this could look like, the [[Eric Caldow]] article nominated below is a good example of what I would consider minimal standards for RD. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 21:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak support''' acknowledging Spencer's concern, but this just about passes the line for me. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 17:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' meets minimum RD requirements; marked as ready --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 17:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*:Still ready --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 22:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Klaus Kinkel ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Klaus Kinkel |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = <!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Dumelow <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updater = Gerda Arendt<!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
| nom cmt = German politician. I've given the article a quick tidy and think it meets the minimum standards - |
|||
| sign = [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 13:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
: I boldly added myself to the updaters, - remove if I did too little. Meant to nominate ;) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 13:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Looks ready to me.-- [[User:Pawnkingthree|Pawnkingthree]] ([[User talk:Pawnkingthree|talk]]) 14:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
* [http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/klaus-kinkel-ist-tot-wir-verlieren-einen-vaeterlichen-freund-a-1256288.html Yup]. Good work on references, Gerda ''et al''. – [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 15:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*{{posted}} — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 20:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Johnny Romano ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Johnny Romano <!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.cleveland.com/tribe/2019/03/john-romano-cleveland-indians-all-star-catcher-in-the-1960s-dies-at-age-84.html Cleveland] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = TDKR Chicago 101 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updater = <!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Article well sourced |
|||
| sign = --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 19:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Support''' - Well sourced.--[[User:SirEdimon|SirEdimon]] ([[User talk:SirEdimon|talk]]) 19:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Looks fine to me. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 19:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' satis. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 23:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted'''. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 23:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Closed) RD: Ted Lindsay ==== |
|||
{{atop|Unimproved. [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 01:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Ted Lindsay <!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/obituaries/ted-lindsay-dead.html The New York Times] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Andise1 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updater = <!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Former Hockey Hall of Famer/legend. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Andise1|Andise1]] ([[User talk:Andise1|talk]]) 18:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Oppose''' large swaths of text have no obvious reference or source. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 18:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' ref improve tagged, and what's going on with the refs that ''are'' there??! [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 23:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Per TRM, what ''is'' going on with those refs? [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 23:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Luke Perry ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Luke Perry<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/luke-perry-dead-90210-riverdale-actor-was-52-1192053 The Hollywood Reporter] [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6770153/Luke-Perry-passes-away-aged-52-just-days-Beverly-Hills-90210-star-rushed-hospital.html Daily Mail]<!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = CoatCheck <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updater = SirEdimon<!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Beverly Hills, 90210, Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Riverdale actor, aged 52, dies shortly after reported stroke.<!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| sign = [[User:CoatCheck|CoatCheck]] ([[User talk:CoatCheck|talk]]) 18:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
* '''Oppose''' on quality. "-ographies" are not sourced (and see relevant discussion on [[WT:ITN]] related to these). --[[User:Masem|M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span>]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 18:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Oppose''', woefully under referenced. [[User:Spengouli|Spengouli]] ([[User talk:Spengouli|talk]]) 18:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' ref improve tagged. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 23:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
<s>*'''Oppose''' vast amounts of the article uncited.</s> Looks OK now. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 23:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
* Not quite there, but much improved. ''<small>[[User_talk:GreatCaesarsGhost|<span style="color:#938f8d">GreatCaesarsGhost</span>]]</small>'' 02:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
* I'll admit I'm a Wikipedia neophyte and I'm certainly not a fan of Luke Perry, but I want to point out that in my opinion, Wikipedia holds itself forth as a news source by having a prominent feature of the front page called "in the news," and as such, it is very out of touch. Here I find a debate about whether to merely MENTION this celebrity's death centered on the quality of citations in his article. Surprising. The underlying philosophy of the front page is mystifying to me; where can I look to find an explanation of this? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Cellodont|Cellodont]] ([[User talk:Cellodont#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cellodont|contribs]]) 13:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::{{replyto|Cellodont}} You can read about the purpose of ITN at [[WP:ITN]]. In short, ITN is not meant to be a continuously updated news feed, but a means to improve and promote articles about subjects that happen to be in the news. Recent deaths are presumed notable enough to post to the Recent Deaths line, but the quality of the article and update must be acceptable in order to post it. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:::It is per [[WP:ITNRD]], point 3, {{xt|Of sufficient quality to be posted on the main page, as determined by a consensus of commenters.}} '''<span style="background:#B1810B; padding:2px; border-style:solid; border-width:1px">[[User:Kees08|<span style=color:#FFFFFF;">Kees08</span>]][[User talk:Kees08|<span style=color:#FFFFFF;"> (Talk)</span>]]</span>''' 11:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' Reasonably complete AFAICT, lots of cites, no more maint tags. <span style="color:red">—[</span>[[User:AlanM1|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:green">Alan</span><span style="color:blue">M</span><span style="color:purple">1</span>]]([[User talk:AlanM1#top|talk]])<span style="color:red">]—</span> 19:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - I believe I fixed all the ref issues.--[[User:SirEdimon|SirEdimon]] ([[User talk:SirEdimon|talk]]) 20:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' His death is all over the news, at least in the U.S. The article seems fine and has plenty of citations. [[User:PerhapsXarb|PerhapsXarb]] ([[User talk:PerhapsXarb|talk]]) 21:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Referencing has been much improved. [[User:Pawnkingthree|Pawnkingthree]] ([[User talk:Pawnkingthree|talk]]) 23:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per above.[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 23:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*{{posted}} by [[User:Paul Erik]] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&curid=482256&diff=886387090&oldid=886380801&diffmode=source]) --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 23:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Removed) Sudanese protests ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Sudanese protests (2018–19)<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
|||
| article2 = <!-- Do not wikilink - leave blank if nominating only one article --> |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = <!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
|||
| recent deaths = no <!-- (yes/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Recent deaths" line --> |
|||
| ongoing = rem<!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb3 = <!-- A third alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb4 = <!-- A fourth alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sources = <!-- Include one or more references from verifiable, reliable sources. --> |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| updated2 = <!-- (yes/no); only if there's a second article and article2 is filled in! Leave blank if unsure --> |
|||
| nominator = GreatCaesarsGhost <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = <!-- Username of the editor who created the article --> |
|||
| updater = <!-- Username of an editor who significantly updated the article --> |
|||
| updater2 = <!-- if more than one updater --> |
|||
| updater3 = <!-- if more than two updaters --> |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| nom cmt =Most recent events mentioned are 8 days ago. Updates also waning. <!-- Add the reason for nominating the item and/or any problems. --> |
|||
| sign = ''<small>[[User_talk:GreatCaesarsGhost|<span style="color:#938f8d">GreatCaesarsGhost</span>]]</small>'' 14:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
*'''Remove''' stale article, stale news. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 15:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
* Removed, no substantial updates for several days. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 16:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Keith Flint ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Keith Flint |
|||
| article2 = <!-- Do not wikilink - leave blank if nominating only one article --> |
|||
| image = <!-- Name of image only; do not link. Please crop the image before adding, if necessary. --> |
|||
| blurb = <!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| ongoing = no <!-- (add/rem/no); instead of specifying a blurb the nomination can be for the "Ongoing" line --> |
|||
| altblurb = <!-- An alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb2 = <!-- A second alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb3 = <!-- A third alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| altblurb4 = <!-- A fourth alternative blurb. Leave blank if not needed --> |
|||
| sources = [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-47442312 BBC] |
|||
| updated = Yes |
|||
| updated2 = <!-- (yes/no); only if there's a second article and article2 is filled in! Leave blank if unsure --> |
|||
| nominator = Black Kite <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| creator = <!-- Username of the editor who created the article --> |
|||
| updater = Black Kite |
|||
| updater2 = Ritchie333 |
|||
| updater3 = <!-- if more than two updaters --> |
|||
| ITNR = no <!-- 'No' by default. Only put in 'yes' if the event is listed at WP:ITNR --> |
|||
| nom cmt = Singer from [[The Prodigy]]. Died aged 49. I've cited some of it, but will be AFK for a while now. |
|||
| sign = [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 12:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
}} |
|||
* '''Support''', I've added citations so most of the article is now referenced. I saw the Prodigy at the 1997 V Festival in Chelmsford (although I only stayed for the first few songs) and the sight of them doing "[[Smack My Bitch Up]]" to tens of thousands of people is probably something I'll never see again. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 13:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:* I was at the Leeds version of that (the only year that V had a Leeds show, I think, before it went to Weston Park). It was, indeed, mayhem. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 1:08 pm, Today (UTC+0) |
|||
*'''Support''' RIP Keef. A seminal loss, albeit in a quirky sense. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 13:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' RD. I would also be fine with blurbing the death at 49 of an artist with seven #1 albums. ''<small>[[User_talk:GreatCaesarsGhost|<span style="color:#938f8d">GreatCaesarsGhost</span>]]</small>'' 13:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*:Not a chance, he wasn't transformative, but he did define a micro-genre in the acid house period. Couldn't dance, couldn't sing, but dominated tens of thousands of fans when performing live. A "legend" (especially to those of us who own every single piece of music he was ever involved in) but not a blurb. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 13:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*::I'm not going to beat this drum, but I meant the other criteria -- not transformative, but unexpected (at 49, no known illness) death of prominent (the seven #1s) figures. ''<small>[[User_talk:GreatCaesarsGhost|<span style="color:#938f8d">GreatCaesarsGhost</span>]]</small>'' 13:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::::Obviously I am not a reliable source, but in summer 1997 I recall the Prodigy were the biggest band in the UK, and quite possibly the world and ''[[The Fat of the Land]]'' was number one both sides of the Atlantic and was universally critically praised. That's pretty much mainstream success. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 13:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:::::<small>In Canada, "Breathe" was hot enough to open up [[Big Shiny Tunes 2]], back when things like alternative music and track order still mattered to young people. But "Firestarter" was only a distant second to that, and I can't name another one despite being reasonably hip and with it (''at the time''). In fairness, "Breathe" was catchy enough to never leave, so no real need to follow it up with anything. Same deal happened with Blur and (to a lesser extent) The Chemical Brothers. Light years beyond Wide Mouth Mason and Bran Van 3000, but by lofty all-time British invasion standards, not even "in the mix". |
|||
:::::As for US air that year, they were up against the single most popular riff Sting ever wrote, fueled by the somber power of recent celebrity death and nostalgia. Then Elton John made even ''that'' sound upbeat with his mournful English candlewailing. Even before then, when hot was still cool, America and Canada both generally preferred their spastic movements and vapid lyrics come from the Spice Girls. We even mostly remembered their names (eventually), which ''I don't think'' is the case with the guy from Prodigy. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] [[User_Talk:InedibleHulk|(talk)]] 21:48, [[March 4]], [[2019]] (UTC)</small> |
|||
*:::To be fair and I imagine Keith would have been honest about it too, he didn't really write any of those seven number one albums, he was a performer, a front man, but not a Lennon or McCartney for the outfit. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 13:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''RD. Article is referenced including the discography. However, I do not support a blurb as Liam Howlett was the band leader of the Prodigy. [[User:Capitalistroadster|Capitalistroadster]] ([[User talk:Capitalistroadster|talk]]) 13:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*Obvious '''support''' and a sorry one at that; I could see a blurb, personally, as if not a leader then probably the best well-known/iconic. But not important. [[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">'''——'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">''SerialNumber''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#8B0000">54129</span>]] 13:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::I think only fans knew Liam was "the brains behind the operation"; to the man in the street, The Prodigy was defined by the scary looking bloke doing a mad dance and shouting in [[Aldwych tube station]]. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 13:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - referenced and ready.[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 13:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{posted}}--'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*Post posting '''oppose blurb''' since some people seem to be suggesting it above; I'll be willing to bet a tidy sum that in almost all tomorrow's papers on both sides of the Atlantic Flint is relegated to a small sidebar beside a giant photograph of Luke Perry. The Prodigy were influential for a brief period to a particular generation but we're not talking the Fall here, let alone the Beatles. ‑ [[User:Iridescent|Iridescent]] 20:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:: Since a blurb was only mentioned briefly and only RD was posted, your comment is redundant.[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 21:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::: Discussion of a blurb can and often does continue after a RD is posted. [[User:Pawnkingthree|Pawnkingthree]] ([[User talk:Pawnkingthree|talk]]) 23:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' I didn't know Flint had passed until I saw it in the box today. This is why I wanted to reform ITN/DC. Thanks to everyone involved who turned the article around to get it MP ready. It's great when the system works. --[[User:LaserLegs|LaserLegs]] ([[User talk:LaserLegs|talk]]) 22:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==== (Posted) RD: Eric Caldow ==== |
|||
{{ITN candidate |
|||
| article = Eric Caldow |
|||
| recent deaths = yes |
|||
| sources = [https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47442762 BBC Sport], [https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/17474883.obituary-eric-caldow-former-rangers-and-scotland-captain/ The Herald] |
|||
| updated = <!-- (yes/no); Leave blank if you aren't sure --> |
|||
| nominator = Jmorrison230582 <!-- Do NOT change this --> |
|||
| updater = <!-- Should be filled with the username of the person who has contributed the most to updates. --> |
|||
| nom cmt = [[Rangers F.C.|Rangers]] and [[Scotland national football team|Scotland]] captain, inducted to the [[Scottish Football Hall of Fame]] in 2007. |
|||
| sign = [[User:Jmorrison230582|Jmorrison230582]] ([[User talk:Jmorrison230582|talk]]) 16:41, 7 March 2019 (UTC) <!-- Do NOT change this -->}} |
|||
*'''Weak oppose''' penultimate para of bio is unreferenced. The rest is just about satis. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 17:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Referenced the paragraph mentioned by TRM. '''[[User:Spencer|<span style="color:#082567">Spencer</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">T•</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|<span style="color:#FFBF00">C</span>]]</sup> 21:59, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Posted''' [[User:Stephen|Step]][[User talk:Stephen|hen]] 22:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== March 3 == |
== March 3 == |
||
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2019 March 3]]}} |
{{cot|[[Portal:Current events/2019 March 3]]}} |
Revision as of 00:01, 12 March 2019
This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form;
any comments regarding this page should be directed to Wikipedia talk:In the news. Thanks.
March 4
March 4, 2019
(Monday)
Arts and culture
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
(Closed) RD: Juan Corona
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:
- Nominated by SirEdimon (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Oppose Some unreferenced parts of the article, such as Juan_Corona#Evidence as well as a quote. SpencerT•C 15:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose multiple [citation needed] tags on this BLP. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
(Closed) RD: Art Hughes (Canadian soccer player)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CSA, PR Peak
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by SirEdimon (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Support Everything looks good. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 15:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Weak opposeIncomplete coverage of the subject's life, particularly in Art_Hughes_(Canadian_soccer_player)#Life_and_career. Only 1 single sentence about his life after 1960 up until his death in 2019. SpencerT•C 15:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Spencer: Please take a second look. I think the notable period spanning 17 years of his soccer career are sufficiently mentioned. I have also add a couple of sentences about this personal life and reorganized the page a bit. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 18:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose stricken; thanks for your work in improving the article. I guess my concern is that if he was known for goalscoring, the article would talk about games in which he had a decisive goal (or goals for the national team). Some of the information in the intro could definitely be moved to the "Career" section as well. At the same time, it seems like the information for that may be a lot harder to come by or not exist. For some it may meet minimum standards, but I think our RD articles should have more meat to them: to me, much of the article seems like the Honours section written out in prose. I think that's a good starting point, but to me what makes an RD article of minimum standards worthy of posting is having a little bit more than that. Best, SpencerT•C 03:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- For an example of what this could look like, the Eric Caldow article nominated below is a good example of what I would consider minimal standards for RD. SpencerT•C 21:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose stricken; thanks for your work in improving the article. I guess my concern is that if he was known for goalscoring, the article would talk about games in which he had a decisive goal (or goals for the national team). Some of the information in the intro could definitely be moved to the "Career" section as well. At the same time, it seems like the information for that may be a lot harder to come by or not exist. For some it may meet minimum standards, but I think our RD articles should have more meat to them: to me, much of the article seems like the Honours section written out in prose. I think that's a good starting point, but to me what makes an RD article of minimum standards worthy of posting is having a little bit more than that. Best, SpencerT•C 03:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Spencer: Please take a second look. I think the notable period spanning 17 years of his soccer career are sufficiently mentioned. I have also add a couple of sentences about this personal life and reorganized the page a bit. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 18:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support acknowledging Spencer's concern, but this just about passes the line for me. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support meets minimum RD requirements; marked as ready --DannyS712 (talk) 17:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Still ready --DannyS712 (talk) 22:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Klaus Kinkel
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
Credits:
- Nominated by Dumelow (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: German politician. I've given the article a quick tidy and think it meets the minimum standards - Dumelow (talk) 13:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- I boldly added myself to the updaters, - remove if I did too little. Meant to nominate ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Looks ready to me.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yup. Good work on references, Gerda et al. – Sca (talk) 15:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Johnny Romano
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Cleveland
Credits:
- Nominated by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Article well sourced --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Well sourced.--SirEdimon (talk) 19:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Looks fine to me. --Jayron32 19:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support satis. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted. Black Kite (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
(Closed) RD: Ted Lindsay
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Andise1 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Oppose large swaths of text have no obvious reference or source. --Jayron32 18:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose ref improve tagged, and what's going on with the refs that are there??! The Rambling Man (talk) 23:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per TRM, what is going on with those refs? Black Kite (talk) 23:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Luke Perry
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hollywood Reporter Daily Mail
Credits:
- Nominated by CoatCheck (talk · give credit)
- Updated by SirEdimon (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Beverly Hills, 90210, Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Riverdale actor, aged 52, dies shortly after reported stroke. CoatCheck (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality. "-ographies" are not sourced (and see relevant discussion on WT:ITN related to these). --Masem (t) 18:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose, woefully under referenced. Spengouli (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose ref improve tagged. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
*Oppose vast amounts of the article uncited. Looks OK now. Black Kite (talk) 23:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not quite there, but much improved. GreatCaesarsGhost 02:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'll admit I'm a Wikipedia neophyte and I'm certainly not a fan of Luke Perry, but I want to point out that in my opinion, Wikipedia holds itself forth as a news source by having a prominent feature of the front page called "in the news," and as such, it is very out of touch. Here I find a debate about whether to merely MENTION this celebrity's death centered on the quality of citations in his article. Surprising. The underlying philosophy of the front page is mystifying to me; where can I look to find an explanation of this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cellodont (talk • contribs) 13:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Cellodont: You can read about the purpose of ITN at WP:ITN. In short, ITN is not meant to be a continuously updated news feed, but a means to improve and promote articles about subjects that happen to be in the news. Recent deaths are presumed notable enough to post to the Recent Deaths line, but the quality of the article and update must be acceptable in order to post it. 331dot (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- It is per WP:ITNRD, point 3, Of sufficient quality to be posted on the main page, as determined by a consensus of commenters. Kees08 (Talk) 11:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Cellodont: You can read about the purpose of ITN at WP:ITN. In short, ITN is not meant to be a continuously updated news feed, but a means to improve and promote articles about subjects that happen to be in the news. Recent deaths are presumed notable enough to post to the Recent Deaths line, but the quality of the article and update must be acceptable in order to post it. 331dot (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Reasonably complete AFAICT, lots of cites, no more maint tags. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 19:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support - I believe I fixed all the ref issues.--SirEdimon (talk) 20:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support His death is all over the news, at least in the U.S. The article seems fine and has plenty of citations. PerhapsXarb (talk) 21:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Referencing has been much improved. Pawnkingthree (talk) 23:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support per above.BabbaQ (talk) 23:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted by User:Paul Erik ([1]) --DannyS712 (talk) 23:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
(Removed) Sudanese protests
Nominator's comments: Most recent events mentioned are 8 days ago. Updates also waning. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Remove stale article, stale news. --LaserLegs (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Removed, no substantial updates for several days. --Tone 16:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Keith Flint
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Black Kite (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Ritchie333 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Singer from The Prodigy. Died aged 49. I've cited some of it, but will be AFK for a while now. Black Kite (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support, I've added citations so most of the article is now referenced. I saw the Prodigy at the 1997 V Festival in Chelmsford (although I only stayed for the first few songs) and the sight of them doing "Smack My Bitch Up" to tens of thousands of people is probably something I'll never see again. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I was at the Leeds version of that (the only year that V had a Leeds show, I think, before it went to Weston Park). It was, indeed, mayhem. Black Kite (talk) 1:08 pm, Today (UTC+0)
- Support RIP Keef. A seminal loss, albeit in a quirky sense. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support RD. I would also be fine with blurbing the death at 49 of an artist with seven #1 albums. GreatCaesarsGhost 13:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not a chance, he wasn't transformative, but he did define a micro-genre in the acid house period. Couldn't dance, couldn't sing, but dominated tens of thousands of fans when performing live. A "legend" (especially to those of us who own every single piece of music he was ever involved in) but not a blurb. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not going to beat this drum, but I meant the other criteria -- not transformative, but unexpected (at 49, no known illness) death of prominent (the seven #1s) figures. GreatCaesarsGhost 13:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not a chance, he wasn't transformative, but he did define a micro-genre in the acid house period. Couldn't dance, couldn't sing, but dominated tens of thousands of fans when performing live. A "legend" (especially to those of us who own every single piece of music he was ever involved in) but not a blurb. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Obviously I am not a reliable source, but in summer 1997 I recall the Prodigy were the biggest band in the UK, and quite possibly the world and The Fat of the Land was number one both sides of the Atlantic and was universally critically praised. That's pretty much mainstream success. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- In Canada, "Breathe" was hot enough to open up Big Shiny Tunes 2, back when things like alternative music and track order still mattered to young people. But "Firestarter" was only a distant second to that, and I can't name another one despite being reasonably hip and with it (at the time). In fairness, "Breathe" was catchy enough to never leave, so no real need to follow it up with anything. Same deal happened with Blur and (to a lesser extent) The Chemical Brothers. Light years beyond Wide Mouth Mason and Bran Van 3000, but by lofty all-time British invasion standards, not even "in the mix".
- As for US air that year, they were up against the single most popular riff Sting ever wrote, fueled by the somber power of recent celebrity death and nostalgia. Then Elton John made even that sound upbeat with his mournful English candlewailing. Even before then, when hot was still cool, America and Canada both generally preferred their spastic movements and vapid lyrics come from the Spice Girls. We even mostly remembered their names (eventually), which I don't think is the case with the guy from Prodigy. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:48, March 4, 2019 (UTC)
- Obviously I am not a reliable source, but in summer 1997 I recall the Prodigy were the biggest band in the UK, and quite possibly the world and The Fat of the Land was number one both sides of the Atlantic and was universally critically praised. That's pretty much mainstream success. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- To be fair and I imagine Keith would have been honest about it too, he didn't really write any of those seven number one albums, he was a performer, a front man, but not a Lennon or McCartney for the outfit. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- SupportRD. Article is referenced including the discography. However, I do not support a blurb as Liam Howlett was the band leader of the Prodigy. Capitalistroadster (talk) 13:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Obvious support and a sorry one at that; I could see a blurb, personally, as if not a leader then probably the best well-known/iconic. But not important. ——SerialNumber54129 13:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I think only fans knew Liam was "the brains behind the operation"; to the man in the street, The Prodigy was defined by the scary looking bloke doing a mad dance and shouting in Aldwych tube station. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support - referenced and ready.BabbaQ (talk) 13:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Posted--Tone 13:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Post posting oppose blurb since some people seem to be suggesting it above; I'll be willing to bet a tidy sum that in almost all tomorrow's papers on both sides of the Atlantic Flint is relegated to a small sidebar beside a giant photograph of Luke Perry. The Prodigy were influential for a brief period to a particular generation but we're not talking the Fall here, let alone the Beatles. ‑ Iridescent 20:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Since a blurb was only mentioned briefly and only RD was posted, your comment is redundant.BabbaQ (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Discussion of a blurb can and often does continue after a RD is posted. Pawnkingthree (talk) 23:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Since a blurb was only mentioned briefly and only RD was posted, your comment is redundant.BabbaQ (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't know Flint had passed until I saw it in the box today. This is why I wanted to reform ITN/DC. Thanks to everyone involved who turned the article around to get it MP ready. It's great when the system works. --LaserLegs (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Eric Caldow
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sport, The Herald
Credits:
- Nominated by Jmorrison230582 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Rangers and Scotland captain, inducted to the Scottish Football Hall of Fame in 2007. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose penultimate para of bio is unreferenced. The rest is just about satis. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Referenced the paragraph mentioned by TRM. SpencerT•C 21:59, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 22:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
March 3
March 3, 2019
(Sunday)
Disasters and accidents
Politics and elections
Science and technology
Sports
|
2019 Estonian parliamentary election
Blurb: Kaja Kallas (pictured) is elected as first female Prime Minister of Estonia. (Post)
Alternative blurb: In Estonian elections, the Reform Party (Chairwoman Kaja Kallas pictured) maintains a plurarity in parliament.
News source(s): [2]
Credits:
- Nominated by 159.53.174.140 (talk · give credit)
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
159.53.174.140 (talk) 20:08, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The articles are not ready. But I have suggested some blurbs. This is very news worthy but let's fix the articles. If we want Blurb1, we have to wait for the formation of a new government which I suspect is imminent.--- Coffeeandcrumbs 23:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Commentary - I've been watching this article for sometime now waiting for something to happen. I didn't nominate it exactly because nothing did happen yet. Blurb1 is not true. Altblurb is not news worthy.--SirEdimon (talk) 00:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Waiting for what? The results are in, and they are ITNR. Only the quality of the article is up for discussion. Established consensus is that we post the election, not the formation of a government. GreatCaesarsGhost 12:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Article is a chart farm, with stub-level text if we remove all the tables. Would need a massive expansion with full referencing to be main page ready. --Jayron32 13:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
(Closed) Disappearance of Tom Ballard and Daniele Nardi
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: 100,000 euros is raised to search for Tom Ballard, a British mountaineer best known for the first solo winter ascent of all six major alpine north faces in a single season, and his climbing partner Daniele Nardi, following their disappearance on Nanga Parbat. (Post)
Alternative blurb: 100,000 euros is raised to search for British Mountaineer Tom Ballard and his climbing partner Daniele Nardi following their disappearance on Nanga Parbat.
News source(s): BBC news, Italian post, Sky news
Credits:
- Created and nominated by PeaBrainC (talk · give credit)
- Oppose We should treat this like that recent footballer that died in a plane crash but wasn't affirmed until weeks later. If they find them alive (even if that requires a difficult rescue effort) or end up stating they are dead, that would be the point of posting. --Masem (t) 14:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose ongoing, this would be fine as a blurb. --LaserLegs (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake (first time ITN nom) - misunderstood the nature of Ongoing, tagged it as the events are still unfolding. Have now removed Ongoing tag and as if by magic the first (longer) blurb appears. d'oh. PeaBrainC (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- You're fine, honestly it's not a hard and fast rule one way or the other. If ten other people come and support for ongoing, that's where it'll go. Welcome to ITN! --LaserLegs (talk) 15:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake (first time ITN nom) - misunderstood the nature of Ongoing, tagged it as the events are still unfolding. Have now removed Ongoing tag and as if by magic the first (longer) blurb appears. d'oh. PeaBrainC (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose both ongoing and blurb on lack of general significance. –Ammarpad (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose may be more suitable for another part of the main page. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @PeaBrainC: it looks like consensus is against posting this to "In The News" but since the article is new, you may find support at WP:DYK "Did You Know". --LaserLegs (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) Tornado outbreak of March 3, 2019
Blurb: A severe tornado outbreak hits Alabama and Georgia, causing at least 23 deaths and severe damage. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Multiple tornadoes in Alabama and Georgia cause at least 23 deaths and widespread damage.
Alternative blurb II: A severe tornado outbreak hits the Southeastern United States, with one tornado causing at least 23 deaths in Alabama.
Alternative blurb III: Tornadoes hit the Southeastern United States, with one tornado causing at least 23 deaths in Alabama.
News source(s): ABC News, AP, Reuters, BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Alex of Canada (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Nominating for Alex of Canada who asked it on here. SirEdimon (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose It's spring, tornados in this part of the US are common. --Masem (t) 05:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Tornadoes are certainly common, but tornado outbreaks that cause 23 deaths? That's pretty rare. Also deadliest natural disaster in the US since the hurricane season. Edit: deadliest tornado outbreak since 2014. Alex of Canada (talk) 05:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Deadliest tornado outbreak in the US since 2014. The article is relatively small, but it's likely to improve as more information breaks. Alex of Canada (talk) 05:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Question is this how we name such outbreaks? No indication in the title of any geographical context whatsoever? The Rambling Man (talk) 06:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Apparently yes. See: Tornado outbreak of May 7–10, 2016, Tornado outbreak sequence of May 22–26, 2016, Tornado outbreak of April 27–30, 2014, Tornado outbreak sequence of May 21–26, 2011, Tornado outbreak sequence of May 21–26, 2011.--SirEdimon (talk) 07:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- The article has been moved to Alabama/Georgia tornado outbreak of March 3, 2019. Is it better? --BorgQueen (talk) 10:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, much better, it begs the question why all the other articles aren't named similarly. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Good move. @TRM, I always assumed titles avoided geographic specifications due to the possibility of a tornado covering multiple states and so making the title bulbous and unwieldy. But this certainly works. ——SerialNumber54129 13:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man, BorgQueen, and Serial Number 54129: convention in WP:SEVERE is to keep titles to just dates unless it has a widely accepted name (such as the 2011 Super Outbreak). It avoids the issue of giving too much weight to some areas and keeps the title neutral. In this case, calling it the "Alabama/Georgia" outbreak no longer applies as multiple tornadoes have been confirmed in Florida. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 18:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- The article has been moved to Alabama/Georgia tornado outbreak of March 3, 2019. Is it better? --BorgQueen (talk) 10:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Apparently yes. See: Tornado outbreak of May 7–10, 2016, Tornado outbreak sequence of May 22–26, 2016, Tornado outbreak of April 27–30, 2014, Tornado outbreak sequence of May 21–26, 2011, Tornado outbreak sequence of May 21–26, 2011.--SirEdimon (talk) 07:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment if it's going to claim 12 tornadoes, it needs to list 12 tornadoes with refs (or do a content fork for the list of storms until they can get references). Would benefit from a paragraph of prose about the EF3 which killed 23. --LaserLegs (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Phrasing in the the "Casualties" section seems like it would age out very quickly ("wait for morning" and "currently"). This assumes/requires someone will update it within the next few hours which may not happen. Are there any style guidelines on avoiding this? GreatCaesarsGhost 12:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose perhaps the most deadly tornado outbreak since 14, but still pales behind other recent natural disasters. ——SerialNumber54129 13:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – Multiple tornadoes killing 23 aren't "common." (Reuters says toll likely to rise.)
Alt1 offered above.– Sca (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC) - Support Article looks of proper quality and properly referenced, it happened recently, and the news covered it appropriately. Checks all of the right boxes for me. --Jayron32 17:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – I would suggest rewording the blurb to indicate all the fatalities are from a single tornado in Alabama rather than from the event collectively. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 18:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Jayron32. -- Tavix (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support with Cyclonebiskit's suggested change. Spengouli (talk) 18:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note, per suggestions, I have created another blurb. Would suggest Alt2 be posted based on the several suggestions here. --Jayron32 18:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support ALT2. Significant coverage and unusual death toll. Teemu08 (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support – Alt3, offered above as simplified version of Alt2, dispensing with "outbreak," which sounds more like an outbreak of measles, the flu, etc. – Sca (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support ALT2. @Sca: Tornado outbreaks are what they are called. Nihlus 01:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hmmm. I don't recall encountering this usage, but ... meh. Sca (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support – Uncommon disaster with high death toll. -Zanhe (talk) 04:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 04:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2
March 2, 2019
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
(Posted) RD: Nathaniel Taylor (actor)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times 4 March USA Today 2 March
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by DBigXray (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Kiraroshi1976 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Start Class article with everything sourced. Died on 27 Feb but death was reported in newspapers on 2 March onwards. DBigXrayᗙ 15:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Good enough.--SirEdimon (talk) 19:24, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Sourced and went from Stub Class to Start Class. Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 19:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted, nice work — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Werner Schneyder
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Merkur and many others
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Multi-talented great spirit, cabaret, boxing, journalism, TV presenting, ... - no article in English until today. - He was found dead 2 March, was alive 1 Mar, so day of death is not quite clear. - Much more on the German Wikipedia, but my time is limited, - help welcome. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Looks to be in decent shape. --Jayron32 19:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Recordings section completely unreferenced. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I am tired. I referenced the LPs, and commented out the others. Anybody could have done that (or comment out the section completely. It's there in German, of course). Authority control is a blessing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- There's an ongoing discussion about forking off things like unreferenced discographies on the talk page. Commenting stuff out just to get it onto RD is considered bad form. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I now sourced most of the CDs. Three missing, but I can't keep my eyes open any longer. Anybody can find the three if needed. - These are CDs of spoken German, rather not essential for the English Wikipedia, I'd say. - I am still not over Previn. Unvelievable that we gave Pell prominence for several days, instead. - Get to RD what readers should know. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- There's an ongoing discussion about forking off things like unreferenced discographies on the talk page. Commenting stuff out just to get it onto RD is considered bad form. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I am tired. I referenced the LPs, and commented out the others. Anybody could have done that (or comment out the section completely. It's there in German, of course). Authority control is a blessing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support - I think I fixed the last few refs issues. For me, it's good to go. Great job by Gerda Arendt.--SirEdimon (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Francisco Macri
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters, Washington Post
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Cambalachero (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Father of current president of Argentina Mauricio Macri, and important businessman on his own right. Cambalachero (talk) 05:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support refs are a mess but at least allow verifiability of the facts (for the time being). The Rambling Man (talk) 06:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support I have reformatted some of the refs. –Ammarpad (talk) 17:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Page name is "Franco", also gives "Francesco". I do not find "Francisco" anywhere. 72.94.18.179 (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- The article was moved after this was posted. I've updated it — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Ogden Reid
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Newyorkbrad (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: New York Herald Tribune editor and Congressman; requested by Newyorkbrad on his usertalk [3]. Softlavender (talk) 04:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support This is ready to go. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support looks satis. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted. 331dot (talk) 08:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
(Closed) Laws of the Game changes
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The International Football Association Board amends the Laws of the Game, disallowing hand balls among other changes. (Post)
News source(s): IFAB, BBC, Sky Sports
Credits:
- Nominated by Brandmeister (talk · give credit)
Both articles updated
- Oppose seems like 1) routine (rules of professional sports are frequently changed between seasons to tweak the game) and 2) relatively trivial (a rarely occuring scoring mechanism highlighting the changes on the sources reporting it). --Masem (t) 15:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose as noted above, routine and trivial. If they were going to allow mixed teams, or play until someone scored ten goals or add two extra goals at each end, it'd be worth considering, but this is tinkering around the edges. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose this is ultra-minor tinkering to bring the official rules into line with what 99.9% of the world already thought they were. To be honest, I don't think this should even be listed as a "notable amendment" on the article. ‑ Iridescent 20:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose So you can't use your hand in football? Thanks for clearing that up. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 20:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
(Closed) RD: Yannis Behrakis
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Nominated by Sherenk1 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- Oppose. A large paragraph of text is unreferenced as is the Awards section. Capitalistroadster (talk) 08:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose poor article, lacking refs. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
(Closed) SpaceX Dragon 2
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: SpaceX successfully launches an unmanned test of Dragon 2 (rendering pictured) for shuttling crew between Earth and orbit. (Post)
News source(s): ArsTech
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Comment – I'd say unmanned test flights don't usually warrant posting. – Sca (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- But I would assume that this planned July one would probably merit something? Still outside ITNR but would be a major feat still... --Masem (t) 16:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Needs some refs, then strong support this obviously notable milestone of the first flight of a new spacecraft. --LaserLegs (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – If any flight in the Commercial Crew Development program should be featured, it should be the Crew Dragon Demo-2 and Boeing Crew Flight Test later this year. Those flights will actually be historic, as it will have the first astronauts on American spacecraft for the first time in eight years. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 18:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Question if this is the first test flight of the vessel, wouldn't this be ITNR? Banedon (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Questionable, as this is just the SpaceX Dragon with slightly larger windows and redesigned solar panels, rather than a new design per se. Since aside from genuinely routine missions like ISS resupply flights every spacecraft is configured differently to suit the mission profile, what you're proposing would essentially make every satellite launch where the satellite is an unusual shape or mass, or every time Boeing tests a new variant of the 787, ITNR. ‑ Iridescent 23:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'd support a new variant of the 737 or A320 TBH, it's not at all routine --LaserLegs (talk) 23:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, you could support the nomination, but not the ITNR. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Iridescent, I didn't propose anything. I asked a question. Also, oppose per Iridescent. Banedon (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- As I've pointed out before, the ITNR for Space Exploration is a bit of a dumpster fire. OTOH, it's not like we're plagued with nominations on this front. Posting the biggest news rocketry once a quarter is fine. GreatCaesarsGhost 02:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support The news is sufficiently covering this, and the article is fairly decent, but that article doesn't have much of an update on the current mission; only to note that it happened and the date. I'd like to see the information on this specific launch expanded in the target/bolded article, but otherwise this looks good to go. --Jayron32 17:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
(Closed) RD: Zhores Alferov
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Sputnik
Credits:
- Nominated by Openlydialectic (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
- So many awards/honors need citation. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose too much unreferenced material. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
March 1
March 1, 2019
(Friday)
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: Katherine Helmond
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by DBigXray (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Start Class article with everything sourced. Twice Golden Globe winning actress. Died on 23 Feb, but news of her death was released and got published only on 1 March, hence listed on 1 March as RD (Refer example of Emiliano Sala). DBigXrayᗙ 17:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support No concerns jumping out. GreatCaesarsGhost 02:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Weakest opposethe Emmy nominations &c. are not completely verifiable from the sources. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- The Rambling Man I have added the refs for Emmy noms and Golden Globes. Please see if you can support now. --DBigXrayᗙ 05:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support you got it. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)