Jump to content

User talk:Camra55: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎February 2023: expand, mistakenly thanked wrong editor
Tag: Reverted
Camra55 (talk | contribs)
Line 45: Line 45:


Given the nature and amount of Edits you have made, I wonder do you work for the school? If so, please refrain from editing it. [[User:Yebaop|Yebaop]] ([[User talk:Yebaop|talk]]) 07:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Given the nature and amount of Edits you have made, I wonder do you work for the school? If so, please refrain from editing it. [[User:Yebaop|Yebaop]] ([[User talk:Yebaop|talk]]) 07:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

== February 2023 ==

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Dalziel High School]]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#In talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.''' ''We are using the term the school's web page uses. Stop changing it.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 05:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
:I mistakenly thanked you for your edit to this article. Please disregard that message. You have made this edit at least seven times. That's edit warring. The cited source does not support your change, and I will report you for an edit warring block if you continue. I have opened a discussion on the article's talk page. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 06:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:40, 14 February 2023

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Camra55. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022


Hello, Camra55. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page The Hikers has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.


-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Camra55, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Alex Thomas Crawford (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Dalziel High School

I have removed the former head teachers section that you have added. Former head teachers are not vital information and should not be added on Wikipedia.

Given the nature and amount of Edits you have made, I wonder do you work for the school? If so, please refrain from editing it. Yebaop (talk) 07:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]