User talk:Summichum: Difference between revisions
→Alert: WP:Discretionary sanctions|: new section |
|||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
***[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] Ok so I will link to a location where this video is uploaded |
***[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] Ok so I will link to a location where this video is uploaded |
||
== Alert: [[WP:Discretionary sanctions|Discretionary sanctions]] == |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
| The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the [[Arab-Israeli conflict]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page.<p> |
|||
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. |
|||
| Ambox warning blue.svg |
|||
| icon size = 40px |
|||
}}<!-- This message is derived from Template:Uw-sanctions --> |
|||
Please note also that this particular decision imposes a [[WP:1RR|one-revert rule]] on all articles within this topic area. This means that if you [[Help:revert|revert]] edits in the area more than once in 24 hours per article, you may be blocked without further warning. Please also read our policy on [[WP:EW|edit warring]]. [[User:Heimstern|Heimstern Läufer]] [[User talk:Heimstern|(talk)]] 00:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:19, 24 February 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Mufaddal Saifuddin
Do you have any reliable sources regarding that video? That it is discussed in forums does not make it citeable on Wikipedia — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Crisco 1492 Yes the videos are deliberately being removed from various places accusing copyright violation , the mentioned link gathers all the places where the video has been uploaded. The thread gives various sources where the video is available. Also there is no copyright for such videos and copyright violations are false accusations to conceal evidence.
- I'm not asking if it's true. I'm asking if there is something other than forums to support what you've put in the article. Please read WP:RS if you do not understand why citing forums is an issue. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- And no, the video still attracted copyright. All such works automatically gain copyright, under UK law, US law, and Indian law. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Crisco 1492 Yes the videos are deliberately being removed from various places accusing copyright violation , the mentioned link gathers all the places where the video has been uploaded. The thread gives various sources where the video is available. Also there is no copyright for such videos and copyright violations are false accusations to conceal evidence.
- Crisco 1492 Ok so I will link to a location where this video is uploaded
Alert: Discretionary sanctions
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
Please note also that this particular decision imposes a one-revert rule on all articles within this topic area. This means that if you revert edits in the area more than once in 24 hours per article, you may be blocked without further warning. Please also read our policy on edit warring. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)