User talk:Saiph121

Welcome!

Hello, Saiph121! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jim1138 (talk) 06:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Praetorian Guards

Please stop adding Praetorian Guard to the plot section of Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Praetorian Guards are a specific type of military guard from Roman times. If you disagree in relation to Star Wars you need to provide a source to support this. Robynthehode (talk) 09:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Beauty and the Beast (2017 film). You are editing against the established consensus. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page to establish a new consensus before restoring your preferred version. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

The consensus on the talk page is strongly against including those entries. I know you feel they should be included. The consensus says no. If you restore them again against the consensus, you will be blocked from editing.

Your first block was for 2 days. You didn't "get it". Your next block was 1 week. You apparently still haven't "gotten it". Typically, the next block would be for one month, three months or longer, at the administrator's discretion. If you need to be blocked again, I will make the argument that you are not able to "get it" and ask that you be blocked and placed under an indefinite WP:1RR restriction on film-related articles, broadly construed. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution Caution

You have twice been blocked from editing for edit-warring. You have three times filed requests for dispute resolution at the dispute resolution noticeboard. On the one hand, use of dispute resolution processes is encouraged. On the other hand, misuse of dispute resolution processes is a way to get a reputation (that you now already have) as a disruptive editor, and to get blocked longer. In your first filing at DRN, you told the other editors, "Better comply". That was troubling, and you were cautioned. You then opened another dispute resolution request almost immediately, and had to be again cautioned that bludgeoning the process is not a good idea. You then filed a third dispute resolution request at DRN about the same article, after about two months should have given you time to contemplate, and not only requested informal moderated dispute resolution at DRN, but said, at the same time, that you would follow this up by requesting formal mediation. You don't need to use multiple dispute resolution processes either in parallel or in series. If you file yet another frivolous dispute resolution request, someone will have to request sanctions, such as a topic-ban from DRN and mediation, or, as noted above, a 1RR restriction. If you think that erasing your cautions and blocks means that they didn't happen, think again. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

I know Robert alluded to it above, but I promise that if you file another frivolous case at DRN, I will seek to have you banned from it entirely (at a minimum). Nihlus 20:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Please discuss the issue at Saiph121: Take 4 SummerPhD^v2.0 03:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Warning

SummerPhD explained to you where you have misunderstood consensus, and you have instead continued to assert your personal preference for trivia. If you add these awards again, you will be blocked (again) for disruptive editing. And if you carry on as you are yo may confidently expect to start attracting editing restrictions. Guy (Help!) 23:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)