Jump to content

User talk:Firebrace: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Notice: new section
Line 71: Line 71:


Why then does the infobar state 129? I was just seeking clarification. [[User:De la Marck|''Le Sanglier des Ardennes'']] ([[User talk:De la Marck|talk]]) 21:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Why then does the infobar state 129? I was just seeking clarification. [[User:De la Marck|''Le Sanglier des Ardennes'']] ([[User talk:De la Marck|talk]]) 21:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

== Notice ==


{{Ivmbox
|'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive253#Request to amend sanctions on Syrian civil war articles|community decision]] has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] for pages related to the [[Syrian Civil War]] and the [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant]],&nbsp;such as [[:November 2015 Paris attacks]], which you have recently edited. The details of these sanctions are described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|here]]. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|one revert per twenty-four hours restriction]]''', as described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant#1RR|here]].

[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. [[User:RGloucester|<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt;color:#000000">RGloucester </span>]] — [[User talk:RGloucester|☎]] 01:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg
| icon size = 50px}}

Revision as of 01:38, 18 November 2015

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Firebrace! Thank you for your contributions. I am Montanabw and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Montanabw(talk) 03:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Firebrace (talk) 10:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't

BMK (talk) 18:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Nine days LATER AFTER his birthday,"
  • Two couples commit suicide together; one couple just commits suicide.

So yeah, I will.

Thanks. Firebrace (talk) 18:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WIKIHOUNDING BMK (talk) 19:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:AGF Firebrace (talk) 19:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:AGF is not a suicide pact. BMK (talk) 19:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP is not a place for those on the margins of society to shout at people because they can't do it in real life. So, "don't." Take your anger issues somewhere else. Firebrace (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

25 Million Pounds listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 25 Million Pounds. Since you had some involvement with the 25 Million Pounds redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Harvey Moon (dog) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to The Daily Star and The Telegraph
Colony of New Zealand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Prorogation
Trude Mostue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Live and Kicking

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

China Tamblyn

I know China personally. She was my neighbor when I lived in Hayward CA! Her mother is not Russ's first wife but is with a woman he had an affair with during his second marriage. Her name is Elizabeth Vigil, and I knew her as Betsy! She has a brother named Nathan Vigil and sister named Molly, I think last name is now Christmas! Both are younger! She also has an older brother we called Dondie. These facts are easy to check! She was born in 1969. No wonder people don't trust this site! Melissa613 (talk) 18:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure everyone appreciates your concern. What. Firebrace (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plan multi-attentats

Please see my comments regarding this link on the November 2015 Paris attacks talk page. -- Impsswoon (talk) 02:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015 Paris attacks

WHAT A SUPRISE! They turned out to be Islamist attackers. Bureaucratic moron.[1]--Loomspicker (talk) 15:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a bible, and should contain facts, not beliefs, however strong they might be. Firebrace (talk) 15:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serneholt

If you want to, please help by improving this weeks TAFI article Marie Serneholt. Any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strategic Defence and Security Review, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deficit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015 Paris attacks‎

Why then does the infobar state 129? I was just seeking clarification. Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 21:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, such as November 2015 Paris attacks, which you have recently edited. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. RGloucester 01:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]