Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Wimberley: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Netherzone (talk | contribs) |
MetricMaster (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Comment''' - This is clearly a promotional, CV-like article that requires serious pruning (which I will do after posting this comment). Regarding his notability, a quick BEFORE yielded three notable museum collections that is enough to pass [[WP:NARTIST]] (normally two ''notable'' museum collection are considered enough). These are: [[Portland Art Museum]] [http://portlandartmuseum.us/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record;id=12383;type=701]; [[Museum of Fine Arts, Houston]] [https://emuseum.mfah.org/people/30422/john-wimberley/objects]; [[Yale University Art Gallery]] [https://artgallery.yale.edu/collections/objects/32981]. I've seen other museum collections online, but haven't yet checked if the institutions are notable enough to mention. [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 23:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' - This is clearly a promotional, CV-like article that requires serious pruning (which I will do after posting this comment). Regarding his notability, a quick BEFORE yielded three notable museum collections that is enough to pass [[WP:NARTIST]] (normally two ''notable'' museum collection are considered enough). These are: [[Portland Art Museum]] [http://portlandartmuseum.us/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record;id=12383;type=701]; [[Museum of Fine Arts, Houston]] [https://emuseum.mfah.org/people/30422/john-wimberley/objects]; [[Yale University Art Gallery]] [https://artgallery.yale.edu/collections/objects/32981]. I've seen other museum collections online, but haven't yet checked if the institutions are notable enough to mention. [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 23:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - I've trimmed back most of the unsourced content, promotional content, and content that was solely sourced to his own website. I found a few reviews of his work online (but have not added them to the article at this time). I created a section for three notable museum collections plus citations. He meets [[WP:NARTIST]] and may also meet [[WP:GNG]] based on the reviews that exist online. [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 00:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - I've trimmed back most of the unsourced content, promotional content, and content that was solely sourced to his own website. I found a few reviews of his work online (but have not added them to the article at this time). I created a section for three notable museum collections plus citations. He meets [[WP:NARTIST]] and may also meet [[WP:GNG]] based on the reviews that exist online. [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 00:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''' I couldn't find anything that satisfies any of the four criteria under [[WP:NARTIST]], (There are 13,000 artists listed at the MFA for example, so being there is not notable) and main cite is [[WP:PRIMARY]]. [[User:MetricMaster|MetricMaster]] ([[User talk:MetricMaster|talk]]) 09:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:33, 23 March 2023
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- John Wimberley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
dubious notability. Can find virtually no coverage by reliable sources, seems to exist only to promote the subject FASTILY 23:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Photography, and California. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - This is clearly a promotional, CV-like article that requires serious pruning (which I will do after posting this comment). Regarding his notability, a quick BEFORE yielded three notable museum collections that is enough to pass WP:NARTIST (normally two notable museum collection are considered enough). These are: Portland Art Museum [1]; Museum of Fine Arts, Houston [2]; Yale University Art Gallery [3]. I've seen other museum collections online, but haven't yet checked if the institutions are notable enough to mention. Netherzone (talk) 23:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - I've trimmed back most of the unsourced content, promotional content, and content that was solely sourced to his own website. I found a few reviews of his work online (but have not added them to the article at this time). I created a section for three notable museum collections plus citations. He meets WP:NARTIST and may also meet WP:GNG based on the reviews that exist online. Netherzone (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I couldn't find anything that satisfies any of the four criteria under WP:NARTIST, (There are 13,000 artists listed at the MFA for example, so being there is not notable) and main cite is WP:PRIMARY. MetricMaster (talk) 09:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)