Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Ashlee: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
+reply |
→Christopher Ashlee: REALLY? |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:I see. You want to include porn references, as long as they're not porn references. Is that right? The grabby site stands, if none other. This performer won that award. Do you have a particular POV that you want this excluded? [[Special:Contributions/207.237.230.164|207.237.230.164]] ([[User talk:207.237.230.164|talk]]) 16:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC) |
:I see. You want to include porn references, as long as they're not porn references. Is that right? The grabby site stands, if none other. This performer won that award. Do you have a particular POV that you want this excluded? [[Special:Contributions/207.237.230.164|207.237.230.164]] ([[User talk:207.237.230.164|talk]]) 16:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:: That award doesn't mean boo and your link doesn't even mention this fellow. If I've a PoV here, it's that articles require proper sources that discuss their subjects in depth. [[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 16:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC) |
:: That award doesn't mean boo and your link doesn't even mention this fellow. If I've a PoV here, it's that articles require proper sources that discuss their subjects in depth. [[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 16:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
::: I'm sorry you don't think the award doesn't mean boo, but you may want to check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grabby_Awards for the full history, verifying that, indeed, it does mean boo. [[Special:Contributions/207.237.230.164|207.237.230.164]] ([[User talk:207.237.230.164|talk]]) 16:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:44, 10 April 2010
- Christopher Ashlee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP. May fail WP:PORNBIO - There is no reference to establish that he won the award. EuroPride (talk) 15:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep passes PORNBIO - the previous source was deleted and not replaced as can be seen in the page history. One suitable reference is http://www.grabbys.com/PastWinners.html and the award itself is described with other potential source material at Grabby Award and Grabby recipients. In this case a tag for improving references would have been more appropriate than raising for deletion. Ash (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Ash. He co-won a Grabby Award and passes WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Ash. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 04:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete since there is no in depth coverage of this person, anywhere, fails BIO and GNG.Bali ultimate (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: Please note that 4 resources have been added. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:08, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- None of them a reliable source. Retail wanking sites and wanking-fan blogs aren't reliable sources.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- How about the grabby site itself, which has now been added? 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- None of them a reliable source. Retail wanking sites and wanking-fan blogs aren't reliable sources.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as unsourced and non-notable. Porn sites as cites do not cut it. Jack Merridew 16:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- What about the grabby site itself? 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- I see. You want to include porn references, as long as they're not porn references. Is that right? The grabby site stands, if none other. This performer won that award. Do you have a particular POV that you want this excluded? 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- That award doesn't mean boo and your link doesn't even mention this fellow. If I've a PoV here, it's that articles require proper sources that discuss their subjects in depth. Jack Merridew 16:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you don't think the award doesn't mean boo, but you may want to check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grabby_Awards for the full history, verifying that, indeed, it does mean boo. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- That award doesn't mean boo and your link doesn't even mention this fellow. If I've a PoV here, it's that articles require proper sources that discuss their subjects in depth. Jack Merridew 16:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)