Jump to content

User talk:Luna Santin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Unblocking of Dino
Line 64: Line 64:
Hi Luna,
Hi Luna,


Are you aware that you helped unblock a user, [[User:DeanHinnen|Dino]], who claimed that he called the author of a particularly contentious article, and then claimed that this author said that he never wrote said article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carolyn-WMF&diff=prev&oldid=100953407 here] (when he did write the article - and it's even archived on his website!) - and based on this info a Wiki Foundation employee (who is not an especially active editor) [[User:Carolyn-WMF]] edited a contested article and removed critical material based on these false claims by [[User:DeanHinnen|Dino]]? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Free_Republic/Archive6#The_Bryan_Affair proof here] I look forward to a complete investigation of this matter, and find the utter unresponsiveness of this WMF employee and another Foundation member, Danny Wool, when questioned about this matter by two Admins and two editors more than a little troubling. [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All|Fairness & Accuracy For All]]
Are you aware that you helped unblock a user, [[User:DeanHinnen|Dino]], who claimed that he contacted the author of a particularly contentious article, and then claimed that this author said that he never wrote said article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carolyn-WMF&diff=prev&oldid=100953407 here] (when he did write the article - and it's even archived on his website!) - and based on this info, a Wiki Foundation employee (who is not an especially active editor) [[User:Carolyn-WMF]] edited a contested article and removed critical material based on these false claims by [[User:DeanHinnen|Dino]]? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Free_Republic/Archive6#The_Bryan_Affair proof here] I look forward to a complete investigation of this matter, and find the utter unresponsiveness of this WMF employee and another Foundation member, [[User:Danny|Danny Wool]], when questioned about this matter by two Admins and two editors more than a little troubling. [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All|Fairness & Accuracy For All]]

Revision as of 21:36, 25 January 2007


TalkSandboxBlog


  Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here.
When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps:
• Use a ==descriptive heading==
• Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages
• Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date
If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions.

Click here to leave me a message

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.


Note: I may be pretty busy, over the next few days. I anticipate I'll be checking in, but I will not be as active as usual. I will respond to messages and take care of some regular tasks, as I can, but please don't expect the usual promptness. Apologies for any inconvenience. As always, I can be reached by email.

Luna Santin 13:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV report

Thanks for your help and your prompt action in notifying WP:RFO. I see they've already obliterated the change from the article history. Excellent, the system works! Regards, Zaian 19:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath editprotected tag

The edit request was posted in the edit summary. Sorry, I guess I should have put it in the body of the discussion next to the tag. The protected version is a version recognized as repeated vandalism by Senior Hamsacharya (talk · contribs) by several admins/bots/editors unaffiliated with editing the page. Please see the very recent article history to see that this is true. Diffs: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] In other words, this is not an edit war, its an issue of repeated vandalism by the same person. Hamsacharya dan 22:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for removing the vandalism from my User and Talk pages. I really appreciate it. -- bulletproof 3:16 03:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

69.221.12.13

Oh, just block him already. Isn't the fact that he's made the same edit eleven times enough? – Qxz 04:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prior edit to Riverside, California

The user just prior to you blanked a section. I do not want to override your edit as I a free-lance editor. Cheers, Ronbo76 05:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The point about violence and gangs has been there a while. Plus the section about death stats too. It seems to be a bone of contest in several WP:CAL articles. Overzealous readers want their cities to read vanilla even though the truth may hurt. I hate seeing some truths written about places I lived or even jobs I had but history has written the verdict and Wikipedia is recording it.

I gathered by your removal of the protected tag, you are higher up in the food chain than I. That's why I did not want to reverse you. Thanks, Ronbo76 05:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, the edit by user:BlankVerse is one of the respected editors of our WP:CAL project. If he leaves something in or makes an edit, it's almost carved in stone. Ronbo76 05:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Plus, I started a talk page about the edit war. Hopefully that will put a stop to it or give our WP:CAL editors a firm leg to stand on. Ronbo76 05:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit Seekers Paranormal Investigation Research & Intervention Team

Please reconsider the entry of Spirit Seekers Paranormal Investigation Research & Intervention Team, based on the following sources:

Reliable sources of notability for the Spirit Seekers Paranormal Investigation Research & Intervention Team:

Featured in: Alan Brown's latest book: "Ghost Hunters of the South." "Haunted Nights" Magazine. The Fall 2005 Issue of "Spirit Quest Ezine." The January 12, 2007 Issue of the "Arkansas Democrat-Gazette."

Co-Founder, Alan L. "Buz" Lowe is a contributing author in the recently published book: "Ghostly Tales From America's Jails"; and on "About.com:Paranormal."

Photos by The Spirit Seekers Paranormal Investigation Research & Intervention Team are featured in the book: "Famous Haunted Spots," currently in production.

The Team will be featured in an upcoming episode of "A Haunting" on The Discovery Channel. The episode will focus on a cleansing performed at a private residence. Produced by New Dominion Studios in Suffolk, Virginia, the episode (already filmed) is scheduled to air in September, 2007.

In addition, the Team has appeared on KARK Channel 4 Television's Special Series, "Did You Know?"; and are regular guests on KARN Talk Radio.

Thank you- GhostHunterExtraordinaireSpirit Seeker 05:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

help with persistent NPOV edits

I wonder if you could help me. I find myself caught up in a discussion with an anonymous contributor who appears to have a strong and narrow agenda. I have asked this person to discuss changes to this page - History of IBM - before making more changes. This person has flatly refused.

Could you take a look at the edit history for the page in question, and the Discussion page for that page, and the history of edits made by the anonymous user to that page and advise me on how to proceed? Thanks. Paul 17:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luna. Hope you're having a good afternoon

I wanted to award you this Barnstar of Diligence for your tireless and courteous assistance on Unblock-en-l, but I notice that you've already received so many that you don't want any more! Thanks for your help. Dino 19:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking of Dino

Hi Luna,

Are you aware that you helped unblock a user, Dino, who claimed that he contacted the author of a particularly contentious article, and then claimed that this author said that he never wrote said article here (when he did write the article - and it's even archived on his website!) - and based on this info, a Wiki Foundation employee (who is not an especially active editor) User:Carolyn-WMF edited a contested article and removed critical material based on these false claims by Dino? proof here I look forward to a complete investigation of this matter, and find the utter unresponsiveness of this WMF employee and another Foundation member, Danny Wool, when questioned about this matter by two Admins and two editors more than a little troubling. Fairness & Accuracy For All