User talk:The Sr Guy: Difference between revisions
Sundayclose (talk | contribs) →Removal of content: new section |
|||
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
Please restore the information you removed from the languages parameter at [[Christianity in India]], Thank you. [[User:Sundayclose|Sundayclose]] ([[User talk:Sundayclose|talk]]) 18:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC) |
Please restore the information you removed from the languages parameter at [[Christianity in India]], Thank you. [[User:Sundayclose|Sundayclose]] ([[User talk:Sundayclose|talk]]) 18:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Your disruptive edits in [[Hungary]] and [[Hungarian Greek Catholic Church]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/The Sr Guy|your recent contributions]] did not appear constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]]. You can find information about these at our [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] which also provides further information about [[Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia|contributing constructively to this encyclopedia]]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> |
|||
You have been reverted once already for your unconstructive edits in [[Hungary]] and [[Hungarian Greek Catholic Church]]. You made the exact same edit again after being reverted. This violates [[WP:BRD]]. Discuss on the Talk page of either of the aforementioned articles. Your other edits on these two pages have also been unconstructive. Your edits are factually inaccurate and contain biased text indicating violations of [[WP:BIAS]] and [[WP:NPOV]]. Your edits have also been problematic in style violating [[WP:MOS]]. You have a history of doing these kinds of unconstructive edits, and are now repeating the same destructive edits, indicating [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] behavior. |
|||
Please stop editing these two pages. If you have what you believe is a valid change, propose it on the talk page instead. Keep in mind that these talk pages have shown massive battleground behavior before, and much has already been discussed. Bias and Npov are common there. Please try to keep your suggestions within the guidelines and keep it [[WP:CIVIL]]. We would all appreciate it, so we can work toward making this article better. [[User:LisztianEndeavors|LisztianEndeavors]] ([[User talk:LisztianEndeavors|talk]]) 21:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:09, 20 February 2020
Welcome!
|
Orientation
How are you determining what to place in the "orientation" field for these churches? I had to look up "synergism" (didn't know it was opposed to monergism) and I don't understand how that or amillennianism are central defining theologies of their respective churches. They seem to be merely ancillary features of their theological thought. Elizium23 (talk) 21:04, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- i agree with you, i also agree that it is just ancillary features of the theological thought of those churches, i put amillennialism based on the article Jehovah's Witnesses, (that uses Premillennialist in the orientation field) if you have an idea of what to put in the "orientation" field tell me. maybe Western Christianity for the Catholic Church?.(The Sr Guy (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)).
- It seems this is a duplicate parameter identical to "theology". I would say for the Catholic Church to put "Catholicity" or perhaps, as you suggest, Western Christianity. For the Eastern Orthodox, the Byzantine Rite is actually the raison d'etre for their theology in addition to their liturgy, just like Byzantine Catholics. Because the rite encompasses theological thought and patrimony just as much. However, using "Byzantine Rite" in EO-related articles has been problematic in the past. As "theology" is already filled in for these churches, I would be inclined to delete "orientation" altogether and not try to be completist about filling in every existing field. I don't know the origin of the fields or why there are two now, but it may have been some compatibility or compromise issue in the past. Elizium23 (talk) 21:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- What you are proposing is a very simple solution, and i agree, let's announce this on the talk page of these article.(The Sr Guy (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC))
- It seems this is a duplicate parameter identical to "theology". I would say for the Catholic Church to put "Catholicity" or perhaps, as you suggest, Western Christianity. For the Eastern Orthodox, the Byzantine Rite is actually the raison d'etre for their theology in addition to their liturgy, just like Byzantine Catholics. Because the rite encompasses theological thought and patrimony just as much. However, using "Byzantine Rite" in EO-related articles has been problematic in the past. As "theology" is already filled in for these churches, I would be inclined to delete "orientation" altogether and not try to be completist about filling in every existing field. I don't know the origin of the fields or why there are two now, but it may have been some compatibility or compromise issue in the past. Elizium23 (talk) 21:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!
The Catholic Church is False
The Catholic Church was not ordained by Jesus Christ, nor by his apostles. On the contrary, they regarded each other as heretics.
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.5.34.67 (talk) 02:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sir, what does this website about gnosticism have to do with Roman Catholicism?
(The Sr Guy (talk) 23:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)).
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CIS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
"North–South Schism" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect North–South Schism. Since you had some involvement with the North–South Schism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 21:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Christianity in India
I am confused by this edit. Who are you quoting? Who are you responding to? What in the article are you challenging? And last, but not least, why did you remove items from the language parameter when your edit involves religion? Sundayclose (talk) 01:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I was responding to User:Chintu89, who remove my edits(The Sr Guy (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC))
- Would you mind providing a diff where Chintu89 removed your edits? I can't find it. And again, why did you remove items from the language parameter when your edit involves religion? Sundayclose (talk) 01:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- here its: Chintu89 and My, about the language parameter, I didn't notice that I had removed, sorry.(The Sr Guy (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC))
- Why did you remove this from the language parameter in the infobox: "Gujarati, Tamil, Konkani, Kannada, Telugu and various Indian languages"? Sundayclose (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't notice that I removed.(The Sr Guy (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC))
- Please restore it. Also please read:
- I didn't notice that I removed.(The Sr Guy (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC))
- Why did you remove this from the language parameter in the infobox: "Gujarati, Tamil, Konkani, Kannada, Telugu and various Indian languages"? Sundayclose (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- here its: Chintu89 and My, about the language parameter, I didn't notice that I had removed, sorry.(The Sr Guy (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC))
- Would you mind providing a diff where Chintu89 removed your edits? I can't find it. And again, why did you remove items from the language parameter when your edit involves religion? Sundayclose (talk) 01:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I was responding to User:Chintu89, who remove my edits(The Sr Guy (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC))
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Removal of content
Please restore the information you removed from the languages parameter at Christianity in India, Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Your disruptive edits in Hungary and Hungarian Greek Catholic Church
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
You have been reverted once already for your unconstructive edits in Hungary and Hungarian Greek Catholic Church. You made the exact same edit again after being reverted. This violates WP:BRD. Discuss on the Talk page of either of the aforementioned articles. Your other edits on these two pages have also been unconstructive. Your edits are factually inaccurate and contain biased text indicating violations of WP:BIAS and WP:NPOV. Your edits have also been problematic in style violating WP:MOS. You have a history of doing these kinds of unconstructive edits, and are now repeating the same destructive edits, indicating WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior.
Please stop editing these two pages. If you have what you believe is a valid change, propose it on the talk page instead. Keep in mind that these talk pages have shown massive battleground behavior before, and much has already been discussed. Bias and Npov are common there. Please try to keep your suggestions within the guidelines and keep it WP:CIVIL. We would all appreciate it, so we can work toward making this article better. LisztianEndeavors (talk) 21:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)