Jump to content

User talk:Benjiboi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Benjiboi (talk | contribs)
Cubert (talk | contribs)
Line 479: Line 479:


:If Hullabaloo is [[WP:Wikihounding]] you - following you from article to article - that is a serious civility issue and a serious charge. My suggestion is to start editing other articles and see if they do follow you around. Once something is posted on ''my'' talkpage, even if the issue is resolved, it's my "right" to keep it there and revert someone who deletes it - within reason of course but Hullaboo in effect does control their talkpage. [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- <u style="font-size:14px; font-family: cursive;color:#8000FF">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u><u style="font-size:14px;font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:deeppink">b<font color="#CC0000">oi</font></u>]] 02:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
:If Hullabaloo is [[WP:Wikihounding]] you - following you from article to article - that is a serious civility issue and a serious charge. My suggestion is to start editing other articles and see if they do follow you around. Once something is posted on ''my'' talkpage, even if the issue is resolved, it's my "right" to keep it there and revert someone who deletes it - within reason of course but Hullaboo in effect does control their talkpage. [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- <u style="font-size:14px; font-family: cursive;color:#8000FF">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u><u style="font-size:14px;font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:deeppink">b<font color="#CC0000">oi</font></u>]] 02:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

::It is not only highly likely that he is a sock for a perma-blocked editor, but I am now virtually certain that "Hullaballoo" is actually several users operating simultaneously. A look at his edit history makes this particularly obvious. "He" is on Wikipedia non-stop, virtually all day every day, and during that entire time, he makes edits at the rate of approximately once per minute. Any edits made on or by editors or articles on his "hit list" are almost instantaneously reverted by him, at all hours. The guy would have to literally never sleep, eat, go to the bathroom, or do ANYTHING in life other than constantly patrol Wikipedia. His history reveals that he also has the super-human ability to edit multiple articles simultaneously at a rate that would be physically impossible for a single user. For example, he will remove a particular phrase that he dislikes in the middle of, say, "Jodie Foster"; then within one minute, he will be making an unrelated deletion of an uncited sentence on "Clint Eastwood"; a minute later he will be removing an unsourced phrase deep within another celebrity article, etc. He would have to be speed-reading at an ungodly rate to be able to find, identify, and edit these sentences buried deep within lengthy articles at such a super-human rate. All the while, continually monitoring the pages edited by his "enemies" and reverting their edits; while also continually monitoring his user talk page and deleting discussions there within seconds after they are posted. This has GOT to be multiple individuals. Any suggestions on where such a thing can be reported? Is there a Wiki rule against this? [[User:Cubert|Cubert]] ([[User talk:Cubert|talk]]) 01:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


== [[Rainbow flag (LGBT movement)]] ==
== [[Rainbow flag (LGBT movement)]] ==

Revision as of 01:21, 5 July 2009

Contents

Formatting refs

click edit to see... [1]

Note - access date format 2008-06-16

Living Memory LGBT History Timeline from Trans perspective

Starting draft page

User:Benjiboi/LGBT image quest for current pile.

LGBT Random Picture for user pages

Use {{Portal:LGBT/Pics}} or alternatively <center>{{Portal:LGBT/Pics}}</center> if you want it centered on userspace.Benjiboi


Collapsed for space
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

refs date of benefit event Benjiboi

Kellan

Kellan event in 2007[3]Benjiboi

Sisters controversy section ideas

...because Catholicism and American politics has a vast influence on American culture or history of (discrimination, ?,?) or even the more unique and universal appearance of dress the Sisters ...

Need to find refs of criticism from within LGBT community. Benjiboi

verbiage

James Martin, S.J. the U.S. entertainment industry is of "two minds" about the Catholic Church. He argues that,

On the one hand, film and television producers seem to find Catholicism irresistible. There are a number of reasons for this. First, more than any other Christian denomination, the Catholic Church is supremely visual, and therefore attractive to producers and directors concerned with the visual image. Vestments, monstrances, statues, crucifixes - to say nothing of the symbols of the sacraments - are all things that more "word oriented" Christian denominations have foregone. The Catholic Church, therefore, lends itself perfectly to the visual media of film and television. You can be sure that any movie about the Second Coming or Satan or demonic possession or, for that matter, any sort of irruption of the transcendent into everyday life, will choose the Catholic Church as its venue.Benjiboi

"Chicken and Bulls" Extortion Scam

See this. Seems worthy of an article but loads of research, possibly userfy and build. Benjiboi

Compare to current and clean-off what is used already. Benjiboi

Maybe you can do something with this. I looked at it and tried to figure out how to incorporate it but it was too confusing for me. Of note is that the line is manufactured by American Apparel. ALLSTARecho

Gold mine! I'm digging through a bio right now but we'll deal with that soonly. Benjiboi
Collapsed for space.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Benjiboi Benjiboi

here Benjiboi

There's an interview on there somewhere as well. Benjiboi

New Crocker

article. Banjiboi

Closeted homophobe or severely misunderstood?

  • this one sums his homosexuality as open secret
  • this editorial in ScotsGay - "Nevertheless, Outrage has been far too kind to those gay clerics and MPs like Kilfedder who have used their power to oppress us." (ties in age of consent campaign)

Possible ref for transgender history in the Polk

The original queer district: A brief history of the Polk's queer cred by J. PLASTER; August 29, 2007 Bay Guardian]. Banjeboi

Collapsed for space
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

PU from here.

and now from here.

and now from here Banjeboi

Also:

  • Google scholar
  • Previous AfD may also have some items

sources

the trans connection

A twink's guide to dressing a daddy

a Circuit (film) connection

popular London twink-haven G.A.Y.

104 stories to filter through

18 articles to filter through

twink porn

rolling stone mention

Bel Ami as specialist

Brent Corrigan twink deets and overview

56 here to sort through

About 12-15 refs needed to address OR concerns. Banjeboi

Collapsed for space
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Deep in Vogue, a song released by Malcolm McLaren one year before the documentary film by Jennie Livingston Paris Is Burning. Madonna's "Vogue" came one year later, bringing this subculture to the mainstream audience, but it was far from the real thing.

research this. Banjeboi

create article, part of the House - see Willi Ninja. -- Banjeboi

transgendered --> trangender

All WP (portals, categories, etc. ) done except 100-250 links in articles. Start here. Banjeboi

update link [4] Banjeboi

add infobox. Banjeboi

GA quest - look at rewrites, barnstars and DYKs for possible GA candidates

semi-protected articles have to wait until protection and vandalism ebbs. -- Banjeboi

Research and write. -- Banjeboi

Duly noted

This could possibly be helpful toward explaining on-wiki trans and homo -phobias. -- Banjeboi

review edits on Judicial system of Iran. -- Banjeboi

Nom for GA. -- Banjeboi

Nom for GA. -- Banjeboi

ARS - add to rescued list?

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precambrian rabbit. -- Banjeboi

Bear template?

see here. -- Banjeboi

Stubbyfy, ref and relaunch. User:Benjiboi/Underground culture. -- Banjeboi

Category:LGBT studies articles needing expert attention is always entertaining. -- Banjeboi

LGBT DYK for portal

Portal:LGBT/Did you know; convert past DYKs to the randomizer archive. -- Banjeboi

sorting out shemale, 2nd round

Butterfly metaphor [5],[6], [7], [8], [9], [10] -- Banjeboi

Create project banner? -- Banjeboi

Rewrite his sexuality section, again,

  • speculation prevalent, bundle the notable blogs
  • called gay ..., current note is fine
  • response to that speculation, - our summary of the explanation is better that the quote, attribute the interview
  • criticism to that response - bundle Naff's 3? relevant articles; bundle Olberman's with where that was repeated
  • follow up why Cooper avoids addressing the speculation. - Elle has a good section on this -- Banjeboi

for ARS

Wikipedia:Rescue 101

Collapsed for space
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Rescue template TBD

possible NPOV one? -- Banjeboi

for ARS tagging bot


For Ars. -- Banjeboi

{{Findsources3}}

Paris Hilton's new album

Draft is at User:Benjiboi/Platinum Blonde (Paris Hilton album) for when more sources appear. -- Banjeboi

50 state project, standardize intro with refs, state map and LGBT rights template. See also section and footer templates. Then do talkpages with project tag and proposed section outline. -- Banjeboi

See also

LGBT cat banner and project subpage

"LGBT category" mainspace banner of sorts so that those who actually look at any of the LGBT cat pages can follow a link to page that gives a simplified rationale and direction for adding people to cats. "Per _____ policy 'cats should be clearly supported by content' and per ____ policy 'content about sexual minorities must be reliably sourced'. Below are some guidelines to help determine which if any categories are appropriate and how they are organized." Create and install. -- Banjeboi

fix my mess

add "subst" to these (less than 100). -- Banjeboi

50 left. -- Banjeboi

BFrank

[11] when the noise ebbs. -- Banjeboi

bright, articulate and productive, effective etc.

Template? -- Banjeboi

I notes possible leads

User:Benjiboi/Intersex. -- Banjeboi

Fruit (slang) talkpage

find "strange fruit" song referring to LGBT people refs. -- Banjeboi

Per this start a new "so you tagged an article" template compacted with show/hide sections:

  • Is this worth keeping, appropriate, duplicated; merge might make more sense, etc
  • Is this notable, verifiable
  • Are these fix it issues
  • If you do think it's worth keeping identify appropriate wikiprojects that may be able to find sourcing, clarity

etc. -- Banjeboi

basic ref formatting, a few sections a day ... -- Banjeboi

Done through 1991. -- Banjeboi
Year Unknown section and clean-up refs. -- Banjeboi
  • move cat to items
  • update template(s)
  • update bot
  • create rescue 101 page with section just on templates
  • modify ((tl|Rescue)) with template-specific parameters so displays template info rather than article info
  • update project page to reflect changes, etc. -- Banjeboi

ARS and DrV notes

some possible verbiage also note teh nuance of tagging an article that had the rescue tag vs. one that didn't. -- Banjeboi

Clean refs. -- Banjeboi

More clean-up in aisle three. -- Banjeboi

add sources asap. -- Banjeboi

Wikipedia talk:ARS/Editnotice

create directing to FAQ and instructions. -- Banjeboi

Bored? -- Banjeboi

For homo animal articles

[12]. -- Banjeboi

add filmography [13] and EL. -- Banjeboi

Clean-up archives. -- Banjeboi

sigh

Ref challenge at List of male performers in gay porn films, List of Grabby recipients has a lead to links. -- Banjeboi

I appreciate the emotional rescue (Re: Grief porn)

With apologies to Mick Jagger and the rest of the Stones, i appreciate the rescue template. The article has gotten bogged down in a tendentious bout of lameness, which slowed its development and made it ripe for an AfD. Maybe it can get squared away now. Again, my thanks for the help. :) - Arcayne (cast a spell) 00:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you like the idea of moving to Media portrayals of tragedy? Or have a better title? -- Banjeboi 11:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as I created the article, i am naturally reticent to it being merged into something else. That aside, if that's what's best, I am not going to let my ego get in the way. :) - Arcayne (cast a spell) 19:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The mourning sickness article seems a good match. It can grow and be rebirthed from there. Maybe research for sourcing every few months until you have enough. -- Banjeboi 22:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And this may be useful in the LGBT symbols article. - ALLSTRecho wuz here
ThePinkTriangle.org - wow, that's an article just waiting to happen! I'll see what I can cook up, there certainly seems to be plenty of sources. -- Banjeboi

On path to GA again!

  1. Fix refs style
  2. Check all refs to ensure editorial are cited as opinions, etc. -- Banjeboi

Hullaballo saga continues/ Any word whether he is a blocked editor?

User talk:Doktor Wilhelm#I still need help with this. He just going to continue harassing if he is not reprimanded. Swancookie (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Might be LGBT bias??? [14]

Swancookie (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid this might be the long complicated road on this. My quacker gaydar suspects we are but proving it may take some time and remain inconclusive. A user RfC, as worthless as they can be, may be the only next step betond a Wikiquette alert which may make sense as a good step towards that. The veiled hostility is terribly uncivil and abusive IMHO. -- Banjeboi 10:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
RFC wording here may help. -- Banjeboi

RE:RfC, I think that's what (hopefully) Doktor_Wilhelm will do. If he can't figure it out would you mind starting one? I've asked others to start that thread as I don't know how and am afraid I might do it totally wrong and blow the whole case. I'm curious how said user figured out I was gay? Is it that obvious? = P

Also, any word on the blocked user check?

I moved this whole section- less confusing? Swancookie (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, more confusing, I had put it with the prior thread to keep it all together; now that thread has been archived so I have to go dig for information I needed. -- Banjeboi 23:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Last annoying question.

What about this. If a user takes something off ones talk page (something they wrote) because an issue has been resolved... can the person (who's talk page it is) revert just to be a jerk? He's trying to discredit user:Xtian1313 because he's for lack of a better description "gay friendly". Ugh, this is so annoying. I'm sorry. Swancookie (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To all editors/ Hullaballoo situation

User talk:Swancookie#To all editors.2F Hullaballoo situation. Swancookie (talk) 17:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some responses

You are now making yourself the problem by overly aggressive pursuing this. Anything anyone removes from the article(s) can still be found in the history. It's annoying but can be done even years later. We're not in a rush here and your goal should not be to stop Hullabaloo but to improve the encyclopedia. Again, if any othe articles in question are sent to deletion let me know as that is a diffeerent situation. Until then the article can be edited by anyone, and it will be. Keep looking for solid sourcing and don't allow Hullabaloo or anyone else to push your buttons. You can't control what they do but you do control how you react. Remain civil and let them do themselves in.
I control my talk page just as other users control theirs. If, for whatever reasons, they remove something from their talkpage, that is generally their right - we assume they read it. If it's really a dire situation - most are not - you can ask for someone else to look at it. I've had several users remove my replies making it look like I never responded to their concerns or questions. Personally I find that despicable and revisionistic but it remains their right to rewrite history - on their talkpage. It shows who they are not who you are.
An RfC is premature, IMHO, a Wikiquette alert would make sense. It has to be written neutral and the diffs need to be accurate and obvious. Sorry, but Wikilawyering is labour-intensive and drugery. The good news is that in compiling through their work we will fill-in any evidence that will be a part of a future RfC. I was hoping we had confirmation of them being a formerly blocked user so we didn't have to do all this. So far it's not a slam dunk just a strong hunch. Having stated that there are other editors who specialize in those investigations. -- Banjeboi 23:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Here's the problem, the minute I start editing again he will revert my edits. Per your advice: I'm going to start editing again next week, let's see what happens. I understand about controlling your own talk page, but is it OK for an editor (user:Godblessyrblackheart) to remove something they wrote (on Hullaballoo's talk page) because the issue has been resolved (off wiki) and for Hullballoo to put it back even if said editor has removed it twice?

Can we get the other editors involved who specialize in those investigations, on the blocked user issue? Doing so may save me (and others) involved a lot of aggravation? Anyway, enjoy your 4th of July weekend. I'm sorry I'm such a pain. I get this way when I feel strongly about something. Swancookie (talk) 00:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If Hullabaloo is WP:Wikihounding you - following you from article to article - that is a serious civility issue and a serious charge. My suggestion is to start editing other articles and see if they do follow you around. Once something is posted on my talkpage, even if the issue is resolved, it's my "right" to keep it there and revert someone who deletes it - within reason of course but Hullaboo in effect does control their talkpage. -- Banjeboi 02:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is not only highly likely that he is a sock for a perma-blocked editor, but I am now virtually certain that "Hullaballoo" is actually several users operating simultaneously. A look at his edit history makes this particularly obvious. "He" is on Wikipedia non-stop, virtually all day every day, and during that entire time, he makes edits at the rate of approximately once per minute. Any edits made on or by editors or articles on his "hit list" are almost instantaneously reverted by him, at all hours. The guy would have to literally never sleep, eat, go to the bathroom, or do ANYTHING in life other than constantly patrol Wikipedia. His history reveals that he also has the super-human ability to edit multiple articles simultaneously at a rate that would be physically impossible for a single user. For example, he will remove a particular phrase that he dislikes in the middle of, say, "Jodie Foster"; then within one minute, he will be making an unrelated deletion of an uncited sentence on "Clint Eastwood"; a minute later he will be removing an unsourced phrase deep within another celebrity article, etc. He would have to be speed-reading at an ungodly rate to be able to find, identify, and edit these sentences buried deep within lengthy articles at such a super-human rate. All the while, continually monitoring the pages edited by his "enemies" and reverting their edits; while also continually monitoring his user talk page and deleting discussions there within seconds after they are posted. This has GOT to be multiple individuals. Any suggestions on where such a thing can be reported? Is there a Wiki rule against this? Cubert (talk) 01:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great under the large flag image. -- Banjeboi

I think there was a documentary about this car. -- Banjeboi

Indeed, but I haven't seen it. I remember reading that article several months ago. APK is your own Personal Jesus 03:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia rules! Lol! -- Banjeboi 03:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And look at the available sources. APK coffee talk 06:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. That's a smart website! -- Banjeboi 22:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, is this vehicle the source of the term "Buggery"? Never mind, I don't want to know. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 03:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Favour

Can you take a look at this first stab at reorganising and slimming this, and offer any suggestions on my talk page (or make changes as appropriate) please:

User:MishMich/CV history

I'm avoiding doing anything significant with the US stuff, as there's plenty of people here who are interested in US stuff already.

Oy vey, I'm only so good with lengthy content but will have a look. -- Banjeboi
OK, first thoughts are that flipping back n forth from Europe to US causes more confusion I would consider breaking it all chronologically and explaining how information was shared - newspaper accounts, film news reels, etc. Also I would consider not using Century is the titles as many readers don't know 21st Century equals 2000s; when it comes to WW2 you may need to spel it out and clarify the dynamic shift of all culture justifying a before and after. -- Banjeboi 03:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up. -- Banjeboi

That caught my attention because it sounds like it's either deliberately or coincidentally the opposite of Garrison Keillor's fictitious Lake Wobegon Catholic church, "Our Lady of Perpetual Responsibility". I just wonder which one was invented first. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 03:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lol! An etymology could be fun to find out - Keillor was filling the airwaves before the group even started so - hmmmm. -- Banjeboi 03:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping to clean up the Queer Liberaction page. I'm very new to Wikipedia. If you have time, and don't mind, can you please help with references? If you go to the external website for Queer Liberaction, there is a lot of information there, plus pictures, but I suppose this would not be a 3rd party. Also the latest issue of the Dallas Voice has information and pictures about it. Here is the PDF for it: http://www.dallasvoice.com/artman/archive/07-03-2009.pdf The Dallas Voice, and the local mainstream papers, Fort Worth Star Telegram and the Dallas Morning News have had numerous article over the last few months. As well, local TV news (all local stations) have covered the events. BTW, are you local or just stumbled on the page? Thanks again for you help! Markg65 (talk) 02:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that should help. I don't really deal well with PDF. I was cleaning up transgendered --> transgender so just found it by chance. -- Banjeboi 15:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

add infobox. -- Banjeboi

  1. ^ Vos, Sarah (10 June 2007, page 13). "Barker says O'Donnell could replace him". Associated Press. Retrieved 2008-06-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)