Wayback Machine: Difference between revisions
m BOT: Checking dead links; Added 1 archived Wayback link |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Growth and storage == |
== Growth and storage == |
||
{{expand-section|date=November 2009}} |
{{expand-section|date=November 2009}} |
||
Snapshots become available 6 to 18 months after they are archived, or in some cases even longer. The frequency of snapshots is variable, so not all updates to tracked web sites are recorded, and intervals of several weeks or years sometimes occur. |
Snapshots become available 6 to 18 months after they are archived, or in some cases even longer. The frequency of snapshots is variable, so not all updates to tracked web sites are recorded, and intervals of several weeks or years sometimes occur. Almost 100 weeks have elapsed since the Wayback Machine last updated its content in August 2008. Since then sites have to be listed on the [[Open Directory Project|Open Directory]] at dmoz.org in order to be included.<ref>[http://www.archive.org/about/faqs.php Internet Archive FAQ]</ref> |
||
{{As of|2009}} the Wayback Machine contained about 3 [[petabyte]]s of data and was growing at a rate of 100 [[terabyte]]s per month,<ref>{{cite news | first=Lucas |last=Mearian |title=Internet Archive to unveil massive Wayback Machine data center |publisher=Computerworld.com |date=March 19, 2009 |url=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=hardware&articleId=9130081&taxonomyId=12&intsrc=kc_top| accessdate=2009-03-22}}</ref> as compared with the 12 terabytes/month growth rate reported in 2003. The data is stored on [[PetaBox]] rack systems manufactured by [[Capricorn Technologies]].<ref>{{cite news |first=Michael |last=Kanellos |title=Big storage on the cheap |publisher=CNET News.com |date=July 29, 2005 |url=http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-5808754.html |accessdate=2007-07-29 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070403030705/http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-5808754.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2007-04-03}}</ref> |
{{As of|2009}} the Wayback Machine contained about 3 [[petabyte]]s of data and was growing at a rate of 100 [[terabyte]]s per month,<ref>{{cite news | first=Lucas |last=Mearian |title=Internet Archive to unveil massive Wayback Machine data center |publisher=Computerworld.com |date=March 19, 2009 |url=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=hardware&articleId=9130081&taxonomyId=12&intsrc=kc_top| accessdate=2009-03-22}}</ref> as compared with the 12 terabytes/month growth rate reported in 2003. The data is stored on [[PetaBox]] rack systems manufactured by [[Capricorn Technologies]].<ref>{{cite news |first=Michael |last=Kanellos |title=Big storage on the cheap |publisher=CNET News.com |date=July 29, 2005 |url=http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-5808754.html |accessdate=2007-07-29 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070403030705/http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-5808754.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2007-04-03}}</ref> |
Revision as of 19:22, 23 October 2010
The Wayback Machine is a digital time capsule created by the Internet Archive non-profit organization, based in San Francisco, California. It is maintained with content from Alexa Internet. This service allows users to see archived versions of web pages across time—what the Archive calls a "three dimensional index."
The name Wayback Machine is a reference to a segment from The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show in which Mr. Peabody and Sherman use a time machine called the "WABAC machine" to witness, participate in, and, more often than not, alter famous events in history.[1]
Growth and storage
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (November 2009) |
Snapshots become available 6 to 18 months after they are archived, or in some cases even longer. The frequency of snapshots is variable, so not all updates to tracked web sites are recorded, and intervals of several weeks or years sometimes occur. Almost 100 weeks have elapsed since the Wayback Machine last updated its content in August 2008. Since then sites have to be listed on the Open Directory at dmoz.org in order to be included.[2]
As of 2009[update] the Wayback Machine contained about 3 petabytes of data and was growing at a rate of 100 terabytes per month,[3] as compared with the 12 terabytes/month growth rate reported in 2003. The data is stored on PetaBox rack systems manufactured by Capricorn Technologies.[4]
In 2009, the Internet Archive migrated its customized storage architecture to Sun Open Storage, and hosts a new datacenter in a Sun Modular Datacenter on Sun Microsystems' California campus.[5]
Use in legal evidence
Civil litigation
Netbula LLC v. Chordiant Software Inc.
In a 2009 case Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software Inc., defendant Chordiant filed a motion to compel Netbula to disable the robots.txt file on its web site that was causing the Wayback Machine to retroactively remove access to previous versions of pages it had archived from Nebula's site, pages which Chordiant believed would support its case.[6]
Netbula objected to the motion on the ground that defendants were asking to alter Netbula's web site and that they should have subpoenaed Internet Archive for the pages directly.[7] However, an employee of Internet Archive filed a sworn statement supporting Chordiant's motion, stating that it could not produce the web pages by any other means "without considerable burden, expense and disruption to its operations."[6]
Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, rejected Nebula's arguments and ordered them to temporarily disable the robots.txt blockage in order to allow Chordiant to retrieve the archived pages that they sought.[6]
Telewizja Polska
In an October 2004 case called "Telewizja Polska SA v. Echostar Satellite", a litigant attempted to use the Wayback Machine archives as a source of admissible evidence, perhaps for the first time. Telewizja Polska is the provider of TVP Polonia and EchoStar operates the Dish Network. Prior to the trial proceedings, EchoStar indicated that it intended to offer Wayback Machine snapshots as proof of the past content of Telewizja Polska’s website. Telewizja Polska brought a motion in limine to suppress the snapshots on the grounds of hearsay and unauthenticated source, but Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys rejected Telewizja Polska’s assertion of hearsay and denied TVP's motion in limine to exclude the evidence at trial.[8] However, at the actual trial, district Court Judge Ronald Guzman, the trial judge, overruled Magistrate Keys' findings, and held that neither the affidavit of the Internet Archive employee nor the underlying pages (i.e., the Telewizja Polska website) were admissible as evidence. Judge Guzman reasoned that the employee's affidavit contained both hearsay and inconclusive supporting statements, and the purported webpage printouts themselves were not self-authenticating.[9]
htpCompany.com
In October 2005, htpCompany was a defendant in a U.S. small claims case. The plaintiff of the case had purchased online advertising from the defendant and claimed that the ads had been pulled prior to the end of the paid-for advertising period whereas the defendant claimed in court that the ads had stayed up for the full period. The plaintiff produced printouts of archive.org showing that the ads had gone up and then had disappeared before their expiration. The judge allowed the printouts as evidence and decided the case in favor of the plaintiff. However, because this was a small claims case and the evidentiary rules were not as strict, this likely has little precedential value in the American legal system.
Patent law
The United States patent office and, provided some additional requirements are met (e.g. providing an authoritative statement of the archivist), the European Patent Office will accept date stamps from the Internet Archive as evidence of when a given Web page was accessible to the public. These dates are used to determine if a Web page is available as prior art for instance in examining a patent application.[citation needed]
Limitations of utility
There are technical limitations to archiving a website, and as a consequence, it is possible for opposing parties in litigation to misuse the results provided by website archives. This problem can be exacerbated by the practice of submitting screen shots of web pages in complaints, answers or expert witness reports, when the underlying links are not exposed and therefore can contain errors. For example, archives like the Wayback Machine do not fill out forms and therefore do not include the contents of e-commerce databases in their archives.[10]
Legal status
In Europe the Wayback Machine can sometimes violate copyright laws. Only the creator can decide where his content is published or duplicated, so the Archive would have to delete pages from its system upon request of the creator.[11] The exclusion policies for the Wayback Machine can be found in the FAQ section of the site. The Wayback Machine also retroactively respects robots.txt files.
A number of cases have been brought against the Internet Archive for its Wayback Machine archiving efforts. See Internet Archive controversies and legal disputes.
Search engine links
In 2005, Yahoo! Search began to provide links to previous versions of pages archived on the Wayback Machine. [1]
See also
References
- ^ Green, Heather (February 28, 2002). "A Library as Big as the World". BusinessWeek. Retrieved 2007-07-29.
- ^ Internet Archive FAQ
- ^ Mearian, Lucas (March 19, 2009). "Internet Archive to unveil massive Wayback Machine data center". Computerworld.com. Retrieved 2009-03-22.
- ^ Kanellos, Michael (July 29, 2005). "Big storage on the cheap". CNET News.com. Archived from the original on 2007-04-03. Retrieved 2007-07-29.
- ^ "Internet Archive and Sun Microsystems Create Living History of the Internet". Sun Microsystems. March 25, 2009. Retrieved 2009-03-27.
- ^ a b c LLoyd, Howard (2009). "Order to Disable Robots.txt" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-10-15.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Cortes, Antonio (2009). "Motion Opposing Removal of Robots.txt" (HTML). Retrieved 2009-10-15.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Gelman, Lauren (November 17, 2004). "Internet Archive's Web Page Snapshots Held Admissible as Evidence". Packets. 2 (3). Retrieved 2007-01-04.
- ^ Howell, Beryl A. (2006). "Proving Web History: How to use the Internet Archive" (PDF). Journal of Internet Law: 3–9. Retrieved 2008-08-06.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Debunking the Wayback Machine.
- ^ German lawyer about the Wayback Machine in a law paper, Journal of Internet Law: JurPC.