User talk:Hello5678

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Payal Rohatgi, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Managerarc^[Talk] 17:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Re:

That is certainly not a reliable reference. Also you are deliberately trying to add negativity to the article. Per WP:BLP all articles must be written in a neutral point of view. Please understand the WP policies. — Managerarc^[Talk] 18:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. BritishWatcher (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Payal Rohatgi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Managerarc^[Talk] 12:38, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Payal Rohatgi. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Managerarc^[Talk] 13:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Reply

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is not the truth but reliable sources. Please see WP:OR for details. NO ORIGINAL RESEARCH; This means all material added to articles must be attributable to a reliable published source. The references you have posted such as http://bollywood.rightcelebrity.com/?p=518 is certainly not a reliable source. Now stop edit warring otherwise you will be reported for breaking the 3-revert rule. — Managerarc^[Talk] 13:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Edit war on Payal Rohatgi

You have already been warned in regard to edit warning, but consider this another warning. You've reverted seven times in what appears a 72 hour span, and have made no attempts to discuss the situation. I've opened open a dialog on the articles talk page. Please discuss the situation as opposed to edit waring. Thank you. Akerans (talk) 21:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)