User talk:Tennis expert/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
c |
←Blanked the page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== [[User:Tennis expert/Date delinking arbitration evidence]] == |
|||
I've deleted the page for you - if you ever want it restoring, please don't hesitate to ping me on my talk. '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]<sup>See [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Postlethwaite|the mess I've created]] or [[User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite|let's have banter]]</sup>''' 22:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Actually, I've had to restore it because it's linked to from the main proposed decision page. Sorry. '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]<sup>See [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Postlethwaite|the mess I've created]] or [[User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite|let's have banter]]</sup>''' 22:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::So long as it's no longer considered '''my''' evidence, then I don't really care if someone else adopts it as their own. I'm leaving and, therefore, couldn't care less about the arbitration. [[User:Tennis expert|Tennis expert]] ([[User talk:Tennis expert#top|talk]]) 22:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::You might not care less, but your evidence is currently being used in the final decision (which has clearly been appreciated). I'm sorry, but that means it's going to have to stay. '''[[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|<font color="green">Ryan</font> <font color="purple">Postlethwaite</font>]]<sup>See [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Postlethwaite|the mess I've created]] or [[User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite|let's have banter]]</sup>''' 23:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I have reverted your changes to the case pages. The arbitrators need this in order to understand the case. Please note that the proposals are still being considered. As a result, I would like to talk to you more, either here or via email, to explain this process a bit more. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Jayvdb|chat]])'''</sup></span> 23:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Sorry, I have no interest in corresponding or talking about this more. I will add a note to the evidence page you reverted to make sure that everyone understands that I am disavowing it completely. [[User:Tennis expert|Tennis expert]] ([[User talk:Tennis expert#top|talk]]) 23:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I have protected the Workshop page for one hour. Your disavowing has been noted. If you have comments, please add them to the associated talk page, or here, but please do not keep trying to remove your existing input into this case, which is on the record and has been useful. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Jayvdb|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:Jayvdb|chat]])'''</sup></span> 23:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Why isn't it within my sole decision to disavow and strike my own contributions? On what possible policy basis are you preserving them? [[User:Tennis expert|Tennis expert]] ([[User talk:Tennis expert#top|talk]]) 23:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||