Wikipedia:Featured list criteria: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Bencherlite (talk | contribs) →See also: add featured topic criteria |
Scorpion0422 (talk | contribs) + The revised criteria per the talk page discussion |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{FLpages}} |
{{FLpages}} |
||
|} |
|} |
||
A [[ |
A [[WP:Featured lists|featured list]] exemplifies our very best work. It covers a topic that lends itself to list format (see [[WP:List]]) and, in addition to meeting the requirements for all Wikipedia content (particularly [[WP:Naming conventions|naming conventions]], [[WP:Neutral point of view|neutrality]], [[WP:No original research|no original research]], [[WP:Verifiability|verifiability]], [[WP:Citing sources|citations]], [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable sources]], [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living persons]], [[WP:Non-free content criteria|non-free content]] and [[WP:What Wikipedia is not|what Wikipedia is not]]) a featured list has the following attributes:</noinclude> |
||
#'''Prose.''' It features professional standards of writing. |
#'''Prose.''' It features professional standards of writing. |
||
#'''Lead.''' It has an engaging [[ |
#'''Lead.''' It has an engaging [[WP:Lead section|lead]] that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. |
||
#'''Comprehensiveness.''' |
|||
# |
#* (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. |
||
⚫ | |||
#* (b) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the [[WP:SAL|requirements]] for stand-alone lists; it is not a [[WP:Content forking|content fork]], does not largely recreate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. |
|||
⚫ | |||
#'''Style.''' It complies with the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] and its supplementary pages. |
#'''Style.''' It complies with the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] and its supplementary pages. |
||
#'''Visual appeal.''' It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, [[Help:Table|tables]], and |
#* (a) '''Visual appeal.''' It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, [[Help:Table|tables]], and [[Wikipedia:Colours|colour]]. |
||
#* (b) It has [[Wikipedia:Images|images]] and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Image use policy|usage policies]], with succinct [[Wikipedia:Captions|captions]] or [[Wikipedia:Alternative text for images|"alt" text]]. [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|Non-free]] images and other media satisfy the [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|criteria for the inclusion of non-free content]] and [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free content|are labeled accordingly]]. |
|||
#'''Stability.''' It is not the subject of ongoing [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit wars]] and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process. |
#'''Stability.''' It is not the subject of ongoing [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit wars]] and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process. |
||
<noinclude> |
<noinclude> |
Revision as of 02:56, 5 April 2009
Featured list tools: |
A featured list exemplifies our very best work. It covers a topic that lends itself to list format (see WP:List) and, in addition to meeting the requirements for all Wikipedia content (particularly naming conventions, neutrality, no original research, verifiability, citations, reliable sources, living persons, non-free content and what Wikipedia is not) a featured list has the following attributes:
- Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
- Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
- Comprehensiveness.
- (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.
- (b) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; it is not a content fork, does not largely recreate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.
- Structure. It is easy to navigate through and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
- Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
- (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour.
- (b) It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions or "alt" text. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly.
- Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
See also
- Featured criteria: