Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unleashed (events): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Thank you for your reviewing/stripping of the article, I would like to edit this article to make it more befitting of the available wiki guidelines. |
Thank you for your reviewing/stripping of the article, I would like to edit this article to make it more befitting of the available wiki guidelines. |
||
Notability in references is hard to come by as an event organisation, while speaking about it in text (international visitors, content of shows/stage design/concept, etc) easily creates this promotional tone. If I compare this article to other large (fetish) club events, even ones that are just active in one country, I feel that we have supplied the correct information (now improved by your stripping) and amount of references via notable performers and designers. Would a table with an overview of previous events be of additional value in this? I will research further options, suggestions are very welcome as I am not experienced in dealing with this :) |
Notability in references is hard to come by as an event organisation, while speaking about it in text (international visitors, content of shows/stage design/concept, etc) easily creates this promotional tone. If I compare this article to other large (fetish) club events, even ones that are just active in one country, I feel that we have supplied the correct information (now improved by your stripping) and amount of references via notable performers and designers. Examples: German fetish ball, Wasteland, etcetera.Would a table with an overview of previous events be of additional value in this? I will research further options, suggestions are very welcome as I am not experienced in dealing with this :) |
||
[[User:Nichica|Nichica]] ([[User talk:Nichica|talk]]) 15:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
[[User:Nichica|Nichica]] ([[User talk:Nichica|talk]]) 15:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:12, 25 April 2016
- Unleashed (events) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Don't see anything in the references that establish notability. Imo this is a promotional article, although I have stripped out the more egregious bubbles o'guff. TheLongTone (talk) 14:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your reviewing/stripping of the article, I would like to edit this article to make it more befitting of the available wiki guidelines. Notability in references is hard to come by as an event organisation, while speaking about it in text (international visitors, content of shows/stage design/concept, etc) easily creates this promotional tone. If I compare this article to other large (fetish) club events, even ones that are just active in one country, I feel that we have supplied the correct information (now improved by your stripping) and amount of references via notable performers and designers. Examples: German fetish ball, Wasteland, etcetera.Would a table with an overview of previous events be of additional value in this? I will research further options, suggestions are very welcome as I am not experienced in dealing with this :)