User talk:Biohistorian15: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 4 discussion(s) to User talk:Biohistorian15/Archive 3) (bot Tag: Replaced |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|archive = User talk:Biohistorian15/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = User talk:Biohistorian15/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Promoting fringe theories, edit warring and aspersions == |
|||
Hi Biohistorian15, there are some rules of conduct here. According to [[WP:ASPERSIONS]] you should give evidence supporting this[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARsk6400&diff=1249871507&oldid=1243432648] and this[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AHistorical_race_concepts&diff=1250241943&oldid=1250232870] (the "gaming" part) edit of yours. I strongly believe in the results of academic disciplines (I'm teaching history and physics at a German ''Gymnasium''), but I'm not pushing a POV out of a "left-wing persuasion" (quote from your user page). Theories biologically dividing humans into different races have been ''promoted'' for political reasons, but they have been debunked by science. That's why I can only see this edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genetic_history_of_the_British_Isles&diff=1249814780&oldid=1249786688] as disruptive promotion of a fringe theory. Why should an article about a scientific subject contain a map from a racist book ? Why should real-life Anglo-Saxons form part of the "Nordics" from Grant's and Hitler's horror stories ? I'm not sure whether this series of edits[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nordic_race&diff=1249710122&oldid=1249507309] was promoting pseudo-science, but it surely was edit warring from your part. And, as you surely noticed, I was not the only editor taking issue with [[:Template:Historical race concepts sidebar]]. [[User:Rsk6400|Rsk6400]] ([[User talk:Rsk6400|talk]]) 10:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:00, 9 October 2024
| This is Biohistorian15's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Promoting fringe theories, edit warring and aspersions
Hi Biohistorian15, there are some rules of conduct here. According to WP:ASPERSIONS you should give evidence supporting this[1] and this[2] (the "gaming" part) edit of yours. I strongly believe in the results of academic disciplines (I'm teaching history and physics at a German Gymnasium), but I'm not pushing a POV out of a "left-wing persuasion" (quote from your user page). Theories biologically dividing humans into different races have been promoted for political reasons, but they have been debunked by science. That's why I can only see this edit[3] as disruptive promotion of a fringe theory. Why should an article about a scientific subject contain a map from a racist book ? Why should real-life Anglo-Saxons form part of the "Nordics" from Grant's and Hitler's horror stories ? I'm not sure whether this series of edits[4] was promoting pseudo-science, but it surely was edit warring from your part. And, as you surely noticed, I was not the only editor taking issue with Template:Historical race concepts sidebar. Rsk6400 (talk) 10:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)