Jump to content

User talk:Usernamekiran: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ziyush (talk | contribs)
Line 145: Line 145:
can you share reason why you have nominated page for delete, please check more about tanuj khatri in video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SY_cjEbqPk , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ3i_0FQfLs kindly check ([[User:Ziyush|Ziyush]] ([[User talk:Ziyush|talk]]) 12:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC))
can you share reason why you have nominated page for delete, please check more about tanuj khatri in video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SY_cjEbqPk , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ3i_0FQfLs kindly check ([[User:Ziyush|Ziyush]] ([[User talk:Ziyush|talk]]) 12:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC))
:{{re|Ziyush}} Hi. I already explained my reasoning at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanuj Khatri]]. I nominated the article for deletion because Tanuj Khatri doesn't pass the [[wp:gng|general notability guidelines]]. That means, Tanuj Khatri has not been covered in [[wp:rs|reliable sources]] significantly. Regards, —usernamekiran [[User talk:usernamekiran|(talk)]] 12:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
:{{re|Ziyush}} Hi. I already explained my reasoning at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanuj Khatri]]. I nominated the article for deletion because Tanuj Khatri doesn't pass the [[wp:gng|general notability guidelines]]. That means, Tanuj Khatri has not been covered in [[wp:rs|reliable sources]] significantly. Regards, —usernamekiran [[User talk:usernamekiran|(talk)]] 12:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

@Usernamekiran i have used source of bhaskar.com jagran.com, dailypioneer,telegraphindia,shared youtube link of 2 reputed news channel as well, if you need more i will provide more.i have collected this information by spending 3-4 hour, please do some research you will see a lot of article ([[User:Ziyush|Ziyush]] ([[User talk:Ziyush|talk]]) 12:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC))

Revision as of 12:39, 8 July 2020

WP:RETENTION: This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.

Please comment on Talk:Useful idiot

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Useful idiot. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is that you DumbBOT?
usernamekiran(talk) 19:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello Usernamekiran,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources
  • A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
  • Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
  • Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fake allegation of reliable sources & Significant coverage

I have gone through its website, but its clearly shows that it is supported by different dignitaries from all around the world(Refer : Supported. If it is an promotional event how it can be covered by famous media houses from all around the world & supported by government peoples, music directors and many high profile people . The criteria which has been considered is already mentioned the kid should be below 15 & the steps/Hierarchy of selecting kids are already defined. I have also seen the question was raised on the funding source but it is already mentioned on there website it is done by there sponsors and partners Significant coverage has been done by different media sources when i have gone through the google search there is enough reliable content from which it can be removed from the deleted wiki source & make it live --Ajit.rox28 (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Racial bias on English Wikipedia

I'm not sure that this discussion resulted in a consensus to move these pages. Plus the new title is grammatically incorrect, which was pointed out by several commenters. Are you willing to reconsider, or to provide a more detailed rationale for your close? Thanks for your time. – bradv🍁 00:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bradv: Hi. Yes, I can update the rationale. And I will :) but I'm not sure what grammatical inaccuracy you are referring to. The "the Wikipedia"? Kindly let me know so that I can update the rationale/title accordingly —usernamekiran (talk) 02:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The proper grammar here is the English Wikipedia. Using the definite article is required here in English. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Even apart from the grammar issue, I think the close itself is incorrect, and it should either be relisted or closed as no consensus. Criticism of Wikipedia has already been contested and reopened for discussion. If you're not willing to reverse your close of the other two I'd be willing to take this to WP:MRV for another opinion – please let me know what you prefer. – bradv🍁 04:38, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bradv and TonyBallioni: Hi. I reverted my close, relisted the discussion, and posted a comment there. I also closed the newly opened discussion, with a link to the original discussion. I hope everything is okay now. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I appreciate it. :) – bradv🍁 19:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional help please

Usernamekiran Is it possible to archive all of the conversations on the Kent Tate talk page? I really would like to see the talk page clean without the condescending nasty comment. Is it a matter of changing the settings? Thank you! LorriBrown (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t delete a page I created

Hi Plazmid here , requesting that you do not delete my page , I may be a a newbie but this page needs to exist ! Plazmid 12:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plazmid (talkcontribs)

@Plazmid: Hi. Don't panic. Nothing is going to get deleted. The message on your talkpage was sent accidentally. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you Usernamekiran! That looks so much better now. :-) Yeh! LorriBrown (talk)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

Administrators' newsletter – July 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community.
  • The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles.

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lists of state leaders by age on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

untitled

can you share reason why you have nominated page for delete, please check more about tanuj khatri in video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SY_cjEbqPk , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ3i_0FQfLs kindly check (Ziyush (talk) 12:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

@Ziyush: Hi. I already explained my reasoning at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanuj Khatri. I nominated the article for deletion because Tanuj Khatri doesn't pass the general notability guidelines. That means, Tanuj Khatri has not been covered in reliable sources significantly. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 12:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernamekiran i have used source of bhaskar.com jagran.com, dailypioneer,telegraphindia,shared youtube link of 2 reputed news channel as well, if you need more i will provide more.i have collected this information by spending 3-4 hour, please do some research you will see a lot of article (Ziyush (talk) 12:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]