Jump to content

User talk:Guinea pig warrior: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→WP:RPP: new section
→Warning: new section
Line 566: Line 566:


Hi GPW. In an attempt to re-add your entry, you reverted the file which caused a couple of later additions to be deleted. Please be a little more careful. I had to revert you, so you should manually re-add your entry. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 11:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi GPW. In an attempt to re-add your entry, you reverted the file which caused a couple of later additions to be deleted. Please be a little more careful. I had to revert you, so you should manually re-add your entry. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 11:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

== Warning ==

The edit warring you are doing on the [[Port Adelaide Football Club]] article is against wikipedia policy (please read [[WP:3RR]]). Persist and you will be reported. This applies also to the Matthew Primus, Mark Williams and other Port Adelaide articles. Cheers. [[User:Jevansen|Jevansen]] ([[User talk:Jevansen|talk]]) 11:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:51, 12 July 2010

Welcome

Hello, Guinea pig warrior! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Burner0718 JibbaJabba! 06:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Unnamed Ratchet & Clank Future Sequel

You should look at improving the article at User:HK22/Unnamed Ratchet & Clank Future Sequel‎, where the article was just userfied to. You should make improvements to the topic there, and when it's suitable enough for inclusion (I don't require much), then we can move it back into the mainspace. I hope you understand that, and I hope that you can merge the verifiable information that you have into the userfied article. Thanks, MuZemike 07:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ratchet & Clank Future: (TBA)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ratchet & Clank Future: (TBA), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratchet & Clank Future: (TBA). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MuZemike 04:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank an AfD. It can be grounds for a block. Thank you, --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 04:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Please do not remove the AfD notice from the article. Rather, you should comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratchet & Clank Future: (TBA). Thanks! THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You can still edit the article in any manner you wish, you just can't remove the AfD notice at the top. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 05:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Ratchet & Clank Future: (TBA) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 04:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Your Message

Hi, I've left a response to your message on my user page -- Marek.69 talk 05:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:17, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Guinea pig warrior. You have new messages at Marek69's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Marek.69 talk 05:34, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you can sign your posts by typing four tildes, like this ~~~~  :) Marek.69 talk 05:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Ratchet TBA

Look, the article is very non-notable, with very little info at all. Please see WP:MOS etc for more info about notability. — HK22 \my contributions/ (my talk) 06:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Unnamed Ratchet & Clank Future Sequel. You may wish to comment here, as many other editors would likely disagree with your move of the userfied page back into the mainspace as per the previous AFD. Thank you, MuZemike 08:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

R&C articles

Please do not move or recreated Ratchet & Clank sequel (TBA) (or variations thereof); the AFD for it clearly showed that what infomration there is is not enough for an article. The version that was in HK22's userspace has been restored for any possible userification, but please do not move this back without checking with other editors to see if it meets the quality for other sources. If you attempt to move it back without improving it and checking with others, you may be blocked for that action.

Also, your recent edits on most of the other R&C articles, as to arrange release dates in order of EU/NA/AUS is inappropriate; the dates in the infobox are to be in the order of releases, this would be North America first in all these cases. --MASEM (t) 15:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Masem on this. Please see the similar comment/reply to your query directed at me at User talk:MuZemike#Ratchet and Clank Future: (TBA). MuZemike 15:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Unnamed Ratchet & Clank Future Sequel

A tag has been placed on Unnamed Ratchet & Clank Future Sequel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Friends

Ok.... — HK22 \my contributions/ (my talk) 07:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Ratchet

Yes, I like Ratchet & Clank. My favorite is Tools of Destruction. — HK22 \my contributions/ (my talk) 09:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Ratchet Info

If you like R&C, you should create an account at the Ratchet & Clank Wiki encyclopedia. — HK22 \my contributions/ (my talk) 00:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Maitch. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Camw (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't alter sourced content, as you did on Resident Evil 5. Please provide sources for your edits. — R2 11:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again, please do not add material without adding a source as you did Hooked on Monkey Fonics. Doing so violates out policy of verifiability and frequently violates our policy of no original research. Your edit has been reversed. Notnotkenny (talk) 12:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Coon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mysterion.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stan Marsh, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Ched ~ (yes?)/© 05:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Manbearpig.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 06:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Park character infoboxes

Just so you know, adding birthdates, sexual preference, etc. will ultimately not be displayed in the infoboxes of South Park characters because they are not formatted to display such info. Please look here to see what info they are designed to showcase. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 07:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AFL Premiership 2007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AFL Premiership 2005.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 05:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 05:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Coon

Updated DYK query On March 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Coon, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bruce Howell

A tag has been placed on Bruce Howell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 02:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Ratchet & Clank Future- A Crack in Time.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ratchet & Clank Future- A Crack in Time.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now fixed this. Please be careful when uploading copyrighted images. By your use of incorrect licensing information, you inadvertently implied that you had created this image, which evidently isn't the case. If you're unsure of what to put put in the image description, you can always look at (read: copy and paste) the code from existing box art and make minor changes to suit the image you're uploading. Just try to use images from well-established articles (like LittleBigPlanet for example) as these are more likely to have correct licensing in the first place! Cheers. ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 13:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wade Thompson

I have nominated Wade Thompson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Thompson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJMitchell You rang? 11:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Brendon Lade.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 07:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Domenic Cassisi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gary Tredrea.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Warren Tredrea.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I think I have seen you here before, but I would just like to be notified if you're using my sig or copying code from my user page in the future, as you have signed here. Thanks, иιƒкч? 07:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucy Bell

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cxz111 (talk) 20:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Seventh generation game consoles. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You have not provided a rationale other than personal opinion (pushing an agenda) for removing the Zeebo from this template. Please discuss the issue as requested before removing it again - otherwise, it will be considered a violation of this policy and you will be blocked for disruptive editing. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 19:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for Template:Sixth generation game consoles as well. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Domenic Cassisi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW (Talk) 02:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Gary Tredrea.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW (Talk) 02:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just curious what your source was for changing the release date for AFL challenge. I don't doubt you had one, just curious what it was.--Senor Freebie (talk) 01:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to South Park - Whale Whores ep.

Hi, I reverted a change you made to that article. I originally classified this edit as vandalism. In retrospect this doesn't appear to be the case as the section only mentions the Lady GaGa song so I can see why you'd want to relabel this section. I apologize for the mislabeling of the reversion of your edit. Jarkeld (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning re Zeebo edit war

Hi GPW. This is your last warning regarding the edit war in Template:Seventh generation game consoles, where you are consistently removing Zeebo from the list. You claim in your edit summaries that "people" are saying in "discussions" that Zeebo doesn't belong in this list, but you have NOT provided a source of any sort that backs this up in any way that meets Wikipedia's policies. Near as anyone can tell, this is simply your own personal opinion. If you cannot back up your opinion with verifiable facts from reliable sources, then you need to stop edit warring on this issue.

The next instance I see of edit-warring on this will result in a block. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 17:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, this matter has been referred to WP:ANI#Ongoing dispute in Template:Seventh generation game consoles for discussion. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 18:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone off-wiki suggested I try a different tack on this, so here goes: I do want to work with you on this matter if you're willing to work with us. I don't believe either Marty or I are claiming ownership of the Zeebo content or pushing agendas that unnecessarily promote the console as belonging to any particular generation. What we're doing is enforcing the policies and guidelines that Wikipedia operates under, the biggest of which is that we simply present information that is provided by reliable sources. We trust those sources to "get it right", though there's always the possibility that they don't.

Marty provided a number of sources in the talk page that classify Zeebo as 7th-gen. The designation isn't based solely on hardware specs or target market (since Zeebo isn't competing with 360 or Wii, it has a different target market). I don't think there's necessarily any clear-cut objective explanation of what constitutes a console generation. But the fact that numerous industry sources do refer to it as 7th-gen is significant.

Wikipedia is not in the business of defining or judging content. We're only allowed to go by what the sources say. That's been my point through most of this dispute: If you have a reliable source that clearly states Zeebo is something other than 7th-gen, we'd like to see it. The burden of proof is on you at the moment, since you've been removing the console from the list without a sourced explanation.

To clarify my warning above: I am not saying your content is wrong. I am saying that your edits have become disruptive because you aren't discussing the matter with us or abiding by established policies. It gives you the appearance of pushing an agenda, tendentious editing, disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, and acting in bad faith. I'd like to believe that you're acting in good faith and that you have a valid reason for your edits, but in terms of WP policies, we haven't seen evidence of that yet. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 18:57, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi. I've reverted a string of your recent edits which fall in the category of overlinking. Linking words such as "conflict", "frustration", and "actress" only serve to dilute the higher value links in an article. If you are mounting a case for linking "frustration", then you're going to have to link most words on a page. Have a read of Wikipedia:Linking#Overlinking_and_underlinking for more details on linking. Cheers.  HWV258.  10:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uncharted Template

I see that you are undoing the actions of an anon with no warning at Template:Uncharted series, perhaps this should be decided on the talk page, rather than what is very close to becoming an edit war. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 03:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Ablett, Jr.

Hi there,

Noticed our different opinions on the matter of article formatting. Perhaps I can direct you to featured articles in the sporting field such as Magic Johnson and Tim Duncan. Both use similar formatting to the one I have used in title conventions (no spaces etc). Keep in mind that featured articles are accepted as extremely high standard articles in terms of content and formatting. Cheers Boomtish (talk) 11:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File permission problem with File:Brisbane Lions 2010 Home Guernsey.png

Thanks for uploading File:Brisbane Lions 2010 Home Guernsey.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File permission problem with File:Josh Carr.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Josh Carr.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Warren Tredrea Back in Black.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Warren Tredrea Back in Black.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Port Adelaide Power Back in Black.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Port Adelaide Power Back in Black.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Port Adelaide Power Back in Black.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Port Adelaide Power Back in Black.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File permission problem with File:Port Adelaide Power Back in Black 2010 guernsey.png

Thanks for uploading File:Port Adelaide Power Back in Black 2010 guernsey.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File permission problem with File:Port Adelaide Power Original Guernsey.png

Thanks for uploading File:Port Adelaide Power Original Guernsey.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Tredrea bow.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tredrea bow.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Tredrea 2004 GrandFinal.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tredrea 2004 GrandFinal.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File permission problem with File:Tredrea 1999.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Tredrea 1999.PNG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Warren Tredrea 2009.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Warren Tredrea 2009.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 08:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Port Adelaide Power Back in Black.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Port Adelaide Power Back in Black.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source or was it WP:OR?

This annual report clearly states that they are the Footscray Football Club Ltd, trading as Western Bulldogs. No sign of WBFC anywhere other than on the website headers, which I wouldn't trust as it's a cut and paste job by Telstra from a template that is used for all the other clubs. They also have the Official AFL website of the Sydney Swans Football Club and West Coast Eagles Football Club, both of which are wrong - they (and the Dogs) do not have Football Club in their official title. Please revert, unless you have a more reliable source than the club's official annual report. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 18:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Oval

Just so you have some idea of what's going on ...

  • WP has a "watchlist" feature. Lots of people have lots of pages on their watchlists
  • One of the pages on my watchlist is Elizabeth Oval.
  • When someone makes an edit without an edit summary, it's usually vandalism, so I look at it.
  • Your edits to this page do NOT have an edit summary, so I looked at them.
  • Your edits were NOT vandalism.
  • HOWEVER, it's not clear what value your edits have added to the article, and your edits are NOT consistent with any WP guidelines, policy, etc. etc.
  • So I reverted them.
  • To revert such edits, I use "Rollback". Rollback does NOT give the rollbacker the option of providing an edit summary.
  • I felt you might see my reversion and think: "WTF is going on?!?!" (I know I would.)
  • Hence this message.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them on my talk page.

In future, may I suggest you make use of the edit summary?
Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I see you've made edits to other pages without putting anything in the edit summary. The above comments also apply to any reversions I make to those edits. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've just had a similar experience with Guinea pig warrior (see below). The problem with the Elizabeth Oval edit[1] seems to be part of Guinea pig warrior's belief that 1) They do not need to explain what they are doing, 2) That reliable, verifiable references are not important. (And hence requests for them can be deleted without comment.) Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 12:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Warren-Tredrea2010.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Warren-Tredrea2010.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 11:36, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warren-Tredrea2010.jpg

Guinea pig warrior, there is nothing you could do to save this image. We (in general) do not host non-free images of living people and don't take images from news sites and upload them here. I see that you have notes about uploading images—that get deleted—that date back over the past year or so. Perhaps now would be a good time to consider why all but one image you have ever uploaded have been deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 23:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Taheny

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Emily Taheny. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Emily Taheny

I have nominated Emily Taheny, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Taheny. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hi, I have a question I would like to ask of you. Do you have an active email address I can send to?--Senor Freebie (talk) 00:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If he has set an email address, you should be able to email him by Special:EmailUser/Guinea pig warrior. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 17:51, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
However, he has not. Just ask the question here; his talk page is meant for him to answer questions. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 17:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 16:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guinea pig warrior. Do you have a reason why you moved LittleBigPlanet (PSP) to LittleBigPlanet (2009 video game) without discussion? —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 17:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are not referenced or explained properly

I noticed you completely reverted an edit of mine without explanation (an edit that I had explained carefully).[2]

Looking at a couple of your other edits, I noticed somewhat similar behavior, which is that you make substantial changes without explanation, and in this case, contradicting a reference with your own uncited material. [3] The particular problem with this edit is that you inserted material before a reference that the reference does not support. Also with this edit there is a problem with WP:CRYSTAL, what may never happen in the future is not proper for encyclopedic content. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better tag, rather than removing tag

In this edit, again without an Edit Summary, you removed the tag noting that no references were given.[4] Since there are no references, and only two external links that do not verify most of the article content, rather than remove the tag entirely, a better approach might have been to substitute {{nofootnotes|date=May 2010}}, which would highlight that there is no easy for a reader looking at the several hundred word article to see which statements are supported by reference. Regards, Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 12:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits in Krome Studios Melbourne

Hi Guinea pig warrior, you have removed a tag and section titles without any comment. This makes it hard to see your reasoning behind the changes. When you read the article, you will notice, that the era as a Krome inhouse studio is only a minor part of the article and as well of the studio's history. The addition of the current logo doesn't appear to be encyclopaedic. But you may have had good reason to do so. However without a hint in the form of a comment how should I and others know? I would be happy if you could consider my suggestions in the future. Regards -- Make (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You make it really difficult to work together if you don't answer questions or give comments for your edits and reverts. Your edits don't make sense to me in an encyclopedic context. To be honest, the situation is starting to get a bit annoying since you do not seem to care for others understanding the reasoning behind your edits. -- Since I am not sure how to deal with the situation I asked for advice at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Help_appreciated_with_Krome_Studios_Melbourne. And please keep in mind, that this is a collaborative project that requires some amount of discussion and coordination. Sincerely -- Make (talk) 09:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"It was founded 1980 as Beam Software before 1999 when it was acquired by Infogrames in 1999, who changed the name to Melbourne House" is very poor English. IMO Make's version of this sentence is worded better. Sequal1 (talk) 14:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even read or care for what others are writing on this page, in edit comments or on article's discussion pages? -- Would You be so kind and explain what is the advantage of restructuring an article chronologically (80's 90's 2000's) which has been structured by subject. -- I don't get it. The same goes for reintroducing unreferenced claims. Without a proper source such information is useless. Sorry. -- Make (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let me summarize what I just reverted: (1) bad wording (2) unreferenced claims (3) poor structure by no-sense headings (4) misleading weblinks. although the shortcomings of your edits should be obvious, Me and another editor have explained here and on the article's talk page why your edits are inferiour. I am still happy to discuss it. Your way of contibuting is at least questionable. Would you agree to take the dispute to the next level so we can come to a solution? Cheers -- Make (talk) 21:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits in Krome Studios Adelade

This issue has been resolved. Section no longer needs to be open
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Your changes are totally inaccurate. Please revert your renaming of Ratbag to Krome Adelaide as Krome never bought Ratbag, it just hired a lot of the ex staff. This makes it a totally different company.

I would make this change, but I'll be honest with you, I don't know how to (although I will be asking for help to do so).

Also, while I have your attention, please provide references and comment your changes as it makes it very hard to see what you are trying to do, and I have had to revert a few of your changes as they are pure speculation. Sequal1 (talk) 14:04, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nomination of Template talk:Sly Cooper series

blanked page
blanked page

Hi Guinea pig warrior, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Template talk:Sly Cooper series. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{db-author}}. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{db-author}} tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=FrescoBot}} somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot (msg) 23:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LittleBigPlanet (2009 Video Game)

I would just like to know why you moved this without any discussion on the talk page and not saying how it was the "currect" title for it. LittleBigPlanet (PSP) was just fine. Of course this is fine too as long as those redirects hold up. Maybe there's a Wikipedia rule I don't know about... I have moved the page back to LittleBigPlanet (PSP) until you discuss it with other users on Talk:LittleBigPlanet (PSP)--15avaughn (talk) 03:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Hi

I once again reverted 2 of your changes. These were Krome Studios Melbourne and Port Adelaide Magpies Football Club

I reverted the Krome change as the first paragraph in your version of the change is very poor English, which I have mentioned both on this page and in the comments for my changes. The rest of the changes need to be discussed in it's discussion page. The other person edited the page has commented his changes and has stared a discussion about it on both this page and on the Krome discussion page. I would appreciate it if you would comment on both before reverting my change as we are trying to have an open discussion about this matter.

The Magpies changes were backed up by [5]. This is the official page for the club and clearly states that it shares the history with Port Adelaide Football Club from 1870. Again, I would be happy to enter an open discussion over this with you on the discussion page for that article.

Once again, please leave comments for all your changes as this makes it easier to see why you are making the changes.

Thanks Sequal1 (talk) 23:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again I have reverted them. I'm still happy to discus it. Sequal1 (talk) 01:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm much happier with your changes now. I'm just about to add my email to my profile. Feel free to email me and I'll happily explain why I was so insistent. Sequal1 (talk) 02:34, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Port Adelaide Magpies Football Club‎

Hi. Just to give you a quick warning - you're currently well passed three reverts on the article. Unfortunately that's a bright line, so if you continue you risk being sanctioned irrespective as to whether or not you're right. - Bilby (talk) 02:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RPP

Hi GPW. In an attempt to re-add your entry, you reverted the file which caused a couple of later additions to be deleted. Please be a little more careful. I had to revert you, so you should manually re-add your entry. Favonian (talk) 11:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

The edit warring you are doing on the Port Adelaide Football Club article is against wikipedia policy (please read WP:3RR). Persist and you will be reported. This applies also to the Matthew Primus, Mark Williams and other Port Adelaide articles. Cheers. Jevansen (talk) 11:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Guinea_pig_warrior&oldid=373065152"