User talk:Ariconte: Difference between revisions
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
:::Please also read the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] guideline. I would encorage you to enter a paragraph in the talk page of the castle declaring your relation to the castle and your awareness of the COI guideline. Regards, [[User:Ariconte|Ariconte]] ([[User talk:Ariconte#top|talk]]) 22:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC) |
:::Please also read the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] guideline. I would encorage you to enter a paragraph in the talk page of the castle declaring your relation to the castle and your awareness of the COI guideline. Regards, [[User:Ariconte|Ariconte]] ([[User talk:Ariconte#top|talk]]) 22:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
'''' |
|||
Yeah-about me undoing what you removed. I was traipsing-around Wikipedia and I came upon your dispute about the material and I looked at the amount of material that had been removed. I undid your removal because you had taken-off a tremendous amount of info. I admit that I thought that the poem was long, but it did look to me to have something to do with the history of the castle.-(in other words-I myself did not read every single word of an almost epic poem/just skimmed it to get the gist of that it looked like it had something to do with the castle history). |
|||
I have a thing about large amounts of relevant material being deleted and that is exactly what was done.[[Special:Contributions/24.0.133.234|24.0.133.234]] ([[User talk:24.0.133.234|talk]]) 06:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:52, 6 February 2013
Welcome to Ariconte's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. |
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
cake
Commander v99 (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!
Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks
原星章 | |
Thank you , i will read the guidance Jixian Wang (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC) |
- Your Welcome, Ariconte (talk) 04:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help again, if i understand correctly , i should write a article "Openbiz Cubi" in my "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hellojixian/Openbiz_Cubi" this link and follow by the wizard, when it done , i'd better send the link to you for review, if its looks OK for publish, then create a new page, is that OK ?
- i dont mean to missed up the pages, forgive me if i did wrong operation on the page, i m kind of new to wikipedia, sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellojixian (talk • contribs) 05:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yes. Find independent references and add them to the article. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 05:09, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sir can you help me to review this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hellojixian/Openbiz_Cubi can it be publish , — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellojixian (talk • contribs) 06:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry but I do not think any of the sources are reliable sources. You need to find articles in magazines, newspapers, or books that are independent of the Openbiz Cubi developers and users. Publications like Infoworld, Computer World, major newspapers,etc. See WP:Sources. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
RE: In response to your feedback (Blue Jacaranda)
Hello, Ariconte. Just wanted to thank you for the welcome, and the useful information you just left on my page. Many thanks! —Blue Jacaranda (TALK)— 05:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback Ariconte
Thanks Ariconte, your feedback was very helpful. I'm writing the Wikepedia for my wife, so I guess you can say I'm a little biased, but most of the information I supplied is backed up with news articles, books, news reports, and appearances through the Clark County Library. I still cannot figure out how to re-direct or highlight people's names and places. Could you be so kind to direct me to that information or a u-tube video?
I think I will start over and create a new Wikepedia instead of trying to re-direct.
Take care my freind, MafiaMobDoll (talk) 20:01, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you mean by 're-direct'. To link to another article in Wikipedia surround the article name with double square brakets like [[xxxx]], You may find more information in the WP:Tutorial. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Ariconte, what I meant by re-direct is taking my user page which I created a Wikipedia on Wendy Mazaros, then trying to transfer the work to Wikipedia for permanent display. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MafiaMobDoll (talk • contribs) 20:34, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- What you want is WP:MOVE or use the wizard at WP:WIZ. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Ariconte, what I meant by re-direct is taking my user page which I created a Wikipedia on Wendy Mazaros, then trying to transfer the work to Wikipedia for permanent display. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MafiaMobDoll (talk • contribs) 20:34, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Foulksrath Castle
I am not sure how this works so I will just go ahead and state my case.
I recently edited and updated the entry for Foulksrath Castle. I added relevant information regarding it's history and some other information reference the original founders.
Nothing of what I added is copyrighted. In addition I removed the part about the current owner claiming to have seen ghosts as it is inaccurate.
I intend to add a lot more information as I learn more.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.79.57.69 (talk) 10:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- I presume you are user 'Paul hopkins777'. I hope you understood from my previous note on your user page .... that sources are needed. See WP:42 for a pointed summary. Please tell me what you don't understand, so I might help.... Regards, Ariconte (talk) 10:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello
- Well as far as the comments about the current owner seeing ghosts etc goes the only source I can give is myself as I both own and live in Foulksrath Castle and have not seen any Ghosts. The other information iincluded in my edits I have uncovered in my research.
- Most of the information is just general information about the building which is again from what I can see myself.
- Some of the history comes from histories/pamphlets written over a hundred years ago which I have looked for on the internet but can't find any copyright information about it. As far as I know any copyright on these publications will have expired by now anyway.
- I didn't start the page for Foulksrath Castle but as the Owner and occupier of the actual building and grounds I feel that I have access to certain information that is not available to others. I should have the ability to ensure that the information posted on this page is as accurate as possible. Additionally, I feel that if the information added or edited by others is inaccurate that I should be allowed to remove it.
- Thanks for your information and points. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul hopkins777 (talk • contribs) 13:09, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi again, References you might provide do not have to be 'on the internet' but they do have to be published and accessible to others (in libraries, etc.). Information that is "not availble to others" is sure to violate the original research policy. If the castle is truly notable, I'm sure there are references to it in Irish history sources.
- Please also read the conflict of interest guideline. I would encorage you to enter a paragraph in the talk page of the castle declaring your relation to the castle and your awareness of the COI guideline. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 22:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
' Yeah-about me undoing what you removed. I was traipsing-around Wikipedia and I came upon your dispute about the material and I looked at the amount of material that had been removed. I undid your removal because you had taken-off a tremendous amount of info. I admit that I thought that the poem was long, but it did look to me to have something to do with the history of the castle.-(in other words-I myself did not read every single word of an almost epic poem/just skimmed it to get the gist of that it looked like it had something to do with the castle history). I have a thing about large amounts of relevant material being deleted and that is exactly what was done.24.0.133.234 (talk) 06:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)