Jump to content

User talk:Mbz1/a7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mbz1 (talk | contribs)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


'''[[WP:3RR]] doesn't have an exception for your interpretation of [[WP:NPOV]].''' —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 05:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->
'''[[WP:3RR]] doesn't have an exception for your interpretation of [[WP:NPOV]].''' —&nbsp;[[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|Stalk]]</sub> 05:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->
This block was fair, I was edit warring,but the administrator protected the article and lifted the block about 30 minutes after it was issued. I have to give credit to [[:User:Nableezy]] for helping me out, and I am grateful to him for doing so, most of all because the user is on the different side. Nableezy asked Malik to lift the block because the article got protected. Administrators, do not block the editors, if you protected the article. Contributes, do not edit war. It never leads to anything good.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 00:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
This block was extremely unfair posted by an involved administrator, who [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israeli_West_Bank_barrier&limit=500&action=history heavily edited this very article himself]. The block was lifted soon after it was posted. I have to give credit to [[:User:Nableezy]] for helping me out, and I am grateful to him for doing so, most of all because the user is on the different side. Nableezy asked Malik to lift the block because the article got protected. Administrators, do not block the editors, if you protected the article, and never act as admins, if you are involved up to your nose like in this case.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 00:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


== Blocked for 24 hours for disruptive editing ==
== Blocked for 24 hours for disruptive editing ==
Line 31: Line 31:


== April 2010 ==
== April 2010 ==
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''24 hours''' from editing{{#if:| for {{{reason}}}|}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 13:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div>
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''24 hours''' from editing{{#if:| for {{{reason}}}|}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 13:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div>
</div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->
</div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->


This is in reaction to your violation of the topic ban noted above by your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rothschild_family&diff=354047312&oldid=354020321], as per the reports on my talk page. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 13:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
This is in reaction to your violation of the topic ban noted above by your edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rothschild_family&diff=354047312&oldid=354020321], as per the reports on my talk page. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 13:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


;Block analysis.
;Block analysis.
Line 42: Line 42:


==AE block==
==AE block==
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''48 hours''' from editing{{#if:| for {{{reason}}}|}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 16:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''48 hours''' from editing{{#if:| for {{{reason}}}|}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 16:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->


This is in reaction to your topic ban violation at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=354641444]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 16:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
This is in reaction to your topic ban violation at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=354641444]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 16:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


;Block analysis
;Block analysis
Line 53: Line 53:


== June 2010 ==
== June 2010 ==
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''72 hours''' from editing . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 12:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left]] To enforce an [[WP:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''72 hours''' from editing . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 12:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=349940199#Motions_regarding_Trusilver_and_Arbitration_Enforcement 2010 decision]</span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as [[WP:AN]] or [[WP:ANI]]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|proper page]]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->


This concerns your third violation of your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=353684552#Result_concerning_User:Gatoclass Israeli/Arab conflict topic ban], at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=prev&oldid=366357248] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Breein1007&diff=prev&oldid=365950378]. Continued ban violations will lead to longer blocks and/or an extension of the ban. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 12:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
This concerns your third violation of your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=353684552#Result_concerning_User:Gatoclass Israeli/Arab conflict topic ban], at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=prev&oldid=366357248] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Breein1007&diff=prev&oldid=365950378]. Continued ban violations will lead to longer blocks and/or an extension of the ban. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 12:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)


;block analysis
;block analysis
Line 62: Line 62:
== Blocked ==
== Blocked ==


<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|left|31px]] '''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' {{#if:|until '''{{{until}}}'''|for a period of '''forty-eight hours'''}} for '''violation of the three-revert rule on [[Art student scam]]'''. To contest this block, please reply here on your '''talk page''' by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block]]. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 21:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC) </div><!-- Template:GBlock -->
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|left|31px]] '''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' {{#if:|until '''{{{until}}}'''|for a period of '''forty-eight hours'''}} for '''violation of the three-revert rule on [[Art student scam]]'''. To contest this block, please reply here on your '''talk page''' by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block]]. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<span style="color:black;">tariq</span><span style="color:gray;">abjotu</span>]]''' 21:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC) </div><!-- Template:GBlock -->
;Block analysis
;Block analysis
It was a fair block. I've learned my lesson and never edit ear again.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 02:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
It was a fair block. I've learned my lesson and never edit war again.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 02:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


== 24 hour block ==
== 24 hour block ==
Line 87: Line 87:


== February 2010 ==
== February 2010 ==
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for '''violating [[WP:BLP]] at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=345744667] as explained at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&oldid=345768930#ANI_discussion my talk page]'''. Please stop. You are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make ''useful'' contributions]] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 00:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->
<div class="user-block"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for '''violating [[WP:BLP]] at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=345744667] as explained at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&oldid=345768930#ANI_discussion my talk page]'''. Please stop. You are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make ''useful'' contributions]] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 00:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->
:I am proud of this block. I am fighting for the right cause! The block only proves one more time my point that Wikipedia is non-censored only from one side. To call [http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/home/home_en.htm European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights] [http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf its working definition for antisemitism] and [[w:Simon Wiesenthal Center|Simon Wiesenthal Center]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=prev&oldid=345768930 original research] seems kind of strange. Oh yes, and I do not think I could ever stop to call the things with their real names.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 00:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
:I am proud of this block. I am fighting for the right cause! The block only proves one more time my point that Wikipedia is non-censored only from one side. To call [http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/home/home_en.htm European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights] [http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf its working definition for antisemitism] and [[w:Simon Wiesenthal Center|Simon Wiesenthal Center]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=prev&oldid=345768930 original research] seems kind of strange. Oh yes, and I do not think I could ever stop to call the things with their real names.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 00:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
::::And how dare you to say that I am [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=prev&oldid=345768930 "mainly here to fight an ideological battle and not to improve Wikipedia"] only because I called an anti-Semite "an anti-Semite" and wrote his name in small! It is he, who was brought here to fight an ideological battle not me. --[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 00:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
::::And how dare you to say that I am [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&diff=prev&oldid=345768930 "mainly here to fight an ideological battle and not to improve Wikipedia"] only because I called an anti-Semite "an anti-Semite" and wrote his name in small! It is he, who was brought here to fight an ideological battle not me. --[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 00:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Line 108: Line 108:


:And who decided that it was "this hollow arb enforcement request" You did? Let me see. On 17:35, 23 December 2010 that AE was first mentioned on AN/I. On 18:28, 23 December 2010 you blocked me after on 18:21, 23 December 2010 you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=403904789 this edit] ? So when you read the AE report and came to conclusion it is hollow? I do not believe you ever read it. I still see no evidences of wikihounding and or personal attacks. I do not believe you should keep your administrative tools.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 19:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
:And who decided that it was "this hollow arb enforcement request" You did? Let me see. On 17:35, 23 December 2010 that AE was first mentioned on AN/I. On 18:28, 23 December 2010 you blocked me after on 18:21, 23 December 2010 you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=403904789 this edit] ? So when you read the AE report and came to conclusion it is hollow? I do not believe you ever read it. I still see no evidences of wikihounding and or personal attacks. I do not believe you should keep your administrative tools.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 19:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

About so called "hollow AE request": Less than a month later [[:User:Supreme Deliciousness]] was
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=409702868 blocked for 24 hours and topic-banned for 2 months]. So, my AE was not "hollow" after all.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 04:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)




Line 118: Line 121:


;My analysis of the block. I hope it might help some users and administrators.
;My analysis of the block. I hope it might help some users and administrators.
After a complaint <small>that should not have been filed in the first place</small> about me was filed on AN/I, and [[:User:Prodego]] warned me they should have archived this complaint on AN/I and mark it as resolved. It was not done, that promoted a few trolls to pick it up a some time after I was warned. At that time I felt threatened because the trolls brought up my communications with another users that had nothing to do with initial AN/I thread, and none of which required any administrative assistance whatsoever. The three users were <s>canvased</s> notified about the thread. Two of those three were dicent enough to ignore the <s>canvasing</s> notifications. The blocking administrator was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gwen_Gale&diff=prev&oldid=403832903 <s>canvased</s> notified too]. At that point I was sooo surprised how an elephant was getting created out of a fly that I filed an SPI request. It should not have been filed of course, but '''it was not filed to harass anybody'''. '''I filed it with the only purpose to protect myself'''. At that point I got blocked for a week. I should not have been blocked even for a minute. A single(even wrong SPI) and a single a few words post on AN/I with no PA in a thread started by someone else (not me) should not have resulted in the block. If [[:User:Prodego]] marked AN/I about me (that should not have been filed in the first place) as resolved and archived it nothing like this would have happened.
After a complaint <small>that should not have been filed in the first place</small> about me was filed on AN/I, and [[:User:Prodego]] warned me they should have archived this complaint on AN/I and mark it as resolved. It was not done, that promoted a few trolls and my personal hounds to pick it up a some time after I was warned. At that time I felt threatened because the trolls brought up my communications with another users that had nothing to do with initial AN/I thread, and none of which required any administrative assistance whatsoever. The three users were <s>canvased</s> notified about the thread. Two of those three were decent enough to ignore the <s>canvasing</s> notifications. The blocking administrator was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gwen_Gale&diff=prev&oldid=403832903 <big>'''canvased'''</big>]. At that point I was sooo surprised how an elephant was getting created out of a fly that I filed an SPI request. It should not have been filed of course, but '''it was not filed to harass anybody'''. '''I filed it with the only purpose to protect myself'''. I was refused in [[WP:AAGF|Assumption of the assumption of good faith]]. At that point I got blocked for a week. I should not have been blocked even for a minute. A single(even wrong SPI) and a single a few words post on AN/I with no PA in a thread started by someone else (not me) should not have resulted in the block ever. If [[:User:Prodego]] marked AN/I about me (that should not have been filed in the first place) as resolved and archived it nothing like this would have happened.


Conclusion: Administrators, if you acted on AN/I report, mark it as resolved and archive it. Do not feed up the trolls and wikihounds, who hardly wrote an article, but are spending lots of time on administrative noticeboards. The contributors, never [[wp:bait|take a bait]].--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 20:57, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Conclusion: Administrators, if you acted on AN/I report, mark it as resolved and archive it. Do not feed up the trolls and wikihounds, who hardly wrote an article, but are spending lots of time on administrative noticeboards. The contributors, never [[wp:bait|take a bait]].--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 20:57, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

*'''Update''':The block and following bans was by my request [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMbz1%2Fspecial&action=historysubmit&diff=418687171&oldid=418682281 examined] by [[:user:AGK|administrator AGK]], who found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=403830930 my comment] to be "of value", and "Daedalus' complaint about my comment" to be "without merit". [[:user:AGK|administrator AGK]] conclusion was: "'''I disagree with the block and with the continuation of the ANI etc. restrictions'''".
*'''Update''' <big>'''I was unfairly blocked by a [[:wp:canvass|canvassed]] administrator Gwen Gale. In accordance with this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EdJohnston&diff=prev&oldid=422766905 "Admins ought to be uncanvassable. Any admin who gets an improper request on their talk page should not take the proposed action. If they do, a question may be raised as to their fitness to be an admin.."] I was absolutely right, when I said Gwen Gale should not be an administrator.'''</big>--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 15:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Fort Mason and Downtown San Francisco]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Fort Mason and Downtown San Francisco]] ==
Line 182: Line 188:
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Photographer's Barnstar'''
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Photographer's Barnstar'''
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For all the hard work improving many articles. Thank you! <b><font face="Edwardian Script ITC" color="#99ccfff" size="5">[[User:Travisthurston|Travis Thurston]]</font></b><b><font color="#000000">+</font></b> 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For all the hard work improving many articles. Thank you! <b>[[User:Travisthurston|<font face="Edwardian Script ITC" color="#99ccfff" size="5">Travis Thurston</font>]]</b><b><font color="#000000">+</font></b> 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
|}
|}
== DYK for tide pool ==
== DYK for tide pool ==
Line 193: Line 199:
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{5}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{5}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|, and '''''[[{{{6}}}]]'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}}{{#if:|, and '''''[[{{{6}}}]]'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Thank you for all that you do! '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Royalbroil|Royal]]</font><font color="#FFCC00">[[User talk:Royalbroil|broil]]</font>''' 00:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
|} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> Thank you for all that you do! '''[[User:Royalbroil|<span style="color:#000000;">Royal</span>]][[User talk:Royalbroil|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">broil</span>]]''' 00:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
== DYK for Mirage of astronomical objects ==
== DYK for Mirage of astronomical objects ==


Line 250: Line 256:
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your many generous donations of gorgeous images (especially those breathtaking photos at [[User:Mbz1/Mbz1 gallery/Underwater]]), please accept this as a small token of my appreciation. –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 19:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your many generous donations of gorgeous images (especially those breathtaking photos at [[User:Mbz1/Mbz1 gallery/Underwater]]), please accept this as a small token of my appreciation. –[[user:xeno|<span style="font-family:verdana; color:black;">'''xeno'''</span>]][[user talk:xeno|<sup style="color:black;">talk</sup>]] 19:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
|}
|}


Line 357: Line 363:
|-
|-
|[[File:Kohala coast at the Big Island of Hawaii from the air levels.jpg|75px|center|]]
|[[File:Kohala coast at the Big Island of Hawaii from the air levels.jpg|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''Your [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates|Featured picture candidate]] has been promoted'''</center> Your nomination for [[Wikipedia:Featured pictures|featured picture]] status, '''[[:File:Kohala coast at the Big Island of Hawaii from the air levels.jpg]]''', gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. [[User:Papa Lima Whiskey|<font color="#ba0000">Papa Lima Whiskey</font>]] ([[User talk:Papa Lima Whiskey|talk]]) 13:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
|{{center|1='''Your [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates|Featured picture candidate]] has been promoted'''}} Your nomination for [[Wikipedia:Featured pictures|featured picture]] status, '''[[:File:Kohala coast at the Big Island of Hawaii from the air levels.jpg]]''', gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. [[User:Papa Lima Whiskey|<font color="#ba0000">Papa Lima Whiskey</font>]] ([[User talk:Papa Lima Whiskey|talk]]) 13:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
|}
|}


Line 541: Line 547:
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#June 27 2010|June 27, 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Sol Hachuel]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201006/Sol_Hachuel quick check] )</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#June 27 2010|June 27, 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Sol Hachuel]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201006/Sol_Hachuel quick check] )</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
}} <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — [[User:Rlevse|<b style="color:#060;"><i>R</i>levse</b>]] • [[User_talk:Rlevse|<span style="color:#990;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 00:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)



== DYK for Châteauneuf-du-Faou ==


{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk"
|-
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#March 17 2009|March 17, 2009]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} '''''[[Châteauneuf-du-Faou]]'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{4}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{5}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|, and '''''[[{{{6}}}]]'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|} <!-- {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}} --> [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 23:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

== DYK for Lac de Monteynard Avignonet ==


{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk"
|-
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#March 22 2009|March 22, 2009]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} '''''[[Lac de Monteynard Avignonet]]'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{4}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{5}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|, and '''''[[{{{6}}}]]'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|} <!-- {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}} -->
[[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 00:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)




Line 755: Line 786:
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#27 November 2010|27 November 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[King Philip shipwreck]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that at [[Ocean Beach, San Francisco, California|Ocean Beach]] in [[San Francisco]], every so often the sand recedes enough to allow the 19th century '''[[King Philip shipwreck|shipwreck of the ''King Philip'']]''' [[clipper ship]] ''(pictured)'' to become visible?'' You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201011/King_Philip_shipwreck quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#27 November 2010|27 November 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[King Philip shipwreck]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that at [[Ocean Beach, San Francisco, California|Ocean Beach]] in [[San Francisco]], every so often the sand recedes enough to allow the 19th century '''[[King Philip shipwreck|shipwreck of the ''King Philip'']]''' [[clipper ship]] ''(pictured)'' to become visible?'' You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201011/King_Philip_shipwreck quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
}} [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Western tent caterpillars and their tent]] ==

<!-- comment to force linebreak -->
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
|-
|[[File:Western tent caterpillars Malacosoma californicum in Joshua Tree NP.jpg|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''An image created by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:File:Western tent caterpillars Malacosoma californicum in Joshua Tree NP.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 02:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
|}


==DYK for Ravens of the Tower of London==
==DYK for Ravens of the Tower of London==
Line 844: Line 884:
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
|-
|-
|[[Image:Iceberg with hole edit.jpg|75px|center|]]
|[[Image:Iceberg with hole around Cape York, Greenland edit.jpg|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''An image uploaded by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:Image:Iceberg with hole edit.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 04:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|<center>'''An image uploaded by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:Image:Iceberg with hole around Cape York, Greenland edit.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 04:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|}
|}
== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Albino Alligator]] ==

<!-- comment to force linebreak -->
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
|-
|[[File:Albino Alligator 2008.jpg|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''An image created by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:File:Albino Alligator 2008.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 10:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
|}


== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold dust day gecko at flower]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold dust day gecko at flower]] ==


Line 855: Line 905:
|<center>'''An image uploaded by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:Image:Gold dust day gecko at flower-edit1.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 02:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
|<center>'''An image uploaded by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:Image:Gold dust day gecko at flower-edit1.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 02:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
|}
|}

== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Concretions on Bowling Balls Beach]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Concretions on Bowling Balls Beach]] ==


Line 905: Line 956:
|<center>'''An image uploaded by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:Image:Lava wildfire.JPG]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 11:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
|<center>'''An image uploaded by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:Image:Lava wildfire.JPG]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 11:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
|}
|}
== A big Golden State thank you ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | [[Image:WPCF.svg|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The California Star'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your numerous contributions to photography related to and in California. Your keen eye (and the fact that you share it with Wikipedia) is appreciated. &mdash;[[User:Scoutersig|Scouter]][[User talk:Scoutersig|Sig]] 15:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
|}

== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Play fight of Polar Bears]] ==

<!-- comment to force linebreak -->
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
|-
|[[File:Play fight of polar bears edit 1.avi.OGG|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''An image created by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:File:Play fight of polar bears edit 1.avi.OGG]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 05:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
|}

== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg]] ==


Line 912: Line 982:
|[[File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg|75px|center|]]
|[[File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''An image created by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:Makeemlighter|Makeemlighter]] ([[User talk:Makeemlighter|talk]]) 05:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
|<center>'''An image created by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:Makeemlighter|Makeemlighter]] ([[User talk:Makeemlighter|talk]]) 05:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
|}

== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Grand Prismatic Spring and Midway Geyser Basin]] ==

<!-- comment to force linebreak -->
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
|-
|[[File:Grand Prismatic Spring and Midway Geyser Basin from above.jpg|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''An image created by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:File:Grand Prismatic Spring and Midway Geyser Basin from above.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 03:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
|}

== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Snowflake moray]] ==

<!-- comment to force linebreak -->
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
|-
|[[File:Snowflake moray in Kona.jpg|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''An image created by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:File:Snowflake moray in Kona.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
|}

== DYK ==

{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk"
|-
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|On [[24 April]], [[2008]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} '''''[[Halema`uma`u crater]]'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{4}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{5}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|, and '''''[[{{{6}}}]]'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|} <!-- [[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}]], [[{{CURRENTYEAR}}]] --> --[[User:Bobet|Bobet]] 13:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

== DYK for Parc naturel régional d'Armorique ==


{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk"
|-
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#February 17 2009|February 17, 2009]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} '''''[[Parc naturel régional d'Armorique]]'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{4}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} '''''[[{{{5}}}]]'''''
}}{{#if:|, and '''''[[{{{6}}}]]'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
|} <!-- {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}} -->
--[[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 19:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Steam phase eruption of Castle Geyser with rainbow]] ==

<!-- comment to force linebreak -->
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
|-
|[[File:Steam Phase eruption of Castle geyser with double rainbow.jpg|75px|center|]]
|<center>'''An image created by you has been promoted to [[Wikipedia:Featured picture|featured picture]] status'''</center> Your image, '''[[:File:Steam Phase eruption of Castle geyser with double rainbow.jpg]]''', was nominated on [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]], gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. Thank you for your contribution! [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 02:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
|}
|}


Line 923: Line 1,042:
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For the great photographs you have contributed and for winning fifth place for PoTY. Congratulations! -- [[User:Muhammad Mahdi Karim|'''Muhammad''']][[User Talk:Muhammad Mahdi Karim|<small>(''talk'')</small>]] 17:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For the great photographs you have contributed and for winning fifth place for PoTY. Congratulations! -- [[User:Muhammad Mahdi Karim|'''Muhammad''']][[User Talk:Muhammad Mahdi Karim|<small>(''talk'')</small>]] 17:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
|}
|}
== [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Green sea turtle]] ==

<!-- comment to force linebreak -->
{| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc"
|-
|[[Image:Hawaii turtle 2.JPG|75px|center|]]
|{{center|1='''Your [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates|Featured picture candidate]] has been promoted'''}} Your nomination for [[Wikipedia:Featured pictures|featured picture]] status, '''[[:Image:Hawaii turtle 2.JPG]]''', gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 03:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
|}
This was the very first image of mine that got promoted to FP. Now it is FP on quite a few wikipedias.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 03:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:47, 7 March 2023

January 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring at Israeli West Bank barrier. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. WP:3RR doesn't have an exception for your interpretation of WP:NPOV. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This block was extremely unfair posted by an involved administrator, who heavily edited this very article himself. The block was lifted soon after it was posted. I have to give credit to User:Nableezy for helping me out, and I am grateful to him for doing so, most of all because the user is on the different side. Nableezy asked Malik to lift the block because the article got protected. Administrators, do not block the editors, if you protected the article, and never act as admins, if you are involved up to your nose like in this case.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 hours for disruptive editing

Without asserting blame for events happening prior to this week, earlier this week I and others imposed the 24 hr interaction ban to try and calm the larger conflict down. Since then, the level of personal attacks and disruptive actions by all but one of the parties involved dropped off nearly completely.

For whatever reason, you have continued them.

I advised you a couple of days ago to take a short break, hoping that you would calm down and find a way to continue the content debates without disruptive actions and personal attacks. Your response has been to redouble those attacks. Reviewing ANI currently, there is significant administrator support for a proposal blocking you for a week and putting you on user interaction probation for three months.

I am not taking up that proposed community sanction now. But reviewing your actions since my request for you to take a break, it's clear that you are poking sticks into situations to escalate conflict, with multiple parties, in multiple venues. That's disruptive to the community. We expect editors to handle conflicts in an adult manner - with respect for other participants, and dealing with disagreements at a friendly, or at least not insultingly combative, level.

I am blocking you from editing for 24 hrs to prevent further provocations and disruptive behavior.

When the block is up - I strongly urge you to either disengage from this subject or to participate in a constructive manner with due respect for other Wikipedians' participation. Even in contentious areas, we expect people to handle content conflicts with dignity and respect. If you cannot do that, you either need to stay away from contentious areas, or reconsider whether you are able to participate in Wikipedia on an ongoing basis.

That decision is up to you. If you chose to behave in a constructive manner then nobody will remember this a year from now. I hope that you chose that path.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Block analysis

The block was unfair. No differences for the block rationale were provided. Conclusion: Admins do not write long block messages. Make them short, clear and the most important specific. Provide the exact differences for the block rational, and provide them in such a way that anybody would be able to see those at any time, even a few years later. Sandstein does it right. Learn from him.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:43, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block.  Sandstein  13:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

This is in reaction to your violation of the topic ban noted above by your edit [1], as per the reports on my talk page.  Sandstein  13:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block analysis.

This block is one of my favorite :-) I was blocked for this edit for violating my topic ban on I/P conflict in... Rothschild family article. What in the word Rothschild family has to do with I/P conflict? There's not a single, not even a half word in that article about the conflict or about Arabs for that matter.

Conclusion: Administrators, if you are really to block contributors for such edits, I believe topic bans conditions should be specified much more clearly than they are specified now. For example, it should be said somewhere: "Do not edit anything that has a word from your topic ban description. For example, if you are topic banned on I/P conflict, do not edit any article that has word "Israel" in it. Blocks should not deepened on what admin is active at the moment and what mood he/she is in. Contributors, if you are topic-banned, for example, on I/P conflict do not edit anything that has a word "Israel" in it even, it has nothing to do with the conflict itself. You might get unfairly blocked for so called topic ban violation.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AE block

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block.  Sandstein  16:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

This is in reaction to your topic ban violation at [2].  Sandstein  16:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block analysis

I was blocked over this edit. As you could see it had absolutely nothing to do with I/P conflict and was only concerning wikipedia user page policies. It was made at AE appeal issued by a user, who was unhappy that a hate propaganda image he displayed at his user page was removed. Did I violate my topic ban by citing wikipedia policies in my own section without mentioning any specifics about removed hate propaganda image. I do not think so, and other topic banned users were not sanctioned in the similar situations.

Conclusion: Admins, what I like about being blocked by Sandstein is that he always provides the differences for the block rationale in block log and in block message. It is a very good practice, and every blocking admin should do the same thing. Contributors, once again, even you believe your edit is not a violation of your topic ban, it is better to be safe than sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block.  Sandstein  12:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

This concerns your third violation of your Israeli/Arab conflict topic ban, at [3] and [4]. Continued ban violations will lead to longer blocks and/or an extension of the ban.  Sandstein  12:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

block analysis

It was my last block for so called topic ban violation for two non disruptive edits on user's talk pages. Was it fair? Well I have seen other topic banned users made multiple comments on an user's talk pages and did not even get warned. As I said about my block for Rothschild family's edit, blocks should not deepened on what admin is active at the moment and what mood he/she is in. The conditions of topic banns should be specified much clearer than they are now.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Block analysis

It was a fair block. I've learned my lesson and never edit war again.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

24 hour block

Following discussion on WP:AE you are blocked for 24 hours due to infringing an interaction ban. PhilKnight (talk) 18:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC) April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block analysis

This block was unfair.I did not violate any condition of my ban--Mbz1 (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brief block / disruption

All of User:Factsontheground, User:Gilisa, and User:Mbz1 are blocked briefly (12 hours) for disruption for recent behavior in thier editor conflicts.

I am going to be proposing a permanent interaction ban and possibly other topic bans on ANI immediately after posting these notices.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Georgewilliamherbert: you seriously need to be kicked off this site. Clickpop (talk) 08:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. --Mbz1 (talk) 00:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Block analysis

Extremely unfair block with no differences for a block rationale provided. I was blocked over few comments on AN/I. In a worst case scenario ban on AN/I might have been in order. I full site block - no a way.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating WP:BLP at [5] as explained at my talk page. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.  Sandstein  00:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am proud of this block. I am fighting for the right cause! The block only proves one more time my point that Wikipedia is non-censored only from one side. To call European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights its working definition for antisemitism and Simon Wiesenthal Center and original research seems kind of strange. Oh yes, and I do not think I could ever stop to call the things with their real names.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And how dare you to say that I am "mainly here to fight an ideological battle and not to improve Wikipedia" only because I called an anti-Semite "an anti-Semite" and wrote his name in small! It is he, who was brought here to fight an ideological battle not me. --Mbz1 (talk) 00:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


blocked

Straight off your interaction ban, you began wantonly hounding that editor and others, again. I have blocked you for one week, owing to harassment and disruption. If, when this block lifts, you carry on with this behaviour, your next block will be much longer. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you blocked me for a week for a bad faith report! It actually was not a bad faith report and it was not intended as a harassment. I really found this strange that a user will react the way they did on AN/I report that should have never been filed in the first place. I do not find it strange anymore, if even admin reacted the way she did. BTW may I please ask you to review what is wikihounding: Wiki-hounding is the singling out of one or more editors, and joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, in order to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance or distress to the other editor. Wikihounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Wikipedia. (highlighted by me) Now, when you have learned what is wikihounding please provide some examples of me ever wikihounding anybody. Please also provide examples of PA and disruption that were worth blocking for a weak or even for an hour for that matter.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the ANI thread speaks for itself. Meanwhile Prodego warned you to stay away from that editor earlier today. Gwen Gale (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but I cannot find any differences of me wikihounding or personally attacking somebody or anybody. Could you please be so kind and provide the exact differences of me wikihounding and personal attacking somebody. Please just take them from that very AN/I report and post them here. --Mbz1 (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly this AN/I report and the block look more and more as witch hunt, and witch hunt it is.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:13, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • See the ANI thread which you linked to in your unblock request, along with this hollow arb enforcement request and the meaningless CU report I linked to above. If you don't understand what you've done, there may be a need to lengthen your block. Gwen Gale (talk) 19:15, 23 December

2010 (UTC)

And who decided that it was "this hollow arb enforcement request" You did? Let me see. On 17:35, 23 December 2010 that AE was first mentioned on AN/I. On 18:28, 23 December 2010 you blocked me after on 18:21, 23 December 2010 you made this edit ? So when you read the AE report and came to conclusion it is hollow? I do not believe you ever read it. I still see no evidences of wikihounding and or personal attacks. I do not believe you should keep your administrative tools.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About so called "hollow AE request": Less than a month later User:Supreme Deliciousness was blocked for 24 hours and topic-banned for 2 months. So, my AE was not "hollow" after all.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Gwen Gale, don't worry. I am not going to post unblock request or/and appeal the block. I have done nothing to be blocked for, and you still did not present any differences to support the claim of wikihounding and personal attacks because the above differences are not personal attacks .
I have never done anything in purpose to harass and/or wikihound anybody. I was wikihounded and harass way too much myself to do this to anybody. This SPI I filed could have been filed as a mistake, in a hurry, but it was not filed in bad faith and it was not filed to harass anybody. I myself was the subject of 2 SPI with much less (practically no evidences) They both were approved, were run, came back as "unrelated" and nobody ever got even warn over any of them leave alone blocked. --Mbz1 (talk) 20:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This block isn't about guilt Mbz1, it's about things you have done which stalled building the encyclopedia by wasting the time of volunteer editors on this privately owned website, with all its flaws. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've edit warred over a misleading template at the top of this page, I have locked you out of your talk page. You can ask to be unblocked by email, through WP:BASC. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Indef-blocked by Gwen Gale Rd232 talk 12:51, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My analysis of the block. I hope it might help some users and administrators.

After a complaint that should not have been filed in the first place about me was filed on AN/I, and User:Prodego warned me they should have archived this complaint on AN/I and mark it as resolved. It was not done, that promoted a few trolls and my personal hounds to pick it up a some time after I was warned. At that time I felt threatened because the trolls brought up my communications with another users that had nothing to do with initial AN/I thread, and none of which required any administrative assistance whatsoever. The three users were canvased notified about the thread. Two of those three were decent enough to ignore the canvasing notifications. The blocking administrator was canvased. At that point I was sooo surprised how an elephant was getting created out of a fly that I filed an SPI request. It should not have been filed of course, but it was not filed to harass anybody. I filed it with the only purpose to protect myself. I was refused in Assumption of the assumption of good faith. At that point I got blocked for a week. I should not have been blocked even for a minute. A single(even wrong SPI) and a single a few words post on AN/I with no PA in a thread started by someone else (not me) should not have resulted in the block ever. If User:Prodego marked AN/I about me (that should not have been filed in the first place) as resolved and archived it nothing like this would have happened.

Conclusion: Administrators, if you acted on AN/I report, mark it as resolved and archive it. Do not feed up the trolls and wikihounds, who hardly wrote an article, but are spending lots of time on administrative noticeboards. The contributors, never take a bait.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:57, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Lower Fort Mason abd Downtown San Francisco.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Thanks I just fixed the caption. Hope it passes. Beautiful image, BTW! - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You really do have some great images! What would you consider your best? I came upon this which looked nice. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. I had to laugh. Did you know it was your image when you asked for a photo? You really really deserve this:
The Photographer's Barnstar
For uploading several images to Wikipedia, several featured, I - Milk's Favorite Cookie hereby award you this Barnstar.- Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you've been to Antarctica?!- Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. I consider you an awesome photographer. You must love to travel! Next time, (hopefully you can do this), you travel to South America, you really ought get an image of a Goliath Birdeater. Although, it is EXTREMELY scary, I've always wanted to know someone who has taken a photo of it. Obviously, if you hate spiders as much as I do, don't even bother. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Really?! I've never seen a shark (in real life). Although you were in a cage, were you scared by any chance? Also, how cold did Antarctica feel? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you go looking at sharks? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which would you consider most interesting? And, any images? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How close did the sharks come to the cage when you went diving? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Have you been to every state in the US? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
42, 43. I really want to go to Alaska, and Hawaii though. Have you ever been to Alaska? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:GGB reflection in raindrops.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 09:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:Crepuscular rays in ggp 2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 10:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

A Barnstar!
The Bio-Barnstar

I award this Barnstar to Mila for all of the countless beautiful images of hers that are gracing so many biology-related articles! Invertzoo (talk) 22:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Photographer's Barnstar
For all the hard work improving many articles. Thank you! Travis Thurston+ 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for tide pool

Updated DYK query On 24 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article tide pool, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for all that you do! Royalbroil 00:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mirage of astronomical objects

Updated DYK query On 7 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mirage of astronomical objects, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 02:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Novaculichthys taeniourus

Updated DYK query On 11 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Novaculichthys taeniourus, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 07:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Welcome back! Also, thanks for the barnstar. I think you deserve one of these too, for this particularly kind and civil conversation with a new user. I came across that conversation in December, from looking at one of the pictures that he had posted, and was happy to see that someone had been civil to him, especially since he seemed to be in a difficult situation! Cheers, CordeliaNaismith (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


How daft of me!

I should have awarded you with this right away.

The Photographer's Barnstar
I, Pericles, award User:Mbz1 this honorary barnstar in recognition of her most excellent and thoughtful work in touching up File:Arm less man.JPG, drastically improving the visual quality of a valuable historic image used in Parthian Empire and several other articles at Wikipedia. I bow to you madam, and thank you! Pericles of AthensTalk 17:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!--Mbz1 (talk) 21:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome! You can keep track of the progress I'm making on my draft here if you like: User:PericlesofAthens/Draft for Parthian Empire. I've yet to add your picture, but it will be placed in an appropriate section, most likely "nobility" or "art and architecture". Cheers buddy.--Pericles of AthensTalk 22:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well-deserved

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your many generous donations of gorgeous images (especially those breathtaking photos at User:Mbz1/Mbz1 gallery/Underwater), please accept this as a small token of my appreciation. –xenotalk 19:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Flora and Maria

Grondemar 23:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Homelessness in Japan

Updated DYK query On June 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Homelessness in Japan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Backslash Forwardslash 15:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Dead trees at Mammoth Hot Springs.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 18:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Valued Picture

An image created by you has been promoted to valued picture status
Your image, File:Kissing Prairie dog edit 3.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Elekhh (talk) 03:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the nomination! I've missed on it.--Mbz1 (talk) 05:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for List of Jewish Nobel Prize Winners

Updated DYK query On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of Jewish Nobel Prize Winners, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ronald Levy

Updated DYK query On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ronald Levy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thelmadatter (talk) 23:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Development of Green Flash.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 18:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Mauna Loa from the air.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 20:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Carpilius convexus is consuming Heterocentrotus trigonarius in Hawaii.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 12:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Mercury transit 2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aureole effect

Updated DYK query On March 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aureole effect, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 08:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Kohala coast at the Big Island of Hawaii from the air levels.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 13:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maimonides Synagogue

Updated DYK query On April 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maimonides Synagogue, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Fata Morgana (mirage)

Updated DYK query On April 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fata Morgana (mirage), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see this made it onto the all-time most-viewed list. Congratulations! --Avenue (talk) 10:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it was a very big success as a DYK! Well done, especially on your great images. I was delighted to have been able to work on the text. Invertzoo (talk) 21:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Abraham Reuel

Updated DYK query On April 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Abraham Reuel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The geological history of Point Lobos

Updated DYK query On April 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The geological history of Point Lobos, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Looming, Towering, Stooping, and Sinking

Updated DYK query On April 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Looming, Towering, Stooping, and Sinking, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jewish pirates

Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bernese Fassnacht (Carnival)

Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Majorcan cartographic school

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Legends of the Coco de Mer

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 17 May 2010 (UTC)


DYK for Orchid hunters

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Carrier Pigeon (ship)

Bradjamesbrown (talk) 06:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Historically significant lunar eclipses

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome Mila! Invertzoo (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peacock flounder

RlevseTalk 12:02, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Underwater camouflage and mimicry

RlevseTalk 18:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for RMS Mulheim

RlevseTalk 06:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Australite

RlevseTalk 06:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Max Frauenthal

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I don't hand Barnstars out very often, in fact, I can't remember the last time I did so. I had promised you one, if Herrengasse 23 became a DYK but, it seems the world and Wikipedia must remain in ignorance. However, you have contributed greatly to my crusade to give recognition to lesser and little known buildings - so here it is and you desearve it:


The Content Creativity Barnstar
To Mbz1 for his tremendous work and research in bringing Herrengasse 23 to a wider puplic appreciation.  Giacomo  18:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


PS: I would like to give Sandstein something similar for the really good photos, but don't think it wise to hand him a sharp pointy object when I am the vicinity. I will thnk on it.  Giacomo  18:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Herrengasse 23 (Bern)

RlevseTalk 00:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jacob Barnet affair

Mifter (talk) 12:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sol Hachuel

RlevseTalk 00:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Châteauneuf-du-Faou

Updated DYK query On March 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Châteauneuf-du-Faou, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 23:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lac de Monteynard Avignonet

Updated DYK query On March 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lac de Monteynard Avignonet, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Frederick Mayer (the spy)

RlevseTalk 12:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Schloss Reichenbach

RlevseTalk 00:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for La Peregrina pearl

RlevseTalk 06:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for The Holocaust's Arab Heroes

RlevseTalk 00:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tub'a Abu Kariba As'ad

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Paul the Octopus

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sefer ha-Temunah

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Peacock_Flounder_Bothus_mancus_in_Kona.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! I'ḏOne 06:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Mountain of Israeli-Palestinian Friendship

RlevseTalk 12:02, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:360_degrees_fogbow.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 03:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Yoni Jesner and Ahmed Khatib

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Operation Diamond

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ali Bushnaq, Dudu Yifrah and Micha Yaniv

RlevseTalk 00:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Grand Design (book)

-- Cirt (talk) 06:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Great Comet of 1264

RlevseTalk 00:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Great Comet of 1556

RlevseTalk 00:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Yolande Harmer

RlevseTalk 18:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jewish pope Andreas

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Sara Copia Sullam

RlevseTalk 06:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Earth's shadow

RlevseTalk 18:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mila, as you probably already know, Earth's shadow got 19.9k views on Oct 26th while it was a DYK! Invertzoo (talk) 13:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did. Thank you for your great help.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but you take the lion's share of the credit for putting together the article with your excellent image, and also most important, thinking of the idea in the first place! I did not even know what these colored bands were until I read the article!
By the way, when I was at Long Beach, Long Island 2 weeks ago, the same beach where I saw the superior mirage on the horizon a while ago, this time I saw an inferior mirage in the distance below Staten Island, which was on the horizon. I never saw an inferior mirage over the ocean before. I have learned a lot from you, Mila! I did not have my binoculars or a camera with me, but I will try to take them next time, although as I said before, on my regular camera the telephoto function does not give very much magnification at all. Anyway, thanks and good wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 19:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Susan! Such comments from such a great person and such a great, respectful editor as you are keeping me going on Wikipedia. I'm looking forward seeing some of your images. Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are very welcome Mila. I showed my husband some of your photos yesterday (the ones on your subpage) and he said that they are National Geographic quality. I agree. And by the way, it turns out that Earth's shadow got another 6.3k views on 27th October, so that makes a total of 26,200 views! I will put it on the "over 20,000" list. Invertzoo (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Susan!--Mbz1 (talk) 01:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. And by the way, you now have your name on 4 out of the top 43 most-viewed DYKs so far in WP history. Only User:Materialscientist has as many as you in that list. I have 3, of which 2 of them are thanks to you. Invertzoo (talk) 19:28, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, Susan, I am an absolutely unique editor on Wikipedia I am trying to be the first in everything I am doing:
The images I upload are one of the best ,
The articles I start are the most-viewed ...
My block log is one of the longest on Wikipedia but I hope that my blocking administrators will see this thread,realize how good I am, and will block me never again
But on a serious note, Susan, most of the articles I started would have never got finished without your generous help, including my favorite Fata Morgana (mirage). I am so lucky I found you!
Best wishes, and thank you for everything.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is an honor to work with someone who is such a fine photographer, and one who is interested in so many different kinds of subjects! Invertzoo (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!--Mbz1 (talk) 02:50, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Broderick – Terry duel

-- Cirt (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Devastation in San Bruno.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 04:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2004 Iraq churches attacks

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for King Philip shipwreck

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Western tent caterpillars Malacosoma californicum in Joshua Tree NP.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 02:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ravens of the Tower of London

The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:The sun, street light and Parallax edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 02:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Photographing a model.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! jjron (talk) 13:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Vineyards of Napa Valley panorama.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Caspian blue 05:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Bluff erosion in Pacifica 2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! jjron (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:Tamarin portrait 2 edit3.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 01:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:Lava channel with overflows edit 4.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 08:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:Surfer in california 2.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 09:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:Mono lake tufa.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 05:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Hot springs of Pamukkale edit cropped.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Wronkiew (talk) 01:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:Iceberg with hole around Cape York, Greenland edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 04:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Albino Alligator 2008.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 10:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:Gold dust day gecko at flower-edit1.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 02:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Bowling Balls Beach 2 edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! jjron (talk) 03:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Black Abbey

Updated DYK query On October 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Black Abbey, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BencherliteTalk 13:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Saint-Savin, Hautes-Pyrénées

Updated DYK query On September 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saint-Savin, Hautes-Pyrénées, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Kanonkas :  Talk  04:43, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:A fire helicopter with helicopter bucket.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 03:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:San francisco in fog with rays.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! jjron (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, Image:Lava wildfire.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 11:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A big Golden State thank you

The California Star
For your numerous contributions to photography related to and in California. Your keen eye (and the fact that you share it with Wikipedia) is appreciated. —ScouterSig 15:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Play fight of polar bears edit 1.avi.OGG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 05:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 05:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Grand Prismatic Spring and Midway Geyser Basin from above.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 03:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Snowflake moray in Kona.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 24 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Halema`uma`u crater, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bobet 13:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Parc naturel régional d'Armorique

Updated DYK query On February 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Parc naturel régional d'Armorique, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Steam Phase eruption of Castle geyser with double rainbow.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 02:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Photographer's Barnstar
For the great photographs you have contributed and for winning fifth place for PoTY. Congratulations! -- Muhammad(talk) 17:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Hawaii turtle 2.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 03:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was the very first image of mine that got promoted to FP. Now it is FP on quite a few wikipedias.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]