User talk:Director

Home   Talk   Contributions   Archives Make yourself at home....

I usually reply to posted messages here, but if the message is important I'll notify you on on your talkpage as well. If I posted a message on your talkpage I will reply there, but feel free to notify me on my talk if you feel it is urgent. I'd prefer it if noone removed content here, but naturally I have no objections if it's just grammar. Please don't revert my edits on this page. Finally: no insults. I can take criticism as much as the next guy, but outright personal attacks will be reverted and reported. Socialist Republic of Croatia Hello, Director. You have new messages at Talk:Socialist Republic of Croatia#Predecessors/Successors. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. You won Ok you won: never more contribute by me in dalmatian articles ok? I'm not a sock, so thanks me for house of cerva and stop bother me or accusing me i'm not interested any more in YOUR influenced pages. Another edit war Draza Check out Sunray's talk page, he blessed these edits.... --Nuujinn (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC) The Milhist election has started! The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010. With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 21:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:Petar Stambolic1.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Petar Stambolic1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC) Hello, Director. You have new messages at Talk:Breakup of Yugoslavia#New states. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Stojadinović-Pavelić agreement Hi. Are You interested in translating this article to English? -- Bojan  Talk  14:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC) Possible mistake Hi, DIREKTOR! Did I made a mistake here? Kebeta (talk) 08:25, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Lazar Kolishevski.JPG ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Lazar Kolishevski.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). PLEASE NOTE: I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page. Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia:Civility Before calling editors "nationalists" and threating them[1]. You should take a look at Wikipedia:Five pillars. Especially Wikipedia:Assume good faith and Wikipedia:Consensus. Good reading. UltimaRatio (talk) 19:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC) If you look carefully, you'll notice that I did not call anyone a "nationalist". --DIREKTOR (TALK) 19:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC) You replaced a longstanding picture without consensus and when someone reverted your edit, you threating him to report his edits for not respecting Consensus ! I'm not sure this is the way Wikipedians should work... UltimaRatio (talk) 19:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC) I was "threatening" to report you because you removed the picture altogether for no reason whatsoever. The Dunkrik evacuation of the British is hardly the point of the article, the image is very much anglo-centric and seems to center on the British role rather than on the actual battle which was fought overwhelmingly by Frenchmen and Germans. The new pic represents the disasterous Battle of France in a more direct way. I want to be clear here: I am not some sort of "Nazi/German-sympathizer", nor am I a German for that matter. I'm just trying to improve the articles. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 19:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC) The threats I'm talking about where made on the Paris article, not on Battle of France, see [2]. By the way, there was not a single battle in Paris during the Battle of France, the battle was almost entirely fought between Belgium and Dunkirk. The german occupation of Paris is a consequence of the battle, not the battle itself. I'm not interested about your political opinions. UltimaRatio (talk) 20:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Talk:Légion d'honneur#Requested move (2010) Hello DIREKTOR, I creatded fr:Museum van Hedendaagse Kunst Antwerpen with its title in dutch, not in french; also, frWP has a lot of articles with english titles, even abbreviated, cf fr:MASS MoCA. Can you explain "Nationalist POV is likely to blame"? Who are the nationalists there? Am I among this nationalists? Thanks in advance for your answers. Alvar☮ 06:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)