Jump to content

User talk:Epson291: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Peter Karlsen (talk | contribs)
Rick Sanchez: Plagiarism makes Wikipe-tan sad...
Line 738: Line 738:
==Discussion on closure of Israel and Aparthied mediation==
==Discussion on closure of Israel and Aparthied mediation==
Current consensus seems to be to move the article to '''Israel and Apartheid''' with an appropriate disambiguation line to prevent any misinterpretations. Please weigh in over the next few days. --[[User_talk:Ludwigs2|<span style="color:darkblue;font-weight:bold">Ludwigs</span><span style="color:green;font-weight:bold">2</span>]] 17:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Current consensus seems to be to move the article to '''Israel and Apartheid''' with an appropriate disambiguation line to prevent any misinterpretations. Please weigh in over the next few days. --[[User_talk:Ludwigs2|<span style="color:darkblue;font-weight:bold">Ludwigs</span><span style="color:green;font-weight:bold">2</span>]] 17:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

== [[Rick Sanchez]] ==
The use of verbatim, unattributed quotations [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rick_Sanchez&diff=prev&oldid=388235685] ("Dominick suggested that Stewart, who is Jewish, is also a minority.", from [http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/39464138/ns/today-entertainment/]) in articles is considered [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]]. Whenever you incorporate the exact text of a source into an article, please provide appropriate attribution in the form of quotation marks, <nowiki><blockquote></nowiki>, or similar. Also, Wikipedia style guidelines discourage the excessive use of quotations, even when correctly attributed. Thank you. [[User:Peter Karlsen|Peter Karlsen]] ([[User talk:Peter Karlsen|talk]]) 07:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:06, 2 October 2010

→ Purge ←

Welcome!

Howdy, Epson291, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.


Additional tips

Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

Be bold

Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing {{help}} anywhere on your own user or user talk page.
You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

 Joe  I 16:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Psalms

I see what you've done with the pages on individual Psalms, with the "Psalms" tag on the front. Does this create the banner on the side? Does every page with that tag go on the banner on each page? Bernard S. Jansen 00:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you answered my question exactly. Bernard S. Jansen 10:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Epson291. I don't think the link to fish (food) should be added to the top of the fish article. There's already fish (disambiguation) where one can find fish(food). In addition, fish(food) is also listed in the "see also" part of the article. The same goes to the chicken article where chicken (food) is included in Chicken (disambiguation). Cheers. --Melanochromis 08:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I think I see your point. Let's say I'm neutral at this point. But how about proposing this in the article discussion pages first? Fish has several regular editors. I'm sure Chicken has some too. If they agree with this, then it should be added to the articles. Cheers. --Melanochromis 14:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I hope I wasn't messing around with your page when you were in the middle of something. Basically when going to Horseshoe Falls and clicking on Horseshoe Falls (Canada), it just redirects you back to Horseshoe Falls. I 'fixed' that. Again, hopefully I didn't get in the way of something else you were trying to do. If I did, I apologize - just trying to fix what looks like a mistake. Chupper 03:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Bagels

I think there is a sort of humour in the way "everything" bagels do not contain everything. This is not "POV" or opinion, but rather, a documentable fact that people have recognized and appreciated this strange irony. I had originally added a link to a website referencing this, but the link was automatically removed by an anti-spam bot. Perhaps "everything bagel" doesn't deserve its own paragraph, but I think that it's worth mentioning that an "everything" bagel does not contain everything--it may be self-evident from experience of eating a number of bagels from a number of different places; it is not self-evident from the name. I remember as a child being puzzled to find that an "everything bagel" didn't come close to containing everything offered by the bagel stand selling it. Cazort 14:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jews

Hi! I don't think it would be necessary to write Russian, French, German etc. because that is only a minority of Jews worldwide. It does not say what ethnic language or the such. Jews today, who are more correctly a nation rather than an ethnic group, are unlike Russians, Germans, Pashtuns, Armenians etc. since most of them do not speak their ancestral languages. If this were perhaps 60 or 70 years ago, Yiddish would probably be written first, since it was then the language shared by most Jews. The language shared by most Jews today is overwhelmingly English and it is the prime language of the community, whether or not it has to do with immigration is irrelevant. (Another factor to consider is the large portion of Israeli and European Jews who speak English.) I will post a discussion on the talk page. --Shamir1 23:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but speaking English is incidental to their being Jewish. It is a logical accident. Anyways, Epson, I am outta here! I just totally disagree with Mr. Shamir1 Oemb1905 18:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dollar sign

Hi,

while I don't disagree your edit on $ in principle, please consider interwiki while changing an article to a redirect. You might want to merge the interwiki links. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 10:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 10:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Einsteins tallk page

First , I wish to ask for your e-mail as i have a long story to tell you ( I can put it here but it will take alot of space).Secondly , I think that refring to Einstein as an ethnic German is at least very unclear (and so its not a matter of a poll to decide wheter he would considered as an ethnic German since there will never a strong agreement in favor of this idea even if it will win the poll) and it seems offensive for many Jewish peopole ( I admit that it offense me) -and as there is a storng objrction from some users , in many different ways, to make the Jewishness of many great Jews clear - i think that regarding the Einstein article and regarding to the history of this article the infobox status quo should remain as it is now (i.e only Jewish) .I guess that you can agree with me about this that an ethnic origin of one is not something that should be decide by using a poll (but it can be debate even if its clear).Best wishes.--Gilisa 20:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

שלחתי לך עוד אי-מייל , ראית?--Gilisa 08:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity poll

I am confused by your statement: “I am (and at the same time not) surprised on this artcle the number of people who don't want to reconize his Jewishness, and for another user to drag this to a poll once again (see the archives).” I have never heard of anyone anywhere who didn’t recognize Einstein’s Jewishness. And I am unaware of any previous poll on the subject. Please enlighten me.

Perhaps I shouldn’t have included “Jewish” in the poll; the answer is a no-brainer. I included it out of (imagined?) fairness someone who might think neither should be included (i.e. no Ethnicity field).

Happy Passover to you. --teb728 23:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Making charts

Unfortunately, no, I'm not an expert with charts. However, you might want to take a look at the "month names" chart in the Iranian calendar article, which I tweaked the other day. This chart might be particularly helpful for your current situation, since it includes right-to-left text. Richwales 16:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm willing to at least try, if you can send me what you already have. Richwales 16:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I finished creating a chart (table) for the "Honorifics in Judaism" article, in place of the graphic image. Hopefully you'll find it OK, and I hope I didn't make any mistakes. Richwales 02:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Work!

  • Hey, I just wanted to thank you for your great work on the Jewish Music page! Between the organization and the new navbar on the side, it looks a million times better! I'd have given you a barnstar, but I couldn't find one with a Jewish theme! Great work! -- Chabuk T • C ] 22:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Matzo to Matzah

The article has been put up on WP:RM and a new discussion has been started on the Talk:Matzo page. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 21:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are near the top of the history list on that article. Is there a way to put in the actual Braille dots? All I get are question marks in the table. Also, I fixed a link from bopomofo to this Braille article. It was dead because the article itself has a lower-case "braille" instead of "Braille". Jeffmatt 06:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Epson

I had a discussion with Stephan Schulz on his tallk page -and after I ask him to get to an agreement with me he had his suggestion-please look on it and share me with your opinion. Best--Gilisa 10:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-)תודה רבה על העזרה עם התמונה. --Gilisa 12:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ألصَّديق وَقْت الضِّيق--Gilisa 12:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new articles

Your article creations are welcomed. Please add them to WP:Israel/New and WP:JEW/New. Thanks.--Shuki 18:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JM Template

  • Epson, I feel like the images at the top of the template are just adding unnecessary extra width to the panel. They don't really serve a purpose besides decoration, but take up a significant amount of room on the page. Also, when you reverted me edits you re-added redundant links that were already listed... -- Chabuk T • C ] 16:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you have the same concern. Can you help find the exact info, please. We need to find more sourses, more exact. I remember his son Joe repeating in interview that Liviu Livrescu did not want to talk about that, perhaps it was a very unpleasant experience, and him being such altruist... It would be a shame if someone later would try to exploit the fact that in the first days the information might turn out to be somewhat incorrect. My personal opinion is that even if it turns out that he was not in a Nazi camp, only the fact that he survived a deportation and danger of death is sufficient to be called a full-right Holocaust survivor. :Dc76 20:24, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I had to check myself to make sure Yom HaShoah wasn't celebrated for two days in the Diasporah, after seeing the news article. But some Orthodox congregations don't even recognize it as a holiday. See [1] What an irony. I live only 35 miles from Tech and have so many friends on the faculty and in graduate school. We're all in shock.--Beth Wellington 20:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the wishes and the links. I'm wondering if we we should be talking about when Yom HaShoah was observed in the US, as the incident happened in Blacksburg? I've called my Rabbi and left a message and am expecting a call back. Since it's not an othodox holiday and some orthodox Jews don't celebrate it at all, the question becomes, since there was no conflict with the Shabbat in the U.S., whether the date was moved to coincide with observation in Israel. (See discussion with Pharos.)

At a dinner party last night in Roanoke, a friend who works at Tech with the wife of one of the professors shot and drove up from Montgomery County told me Dr. Granata was in his office on the third floor when he heard shots. He locked the students in his office and went down to investigate and never returned. I just looked it up and his story in the Washington Post is here: [2]. Another friend at dinner told me that her friend who works in a local hospital said someone in the building in the aftermath said that one of the eeriest things was the sound of thirty cell phones on the floor repeatedly ringing. --Beth Wellington 22:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken about the use of the word celebrate as to connotation, although the denotation is "to observe." And one can celebrate the lives, as well as mourn the deaths of those who perished in the Holocaust. But while you call it silly, many U.S. Jews observed Yom HaShoah April 15, including the congregation in Blacksburg [3] and Roanoke [4], the Orthodox Union [5], the U.S. Holocaust Museum [6]. I've already mentioned the Conservative movement. A sampling of others Midwest Center for Holocaust Education [7], Temple Israel of Minneapolis (http://www.templeisrael.com/holidayslong.html], Office of the Governor New Jersey Commission on Holocaust, Henry Ricklis Holocaust Memorial Committee and Jewish Federation of Greater Middlesex County [8], Sinai Temple of Los Angeles [9], American Jewish Congress of Nova Scotia [10], Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Boston [11]. --Beth Wellington 04:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's often easy to overlook one's assumptions. I think you've come up with an elegant fix. Now here's my next question. Dr. Lebrescu is listed in the article as having dual citizenship; is that accurate? I know that he had been in the U.S. for 20 years, but failed, in a cursory search, to find an account of U.S. citizenship. --Beth Wellington 07:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

echad mi yodea

cool--you did a much better job than i think i could have. thanks. :)

shalom, Adam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aasmith (talkcontribs) 21:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Prophets of the Tanakh template

Hi, now that you have created this template, are you going to add it to the rest of the articles that are linked within it? - Fayenatic london (talk) 21:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've centred the last line simply by leaving more of the initial columns blank. There's probably another way, but that works! I also added Daniel (my hero), who was inexplicably missing, by extending the line above. There are a few whom I can't place; is Mehseiah the same as Meshach/Mishael? I suggest you add entries for the missing ones in List of minor Biblical figures, then link the template straight to that heading using e.g. List_of_minor_Biblical_figures#Hanani. - Fayenatic london (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I forgot to answer your questions. I'm not aware of any fixed list of people recognised as Tanakh prophets in Christian tradition, so I suggest you keep Hebrew in the title. "Is Saul also among the prophets?" (1 Samuel 10:11. You don't have to answer that!) I suggest you change the heading to "Prophets of the Hebrew Bible", as "scriptures" seems to have a wider meaning e.g. here.
I agree that Michaiah (son of Imlah) and Micah are both prophets. At the moment they share an article, so it is fine to have two entries in the template pointing to the same article.
Thanks for the interesting explanation about Daniel. I think it would be useful to keep him in the template, otherwise Christian editors might keep trying to put him in. Can he go at one corner marked "See also: Daniel"? We could document the position on him both in the Daniel article, and with inline text (i.e. visible only when editing) in the template.
Again, I'm not aware of a definitive list of New Testament prophets, although you could refer to the work already done at List of Biblical prophets and Category:Christian_prophets. The gift of prophecy was widespread, but not everyone who prophesies necessarily bears the title of prophet. - I see you have just written the same about Tanakh times. I'm going to stop editing this reply and save it now!
You might also want to look at Category:Prophets_of_the_Hebrew_Bible which currently includes at least one not on your list, Ahijah HaShiloni. - Fayenatic london (talk) 19:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ezra was in that category too, but I have changed that to Category:Major Tanakh figures.
I recommend "Hebrew scriptures" or "Hebrew Bible" rather than "Tanakh" in the heading, as most gentiles wouldn't know the word Tanakh. Fayenatic london (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The second format is best, I think. It's a Hebrew Bible template, so give priority to Jewish recognition rather than gender. Also: (i) move Ezekiel down to the next line, and (ii) take out the Category from the template. All the articles apart from Daniel should be manually added into Category:Prophets_of_the_Hebrew_Bible, which is a sub-category of Jewish prophets; then, the template should not double-up with a second category. Fayenatic london (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I still prefer the second layout, for the reason stated above, and because the left column looks better. Ah - you've removed it now. That's fine, too, unless any feminists object.
I'm pretty sure Daniel is the only "missing" Christian prophet. There are some in the list that we wouldn't get very excited about, e.g. Neriah, but if the Talmud has determined a list of who's a prophet, then stick with that. Fayenatic london (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When replaceing redirect templates with {{Prophets of the Tanakh}} it would be helpful if you included a edit summary per Wikipedia policy

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you.

Specific reference is made to Moses where two redirect templates were replaced with the single actual template. I added a note inside the article code explaining the change to avoid someone reverting it. Dbiel (Talk) 19:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, but no need for apologies, I had to be reminded about the importance of edit summaries myself by PaladinWhite which I will quote here for your bennefit as well:
As a side note, it's good to sign all your posts, including those on your own talk page, with four tildes (~~~~). I didn't the first few posts I made to my own talk page, but another editor pointed out to me that it was just as useful to someone reading your posts there as it would be anywhere else. Cheers! PaladinWhite 00:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks again for fixing the problem with the duplicate templates. Dbiel (Talk) 22:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As regards your reply on my talk page, yes I would be interested in taking a look into the list of prophets. I want to do a bit of research first, but generally speaking the Jewish and Christian (pre-Christ) prophets are the same.
They are generally cateorized as Major or Minor prophets (but keeping in mind that this often simply refers to the list of the Books of the Bible). There are other classifications as well such as Judges, Kings and other persons of importantance. It may take me a bit of time, but I will post what I come up with at Template_talk:Prophets_of_the_Tanakh. Thank you for asking. Dbiel (Talk) 11:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Independence Hall

Just an FYI, when you moved the Independence Hall page to Independence Hall (United States), you left approx 200+ links that are now going to the disambiguation page. Also there was a peer-review done in August 2006 that had to be re-linked. It would have been easier to have left the original page as it was, rename the Israel independence hall, and place a disambiguation link at the top of the original US oriented page. Now it will be necessary to relink all the other pages that now go into the disambiguation page to the new US page you made. Next time for something with this much work to fix, please discuss.-- Marcsin | Talk 20:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your "welcome" graphic

I really like it, except that I think the Chinese (it is supposed to be Chinese, right?) is incorrect or at least highly uncommon. I read 歡迊 huānzá, when I think what you mean is 歡迎 huānyíng (cf. http://cdict.giga.net.tw/?q=welcome). It is possible that the former is a greeting, though I've never heard it. The graphic is great otherwise! 209.98.138.38 21:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ewwww

No offense, but that meatball picture on the Sephardi cuisine page looks gross.--Gilabrand 15:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode roman numerals

These characters have been deprecated from day one in unicode itself, and using them adds nothing visually to the table. Why did you re-add them? --Random832 02:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you reverted two edits from before I'd removed them, and one edit from afterward. Please be more careful in the future. --Random832 03:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that these were never "accepted" unicode characters, they're only there to enable round-trip conversion to east asian encodings that have them so you can put each roman numeral for 1-12 in a single character block. The 'proper' unicode versions of the roman numerals are in the U+0020-U+007F block, the others are compatibility characters only.

How about a compromise - expand the paragraph about these characters to include a listing of all of them, but take them out of the main table. --Random832 16:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OldCityMap.PNG

Since the Lions are plural ("Gate of the Lions") in the Hebrew, the proper English spelling is Lions' Gate, as borne out by the article on same (Lions' Gate). I can't make the correction, but I'm sure you must have a way to correct the mispunctuated version accompanying this graphic linked to Old City. BTW, thanks for your many informative, entertaining & diverse contributions to Wiki. Very best, Hertz1888 17:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on {{Jaffa Road}} - I'm just a drop annoyed because I was in the middle of working on the exact same thing ;-) I suppose I'll get to help fill it out though. Again, good job. Cheers, TewfikTalk 23:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to change the image title to Entry to Jerusalem and to Jaffa Gate. TewfikTalk 09:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks to epson

Glad you like my photos - I appreciate that. I put up the Kubbeh picture and did some major work on the Sephardi cuisine page. Have you seen it?--Gilabrand 12:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Claiborne

I noticed you moved the Liz Claiborne Inc. page to Liz Claiborne and the Liz Claiborne page to Liz Claiborne (fashion designer). I don't see why this was necessary. I think it would help in the future if you discussed the issue on either talk page before moving any pages. Did you object to the title of Liz Claiborne Inc. for that article? I see there are people confused by the current title, and are adding information about the woman, not the company. And you added lizclaiborne.com as the hompeage in the infobox, but that's not the homepage of the company. You assume someone searching for "Liz Claiborne" on Wikipedia wants to know about the company and not the person? There are many Wikipedia articles with "Inc." in the title, such as Nike, Inc., Turbine, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Amiga, Inc., etc. You can read WP:RM for more about moving pages. WP:NAME says the legal status of a company (Inc. in this case) is not normally included in the title, but when disambiguation is needed (like in this case), legal status can be used to disambiguate, like on Nike, Inc.. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies) says that there should be no comma before the legal status unless specified in company literature. Liz Claiborne Inc. is the title on lizclaiborneinc.com and I think that title was just fine for the page and I feel your edits were made in haste. --Pixelface 05:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose we don't need a disambiguation page, and I see your point that the brand is probably more notable now. But I noticed the edit history on Liz Claiborne is missing my edits on Liz Claiborne Inc.. It looks like Liz Claiborne was moved correctly to Liz Claiborne (fashion designer) but Liz Claiborne Inc. was copy pasted to Liz Claiborne and the edit history was lost.
At Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen I've requested an admin merge in my edit histories.
WP:MOVE has some helpful information about the topic.
I also noticed that over 78 pages link to Liz Claiborne and I think most of those wikilinks now need to be changed to Liz Claiborne (fashion designer). In the future I would appreciate a discussion of any potential page moves on an article's talk page. Thank you for your message. --Pixelface 12:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I take that back. It looks like only 12 pages link to the person. I'll change those wikilinks. I think it was a good move afterall. Remember to use the Move tool though :) --Pixelface 12:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Updated DYK query On 4 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Liz Claiborne Inc., which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--Andrew c [talk] 00:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rambamfan

If you have a chance, could you take a look at the recent edits by Rambamfan in Nevi'im and Books of Kings the following link http://www.tanakhpersonalities.org/showappendix.php?num=4 does not seem to be to belong in the English version of Wikipedia and I did delete a similar one from the See also section of Aaron It is in a more fitting section in the other two articles but with all name being written only in Hebrew, the link has no value for most English speaking readers. I respect your contributions to the Jewish related articles and feel that you can be more objective on the subject than I can. Thank you. Dbiel (Talk) 09:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply on my talk page. The items that you pointed out, all names in Hebrew and the fact the only edits by this user were to include links to this one Hebrew/English web site were the key reason for asking for your assistance. I like your idea of taging the link with the "(Hebrew/English)". I just was not confortable deleting the links if others might find them helpful. But on the other hand, it was starting to look like an attempt to advertise a particular web site. Thank you again for your reply. Dbiel (Talk) 19:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sheqel symbol

Hi Epson291! I converted the image to an SVG because that is the preferred format for "images" that contain only text. Using an SVG, however, ensures that the text displays correctly regardless of which fonts the user has installed. The caption on the image said that "the symbols are not necessarily smaller than the numbers, this was done for stylistic reasons," so I assumed that, like the dollar sign and Euro sign, the sheqel symbol would be of the same height as the numerals. Can you tell me how the symbol should be used? Alternately, you can just upload an SVG file yourself, if you have an appropriate editor (like Inkscape). Cheers, bdesham  23:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, for "₪4" both characters have the same height in my browser… I guess I don't quite know how it's supposed to appear. Also, I just used the ₪ symbol from the Lucida Grande font, I didn't draw it myself; maybe there was a different font I should have used? Anyway, let me know if you need any assistance with Inkscape! :-) Cheers, bdesham  00:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By default, when you create a text object in Inkscape, it merely embeds the text, with a mention of which font to use. However, the image doesn't display correctly if the user doesn't have that particular font installed. To fix this, select all of the text objects in the picture and go to Path > Object to Path. This will convert each letter into a "path", so you won't be able to edit the text anymore, but you will ensure that it shows up the same for everyone. Hope this helps! bdesham  03:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's me again :-) I have moved Image:Sheqel signs.svg to the Wikimedia Commons; its page is available here. Unless you have objections, I'll remove the version on Wikipedia right away. --bdesham  21:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Language list

Are you looking to transwiki it, or do you just want the source for your personal information? (I'm happy to provide it either way, I just need to know so I can give it to you in the best way for what you intend to do.) Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a copy of it on my userspace. It's just one of the edits. Before it was messed up by another user. User:Christopher Sundita/List of common phrases in various languages. --Chris S. 07:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Chagall, I LOVE

Dear User,

PLEASE upload your jewishculture.png on commons, it is so beautiful, PLEASE, allow us to copy that on the french wiki.

PLEASE! (and, aside, shana and chatima tova)-- fr:Utilisateur:'Inyan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.1.3.183 (talk) 18:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Zionism

So is the cultural Zionism article wrong when it says that Ahad HaAm "saw nationalism as a way to reconnect Jews to Judaism"? (That's what I was referring to on the Einstein talk page.) --teb728 18:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the JAFI link. It explains much better than the Wikipedia article, which defines cultural Zionism mainly in contrast to political Zionism, which is itself not well defined. --teb728 22:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alif

I see that the Arabic alphabet letters (like alif) have been merged into their Proto-Canaanite alphabet counterparts. Any reason why? It seems like a bad idea to me. Was there a discussion? --Knulclunk (talk) 21:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of perfume move

Why did you move the section up to the very beginning. I would think that people would like to know about the content and types before going into the history Sjschen 20:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


your changes to Menorah

I strongly disagree with the changes you made to Menorah. The article should ONLY be about the temple use and only mention hannucha as relevant to the rededication. By making the article about both you are creating a large repeat of data. Jon513 (talk) 00:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI this google result seems to be about the only one on the web, so at least it's not a hoax. Tyrenius (talk) 23:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I added to the confusion. ←Humus sapiens ну? 12:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

help

Please respond to Bikinibomb's comments about figs and Judaism here, thanks Slrubenstein | Talk 00:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello

Regarding: (→Sivan in Jewish history - nothing showing it's a copyvio, tag's been here for awhile, removing tag) & all the other months.

I wasn't sure what to do, so I left that notice there, thank you for taking care of it. --Bachur (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

What's wrong with Template:Wikiproject Israel? Its screwing up all the article talkpages its on... Relata refero (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks. I asked the editor who fixed it, and he says he was alerted at Template talk:WikiProjectBannerShell, so that's a useful location to keep in mind. Relata refero (talk) 23:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice!

Nice work at Wikipedia:Featured pictures/template and subpages. Thanks!

--howcheng {chat} 02:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broken template

The version you originally made lacked a </div>, so the box, and the right justification, were applied all the way down the talk pages. Congratulations on having dealt with this. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning diacritics

Hi, could you take a look here? Dan Pelleg (talk) 06:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To continue on Dan Pelleg's comment, I would like to add that we really don't appreciate you coming and changing half the WP:HE page, which is a result of nearly 3 years of discussion, any every little detail there has a reason unless stated otherwise (including the underline). If you don't like something, bring it up on the talk page, and if it hasn't discussed before (doubtful), the other editors will be more than happy to discuss the issue(s) with you and reach proper consensus. Thanks, Ynhockey (Talk) 16:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See my reply at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew)#Comments regarding guideline. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 17:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HaDag Nahash

The band is spelled Nahash in English.[12] FYI. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 19:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I did a 'google test', which overwhelmingly favours spelling it with a c, but I would use the offical press release as well. Epson291 (talk) 06:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also did the Google test, it appears to be something like 80k vs. 50k hits. Although this does assert that Nachash is the more common spelling, a 60% difference isn't always clearly indicative. Usually WP:COMMONNAME is exercised when there's an overwhelming difference, something like 500%. However, no harm done. Keep up the word you're doing for Wikipedia! Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 14:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Odd, I got 83,000 vs.13,000. Epson291 (talk) 01:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew/Yiddish Babel

Hi Epson, I was just wondering if there was any consensus reached regarding the change of the Yiddish and Hebrew babels to right-to-left, because IMHO it makes everything horribly inconsistent. Thanks. Keyed In (talk) 06:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Its based on Hebrew Wikipedia, (see ex. here), and the idea the websites in Hebrew reverse everything. Regards Epson291 (talk) 06:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But obviously, since the Hebrew wiki is right-to-left, all userboxes will also be that way. I was wondering about the English wiki, and if anybody else prefers it that way. Userboxes on the English wiki should not primarily take Hebrew browsers into account. It just seems so much more consistent to have it the old way. Cheers Keyed In (talk) 06:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but it makes it more odd to read. I'm not sure if anyone else prefers it that way, no one has commented yet (till you). Epson291 (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Apparently some other users agreed with me, and all your edits to the Hebrew babels were undone. I am therefore going to do the same to the Yiddish ones. Cheers. Keyed In (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew phonology

I have restored the earlier consonant chart at Hebrew phonology. In addition to my discussion with its creator at my talk page, see WP:PHON where one of the stated goals is to cover phonology information consistently. The "transcription" system was presented on the table as if it were IPA, which it is not, though it might be a good idea to present the transcription in the table in the "regional and historical variation" section. I'll leave this task to you since I can't read the Hebrew of the pdf and might mess it up. We also might (although this isn't necessary) want to make a separate consonant chart that indicates the phonological information for the older form of Hebrew upon which the orthography is based. I hope I didn't remove anything substantive unrelated to my opposition to the orthography in the table, and if I did, don't be afraid to assume that I simply accidently removed it. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 02:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've just been given notice by a friend that you wrote there, December 1, 2007, about the Hebrew alphabet: «Can you add the Hebrew transliterations to the foreign sounds table that you added?».
Sorry for being so late answering about this. Unfortunately, my long-time pal and colleague Ivan Korenyuk died (October 6, 2007). I would have liked to help, but I do not see where the foreign sounds table you mentioned is.
Cordially,
✓ Kanġi Oĥanko (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS: If you need more (well-meaning) information, please feel free to e-mail me.

RFC: Removal of magic methods - what next? More input please!

Hi! As someone who has taken part in the RFC in Project Magic, I thought you ought to be aware that it looks like a consensus is being reached, and it is probably now just a case of dotting the i's and crossing the t's. If you could pop over to the discussion and add your thoughts, that would be great. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I realise just a bit too late that my eyes were going cross-eyed, and were looking at the wrong thread. However, as a non-participant in the RFC, but obviously an interested participant in Project Magic, you are more than welcome to add your thoughts, even at this stage of the RFC. I shall now go and have a lie down to rest my eyes.... StephenBuxton (talk) 12:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

6/12 DYK

Updated DYK query On 12 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hebrew punctuation, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--Bedford Pray 00:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you very much :) -- Ynhockey (Talk) 17:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For using one of my photos in your user page :) . I looked at your contributions and you've done amazing work. Amoruso (talk) 01:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Hebrew writing

Hi Epson! I briefly read the article, and could not find any glaring issues except one (the article's name, will talk about that) and minor WP:HE and WP:MOS problems, some of which I have fixed (to that end, if I have time and energy, I'll try to get niqqud moved to nikud). I think that the problem of red links for ktiv haser and ktiv menukad could be solved by expanding and renaming the ktiv maleh, because the 3 writing 'systems' are actually fairly similar and probably shouldn't have their own articles.

About the article's name: I think that the current name implies orthography, while the article actually talks about writing systems. Not sure what name it should have, but this should be mulled over. Maybe a Hebrew writing methods which would incorporate the current article, as well as ktiv haser, maleh and menukad.

On an unrelated note, I am really angry at Epson (the company)! I bought a scanner from them about 6 years ago and now they tell me that there are no x64 drivers for it and won't be in the future, so I either have to install x86 (not doing it, Vista x64 cost more than the scanner), or buy a new scanner. This is most annoying! (end of rant).

Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 17:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Cut-and-paste move

You did a cut-and-paste move of Freedom ain't free to Freedom isn't free. I concur with the move, but have requested (db-histmove) that an admin repair of the resulting page history problems. Robert A.West (Talk) 01:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ZKeyHebrew.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ZKeyHebrew.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:00, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Elul in Jewish history

I (finally) got to starting and completing, for the most part, the subcategory for the Elul page. I forget if I thanked you already for the Barnstar, if I haven't, then "Thank you for giving me The Jewish Barnstar". Is there any way that you think I can be of help? Please let me know. --Bachur (talk) 07:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


paul newman

Hi Epson, I see you have restored the Judaism category and I believe that you are mistaken. A person with a Jewish father and a Christian mother is not a Jew, no matter how you cut it. That he identifies as Jewish is very nice, and personally, I have no problem with that, but this is an encyclopedia, and facts are facts. To say that he is a "Jewish actor" is perpetuating a falsehood. He is "half-Jewish" - but according to the rabbis, who make these decisions (perhaps unfortunately), it is the wrong half.--Gilabrand (talk) 08:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Epson: The [Template:TASE]] appears to be broken. I put it on the Israel Discount Bank but when you click the ticker symbol of DSCT it produces a proximity search. I could drill down in the options of DISCOUNT and get the right quote. I tried some other articles in the Tel Aviv category and they had the same problem. Thanks. Americasroof (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix it but may have messed it up. Feel free to revert. Here's a correct URL for DSCT http://www.tase.co.il/TASEEng/Management/GeneralPages/SimpleSearchResult.htm?objectId=&objectType=&securityType=&searchTerm=DSCT

Americasroof (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]




Moses Montfiore Windmill

Is this windmill the Jaffa Gate Mill built by the Canterbury, Kent millwrights Holman Brothers? If so, I can expand the article with details about its construction. Mjroots (talk) 17:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will expand the article tomorrow :-) Mjroots (talk) 22:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Moses Montefiore Windmill, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on November 10, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, Mjroots (talk) 08:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, bashing the lead into shape eh? That looks much better now and should stop the squabbling over where it is! Mjroots (talk) 21:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There's a bit of fuss over the paragraph I added about the construction and early life of the mill. See article talk page for discussion. Mjroots (talk) 03:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've commented on the proposed new paragraph. Mjroots (talk) 09:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magic templates

All the articles that are transcluding the old template names will have redlinks if you simply delete the templates. By contrast a redirect to the magic and illusion template makes all the article with the old templates simply show the new template. Maybe, once all the articles have been dabbed, the templates should be deleted, but even then the redirects are often useful. By the way, when you add a deletion template to a template page, enclose it in <noinclude></noinclude> tags so every article transcluding the template does not show up in CAT:CSD, but just the template page. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Moses Montefiore Windmill

Updated DYK query On 16 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Moses Montefiore Windmill, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 10:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You got the picture slot too! Well done! Mjroots (talk) 10:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew formatting

Hi Epson291! Please don't forget to format Hebrew with the widely-used templates, and in the proper fashion:

  • '''Name''' ({{lang-he|שם}}, ''Transliteration'')
  • '''Nikud name''' ({{lang-he-n|שֵׁם מְנֻקָּד}}, ''Transliteration'')

Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 23:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I looked around but was unable to find one sources in which the Chabad house is referred to as "Mumbai Chabad House". What is your source? --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is one source supporting the fact that the Nariman House was also residential. Just from a practical standpoint, although the building was not that big, they wouldn't need 5 floors for "chabad house" related activities. By the way, you're doing an amazing job with the article.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I nominated the article for a DYK. Let me know if you agree with the "hook". Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also (and lastly :-) can you expand on your rationale here. Thanks, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 07:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aluf

As it happens, I hadn't looked at WP:HE. Until such time as WP:HE says differently, it doesn't really matter what my source is/was, or whether I think I can justify it or not, does it. To simplify any further discussion, let's just agree that "Alúf" is wrong.
Regarding the use of foreign characters, (for example "ç" in "garçon"), it isn't relevant that "ç" "is not even a letter in English".
Your third point is/was that "I'm not sure what you are talking about" - To quote Mickey Blue Eyes, "fugedaboudit", it's not important.
(BTW, I've put a WP:CSD notice on the Alúf re-direct page.)
Thanks for providing the evidence to make resolution of this easy. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nariman House

Updated DYK query On 2 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nariman House, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 01:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Epson291! Kudos on creating that aritcle. I've added a factoid to the lead and nominated the article for DYK. Feel free to suggest alternative hooks at Template talk:Did you know#Tiv Taam. Cheers, Nudve (talk) 10:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for United Jewish Appeal

Updated DYK query On 15 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United Jewish Appeal, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tiv Ta'am

Updated DYK query On 19 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tiv Ta'am, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 23:53, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template Psalm

Hi! why do you have removed the template Psalm from Psalms, Psalm 151‎, Psalms 152–155‎? It was very useful. A ntv (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hebraization of surnames

Updated DYK query On January 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hebraization of surnames, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Dravecky (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on that and thanks. Always interesting new articles here :) --gren グレン 21:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for McDonald's Israel

Updated DYK query On January 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article McDonald's Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Dravecky (talk) 08:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Old City (Jerusalem)

Hi. It appears that you created the (very useful) map for Template:Old City (Jerusalem). I've only recently started editing many pages dealing with Jerusalem and the question arose why the Hulda Gates aren't on the map? I started a section on Template talk:Old City (Jerusalem), if you want to discuss it there. Jason Quinn (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can do a history merge, which'll be sufficient to meet the licensing requirements, if you so desire. You can then restore any bits that interest you. WilyD 02:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to The Knesset website, the name of the channel is "The Knesset Channel", and not just "Knesset Channel". Edenc1Talk 07:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've written an article about me. Honestly I'd rather not have an article about me on Wikipedia, but as this is the third time someone has started one, it might as well be accurate. I took the liberty of removing my date of birth, for reasons of privacy I'd rather this not be publicised so openly. I realise it appears in other sources, I have asked to have it removed from some of them but not everyone is responsive. It is true I wrote reviews for La'Isha for several years, but my contract was terminated several months ago. An omitted fact which I feel should be added is that I am editor of Children and YA books for Graff Publishing in Israel: [[13]] --woggly (talk) 08:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Some minor corrections: The annotated Peter Pan has not yet been published. Also, strictly speaking only one of the two Geffen awards was mine: the award for best translation (given in conjunction with the Israeli Translators' Association) was for me, but the award for best translated book I accepted on behalf of J.K.Rowling.--93.172.70.70 (talk) 11:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

House-keeping and moves

Hi there. Just a tip for the future: If you want something moved to a place where there is already a page, you can use {{db-move|page to be moved here}} on that page and it will create a deletion template already prefilled for an admin to simply click and move the page. Regards SoWhy 08:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, no need to write a specific criterion into a template, just use {{db-criterion}} (e.g. {{db-r3}}) and it does it for you. You can find a complete list here. Regards SoWhy 08:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ;-)

It was fun, good work yourself! Dan 12:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contemporary Jewish religious music

Just wanted to thank you for creating http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contemporary_Jewish_religious_music I gave a shout out to see if we can get more edits. We'll see. Joe407 (talk) 09:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Same-sex marriage in New England

An article that you have been involved in editing, Same-sex marriage in New England, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Same-sex marriage in New England. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hekerui (talk) 09:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cfd for Category:Jewish terrorism

Hello Epson291, since you are an active user on en.wikipedia, I wanted to know what is a chance of having a successful Cfd for Category:Jewish terrorism? --Kaaveh (talk) 06:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Welcome differentlangs.PNG

File:Welcome differentlangs.PNG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Welcome differentlangs.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Welcome differentlangs.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delegates at First Zionist Congress.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Delegates at First Zionist Congress.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Typos

While you're at it, correct typos and the rest in all articles where you promote your article. In addition, your statement in the lead of Recognition of same-sex unions in New Hampshire is factually wrong, there were states which legalized it before 2009. Hekerui (talk) 00:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, I removed the passages from the leads. This should be mentioned, at most, in the article. This was not a masterplan. Hekerui (talk) 00:09, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Query

Hello! Your submission of Ice Hotel (Québec) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Jake Wartenberg 14:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ice Hotel (Québec)

Updated DYK query On June 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ice Hotel (Québec), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Royalbroil 15:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for going ahead and getting that put up. I have a couple of small points I wanted to run past you. First, I think it is prudent to include both iPhone and iPod Touch models. The tables that you copied from my sandbox include the Touch; I think we can include them under in the table under a different subheading (===iPod touch===). The other issue is the name. A list implies a little bit of detail about a lot of items, such as List of Macintosh models grouped by CPU type. More detailed examinations of only a few models are more properly called comparisons, such as Comparison of Macintosh models. Such, I suggest the page be moved to Comparison of iPhone and iPod Touch models. Other than that, I'm going to be doing some pretty heavy copyediting, as my sandbox version wasn't quite ready, but if you disagree with anything just let me know, okay?--HereToHelp (talk to me) 13:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I did my research and found that, according to WP:LISTNAME, "the name or title List of _ _ is still preferable to Table of _ _ or Comparison of _ _." So that makes List of iPhone and iPod Touch models. I think we need to be consistent in including the Touch. Either it shows up in the article title, the table, and the yes/no tables, are not at all. I prefer to include it but I don't really care as long as its consistent.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 14:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LuckyBrandJeans.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:LuckyBrandJeans.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Wilson

Funny. I couldn't see anything. Care to explain? If not, care to revert? And while you're at it, care to stop threatening me? J Milburn (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I can see nothing on the deletion discussion. All I can see is people saying they like the images. Care to explain? J Milburn (talk) 17:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you are not willing to discuss the issue with me, undo your reversion and back away from the article. J Milburn (talk) 17:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I misunderstood. We can continue our discussion at the FFD debate. J Milburn (talk) 17:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Universalstonecutter (talk) 02:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colonial Street 1950 to 1979 - Colonial Street 1981 to 1988 - Colonial Street 1988 to 2004 - Wisteria Lane 2004 to 2009

Thankyou for posting the photos and map - http://www.flickr.com/photos/universalstonecutter/collections/72157618252409259/ Maps - house blueprints - researcher sent to thestudiotour website- Updates on the Crowell house, Ron's Barn, Allison House, Paramount House, Maxim House, Hubbart House, Deanna Durbin House, Morrison House, New England Street House, The Thrill of it All House etc. http://www.flickr.com/photos/universalstonecutter/2559266363/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/universalstonecutter/3203255060/in/set-72157605231412378/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/universalstonecutter/2785425343/in/set-72157612663352100/

IPA pronounciation

I see you added the IPA stuff yesterday on a page I follow. Please do this for Bronte,_Texas. Tnx. Irv (talk) 10:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested, this discussion has continued. You and I were the main ones putting up arguments for "Keep," so I felt you might want to go for a Round 2 with this. Flyer22 (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

response to question about template is on my talk-page

Why have you renamed LGBT-affirming churches to LGBT-affirming denominations without any discussion? The only links to Jewish organisations were under 'see also'. Mish (talk) 13:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yahrzeit

Hi, I think the Yiddish spelling of Yahrzeit candle belongs before the Hebrew in this article, no? Yahrzeit is, afterall, a Yiddish word. -shirulashem(talk) 20:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Yahrzeit candle

Updated DYK query On August 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yahrzeit candle, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Wikiproject: Did you know? 23:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Hebrew language

Hi Epson291! As an author of quite a few articles on the Hebrew language, you might be interested in this discussion. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 11:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting AfD

"Unwashed masses try to explain Kumzitz to WP editors!" . Joe407 (talk) 05:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking at the AfD. I have no stake in which way it closes but I thought it would be a good idea for editors with jewish background weigh in on the afd. Joe407 (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wedding of Charles, Prince of Wales, and Lady Diana Spencer

Updated DYK query On September 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wedding of Charles, Prince of Wales, and Lady Diana Spencer, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Jewish Encyclopedia topics

I have been making some changes at WP:JE. (See WT:JE#Changes). I hope these make sense, and have your approval; I'd welcome your thoughts on them in the discussion there. Jheald (talk) 21:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paleo-Hebrew.PNG

Hey there Epson, could you tell me from what source you uploaded File:Paleo-Hebrew.PNG? Specifically, did you scan it or copy it by hand? Dan 22:54, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How 'bout it, Epson? Dan 17:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Epson, I'd really appreciate your response, Dan 07:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there Epson! Partial images derived from this file are being used in several wikis as authentic archaeological specimens, often in comparison with samples of the Phoenician alphabet. If you scanned the file from an authentic archaeological source then there's no problem, but please specify this source. If, on the other hand, it was hand copied, then incidental graphic details might misleadingly be taken to be cardinally distinguishing characteristics. Including these files in Wikipedia articles also implies archaeological authenticity, which, if they were indeed hand copied, is false. In this case I would recommend deleting the file and it's derivatives and replacing them with a verifiable, genuine archaeological source. Dan 22:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So I assume you agree with me that the file and it's derivatives be deleted and hopefully replaced by a verifiable, genuine archaeological source. Dan 00:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I must of missed this. It is scanned, but it was over three years ago and I do not remember from where. Hope it helpsEpson291 (talk) 14:01, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kubutz, Shuruk and Holam

Hi,

I made a lot of changes to Kubutz and Holam. You're welcome to take a look.

Take a look also at Talk:Kubutz.

Thanks in advance for any constructive - and thanks a lot for starting the articles! --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 22:12, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have time to go over it at the moment, but it looks good the work you've put into it. You have certainly done a lot more then I could have. I have no real comment/strong opinion on the rename, I understand your point, feel free to take that as agreement with you. - Epson291 (talk) 10:02, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! What interests me the most is whether you actually understand anything of what i wrote there. I really want that these pages will be understandable to anybody who wants to learn Hebrew. If there's anything i can do to make them more readable, please let me know. (Please reply here. It will be easier for me to follow the conversation if it stays on one page. Thanks in advance.) --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:Goldstar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Goldstar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IPA for Hebrew chart

Hi,

I saw that you uploaded File:IPA Chart for Hebrew.png in 2008.

The chart at Wikipedia:IPA for Hebrew was significantly updated since then. Can you please update the image accordingly?

Thanks in advance. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 10:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Transcribe.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Transcribe.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:154px-Braille lamed svg.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:154px-Braille lamed svg.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:34, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for MEDCAB Mediation

The request for mediation concerning Israel and the apartheid analogy, to which you were are a party, has been accepted. Please watchlist the case page (which is where the mediation will take place). If you have any questions, please contact me.

Ronk01 (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:154px-Braille lamed svg.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:154px-Braille lamed svg.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for electric vehicle warning sounds

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Mediation: Israel and the Apartheid analogy

Just an FYI, we are running a straw poll on title choices on the mediation page - see Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-04-14/Israel_and_the_apartheid_analogy#Straw_poll_on_titles. If you pitch in a vote or three, we can move this along. --Ludwigs2 06:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SHOPPERS former logos.PNG

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:SHOPPERS former logos.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Map Tips

[[14]]

I want to add this map as an image to articles such as History of Jews in England and Religon in London. Information about the map itself can be found on the page. I would attempt it myself, however whenever I have uploaded a photo, be it one from the internet or one I've taken myself, I've never done it right, and wikipedia has always ended up removing it. Please could you upload the photo to wikicommons for me, it would be a great great help. Thank you. Colt .55 (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on closure of Israel and Aparthied mediation

Current consensus seems to be to move the article to Israel and Apartheid with an appropriate disambiguation line to prevent any misinterpretations. Please weigh in over the next few days. --Ludwigs2 17:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The use of verbatim, unattributed quotations [15] ("Dominick suggested that Stewart, who is Jewish, is also a minority.", from [16]) in articles is considered plagiarism. Whenever you incorporate the exact text of a source into an article, please provide appropriate attribution in the form of quotation marks, <blockquote>, or similar. Also, Wikipedia style guidelines discourage the excessive use of quotations, even when correctly attributed. Thank you. Peter Karlsen (talk) 07:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]