Jump to content

User talk:BT35: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: Line 16:
You have been reported for violating the [[WP:3rr|three-revert rule]]. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. The report is filed here: [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:BT35_reported_by_User:Professor_marginalia_.28Result:_.29|User:BT35 reported by User:Professor marginalia]]
You have been reported for violating the [[WP:3rr|three-revert rule]]. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. The report is filed here: [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:BT35_reported_by_User:Professor_marginalia_.28Result:_.29|User:BT35 reported by User:Professor marginalia]]
- [[User:Professor marginalia|Professor marginalia]] ([[User talk:Professor marginalia|talk]]) 18:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- [[User:Professor marginalia|Professor marginalia]] ([[User talk:Professor marginalia|talk]]) 18:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

== Some articles of interest to you are subject to [[WP:ARBR&I]] sanctions ==

[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose, at their own discretion, [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|sanctions]] on any editor working on pages broadly related to [[Race and intelligence]] if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], any expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behavior]], or any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Race and intelligence#Final decision]]. <!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} -->

You seem to be here on a mission, judging from your edit summaries: ''"I can understand that this information is devastating to your little dog and pony show.."'' Please reflect on whether you belong here, if you are not willing to collaborate with others. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:15, 31 December 2010

Discretionary sanctions in "Race and Intelligence" articles

See Arbcom decision, race and intelligence articles are under discretionary sanctions. This means that you should be in your best behaviour while editing those articles, and that you should be careful to follow wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

In this edit you are being very harsh with other editors in the page.

You are being reverted because a) people think that you are User:Mikemikev and/or b) you are being very very confrontational and/or c) they already explained in that thread why they think that the proposed edits are not good. The "sock" thing is because people think that you are a sockpuppet of Mikemikev (an alternate account used by Mikemikev to evade the block in his original account). The "troll" thing is because arguments similar to your own arguments have been bandied around for months, and people are starting to think that it's just a tactic to piss off the regular editors of that page.

Please try to be less confrontational. Try to accept that other editors might just not see things your way. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And wikipedia is not a forum of discussion, that's why your comments are being removed as rants. Try limiting your comments to succint suggestions of changes, supported by sources. That means making specific suggestions of specific changes.

(if you keep commenting in the same line, then you will simply be reported to the arbitration enforcement board. Once there, you will probably be topic banned from race and intelligence topics, for "causing disruption in an article that is under discretionary sanctions" or something similar. Consider this a friendly warning from someone who has seen other editors follow the same line of comments.) --Enric Naval (talk) 17:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AN/3RR

You have been reported for violating the three-revert rule. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. The report is filed here: User:BT35 reported by User:Professor marginalia - Professor marginalia (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some articles of interest to you are subject to WP:ARBR&I sanctions

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Race and intelligence if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Race and intelligence#Final decision.

You seem to be here on a mission, judging from your edit summaries: "I can understand that this information is devastating to your little dog and pony show.." Please reflect on whether you belong here, if you are not willing to collaborate with others. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]