Jump to content

User talk:SouthernNights: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
HagermanBot (talk | contribs)
m 136.1.1.101 didn't sign: "please, explain me definition of the link spam. "
Benjiwolf (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:


How else can I let people know that there is the support page? <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/136.1.1.101|136.1.1.101]] ([[User talk:136.1.1.101|talk]]) 19:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
How else can I let people know that there is the support page? <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/136.1.1.101|136.1.1.101]] ([[User talk:136.1.1.101|talk]]) 19:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

== blanking ==
{{uw-delete4}}........please do not blank new valid articles without discussing on the talk pages...im not sure whether this was politically motivated blanking or just why u did that...yet i am citing u for possible vandalism...[[User:Benjiwolf|Benjiwolf]] 19:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:48, 6 February 2007

NOTE: If you are here about a deleted article: Before asking why I deleted your article please read through Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specifically concerning copying copyrighted text and notability of articles. If your article was deleted because it was about "Unremarkable people or groups," please see Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles for more information. If the article was deleted for a copyright violation but you wrote the material yourself, then there are several ways that you can make sure it does not get deleted again. For example, you could put a notice on your other web site that says that you release the material under the GFDL, so it can be used here without infringing on anybody's copyright. Or you can use an email address associated with the website to file a confirmation of your release of the material under the GFDL with our permissions department at "permissions at wikimedia dot org". You can look at Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission for some more instructions. Hope this helps.--Alabamaboy 17:58, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Please note that I tend to post responses on this page (except when I don't :-).

Archive
Archives
  1. Talk Archives 1
  2. Talk Archives 2
  3. Talk Archives 3
  4. Talk Archives 4
  5. Talk Archives 5
  6. Talk Archives 6
  • Alabamaboy maintains a grab bag page of different templates and links which admins and other users may find useful.


Allen Ginsberg

Hi - there is some difficulty going on with the Allen Ginsberg page, as you can see. Haiduc is now trying to conflate the gay rights movement with pederasty, and using the inaccurate wording "homosexual emancipation" to do so. Gays were never emancipated. I think the sections under Ginsberg's controversial activism works as it is now, with NAMBLA and gay rights remaining separate issues of his activism. Haiduc wants to blend the two together. He continues to make odd edits (such as his last) that border on nonsense. Is there any assistance you can lend to the disagreement? --DavidShankBone 16:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the liberty of extending the block on this account to indefinite, as I believe this is a vandal only account (particularly given the recent unblock request). If you feel differently, please go ahead and adjust the block length, I won't be offended. Best, Gwernol 18:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I agree. thanks,--Alabamaboy 18:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Religion

Hi. I note that Religion is getting vandalized on a fairly regular basis. Would it not be possible to semi-lock it or whatever to prevent this? It seems that 99-and-44/100 percent of anonymous edits are vandalism. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 19:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Best, --Alabamaboy 19:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey22dude

Go and block him now, he vandalised again--Retiono Virginian 19:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also done. Best, --Alabamaboy 19:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why you removing my info about Nowak support page? I think that she like all the people suffering from love obsesssion needs it...

Check the history. That wasn't me. But it was link spam and deserved to be deleted.--Alabamaboy 19:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please read the response to this deletion on Dhartungs page

ur deletion is totally not sound...please restore so people can further expand...is there is something int he article specifically u have a problem with then remove~that line...Benjiwolf 19:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How else can I let people know that there is the support page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 136.1.1.101 (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

blanking

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. ........please do not blank new valid articles without discussing on the talk pages...im not sure whether this was politically motivated blanking or just why u did that...yet i am citing u for possible vandalism...Benjiwolf 19:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]