User talk:Psychologist Guy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→ANI notice: Reply |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[Special:Contributions/90.255.65.51|90.255.65.51]] ([[User talk:90.255.65.51|talk]]) 22:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[Special:Contributions/90.255.65.51|90.255.65.51]] ([[User talk:90.255.65.51|talk]]) 22:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
||
:I suggest you read that thread well, PG. It's pretty solid proof for my past claims after all; although not in the way the UK IP might think... [[User:Biohistorian15|Biohistorian15]] ([[User talk:Biohistorian15|talk]]) 23:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:20, 17 September 2024
September 2024
Hey, the discussion over at AP's new SPI got very heated. I hope you understand why I was (originally) reaching for something while perma-banned without much of an explanation. Most of my ideas were possibly delusional, but I think AP was likely involved - and be it just to gravedance and associate me with some fringe figures. Biohistorian15 (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have filed a lot of SPIs over the years but it was only ever against disruptive users who were active on the project making a serious mess of things. It seems a waste of time to file against troll accounts that are already blocked or throwaway IPs. I regret getting involved and commenting on that SPI because now I have become a target. The IP over there has been blocked [1]. The best thing to do is move on and leave it to the admins. Psychologist Guy (talk) 01:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. I am sorry for that; I tried to warn the IP about this kind of posting on their talk page. I don't think it's ban evasion actually, but certainly disruptive and WP:NOTHERE. This is just one of multiple conspiracy theories that I was personally sent through the email feature during my 3-week ban, actually. May I hat that whole discussion now? Biohistorian15 (talk) 08:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Admins and the WMF are aware about these far-right extremist trolls and their conspiracy theories. The best thing to do is ignore their emails or if needed temporally disable your email so you can't be contacted. It's not worth engaging them. The reason you are being contacted is because they think you are "one of their own" and an ally. The best thing to do is go back to normal editing before any of that drama opened up. Feel free to hat or close the discussion as I won't be commenting there again. As a historian I have 100s of articles to create. Banned idiots who have never contributed anything of value to the project are not going to ruin my editing time. Psychologist Guy (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, and in that case sorry for the
"your frivolous accusations"
talk. Best of luck with your content work! Biohistorian15 (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, and in that case sorry for the
- Admins and the WMF are aware about these far-right extremist trolls and their conspiracy theories. The best thing to do is ignore their emails or if needed temporally disable your email so you can't be contacted. It's not worth engaging them. The reason you are being contacted is because they think you are "one of their own" and an ally. The best thing to do is go back to normal editing before any of that drama opened up. Feel free to hat or close the discussion as I won't be commenting there again. As a historian I have 100s of articles to create. Banned idiots who have never contributed anything of value to the project are not going to ruin my editing time. Psychologist Guy (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. I am sorry for that; I tried to warn the IP about this kind of posting on their talk page. I don't think it's ban evasion actually, but certainly disruptive and WP:NOTHERE. This is just one of multiple conspiracy theories that I was personally sent through the email feature during my 3-week ban, actually. May I hat that whole discussion now? Biohistorian15 (talk) 08:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Category:Critics of Black Lives Matter has been nominated for deletion
Category:Critics of Black Lives Matter has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 16:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 90.255.65.51 (talk) 22:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest you read that thread well, PG. It's pretty solid proof for my past claims after all; although not in the way the UK IP might think... Biohistorian15 (talk) 23:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)