User talk:Boomerbuzz

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 20:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Warning

Hi. I'm an administrator here. Please start a discussion at Talk:Kappa Alpha Order about the changes you wish to make. If you just revert again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You cannot force changes at Wikipedia. That doesn't work. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I will be happy to unblock you if you wish to use the article talk page. I know you want changes to the article, and that is the only way, as you have now figured out. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Boomerbuzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

new to this and was trying to fix complete inaccuracy.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=new to this and was trying to fix complete inaccuracy. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=new to this and was trying to fix complete inaccuracy. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=new to this and was trying to fix complete inaccuracy. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Understood. But you were warned again and again, and asked to use the talk page. Instead, you just reverted again and again.

If unblocked, will you use the talk page and wait for/until consensus? Do you promise not to touch the article until things are worked out at the talk page? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:37, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes. How do you even know when a consensus is reached?

You start a discussion, say what changes you want, and ask other for approval or even say "any objection". If no objections after a few days, then make the change. Easy. If others turn up and object, then no consensus. Then, drop the matter or compromise. So, sound like a good plan? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes. Understood.