::::Thank you for the apology. May I ask why I can't see your previous comment in history? [[User:Bilseric|Bilseric]] ([[User talk:Bilseric|talk]]) 21:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
::::Thank you for the apology. May I ask why I can't see your previous comment in history? [[User:Bilseric|Bilseric]] ([[User talk:Bilseric|talk]]) 21:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
::::I'm asking because it was in conciliatory tone. Few hours later I can't see that comment in history and your new tone is quite opposite in tone. Furthermore, I can see you have sent 3 mails? I can only assume what's comming. Can I ask you, what changed your opinion? Is this really needed? I don't know what to say, but to apologize for my previous comments. Years pass, people change. Even I am surprised about the tone some of them have. Please understand that I'm not a native English speaker and sometimes English comes of way to harsh than it sounds in my native language (even now I have to be careful not to be too harsh in tone). Too bad about the misunderstanding that triggered this. [[User:Bilseric|Bilseric]] ([[User talk:Bilseric|talk]]) 22:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
::::I'm asking because it was in conciliatory tone. Few hours later I can't see that comment in history and your new tone is quite opposite in tone. Furthermore, I can see you have sent 3 mails? I can only assume what's comming. Can I ask you, what changed your opinion? Is this really needed? I don't know what to say, but to apologize for my previous comments. Years pass, people change. Even I am surprised about the tone some of them have. Please understand that I'm not a native English speaker and sometimes English comes of way to harsh than it sounds in my native language (even now I have to be careful not to be too harsh in tone). Too bad about the misunderstanding that triggered this. [[User:Bilseric|Bilseric]] ([[User talk:Bilseric|talk]]) 22:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
@[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] Since you brought up blocks on the Talk page, I'd like to suggest a page block might be appropriate for [[User:Bilseric|Bilseric]], under the [[WP:Contentious topics]] rules. Bilseric not only brought the meritless [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity/Archive_11#RfC:_Nikola_Tesla%27s_birthplace_(in_need_of_objective_editors) 2018 RfC] you mention, after losing 15 to 1 he [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive305 challenged] its closure. Since then, he has been polite, but has a record of [[WP:TENDENTIOUS]] pushing his nationalist agenda on [[Talk:Nikola Tesla#Nationality and Ethnicity]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity&diff=prev&oldid=1175094397], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity&diff=prev&oldid=1175709980], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity&diff=prev&oldid=1221107295], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity&diff=prev&oldid=1176585598] sometimes advancing [[WP:OR|OR]] arguments [[WP:SYNTHESIS|SYNTHESIZED]] from sources which have nothing to do with Tesla. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity&diff=prev&oldid=808341725], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity&diff=prev&oldid=963374997], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity&diff=prev&oldid=1176605188], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Nationality_and_ethnicity&diff=prev&oldid=1176701056]. These examples seem to violate several [[WP:Contentious topics]] limits. --[[User:Chetvorno|Chetvorno]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Chetvorno|<i style="color: Purple;">TALK</i>]]</small></sup> 23:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
== Tech News: 2024-18 ==
== Tech News: 2024-18 ==
Revision as of 23:06, 30 April 2024
The current date and time is 14 November 2024 T 05:09UTC.
Discretionary sanctions alerts
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues
gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them
gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them
gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them
genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed
You can email me from this link but in the interests of Wiki-transparency, please message me on this page unless there are pressing reasons to do otherwise.
Comments which I find to be uncivil, full of vulgarities, flame baiting, or that are excessively rude may be deleted without response. If I choose not to answer, that's my right; don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
Coming here to ask why I reverted your edit? Read this page first...
Please leave me new messages at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new section at the bottom. I usually notice messages soon. I attempt to keep conversations in one location, as I find it easier to follow them that way when they are archived. If you open a new conversation here, I will respond to you here. Please watchlist this page or check back for my reply. If I have already left a message at your talk page, unless I've requested follow-up here or it is a standard template message, I am watching it. If you leave your reply here, I may respond at your talk page if it seems better for context. If you aren't sure if I'm watching your page, or I'm slow to reply, feel free to approach me here.
Welcome to my talk page! I am an administrator here on Wikipedia. That means I am here to help. It does not mean that I have any special status or something, it just means that I get to push a few extra buttons to help maintain this encyclopedia.
If you need help with something, feel free to ask. Click here to start a new topic.
If I have not made any edits in a while, (check) you may get a faster response by posting your request in a more centralized place.
If you want to ask for help, you can ask at the help desk for questions about Wikipedia, and at the reference desk for more general questions. You may also simply ask a question on your talk page and add {{helpme}} before your question. This will attract the attention of experienced users who will most likely be able to help you.
Did I delete your page, block you, or do something else that I should not have done?
First, please remember that I am not trying to attack you, demean you, or hurt you in any way. I am only trying to protect the integrity of this project. If I did something wrong, let me know, but remember that I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please keep your comments civil. If you vandalize this page or swear at me, you will not only decrease the likelihood of a response, your edits could get you blocked. (see WP:NPA)
When posting, do not assume I know which article you are talking about. If you leave a message saying "Why did you revert me?", I will not know what you mean. If you want a response consisting of something other than "What are you talking about", please include links and, if possible, diffs in your message. At the very least, mention the name of the article or user you are concerned with.
Also, if you sign your post (by typing four tildes - ~~~~ - at the end of your message), I will respond faster, and I will tend to be in a better mood, because unsigned comments are one of my pet peeves.
If you are blocked from editing, you cannot post here, but your talk page is most likely open for you to edit. To request a review of your block, add {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page. (replace reason with why you think you should not be blocked.) I watch the talk pages of everyone I block, so I will almost definitely see you make your request. If I am making edits (check Special:Contributions/Doug Weller) and I do not answer your request soon, or you cannot edit your talk page for some reason, you can try sending me an email. Please note, however, that I rarely check my email more than a few times a day, so it may be a couple of hours before I respond.
Administrators: If you see me do something that you think is wrong, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you undo my actions. I would, however, appreciate it if you let me know what I did wrong, so that I can avoid doing it in the future.
Looks like I'll be around for quite some time still. Chemo held the cancer back and my Oncologist is very pleased. He says I look very well and that the cancers are still very small. So I'll have some time off and then back on chemo. Blood tests every 2 months to check. His guess was that my prognosis is the same as last year, another 18 months is quite possible. Who knows, if things go well, maybe more. In any case I'll see 82, Christmas, and the inauguration of the next American president - two pleasant things at least! Doug Wellertalk16:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My best wishes for continued improvement over the ongoing treatment...but is looking forward to the inauguration of the next president a bit tongue in cheek? Sweetpool50 (talk) 17:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, this is great news! I'm so happy to hear it (and let's hope against hope that the election results will be good news too). --Tryptofish (talk) 22:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's the only news that has brought a glow to my heart today. Forget about setting your sights on catching the outcome of the McDonald vs Bidet rope-the-dope battle on Nov 4, 24, far too shortsighted. Think of the long term, and do us all a favour by hanging in here at least till Nov.4 2028. Best Nishidani (talk) 08:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I am thrilled by this news. Know you are continuously on my mind. Here's to the wholeness that I hope takes root and blossoms in you, my friend. --ARoseWolf14:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's cheered me up enormously. And on International Women's Day, big thanks too, to your wife, who I'm sure is the biggest element in your progress. And don't forget the NHS! (but one thing you can safely ignore, and should, is the US presidential election) --NSH001 (talk) 19:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cancer update - being offered palliative care (chemo), incurable
I'll see an oncologist in a couple of weeks to discuss chemo and to ask about my prognosis. Exercising as much as I can but mainly on my treadmill, 3 times a day for a mile so each time, only about 2mph. Calf muscles are the main problem, doing exercises prescribed by a physiotherapist. But not walking outside as the painful calf and thigh muscles don't go away and as I've twice had to stop and call for a pickup, safer to stay inside, especially with my Parkinson's. I'll soldier on! Doug Wellertalk16:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
God bless Doug, hope you know how many people are blessed to at least call you an internet friend, and Im sure many more offline. nableezy - 17:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, my best wishes in this journey. I'm not good at dealing with this shit. How I can identify with "the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak." We older dudes feel the pull of destiny, and it ain't pretty. Just make life comfortable. Don't overdo anything, even the exercise (and I'm a PT). Moderation in all things. You don't have to drink the whole bottle of OZV Zinfandel in one sitting, but do enjoy the finer things in life. Good wine, truffles, chocolate, books, movies, whatever. Now is the time to aim for quality, not quantity/longevity. Hang in there brother. Feel free to email me. When dealing with my own cancer ordeal, I often resorted to gallows humor. The staff in ICU and ER were especially understanding. I'd say: "I'm going to get "CC & DNR" tattooed on my chest." -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stay strong and hang in there, man. Sending you all the good vibes I can muster (hey, WP:FRINGE or not, it can't hurt, lol). Heiro17:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is most important at some point to just enjoy the moment as much as you can and to enjoy life in general as it goes on, without trying to determine how long it will go on for, since that determination is really out of our hands, no? In other words, the life we live, I believe, has to be good and enjoyable for a long as it goes on. That is the most important, in my view. Hoping this may help a bit somehow, I wish you also much strength and courage in the jouney ahead. warshy(¥¥)18:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What Tryp said. I was down in your ^former neck of the woods just recently for the first time as an adult. Got to see a wild alligator for the first time, along with some other fauna. Miami-Dade is one of the best places in the country for birds - I imagine you can see quite a lot out your window, compared to here in NY? At least here there's a zoo across the street. The only animal it has is a dog, though. It's a pretty shih-tzu. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 19:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. But I live in Derbyshire now, having gone to England in 1970 and not returning (except of course for vacations, family visits, etc. When I was a young boy there was a sub-tropical jungle behind the houses across the road, complete with possums, snakes, banyan trees, and of course alligators down by the Miami river. Played there a lot with a boy named John Christmas (whose mother was named Mary). Doug Wellertalk08:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry, I think I knew that but was thrown off by a userbox. Fewer gators in Derbyshire, I reckon. The banyan trees were incredible. The first one I saw was in Palm Beach, where they are ubiquitous and strangler figs make for ripe metaphor. :) As for Christmas, I know it was pretty uncommon then for women to keep their name when getting married, but Mary Christmas?? Hard no. Lots of names you can't have with that surname: Mary, Wyatt, Eve, Nicholas/Claus, Carol... There's a name I hear on Fox News every December, over and over. Must be a seasonal anchor or something: Theresa Warren-Christmas. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 21:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I've so appreciated you sharing this part of your life with us. You've been in my thoughts and I'm sad to hear you're talking about palliative care. Whatever decisions you make in the days and weeks ahead, I know they will be ones that have been deeply thought through and which will reflect the way you've lived your life. I'm just glad that we continue to have your presence here onwiki. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Doug Weller! Not much one can say in these situations that hasn't already been said and that hasn't already occurred to you (several Big Bad Words spring readily to mind...). Hopefully it'll be kinda nice to reflect on how many people are thinking of you and that in some way you've made a difference to all the people who know you personally, as well as to the Wikipedia project and to the rest of us who are used to seeing your edits while we're sorta amiably faffing around this neck of the woods. Big Virtual Hug, --Technopat (talk) 19:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot think of any better way to express my support than to second what Barkeep49 said. Whether your philosophy on cancer is to fight it, treat it like a chronic degenerative condition, or just embrace not-give-a-fuckism, please know that I and all the others commenting here support you and wish for the best possible outcomes. EvergreenFir(talk)20:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, thank you for all the work that you have done for Wikipedia. Thank you for being willing to make tough decisions. Thank you for keeping us informed about your illness. Thanks for being you. Cullen328 (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find the words to express how the wonderful support from you all and others now and in the past has meant to me. It will help me sleep well tonight. Ironically the thought of cancer itself rarely affects my sleep, it's only the effect on others and right now wondering how I will be able to die with dignity - at a time I choose and where I choose that costs me sleep at times. In the UK you aren't allowed to die with dignity. So if I can't die at home with my wife I'm thinking that when the time comes - and I am going to try to make that a few years from now - I may be able to take one last holiday with my wife somewhere that I can die with dignity. Doug Wellertalk21:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I'm always glad to see your signature on a talk page or to find your name in a contribution history, however old, and that will carry on as long as I'm editing. Now you're giving us even more reasons to be grateful. I hope you take every holiday you want! Thank you. NebY (talk) 22:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I'm sorry to read this news. I hope you are able to have your wishes. I was always taught to get it in writing and to get a second opinion. I've also heard a lot of interesting things about the new treatments nowadays like CAR-T cells and immunotherapy, IANAD, but it's a shame and saddening to read this even without a lot of details. Anyway, we don't know each other well but I just wanted to say it's always been a pleasure to interact with you on here and I wish you the best, and will fondly remember your work on Wikipedia. Andre🚐23:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So sorry to hear of this Doug. You were one of the first admins to help me out and guide me when I started taking an interest in contributing. In fact you might have been the first admin that I would refer others to if we disagreed or I was unsure what to do. I wish you all the best and keep fighting! GiggsIsLegend (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, please research and pick up a copy of the Book, titled "The China Study" I'm sure it'll help you learn more and get a better understanding about our relationship to food and diseases we suffer from. 174.81.53.148 (talk) 15:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Best to you Doug, hang on in their man and hope you remember the very high regard you are held to within our community; you have lead by example and have always been encouraging. Ceoil (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An icon and an inspiration. Thanks for sharing this with us - it makes me feel that WP is not only a source of information, but also a community. You are surely in my thoughts and prayers. Rsk6400 (talk) 16:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The day you get an entry added to the "List of deceased Wikipedians" will be one of the saddest days this website will have seen in a long time. I hope whatever time you have left is free of pain, and that you are able to die with the dignity that you deserve. Thanks for everything you've contributed to Wikipedia over the years. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, you're one of the editors I most respect, and seeing how your handling this makes my respect even greater. As has been said above, I hope you enjoy your life without pain and go on your own terms with dignity. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, devastating to read this, and I don't know what to say that hasn't already been said so well by other above. I've always found you to be a rock here on Wikipedia, and your tireless and immensely helpful efforts are very much appreciated. Jeppiz (talk) 01:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I will never forget all the times you gave me support and advices in my previous iteration. Thank you for this and for making WP a better place. I can only wish you all the best. K. Lone-078 (talk) 09:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Run through a comprehensive list of expletives, dear Doug, and that will sum up my feelings on seeing this bitter news. I am deeply moved by your references to your wife. As many of us will know from experience, it is what we manage to say to each other, brightly under strain, in reviewing a shared past, that tasks our minds in such terrible situations. I am assured that in planning for what future remains (the months and years will be, ineludibly, seamed with an elegiac tone of finality), you will work to ensure that your spouse will have many more memories to add to those of your rich life together as you also find time, with your characteristic donative generosity, to patch with further quilts of tender recall the hard ledges of survival for the other victim here who will, prospectively, grasp for them if or when they find themselves forced to endure the icy rockface of widowhood.
Before posting this, I took a Persian nap (Herodotus), worried it might sound intolerably pompous, intrusive and rhetorical, rather than spontaneous. Two dreams, in one of which you figure as a lone archaeologist probing a dark desert for spoors of a lost past, and the other where you emerge as a Virgilian cicerone as I stumbled along native bushland. On waking, I thought ‘what the fuck’. Hang in there, whatever. As others have noted, remarkable things can crop up in science. There’s always hope.Nishidani (talk) 17:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what a Persian nap is, but one thing I really want to give to Wikipedia is a new article (I have written only a handful at most) and have started a draft at User:Doug Weller/Racism in pseudoarchaeology. I'm getting tremendous help from some knowledgeable folks at the Facebook group Fraudulent Archaeology Wall of Shame. I've been putting this off for a long time but all the wonderful people above have made me feel I must get it done. Doug Wellertalk17:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Herodotus 1:133. I can't give you a Perseus link because my main computer crashed weeks ago, and accessing anything from this minor one, antiquated but minimally functional, is nigh impossible. I'll bookmark that project and recommend to others here that they also do so and help where possible.Nishidani (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Writing new articles is the most fun part of this project (and one that I don't spend enough time doing). This isn't in my area of subject-matter expertise, but let me be the first to volunteer if you want a second pair of eyes for copyediting, formatting and the like - just let me know. GirthSummit (blether)18:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, what a terrible thing to hear. I'm so sorry. It's said that a man never truly dies until his name is forgotten; yours will live on here in the memory of everyone on this project. With love, ♠PMC♠ (talk)23:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I send you my best wishes, confident that you will find the strength, courage and capacity for clear thinking that you will surely need to deal with this, just as you already have in your invaluable contributions here. Best regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing I could say feels adequate. But you will be greatly missed, and I hope you are able to find some measure of happiness in the time you have left. And if there's anything Wikipedia-related that I can help with, don't hesitate to ask. A. Parrot (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've only just heard this news, Doug, and I am deeply sorry. 'Keep buggering on', as Churchill used to say when things were bad. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 19:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Jeez! All any of us can do is praise the work you've done here and (I suspect) elsewhere; and let you know how much it's been appreciated. --Orange Mike | Talk19:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Only just heard of this. A terrible situation but I know you'll face it with strength. Please take some strength from the rest of us. Reach out to the community if you need anything even if it's just moral support. Canterbury Tailtalk12:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I felt the need the last few days to jump on here and get an update from you but the weather had not allowed for this. It has not diminished my thoughts towards you and as I was able to get on I came here to see this. My heart is heavy with the fact you are still suffering so much through pain in your body but I am inspired by your journey at the same time. Your courage, your strength, your tenacity are all indescribable. Your Song is such a beautiful melody and I believe there are lyrics yet to be written that will have such a lasting legacy and be inspirational to so many. That may be a Wikipedia article or perhaps your wisdom passed on to listening ears desiring to grasp on to the depth of knowledge you have accumulated throughout your life. One thing is certain. You have made a lasting impact and you continue to do so with every breath taken. My hope, my morning songs are for many more days of impact here with us. You are incredible as an editor and an amazing human being. You are an integral part of my daily thoughts. I am beyond honored to know you in even this limited capacity. I count it such a blessing to have even the smallest interaction with you. May my words be an encouragement to you like so many others mentioned here and may you find strength to continue "soldiering on" as you put it. I call it the Color Green, surviving, yes, but finding a way to thrive despite the circumstances. Take that and let it feed life into your Song. May the Color Green fill and flood you, my friend. --ARoseWolf15:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I have some experience of what you are going through. I have no words, except to say you are in my thoughts and I do hope things go better for you. As ever, David, David J Johnson (talk) 20:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to hear this Doug. Best luck anyway, things could be uncurable but still stay for very long. Just do whatever you find comfortable.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just saw this, and wanted to add my name to those who will be thinking of you, and hoping for the best. You're most definitely one of the best admins here, and I appreciate your keeping your hand in as much as possible. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I realize we've interacted under questionable circumstances, since I don't quite fit in to the culture here. But, you seem alright, and I wish you the best of luck that your circumstance permits (whether that's more years of life, or a painless, dignified end, whatever the fates decree). I should know what it's like to deal with a rare, deadly medical condition -- at least in my case, I've got a cocktail of meds to commute my would-be death sentence. Godspeed! Xcalibur (talk) 04:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hang in there, Doug, and more than ever, do what gives you pleasure. I hope some part of that includes your contributions here–pretty sure it is–but take care of number one, regardless. I have benefited enormously from your thoughts and interventions in the past, and selfishly, I hope to do so still, for as long as is feasible. We all have a limited time left, we just don't feel it quite as keenly. Times like this make me think about it, though. You're much in my thoughts. Mathglot (talk) 02:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mathglot, although I feel that agreeing is often a bit boring: I want to agree with you that we all have limited time left (if you can accept that, you are close to wisdom), and that I, too, have benefitted enormously from Doug's thoughts, interventions and example. Doug, in Cuba people often encourage each other saying "Ánimo !", meaning "Courage !". Rsk6400 (talk) 08:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Doug: I am saddened, of course, to hear the news that the cancer has proved incurable. I was hoping you would beat it, but illnesses are not privy to the hopes and wishes of humans from either near or afar. To carry on with equanimity and honesty in the face of life's exigencies is all we can hope for. That you seem to be doing not just with those qualities, but also creatively. All too often an off-handed mention of "real life," and usually just "RL," constitutes the sum total of our humanity we allow others to peek into on Wikipedia. All too often editors whose edits have given us a convincing, even inspiring, picture of the living breathing and feeling individuals they are, disappear anonymously from our presence. So, you have already bucked the trend. As an all too mortal human myself, I will look forward to reading whatever aspects of your journey you choose to share with us. As you must know, I have looked forward to your timely interventions on various archaeology or history-related pages on Wikipedia. You may not know that I have silently noted the pithy, no frills, language that has accompanied your interventions. For both, I offer my thanks and my admiration. Fowler&fowler«Talk»15:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Doug, I am very sorry to hear this news. You have done much for this community and site, for which numerous people have shown how important you are to them. I hope that you and your family are doing well in such trying times. I hope things can change and get better. I will keep you in my thoughts and prayers. 3Kingdoms (talk) 05:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for sharing this, and really sad to hear about it. Wish you a lot of love to share with your loved ones, and faith and peace of mind. May springtime be nice and wonderfull! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk!03:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Came here to see if there were any updates, so sad when I realised what it was. Hoping for the best in whatever time remains and that whatever you decide to do comes true. My thoughts are with you and your family. Nil Einne (talk) 18:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I waited way too long to finish writing this. You were one of the first admins I ever ran into on here, and an absolute paragon of what an admin should be. How much you care about this site and the time you've spent on it, has been an absolute blessing. And nothing can ever take that away from you. I am so honored to have been able to see you do that work, and hope many of us around here are able to take it forward. When I see a page that you were "watching over" (e.g. the only person (or one of few) responding to POV edit requests, keeping the article in good condition, etc.) I've been adding it to my watchlist. I hope others will do the same. I'm also so blown away by the poise and grace you're showing here, and in this announcement. Nothing about this is easy, I cannot even imagine how hard it is to think about or to write. And I just hope I can even approach that level of peace or grace if I get this sort of news. Thank you for everything you do around here, and thank you for continuing to be just an all around good guy. — Shibbolethink(♔♕)15:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I am so saddened to read this. I do hope that whatever may come, you have a strong support network of family and friends to guide you. You and yours are in my thoughts. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
God bless, Doug. Praying for you. Thank you for being one of the bright lights on Wikipedia. If there is anything we or I can do, let us or me know. Love ya. Softlavender (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, every single time I've seen your name it has been good. Thank you for your gracious and wise work for Wikipedia. Holding you in the Light, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 18:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, I stand in awe at all the work you've done. Above all, know that we all here care deeply for your wellbeing, and couldn't be any more grateful to have shared this space with you. A big hug to you and your wife as you go through this, and I dearly hope that your departure will be on your own terms, with dignity. But in the meantime, as Mathglot said, please put yourself first. You more than deserve it. DFlhb (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Know that you are truly one of the great and good editors here; I have immensely appreciated your contributions. Wish the very best to you and your family, Huldra (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, Doug. You have given me the gift of knowing that this project really is a worthwhile endeavor, since it is clearly in the hands of some of the most incredible people, that I have never actually met in person (that I would have liked to, if at all possible). If it has to be about goodbye, well, then let it be among the very longest, and most painless, goodbyes that have ever occurred to anyone. Your admiring fan, StonyBrookbabble21:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've only read this a few days ago along with all the excellent comments. Doug, I too noticed your excellent work on WP long before I finally created my account. Traces of your contributions seemed to be everywhere. At a moment when I had more time to dedicate to WP and finally heeded the recommendation of another editor to create an account, I think that you were the first administrator I visited to announce it. I'm less active here these days, but will never forget the joy of participating a bit with you on this project. Several comments above express better whatever more I could say. I'll still emphasise a point several of them make, about the importance of quality living, and the thanks for all that you've done here. I'm also glad that you allowed us the opportunity to share this: unfortunately there are editors I only could thank after they were gone. You're also one of those I sometimes check for recent activity and it's always a "yay" moment to see recent contributions. —PaleoNeonate – 13:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’m lucky, the 30% chance chemo would work includes me!
As straight continuous chemo would impact my quality of life, I’m having a two month break, will be reassessed then. I want to keep up my 5 km a day on the treadmill! And going out occasionally with my wife on dog walks. Doug Wellertalk17:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doctors have to play safe and give the worst case scenario. If you really want to see who the next president is, you probably will (though the shock might send you into regression!) My wife has leukaemia and found the chemo was so interfering with her quality of life that she gave it up. That was four years ago and she hasn't regretted it, despite the inevitable restriction of her life-style. Enjoy everything you can with gratitude. Sweetpool50 (talk) 18:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am hoping for continued successes, Doug. You are an amazingly strong person and I appreciate you more every day. You inspire others which is an incredible gift. Keep walking the treadmill and going out with the wife and dog. Keep exploring life and paying attention to all the details around you. That has helped me through many, many difficult days. You are truly a Rainbow of vibrant colors and you leave everyone in awe at the beauty of your LifeSong. Bless you, my friend. --ARoseWolf19:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
5k a day on the treadmill! What an inspiration! My wife complains that I spend far too much time on the couch reading, but really snoozing with the cat. This is the kick in the pants I need. Thank you Fowler&fowler«Talk»20:30, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per Donald Albury. That news has made my day, no, my cold rainy Italian spring suddenly lighten with joy. Hang in there, Doug.Nishidani (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Checking my watching after a couple of days and this section makes it all worthwhile; an oasis amidst the muck and bramble. Keep up whatever you are doing, Doug! Abecedare (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great news indeed! Best wishes, Doug Weller. You will definitely see who wins the next US presidential election! You are an inspiration; in fact, 5km a day inspired me as well! Ekdalian (talk) 06:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, you are an inspiration, and perhaps you - and your wife - like the music of our 6 May concert, Misatango and Te Deum, that we found inspiring. I received the link to the YouTube video last night - too tired to share then. I put it there and on my talk page.--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, assuming that the next US president will be elected in 2028, I really hope that you will see it. Your walking and your editing are an inspiration. Rsk6400 (talk) 10:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Another instance of keyboard ruining (see JMF's comment below) ! How did you know that "American Pie" is a favourite of mine ? Rsk6400 (talk) 06:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rsk6400: The odds seem pretty good, but I didn't know it was. I see from the article on it that McLean finally explained the song, debunking some popular ideas. Doug Wellertalk07:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am constantly amazed at what medicine can acheive. But even more amazed by what individuals like you who will fight to bring about the best possible outcomes can do. This is wonderful news, and I wish you the absolute best. - Bilby (talk) 10:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks all. Still ok, doing 5k a day on my treadmill. Went out to eat with my daughter to a Vietnamese restaurant in Nottingham, lovely soft shelled crab. I’m guessing I’ll be starting chemo again next month. Doug Wellertalk19:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Doug, this is good news. I've always respected your work as an admin and an editor, and your ability to inject good humour to cool down hot discussions. Best wishes. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 22:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even tho we haven't had many interactions, your contributions, compassion and commitment have truly served as one of the guiding beacons in helping me become a better editor. :) By the looks of the above signatures, I'm seeing this quiet late but I hope things have gotten better since then! Sending my thoughts and prayers to you and yours and thanks for being a wiki-role model! Best, DantheAnimator06:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Dantheanimator that’s very kind. I feel stronger than I have for a long time but the cancer of course continues to grow, so three months of chemo soon. My experience wiyh it last time was good, no problems except hair loss. Doug Wellertalk18:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller I've not been around for a few years and I've come back and am really sad to hear this. You're a good person and I'm devastated that this is what you're dealing with. Wishing you peace and light. Babakathy (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agh,it's been archived. Another round of chemo ended about 6 weeks ago, stopping the growth. Which of course has started again, so more chemo in a few months. I don't know if the side effects will get worse, butmy prognosis a couple of months ago was 18 months. I feel ok, week but then I'm old!5 k a day on treadmill. Doug Wellertalk16:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are ever in my thoughts. Keep moving. Keep stepping. Keep walking. You are the miracle here Doug and I am thankful to see you on the project every day. Stay strong. Singing a song over you. --ARoseWolf16:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't even remember how I got to your talk page, but I just want to say I wish you all the best.
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your career of great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)
It is with great appreciation that the members of the Editor Retention Project bestow the Editor of the Week award to Doug Weller, a scholar, a gentleman and the sort of Wikipedian we all wish we could one day become. One of the truly bright lights and inspirational editors in the WP community, Doug has faced his recent health diagnosis with his usual thoughtfulness and reason. He has made massive contributions over the years, especially as an administrator, helping to make Wikipedia a more trustworthy source by rooting out misinformation and vandalism. We will never be able to measure the strife he has saved us from, because one never notices the strife which never occurs. A perfect example of his commitment to WP is his welcoming of a new editor just a few days ago. Godspeed to you, good sir. A trusted, productive and helpful editor whose talk page is filled with thanks and well wishes from fellow editors. Thank you for the example, the kindness, and the things that we will miss.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
I’m humbled and literally in tears. This means a lot to me. Without all the support I’m getting from the community I would be struggling. Doug Wellertalk21:19, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your dedicated service and many varied contributions in different roles to Wikipedia. Your work is greatly appreciated. isaacl (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Very much deserved DW. I could copy paste every word of praise already written here but I'll just second them instead. Best regards Doug. MarnetteD|Talk22:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let's settle on Editor of the Decade, and a strong early contender for Editor of the Century (although given that that won't be awarded for another 77 years, the chances of any of us being around to hand out the gong are rather slim). GirthSummit (blether)23:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded, Doug. You were an early guiding light for me here at WP over a decade ago now, literally at times keeping me on the Golden Path. You are a rare and glorious soul. Heiro00:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Doug. It has been a long time since we interacted, and I only just read the news you posted above at the start of the year. I wanted to echo what others have said above (both in this thread and the earlier one). Wishing you all the best. Carcharoth (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We haven't interacted much, but I wanted to add my congratulations and sincere thanks for all the work you have done and continue to do here. Editor of the Years without a doubt. Best wishes, Eddie891TalkWork13:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Doug, it's been a while since we spoke and I wanted to stop by to congratulate you on your Editor of the Week award. Your work is appreciated! –xenotalk18:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreeing with Dudley Miles' "Wikipedia is a much better place because of your contribution" - you really make a difference! Rsk6400 (talk) 19:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Long overdue for a man who for so many of us has set the gold standard for wikipedia volunteers, and indeed for his fellow admins. And thanks to the editor of the week team for summarizing Doug's presence here so eloquently.Nishidani (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure others were quite deserving of this award at the time they got it but no one is more deserving than you, Doug. Thank you for your continued contributions, your steady presence and your words of wisdom. --ARoseWolf19:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Always thinking of you, Doug, at least when my mind's not distracted by blips, such as the defeat of Australia in the Fifth Test. Keep well. We absolutely must be around for next year's Olympics and the November 2024 US elections, at a minimum.Nishidani (talk) 17:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hi @Doug Weller,
Hope you are doing well,may god bless you with good health.Coming to the point ,I joined Wikipedia very recently one user requested one admin to block me in the name of "obvious duck" on the same day! Without even investigation! .I just spent few hours and found except me no one is there in that talk page everyone has been marked as sock of joshi punekar.After seeing the reasons in the sock master page I felt like "sockpuppetry" has been used as a tool by few as that article named "Gaud saraswat" is clearly violating neutrality policy of wiki.I can develop the articles related to konkan very clearly and in neutral POV as my Ph.D is in same field.Now the matter of concern is that,this is my real name,I don't like to get banned for someone's wested interest.So please guide me here.Is there any facility to prove that I am not sock by advanced CU check before someone use sock as a tool?or should I stop editing wiki? Rajeshfadnavis (talk) 05:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rajeshfadnavis I can't do a CU to prove someone isn't a sock, that is against policy. I've mentioned this at the investigation. Can you tell me what brought you to Wikipedia to edit the same articles? Doug Wellertalk11:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug WellerFor me what's same and different.Just scrolling few pages and contributing where ever I can but I didn't knew this new tactics of classification,Wikipedia tells it should be used with utter care but here after seeing talk page it's clear that possibly new tool for pov push .Hope you have seen as i suspecting already even my name is there in the investigation page!(Before I saw the request in talk page of Regentspark,that too direct request!).Was there any vandalism or multiple accounts issue?Editing Chitpavan page or gaud saraswats page?.My expertise is there in konkan communities this is one in that I can tell openly that edit in gaud saraswat is void of neutrality,I have given my few points there.Hope CU will be done by admin during investigation.Anyhow take care of your health . Rajeshfadnavis (talk) 13:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rajeshfadnavis: I saw that request but I don't think there is enough behavioral evidence for a sock block. It is up to the requester to ask for a CU and I wouldn't worry about it unless they do ask. --RegentsPark (comment) 18:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RegentsParkSo nice of you,being admin you replied with a valid point of "lack of behavior evidence".Nice to see the genuine reply. My ambiguity started with the point where without editing even 5 edits some people are lodging complaints.So I strongly feel Some people are using sockpuppetry procedure to satisfy thier wested interest(I found this extensively in bengali caste to hide the reality,In brahmin caste of Maharashtra) concern is it should not happen, in the long run this may damage the ecosystem of wiki.A very nice idea of free encyclopedia will be damaged to satisfy the wested interest.My intension is not to hurt anyone hope I have conveyed my concern @Doug Weller. Rajeshfadnavis (talk) 08:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RegentsParkOne more point I forgot,Some wested interest editors to create behavior evidence forcefully, whatever comes to thier mind,they will collate and present as a proof.So instead of encouraging editors this will be thier try to end the editing of the page(I can give the example of few pages possibly in the future in front of multiple administrators if the same behavior persists).Cross verify my above information.I hope the current discussion will give positive reply in this issue to control editors with wested interest in the limit of wiki policy.Thanks Rajeshfadnavis (talk) 08:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tryptofish I could certainly use your help with the latter once I get time to flesh out the article. Wasted a lot of time today over someone messing with an article. I’ve uploaded one and have written to the local parish council hoping to get permission to use theirs. Failing that I migrant to take my own photos. Doug Wellertalk19:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Just let me know when you have them uploaded (and of course which files they are), and I'll be happy to to help. By the way, KJP1 is very good at articles on that sort of topic. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Just let me know when you have them uploaded (and of course which files they are), and I'll be happy to to help. By the way, KJP1 is very good at articles on that sort of topic. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) FWIW WikiMaps turns up the following Geograph images from the site:
Moat and mound in Castle Wood
Moats in Castle Wood
Moated site near the McArthur Glen shopping outlet
@Odysseus1479 @Tryptofish I went there today with my wife. The underbrush and nettles haven't grown up yet and a lot of tree and bush cutting has been done to clear the visibility. And someone showed us a better way to get really close.Nice to be out in the sun even though the ground was tricky to walk on with steep slopes, my Parkinson's kept telling me it was a bad idea.:) Doug Wellertalk13:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good to hear the site is reasonably accessible, even if it’s not as impressive as Moxy (or his chatbot?) would have us believe. ;) Are there any markers or interpretive displays? (Just curious, not suggesting you illustrate the article with photos of them.) I hope the ground-clearance doesn’t enhance the presence of the motorway & shopping centre!—Odysseus147922:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Odysseus1479 Missed this. No markers or indications anywhere as to what this is, other than they have obviously tried to make it more visible. And you can't see the outlet mall, motorway or industrial estate. Doug Wellertalk19:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ekdalian: You'll need to make a strong behavioral case with diffs and I don't see one yet. Looking at the SPI report, except for the timing, you haven't provided enough diffs to justify a CU. I guess it is up to a check user to decide whether the timing is enough but no one seems to have taken it up. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Doug Weller,
I found some difficulty in understanding WP:Raj source rule.kindly guide me in this as I can find usage of Raj source in many caste related article indirectly creating POV issue.For instance let us consider, Raj source published in 1910-1915 used exactly in the new article published in 2010 or 2015.Can they use that part of information? Rajeshfadnavis (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Doug Weller as per your suggestion I have restrained myself from possible offensive words against any editor of wiki in the boundary of good faith.I believe in mutual respect and constructive work.I do expect the same thing from the other editors too,calling me sock in multiple platform is making me feel embarrassed.You are highly experienced admin,understanding my current mindset is not difficult for you.Kindly tell that user to stop personal attacks.
Thanks for catching and fixing that. Not an unusual mistake for me especially when I try to use my iPad to cut and paste but I usually preview (not that easy using this reply system). Doug Wellertalk18:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A terrorist has recently been active online after 10 years. He has become more silent and giving indirect provocations to violence online. Ten years ago he was recruited by UK based IS group. So as a precautionary measure I created an article which got deleted under A7. (There were citations from three independent news websites. There were few sentences initially.)
What to do in such cases? How can I store (authentic, cited) information about terrorists here on WikiPedia for future reference? Please advise. Kawrno Baba (talk) 11:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wen there and clicked both 'Ask question' and 'Add a topic' buttons, both times there was a popup written 'Unable to stash Parsoid HTML.'. What to do? Kawrno Baba (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Doug, I would just like your opinion on my recent correct on The Searchers and its subsequent reversal by a "editor" with a poor record? I felt that because Wikipedia is read in many English speaking areas, the word "number" was more appropriate? Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 10:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know whether the socks all use the same IP - but if they do, please could you give consideration to blocking article creation by that IP.-- Toddy1(talk)11:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Toddy1 It's a wide range of IP addresses, so I can't block. I've asked GuardianH about semi-protecting their page. Do you have reason to think they might create articles? Not much I can do about that obviously though. Doug Wellertalk12:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're probably all worth tagging as suspected. Technically, they are all different from another, but they're all different in exactly the same sort of way, if you see what I mean. Going off of the CU logs, and looking at this latest batch, I'm going to revisit my opinion on Korensho as well. Will do the needful, thanks for the heads up. GirthSummit (blether)16:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferien I found it. The last edits before yours were by 2 socks,one with a lot of edits[2], then before that 1 legitimate edit, then another sock or sockmaster. Sorry, I think the protection is clearly still warranted. Doug Wellertalk16:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Doug, we have been discussing Wikipedia:Reliable sources in connection with the subject page. On Paracas Candelabra page, the reference for the text Pottery found near the figure has been carbon dated at 200 BC, further leads to page [3]. This end-of-line page does not link the claimed carbon dating to any Original research or Laboratory test report. How do we accept the historicity of the Pottery found at site without a reliable source? I wish to understand. A081950 (talk) 15:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, good catch. I'm pretty sure it's accurate. I'm tired and watching tv, but how about doing some research on Dr Maria Reiche who measured the geoglyph and I think dated the pottery. Be careful, some of the sources might be useless. Doug Wellertalk17:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Doug Weller
How are you doing? I saw your revert on Persecution of traditional African religions and clicked on your talk, when I realised you are fighting the C word! Your health is more important than the article or the revert (which was within your right to do). Despite our old differences, I would not wish that on anybody, and I'm terribly sorry you are going through that. I hope the treatment is working, and I wish you nothing but a speedy recovery/remission. You are strong. I know that better than anyone. Lol! You will be fine. Sending you lots of blessings. You will beat this. I'm praying for your full recovery. Have a blessed weekend.Tamsier (talk) 19:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this. I appreciate your comments but I am afraid it is terminal. i just hope chemo contnues to extend my use-by date.:) Your talk page is still on my Watchlist. If you do appeal and win you need to learn a bit more about editing so your edits don’t look like an essay. Eg language, words like “despite”. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Doug Wellertalk19:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! No! No! No! I am so sorry to hear that. I'm keeping my fingers crossed and pray that the chemo do its thing and you are back on the mend. There is a lot of research into it, just stay positive. Thank you for your advise. You look after yourself.Tamsier (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
You can nominate your favorite tools for the fifth edition of the Coolest Tool Award. Nominations will be open until May 10.
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 April. It will be on all wikis from 25 April (calendar). [6][7]
Future changes
This is the last warning that by the end of May 2024 the Vector 2022 skin will no longer share site and user scripts/styles with old Vector. For user-scripts that you want to keep using on Vector 2022, copy the contents of Special:MyPage/vector.js to Special:MyPage/vector-2022.js. There are more technical details available. Interface administrators who foresee this leading to lots of technical support questions may wish to send a mass message to your community, as was done on French Wikipedia. [8]
Hey Doug, I hope you are doing well. Can you lend me your insight?
"A day of terrible slaughter: The battle of Montgisard, 1177", William E. Welsh, "Medieval Warfare", Vol. 6, No. 1, THEME: Baldwin IV and the Kingdom of Jerusalem (MAR / APR 2016), pp. 28-35. [9]
I'd say no. I'm not convinced the publisher, Karwansaray, is good enough to pass RS. and the author doesn't seem qualified. You can always ask at RSN, neither the publisher nor the journal has been discussed there. Doug Wellertalk07:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have only been part of the project for a moment, but I just saw your userpage and wanted to express how sorry I am to hear it, and wish you and those who love you strength. :) FortunateSons (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FortunateSons Thanks for this. Blood test and seeing oncologist next week to see if I need to start chemo again, which I will have to do either now or maybe in 2 months as the cancer continues to grow in between a 3 month session of chemo. Doug Wellertalk13:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hope the review shows no administrative action is needed at this time - unless of course you wish to endorse it. NebY (talk) 17:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You asked me how I know that aforementioned policy wasn't applied [10]. Not to make unnecessary clutter, I'm posting it here. I've never seen it being applied. However, it would be possible that I would have missed such a thing. Bilseric (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have 263 edits since: February 19, 2017. How could you know what happened before you created your account? How many IP addresses did you use before you created this account here. With this IP you clearly suggest you were already an experience editor then.[11] I'm taking this to your talk page to explain single purpose accounts. Doug Wellertalk11:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Chetvorno. Doug Weller was interested whether the rule was enforced in the past. Maybe you can help him with that inquiry. Or maybe it's not relevant anymore now when you have removed that sentence.
Doug Weller, I apologize if I hurt your feelings in any way. I haven't called your posts clutter. You have asked me a personal question on the talk page and I hastily answered there. Upon reviewing, my thought was , that me answering there would be "clutter". Thank you for your posts on the talk page. Bilseric (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bilseric On the article talk page you wrote "From all the clutter you posted, I don't even understand what you would like to accomplish. If you would like, I advise you to start over and be concise and on the point." Doug Wellertalk15:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, no, I was responding to another editor. See the quote: " First of all, Doug Weller ..<response to you about the rule>. Endy Angello <<response to Endy>>". I was saying to him that he is too emotional and making clutter, and gave him few advices. I feel it did work and that we would have found common ground. Bilseric (talk) 15:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm asking because it was in conciliatory tone. Few hours later I can't see that comment in history and your new tone is quite opposite in tone. Furthermore, I can see you have sent 3 mails? I can only assume what's comming. Can I ask you, what changed your opinion? Is this really needed? I don't know what to say, but to apologize for my previous comments. Years pass, people change. Even I am surprised about the tone some of them have. Please understand that I'm not a native English speaker and sometimes English comes of way to harsh than it sounds in my native language (even now I have to be careful not to be too harsh in tone). Too bad about the misunderstanding that triggered this. Bilseric (talk) 22:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Example of a talk page with the new design, in French.
The appearance of talk pages changed for the following wikis: Azerbaijani Wikipedia, Bengali Wikipedia, German Wikipedia, Persian Wikipedia, Hebrew Wikipedia, Hindi Wikipedia, Indonesian Wikipedia, Korean Wikipedia, Dutch Wikipedia, Portuguese Wikipedia, Romanian Wikipedia, Thai Wikipedia, Turkish Wikipedia, Ukrainian Wikipedia, Vietnamese Wikipedia. These wikis participated to a test, where 50% of users got the new design, for one year. As this test gave positive results, the new design is deployed on these wikis as the default design. It is possible to opt-out these changes in user preferences ("Show discussion activity"). The deployment will happen at all wikis in the coming weeks. [20]
Kartographer maps can use an alternative visual style without labels, by using mapstyle="osm". This wasn't working in previews, creating the wrong impression that it wasn't supported. This has now been fixed. [29]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 30 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 May. It will be on all wikis from 2 May (calendar). [30][31]
Over the Moon for you..―Buster7 ☎ 05:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Rsk6400 (talk) 06:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Moat and mound in Castle Wood
Moats in Castle Wood
Moated site near the McArthur Glen shopping outlet
Moat in Castle Wood
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrative action review regarding an action which you performed. The thread is Indefinite TPA revocation for “proxying while blocked”. Thank you. XMcan (talk) 00:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Please could you give Guardiansassssisdirty an indefinite holiday. The account is the latest in a family of socks who post similar messages on User talk:GuardianH - see talk page history.
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 April. It will be on all wikis from 25 April (calendar). [6][7]
