User talk:Jose34683

August 2017

Dark Matters (The Rasmus album) currently fails WP:NALBUMS. Without any sources, it should stay as a redirect. Please do not recreate it without sources again. Thank you. Ss112 12:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to The Undisputed Era, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 04:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with The Undisputed Era. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. This is in reference to this edit. Nikki♥311 19:35, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

It's two months later and you're still recreating Dark Matters (The Rasmus album) with no sources. Please stop. Read WP:Verifiability. It is one of Wikipedia's core policies. We need sources for what we add. Ss112 04:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Ultima Lucha Tres. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 03:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"New album" for Deuce

The album in question is controversial. Reliable sources about the album should be provided before you add any information about it to other articles. If you have any questions, ask on the talk page of artist's article or the album (which is currently a redirect). Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Nine Lives (Deuce album) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. My removal was explained. Your restoration was 1) the start of an edit war and 2) unexplained. Both are problematic. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Absolution (professional wrestling), you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. This is about this edit. Nikki♥311 04:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Absolution (professional wrestling). This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Nikki♥311 19:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you were repeatedly warned to stop removing AfD templates from articles for discussions that were ongoing, yet refused to stop. This block is to hopefully prevent you from doing this in the future. If you feel an article nominated should be kept, state the reason you feel it should on the AfD page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]