User talk:Pdfpdf: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:31, 6 January 2011

Nancy Wilson and Heart

I have no problem with your edit--it is as accurate as mine. My problem was with the previous version, which asserted that she and her sister were merely a "part", which, while technically accurate, dramatically underplays their pivotal role.

Your edit is better than mine, but not because of what you appear to perceive as inaccuracy, but rather, because of the ambiguity of mine. When I said "formed", you appear to think I meant definition 31 or 32. And you are correct in saying that would not be correct. But for the record, I was using the word with definition 33 in mind, which is accurate. We'll leave your wording in place, which eliminates the ambiguity. 98.82.21.92 (talk) 01:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jolly good. Thanks for your note. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 02:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Lerdthenerd wiki defender 14:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:17, 6 January 2011 edit Pdfpdf (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 54,076 edits →Nancy Wilson and Heart: r ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:31, 6 January 2011 edit undo Lerdthenerd (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 8,563 edits →Nancy Wilson and Heart Next edit →
Line 121:		Line 121:

	:Jolly good. Thanks for your note. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf\|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf#top\|talk]]) 02:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)		:Jolly good. Thanks for your note. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf\|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf#top\|talk]]) 02:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

			[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg\|25px\|alt=\|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring\|edit war]]'''. Users who [[WP:DISRUPT\|edit disruptively]] or refuse to [[WP:COLLABORATE\|collaborate]] with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]] states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines\|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains [[Wikipedia:Consensus\|consensus]] among editors. If unsuccessful, then '''do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. Post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards\|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution\|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy\|page protection]]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --[[User:Lerdthenerd\|<font color="#FF0000">Lerd</font><font color="#00FF00">the</font><font color="#0000FF">nerd</font> <font color="#00BBEE">]][[User talk:Lerdthenerd#top\|wiki defender</font>]] 14:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)