User talk:Benjiboi: Difference between revisions
Line 479: | Line 479: | ||
:If Hullabaloo is [[WP:Wikihounding]] you - following you from article to article - that is a serious civility issue and a serious charge. My suggestion is to start editing other articles and see if they do follow you around. Once something is posted on ''my'' talkpage, even if the issue is resolved, it's my "right" to keep it there and revert someone who deletes it - within reason of course but Hullaboo in effect does control their talkpage. [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- <u style="font-size:14px; font-family: cursive;color:#8000FF">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u><u style="font-size:14px;font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:deeppink">b<font color="#CC0000">oi</font></u>]] 02:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC) |
:If Hullabaloo is [[WP:Wikihounding]] you - following you from article to article - that is a serious civility issue and a serious charge. My suggestion is to start editing other articles and see if they do follow you around. Once something is posted on ''my'' talkpage, even if the issue is resolved, it's my "right" to keep it there and revert someone who deletes it - within reason of course but Hullaboo in effect does control their talkpage. [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- <u style="font-size:14px; font-family: cursive;color:#8000FF">Banj<font color="#FF4400">e</font></u><u style="font-size:14px;font-family: Zapfino, sans-serif;color:deeppink">b<font color="#CC0000">oi</font></u>]] 02:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
::It is not only highly likely that he is a sock for a perma-blocked editor, but I am now virtually certain that "Hullaballoo" is actually several users operating simultaneously. A look at his edit history makes this particularly obvious. "He" is on Wikipedia non-stop, virtually all day every day, and during that entire time, he makes edits at the rate of approximately once per minute. Any edits made on or by editors or articles on his "hit list" are almost instantaneously reverted by him, at all hours. The guy would have to literally never sleep, eat, go to the bathroom, or do ANYTHING in life other than constantly patrol Wikipedia. His history reveals that he also has the super-human ability to edit multiple articles simultaneously at a rate that would be physically impossible for a single user. For example, he will remove a particular phrase that he dislikes in the middle of, say, "Jodie Foster"; then within one minute, he will be making an unrelated deletion of an uncited sentence on "Clint Eastwood"; a minute later he will be removing an unsourced phrase deep within another celebrity article, etc. He would have to be speed-reading at an ungodly rate to be able to find, identify, and edit these sentences buried deep within lengthy articles at such a super-human rate. All the while, continually monitoring the pages edited by his "enemies" and reverting their edits; while also continually monitoring his user talk page and deleting discussions there within seconds after they are posted. This has GOT to be multiple individuals. Any suggestions on where such a thing can be reported? Is there a Wiki rule against this? [[User:Cubert|Cubert]] ([[User talk:Cubert|talk]]) 01:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Rainbow flag (LGBT movement)]] == |
== [[Rainbow flag (LGBT movement)]] == |
Revision as of 01:21, 5 July 2009
This userpage has been blanked. If this is your userpage, you can retrieve the contents of this page in the page history. Alternatively, if you would like it deleted, simply replace the content of this page with {{db-u1}}. |
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Contents |
---|
Formatting refs
click edit to see... [1]
Note - access date format 2008-06-16
Living Memory LGBT History Timeline from Trans perspective
This discussion has been collapsed. |
---|
A possible resource. Transgender Aging Network has launched a project - Living Memory LGBT History Timeline to assist with aging LGBT folks "It is impossible to tell without asking someone precisely which public events shaped their lives, but knowing what was likely reported in newspapers and discussed at dinner parties during a person’s lifetime may help you understand how their worldview was shaped. To offer insight into the concerns, lifestyles, and belief sets of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people who are now 50 and older, the Transgender Aging Network has constructed the following timeline showing how old they would have been when there were critical events or changes in the lives of LGBT people." Starting with the 1920s the events list can be cross-referenced with current GLBT timelines and used as a possible stepping stone to aid Trans projects and awareness. The PDF version is here [1] Html via Google is here [2] |
Starting draft page
User:Benjiboi/LGBT image quest for current pile.
LGBT Random Picture for user pages
Use {{Portal:LGBT/Pics}} or alternatively <center>{{Portal:LGBT/Pics}}</center> if you want it centered on userspace.Benjiboi
Collapsed for space |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
operation Spanner linkrefs date of benefit event Benjiboi KellanKellan event in 2007[3]Benjiboi Sisters controversy section ideas...because Catholicism and American politics has a vast influence on American culture or history of (discrimination, ?,?) or even the more unique and universal appearance of dress the Sisters ... Need to find refs of criticism from within LGBT community. Benjiboi verbiageJames Martin, S.J. the U.S. entertainment industry is of "two minds" about the Catholic Church. He argues that, On the one hand, film and television producers seem to find Catholicism irresistible. There are a number of reasons for this. First, more than any other Christian denomination, the Catholic Church is supremely visual, and therefore attractive to producers and directors concerned with the visual image. Vestments, monstrances, statues, crucifixes - to say nothing of the symbols of the sacraments - are all things that more "word oriented" Christian denominations have foregone. The Catholic Church, therefore, lends itself perfectly to the visual media of film and television. You can be sure that any movie about the Second Coming or Satan or demonic possession or, for that matter, any sort of irruption of the transcendent into everyday life, will choose the Catholic Church as its venue.Benjiboi |
"Chicken and Bulls" Extortion Scam
See this. Seems worthy of an article but loads of research, possibly userfy and build. Benjiboi
Compare to current and clean-off what is used already. Benjiboi
Maybe you can do something with this. I looked at it and tried to figure out how to incorporate it but it was too confusing for me. Of note is that the line is manufactured by American Apparel. ALLSTARecho
- Gold mine! I'm digging through a bio right now but we'll deal with that soonly. Benjiboi
Chris Crocker (Internet celebrity) - Gays and YouTube
Collapsed for space. | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||||||||
Chris Crocker (Internet celebrity) new articleNew Crocker |
Closeted homophobe or severely misunderstood?
- this one sums his homosexuality as open secret
- this editorial in ScotsGay - "Nevertheless, Outrage has been far too kind to those gay clerics and MPs like Kilfedder who have used their power to oppress us." (ties in age of consent campaign)
Possible ref for transgender history in the Polk
The original queer district: A brief history of the Polk's queer cred by J. PLASTER; August 29, 2007 Bay Guardian]. Banjeboi
Collapsed for space |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
PU from here. and now from here. Also:
sourcesA twink's guide to dressing a daddy a Circuit (film) connection popular London twink-haven G.A.Y. twink porn |
About 12-15 refs needed to address OR concerns. Banjeboi
for ball culture and Willi Ninja
Collapsed for space |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Deep in Vogue, a song released by Malcolm McLaren one year before the documentary film by Jennie Livingston Paris Is Burning. Madonna's "Vogue" came one year later, bringing this subculture to the mainstream audience, but it was far from the real thing.
create article, part of the House - see Willi Ninja. -- Banjeboi |
transgendered --> trangender
All WP (portals, categories, etc. ) done except 100-250 links in articles. Start here. Banjeboi
add infobox. Banjeboi
GA quest - look at rewrites, barnstars and DYKs for possible GA candidates
semi-protected articles have to wait until protection and vandalism ebbs. -- Banjeboi
Research and write. -- Banjeboi
Duly noted
This could possibly be helpful toward explaining on-wiki trans and homo -phobias. -- Banjeboi
review edits on Judicial system of Iran. -- Banjeboi
Nom for GA. -- Banjeboi
Nom for GA. -- Banjeboi
ARS - add to rescued list?
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precambrian rabbit. -- Banjeboi
Bear template?
Stubbyfy, ref and relaunch. User:Benjiboi/Underground culture. -- Banjeboi
Category:LGBT studies articles needing expert attention is always entertaining. -- Banjeboi
LGBT DYK for portal
Portal:LGBT/Did you know; convert past DYKs to the randomizer archive. -- Banjeboi
sorting out shemale, 2nd round
Butterfly metaphor [5],[6], [7], [8], [9], [10] -- Banjeboi
Create project banner? -- Banjeboi
Rewrite his sexuality section, again,
- speculation prevalent, bundle the notable blogs
- called gay ..., current note is fine
- response to that speculation, - our summary of the explanation is better that the quote, attribute the interview
- criticism to that response - bundle Naff's 3? relevant articles; bundle Olberman's with where that was repeated
- follow up why Cooper avoids addressing the speculation. - Elle has a good section on this -- Banjeboi
for ARS
Collapsed for space |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Rescue template TBDpossible NPOV one? -- Banjeboi for ARS tagging bot
For Ars. -- Banjeboi {{Findsources3}}{{Findsources3}} |
Paris Hilton's new album
Draft is at User:Benjiboi/Platinum Blonde (Paris Hilton album) for when more sources appear. -- Banjeboi
50 state project, standardize intro with refs, state map and LGBT rights template. See also section and footer templates. Then do talkpages with project tag and proposed section outline. -- Banjeboi
See also
- Defense of Marriage Act
- Domestic partnerships in the United States
- Federal Marriage Amendment
- Freedom to Marry Coalition
- History of civil marriage in the U.S.
- List of benefits of marriage in the United States
- Marriage Protection Act
- Same-sex marriage in the United States
- Same-sex marriage legislation in the United States
- Same-sex marriage in the United States by state
- Same-sex marriage in the United States public opinion
- Same-sex marriage status in the United States by state
LGBT cat banner and project subpage
"LGBT category" mainspace banner of sorts so that those who actually look at any of the LGBT cat pages can follow a link to page that gives a simplified rationale and direction for adding people to cats. "Per _____ policy 'cats should be clearly supported by content' and per ____ policy 'content about sexual minorities must be reliably sourced'. Below are some guidelines to help determine which if any categories are appropriate and how they are organized." Create and install. -- Banjeboi
fix my mess
add "subst" to these (less than 100). -- Banjeboi
- 50 left. -- Banjeboi
BFrank
[11] when the noise ebbs. -- Banjeboi
bright, articulate and productive, effective etc.
Template? -- Banjeboi
I notes possible leads
User:Benjiboi/Intersex. -- Banjeboi
Fruit (slang) talkpage
find "strange fruit" song referring to LGBT people refs. -- Banjeboi
Start Rescue 101 and then link to it on new ARS template
Per this start a new "so you tagged an article" template compacted with show/hide sections:
- Is this worth keeping, appropriate, duplicated; merge might make more sense, etc
- Is this notable, verifiable
- Are these fix it issues
- If you do think it's worth keeping identify appropriate wikiprojects that may be able to find sourcing, clarity
etc. -- Banjeboi
basic ref formatting, a few sections a day ... -- Banjeboi
- Done through 1991. -- Banjeboi
- Year Unknown section and clean-up refs. -- Banjeboi
- move cat to items
- update template(s)
- update bot
- create rescue 101 page with section just on templates
- modify ((tl|Rescue)) with template-specific parameters so displays template info rather than article info
- update project page to reflect changes, etc. -- Banjeboi
ARS and DrV notes
some possible verbiage also note teh nuance of tagging an article that had the rescue tag vs. one that didn't. -- Banjeboi
Clean refs. -- Banjeboi
More clean-up in aisle three. -- Banjeboi
add sources asap. -- Banjeboi
Wikipedia talk:ARS/Editnotice
create directing to FAQ and instructions. -- Banjeboi
Bored? -- Banjeboi
For homo animal articles
add filmography [13] and EL. -- Banjeboi
Clean-up archives. -- Banjeboi
sigh
Ref challenge at List of male performers in gay porn films, List of Grabby recipients has a lead to links. -- Banjeboi
I appreciate the emotional rescue (Re: Grief porn)
With apologies to Mick Jagger and the rest of the Stones, i appreciate the rescue template. The article has gotten bogged down in a tendentious bout of lameness, which slowed its development and made it ripe for an AfD. Maybe it can get squared away now. Again, my thanks for the help. :) - Arcayne (cast a spell) 00:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Do you like the idea of moving to Media portrayals of tragedy? Or have a better title? -- Banjeboi 11:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, as I created the article, i am naturally reticent to it being merged into something else. That aside, if that's what's best, I am not going to let my ego get in the way. :) - Arcayne (cast a spell) 19:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- The mourning sickness article seems a good match. It can grow and be rebirthed from there. Maybe research for sourcing every few months until you have enough. -- Banjeboi 22:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- ThePinkTriangle.org - wow, that's an article just waiting to happen! I'll see what I can cook up, there certainly seems to be plenty of sources. -- Banjeboi
On path to GA again!
- Fix refs style
- Check all refs to ensure editorial are cited as opinions, etc. -- Banjeboi
Hullaballo saga continues/ Any word whether he is a blocked editor?
User talk:Doktor Wilhelm#I still need help with this. He just going to continue harassing if he is not reprimanded. Swancookie (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Might be LGBT bias??? [14]
Swancookie (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm afraid this might be the long complicated road on this. My quacker gaydar suspects we are but proving it may take some time and remain inconclusive. A user RfC, as worthless as they can be, may be the only next step betond a Wikiquette alert which may make sense as a good step towards that. The veiled hostility is terribly uncivil and abusive IMHO. -- Banjeboi 10:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- RFC wording here may help. -- Banjeboi
RE:RfC, I think that's what (hopefully) Doktor_Wilhelm will do. If he can't figure it out would you mind starting one? I've asked others to start that thread as I don't know how and am afraid I might do it totally wrong and blow the whole case. I'm curious how said user figured out I was gay? Is it that obvious? = P
Also, any word on the blocked user check?
I moved this whole section- less confusing? Swancookie (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, more confusing, I had put it with the prior thread to keep it all together; now that thread has been archived so I have to go dig for information I needed. -- Banjeboi 23:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Last annoying question.
What about this. If a user takes something off ones talk page (something they wrote) because an issue has been resolved... can the person (who's talk page it is) revert just to be a jerk? He's trying to discredit user:Xtian1313 because he's for lack of a better description "gay friendly". Ugh, this is so annoying. I'm sorry. Swancookie (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
To all editors/ Hullaballoo situation
User talk:Swancookie#To all editors.2F Hullaballoo situation. Swancookie (talk) 17:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Some responses
You are now making yourself the problem by overly aggressive pursuing this. Anything anyone removes from the article(s) can still be found in the history. It's annoying but can be done even years later. We're not in a rush here and your goal should not be to stop Hullabaloo but to improve the encyclopedia. Again, if any othe articles in question are sent to deletion let me know as that is a diffeerent situation. Until then the article can be edited by anyone, and it will be. Keep looking for solid sourcing and don't allow Hullabaloo or anyone else to push your buttons. You can't control what they do but you do control how you react. Remain civil and let them do themselves in.
I control my talk page just as other users control theirs. If, for whatever reasons, they remove something from their talkpage, that is generally their right - we assume they read it. If it's really a dire situation - most are not - you can ask for someone else to look at it. I've had several users remove my replies making it look like I never responded to their concerns or questions. Personally I find that despicable and revisionistic but it remains their right to rewrite history - on their talkpage. It shows who they are not who you are.
An RfC is premature, IMHO, a Wikiquette alert would make sense. It has to be written neutral and the diffs need to be accurate and obvious. Sorry, but Wikilawyering is labour-intensive and drugery. The good news is that in compiling through their work we will fill-in any evidence that will be a part of a future RfC. I was hoping we had confirmation of them being a formerly blocked user so we didn't have to do all this. So far it's not a slam dunk just a strong hunch. Having stated that there are other editors who specialize in those investigations. -- Banjeboi 23:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
I understand. Here's the problem, the minute I start editing again he will revert my edits. Per your advice: I'm going to start editing again next week, let's see what happens. I understand about controlling your own talk page, but is it OK for an editor (user:Godblessyrblackheart) to remove something they wrote (on Hullaballoo's talk page) because the issue has been resolved (off wiki) and for Hullballoo to put it back even if said editor has removed it twice?
Can we get the other editors involved who specialize in those investigations, on the blocked user issue? Doing so may save me (and others) involved a lot of aggravation? Anyway, enjoy your 4th of July weekend. I'm sorry I'm such a pain. I get this way when I feel strongly about something. Swancookie (talk) 00:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- If Hullabaloo is WP:Wikihounding you - following you from article to article - that is a serious civility issue and a serious charge. My suggestion is to start editing other articles and see if they do follow you around. Once something is posted on my talkpage, even if the issue is resolved, it's my "right" to keep it there and revert someone who deletes it - within reason of course but Hullaboo in effect does control their talkpage. -- Banjeboi 02:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is not only highly likely that he is a sock for a perma-blocked editor, but I am now virtually certain that "Hullaballoo" is actually several users operating simultaneously. A look at his edit history makes this particularly obvious. "He" is on Wikipedia non-stop, virtually all day every day, and during that entire time, he makes edits at the rate of approximately once per minute. Any edits made on or by editors or articles on his "hit list" are almost instantaneously reverted by him, at all hours. The guy would have to literally never sleep, eat, go to the bathroom, or do ANYTHING in life other than constantly patrol Wikipedia. His history reveals that he also has the super-human ability to edit multiple articles simultaneously at a rate that would be physically impossible for a single user. For example, he will remove a particular phrase that he dislikes in the middle of, say, "Jodie Foster"; then within one minute, he will be making an unrelated deletion of an uncited sentence on "Clint Eastwood"; a minute later he will be removing an unsourced phrase deep within another celebrity article, etc. He would have to be speed-reading at an ungodly rate to be able to find, identify, and edit these sentences buried deep within lengthy articles at such a super-human rate. All the while, continually monitoring the pages edited by his "enemies" and reverting their edits; while also continually monitoring his user talk page and deleting discussions there within seconds after they are posted. This has GOT to be multiple individuals. Any suggestions on where such a thing can be reported? Is there a Wiki rule against this? Cubert (talk) 01:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Great under the large flag image. -- Banjeboi
I think there was a documentary about this car. -- Banjeboi
- Indeed, but I haven't seen it. I remember reading that article several months ago. APK is your own Personal Jesus 03:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia rules! Lol! -- Banjeboi 03:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- And look at the available sources. APK coffee talk 06:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Wow. That's a smart website! -- Banjeboi 22:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- So, is this vehicle the source of the term "Buggery"? Never mind, I don't want to know. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 03:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Wow. That's a smart website! -- Banjeboi 22:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- And look at the available sources. APK coffee talk 06:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia rules! Lol! -- Banjeboi 03:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Image added to homophobia and Faggot (slang).
Favour
Can you take a look at this first stab at reorganising and slimming this, and offer any suggestions on my talk page (or make changes as appropriate) please:
I'm avoiding doing anything significant with the US stuff, as there's plenty of people here who are interested in US stuff already.
- Oy vey, I'm only so good with lengthy content but will have a look. -- Banjeboi
- OK, first thoughts are that flipping back n forth from Europe to US causes more confusion I would consider breaking it all chronologically and explaining how information was shared - newspaper accounts, film news reels, etc. Also I would consider not using Century is the titles as many readers don't know 21st Century equals 2000s; when it comes to WW2 you may need to spel it out and clarify the dynamic shift of all culture justifying a before and after. -- Banjeboi 03:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Clean-up. -- Banjeboi
That caught my attention because it sounds like it's either deliberately or coincidentally the opposite of Garrison Keillor's fictitious Lake Wobegon Catholic church, "Our Lady of Perpetual Responsibility". I just wonder which one was invented first. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 03:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Lol! An etymology could be fun to find out - Keillor was filling the airwaves before the group even started so - hmmmm. -- Banjeboi 03:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for helping to clean up the Queer Liberaction page. I'm very new to Wikipedia. If you have time, and don't mind, can you please help with references? If you go to the external website for Queer Liberaction, there is a lot of information there, plus pictures, but I suppose this would not be a 3rd party. Also the latest issue of the Dallas Voice has information and pictures about it. Here is the PDF for it: http://www.dallasvoice.com/artman/archive/07-03-2009.pdf The Dallas Voice, and the local mainstream papers, Fort Worth Star Telegram and the Dallas Morning News have had numerous article over the last few months. As well, local TV news (all local stations) have covered the events. BTW, are you local or just stumbled on the page? Thanks again for you help! Markg65 (talk) 02:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK, that should help. I don't really deal well with PDF. I was cleaning up transgendered --> transgender so just found it by chance. -- Banjeboi 15:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
add infobox. -- Banjeboi
- ^ Vos, Sarah (10 June 2007, page 13). "Barker says O'Donnell could replace him". Associated Press. Retrieved 2008-06-16.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help)